Trying to avoid your sister

PLoS Biology

Volumn 8, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Lao, Jessica P ^a   Hunter, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COHESIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE 1; PHOSPHOTRANSFERASE; RAD51 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; MEIOSIS; MICROTUBULE; MITOSIS; MITOSIS SPINDLE; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN ASSEMBLY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID; SOMATIC CELL; YEAST CELL; ANIMAL; CHROMATID; DNA TEMPLATE; GENETICS; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIDS; MEIOSIS; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE; TEMPLATES, GENETIC;

EID: 78149398514     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000519     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Hunter N (2006) Meiotic recombination. In: Aguilera A, Rothstein R, eds. Molecular Genetics of Recombination. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp 381-442.
2. Nasmyth K, Haering CH (2009) Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu Rev Genet 43: 525-558.
3. Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH (1992) Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132: 387-402.
4. Johnson RD, Jasin M (2001) Double-strand-break-induced homologous recombination in mammalian cells. Biochem Soc Trans 29: 196-201.
5. Bzymek M, Thayer NH, Oh SD, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2010) Double Holliday junctions are intermediates of DNA break repair. Nature 464: 937-941.
6. Sjogren C, Strom L (2010) S-phase and DNA damage activated establishment of sister chromatid cohesion-importance for DNA repair. Exp Cell Res 316: 1445-1453.
7. Cromie GA, Hyppa RW, Taylor AF, Zakharyevich K, Hunter N, et al. (2006) Single Holliday junctions are intermediates of meiotic recombination. Cell 127: 1167-1178.
8. Haber JE, Thorburn PC, Rogers D (1984) Meiotic and mitotic behavior of dicentric chromosomes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 106: 185-205.
9. Jackson JA, Fink GR (1985) Meiotic recombination between duplicated genetic elements in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 109: 303-332.
10. Schwacha A, Kleckner N (1994) Identification of joint molecules that form frequently between homologs but rarely between sister chromatids during yeast meiosis. Cell 76: 51-63.
11. Schwacha A, Kleckner N (1997) Interhomolog bias during meiotic recombination: meiotic functions promote a highly differentiated interhomolog-only pathway. Cell 90: 1123-1135.
12. Hunter N, Kleckner N (2001) The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106: 59-70.
13. Goldfarb T, LichtenM (2010) Frequent and efficient use of the sister chromatid for DNA double-strand break repair during budding yeast meiosis. PLoS Biol 8: e1000520. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000520.
14. Shinohara A, Shinohara M (2004) Roles of RecA homologues Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Cytogenet Genome Res 107: 201-207.
15. Allers T, Lichten M (2001) Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106: 47-57.
16. Borner GV, Kleckner N, Hunter N (2004) Crossover/noncrossover differentiation, synaptonemal complex formation, and regulatory surveillance at the leptotene/zygotene transition of meiosis. Cell 117: 29-45.
17. Schwacha A, Kleckner N (1995) Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83: 783-791.
18. McMahill MS, Sham CW, Bishop DK (2007) Synthesis-dependent strand annealing in meiosis. PLoS Biol 5: e299. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0050299.
19. Jessop L, Allers T, Lichten M (2005) Infrequent co-conversion of markers flanking a meiotic recombination initiation site in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 169: 1353-1367.
20. Bell L, Byers B (1983) Separation of branched from linear DNA by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Analyt Biochem 130: 527-535.
21. Hunter N (2008) Hop1 and the meiotic DNA-damage response. Cell 132: 731-732.
22. Niu H, Wan L, Baumgartner B, Schaefer D, Loidl J, et al. (2005) Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol Biol Cell 16: 5804-5818.
23. Niu H, Li X, Job E, Park C, Moazed D, et al. (2007) Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis. Mol Cell Biol 27: 5456-5467.
24. Thompson DA, Stahl FW (1999) Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153: 621-641.
25. Carballo JA, Johnson AL, Sedgwick SG, Cha RS (2008) Phosphorylation of the axial element protein Hop1 by Mec1/Tel1 ensures meiotic interhomolog recombination. Cell 132: 758-770.
26. Hollingsworth NM (2010) Phosphorylation and the creation of interhomolog bias during meiosis in yeast. Cell Cycle 9: 436-437.
27. Callender TL, Hollingsworth NM (2010) Mek1 suppression of meiotic double strand break repair is specific to sister chromatids, chromosome autonomous and independent of rec8 cohesion complexes. Genetics 185: 771-782.
28. Zierhut C, Berlinger M, Rupp C, Shinohara A, Klein F (2004) Mnd1 is required for meiotic interhomolog repair. Curr Biol 14: 752-762.
29. Sheridan S, Bishop DK (2006) Red-Hed regulation: recombinase Rad51, though capable of playing the leading role, may be relegated to supporting Dmc1 in budding yeast meiosis. Genes Dev 20: 1685-1691.
30. Xu L, Weiner BM, Kleckner N (1997) Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev 11: 106-118.
31. Niu H, Wan L, Busygina V, Kwon Y, Allen JA, et al. (2009) Regulation of meiotic recombination via Mek1-mediated Rad54 phosphorylation. Mol Cell 36: 393-404.
32. Wan L, de los Santos T, Zhang C, Shokat K, Hollingsworth NM (2004) Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic double strand break repair in budding yeast. Mol Biol Cell 15: 11-23.
33. Schmuckli-Maurer J, Heyer WD (2000) Meiotic recombination in RAD54 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Chromosoma 109: 86-93.
34. Oh SD, Lao JP, Hwang PY, Taylor AF, Smith GR, et al. (2007) BLM ortholog, Sgs1, prevents aberrant crossing-over by suppressing formation of multi-chromatid joint molecules. Cell 130: 259-272.
35. Moens PB, Chen DJ, Shen Z, Kolas N, Tarsounas M, et al. (1997) Rad51 immunocytology in rat and mouse spermatocytes and oocytes. Chromosoma 106: 207-215.
36. Jessop L, Lichten M (2008) Mus81/Mms4 endonuclease and Sgs1 helicase collaborate to ensure proper recombination intermediate metabolism during meiosis. Mol Cell 31: 313-323.
37. Tease C (1978) Cytological detection of crossing-over in BUdR substituted meiotic chromosomes using the fluorescent plus Giemsa technique. Nature 272: 823-824.