Mek1 kinase is regulated to suppress double-strand break repair between sister chromatids during budding yeast meiosis

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 27, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 5456-5467

  Niu, Hengyao ^a   Li, Xue ^b,c   Job, Emily ^a   Park, Caroline ^a   Moazed, Danesh ^b   Gygi, Steven P ^b   Hollingsworth, Nancy M ^a  

^a STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c AMGEN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME PROTEIN; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; MITOGEN ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE KINASE 1; PROTEIN RED1; SERINE; THREONINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUTOPHOSPHORYLATION; BUDDING; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; DIMERIZATION; DNA REPAIR; DNA STRAND BREAKAGE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GENE; HOP1 GENE; MEIOSIS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHASE; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SISTER CHROMATID;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMATIDS; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DIMERIZATION; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; ENZYME ACTIVATION; MAP KINASE KINASE 1; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MEIOSIS; MICROBIAL VIABILITY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; MUTANT PROTEINS; PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SACCHAROMYCETALES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; SPORES, FUNGAL; SUPPRESSION, GENETIC; THREONINE; TIME FACTORS;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 34547181857     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00416-07     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adams, J. A. 2003. Activation loop phosphorylation and catalysis in protein kinases: is there functional evidence for the autoinhibitor model? Biochemistry 42:601-607.
2. Allers, T., and M. Lichten. 2001. Differential timing and control of noncrossover and crossover recombination during meiosis. Cell 106:47-57.
3. Bailis, J. M., and G. S. Roeder. 1998. Synaptonemal complex morphogenesis and sister-chromatid cohesion require Mek1-dependent phosphorylation of a meiotic chromosomal protein. Genes Dev. 12:3551-3563.
4. Bishop, D. K. 1994. RecA homologs Dmc1 and Rad51 interact to form multiple nuclear complexes prior to meiotic chromosome synapsis. Cell 79:1081-1092.
5. Bishop, D. K., Y. Nikolski, J. Oshiro, J. Chon, M. Shinohara, and X. Chen. 1999. High copy number suppression of the meiotic arrest caused by a dmc1 mutation: REC114 imposes an early recombination block and RAD54 promotes a DMC1 -independent DSB repair pathway. Genes Cells 4:425-443.
6. Bishop, D. K., D. Park, L. Xu, and N. Kleckner. 1992. DMC1: a meiosis-specific yeast homolog of E. coli recA required for recombination, synaptonemal complex formation and cell cycle progression. Cell 69:439-456.
7. Brachmann, C. B., A. Davies, G. J. Cost, E. Caputo, J. Li, P. Hieter, and J. D. Boeke. 1998. Designer deletion strains derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae S288C: a useful set of strains and plasmids for PCR-mediated gene disruption and other applications. Yeast 14:115-132.
8. Cheng, H., T. Addona, H. Keshishian, E. Dahlstrand, C. Lu, M. Dorsch, Z. Li, A. Wang, T. D. Ocain, P. Li, T. F. Parsons, B. Jaffee, and Y. Xu. 2007. Regulation of IRAK-4 kinase activity via autophosphorylation within its activation loop. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 352:609-616.
9. de los Santos, T., and N. M. Hollingsworth. 1999. Red1p: A MEK1-dependent phosphoprotein that physically interacts with Hop1p during meiosis in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 274:1783-1790.
10. Gilbert, C. S., C. M. Green, and N. F. Lowndes. 2001. Budding yeast Rad9 is an ATP-dependent Rad53 activating machine. Mol. Cell 8:129-136.
11. Haas, W., B. K. Faherty, S. A. Gerber, J. E. Elias, S. A. Beausoleil, C. E. Bakalarski, X. Li, J. Villen, and S. P. Gygi. 2006. Optimization and use of peptide mass measurement accuracy in shotgun proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 5:1326-1337.
12. Hassold, T., and P. Hunt. 2001. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. 2:280-291.
13. Hollingsworth, N. M., and S. J. Brill. 2004. The Mus81 solution to resolution: generating meiotic crossovers without Holliday junctions. Genes Dev. 18:117-125.
14. Hollingsworth, N. M., and A. D. Johnson. 1993. A conditional allele of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae HOP1 gene is suppressed by overexpression of two other meiosis-specific genes: RED1 and REC104. Genetics 133:785-797.
15. Hollingsworth, N. M., L. Ponte, and C. Halsey. 1995. MSH5, a novel MutS homolog, facilitates meiotic reciprocal recombination between homologs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae but not mismatch repair. Genes Dev. 9:1728-1739.
16. Hunter, N., and N. Kleckner. 2001. The single-end invasion: an asymmetric intermediate at the double-strand break to double-Holliday junction transition of meiotic recombination. Cell 106:59-70.
17. Huse, M., and J. Kuriyan. 2002. The conformational plasticity of protein kinases. Cell 109:275-282.
18. Johnson, L. N., M. E. M. Noble, and D. J. Owen. 1996. Active and inactive protein kinases: structural basis for regulation. Cell 19:149-158.
19. Kadyk, L. C., and L. H. Hartwell. 1992. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 132:387-402.
20. Kaldis, P., A. Sutton, and M. J. Solomon. 1996. The Cdk-activating kinase (CAK) from budding yeast. Cell 86:553-564.
21. Keeney, S. 2001. Mechanism and control of meiotic recombination initiation. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 52:1-53.
22. Li, W., and W. T. Miller. 2006. Role of the activation loop tyrosines in regulation of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor-tyrosine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 281:23785-23791.
23. Li, X., S. A. Gerber, A. D. Rudner, S. A. Beausoleil, W. Haas, J. Villen, J. E. Elias, and S. P. Gygi. 2007. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of alpha-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res. 6:1190-1197.
24. Lydall, D., Y. Nikolsky, D. K. Bishop, and T. Weinert. 1996. A meiotic recombination checkpoint controlled by mitotic checkpoint genes. Nature 383:840-843.
25. Marte, B. M., and J. Downward. 1997. PKB/Akt: connecting phosphoinositide 3-kinase to cell survival and beyond. Trends Biochem. Sci. 22:355-358.
26. Neiman, A. M., and I. Herskowitz. 1994. Reconstitution of a yeast protein kinase cascade in vitro: activation of the yeast MEK homolog STE7 by STE11. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91:3398-3402.
27. Niu, H., L. Wan, B. Baumgartner, D. Schaefer, J. Loidl, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2005. Partner choice during meiosis is regulated by Hop1-promoted dimerization of Mek1. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:5804-5818.
28. Nolen, B., S. Taylor, and G. Ghosh. 2004. Regulation of protein kinases; controlling activity through activation segment conformation. Mol. Cell 15: 661-675.
29. Paques, F., and J. E. Haber. 1999. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:349-404.
30. Pecina, A., K. N. Smith, C. Mezard, H. Murakami, K. Otha, and A. Nicolas. 2002. Target stimulation of meiotic recombination. Cell 111:173-184.
31. Pellicioli, A., and M. Foiani. 2005. Signal transduction: how rad53 kinase is activated. Curr. Biol. 15:R769-R771.
32. Peng, J., and S. P. Gygi. 2001. Proteomics: the move to mixtures. J. Mass Spectrom. 36:1083-1091.
33. Petronczki, M., M. F. Siomos, and K. Nasmyth. 2003. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 112:423-440.
34. Prowse, C. N., and J. Lew. 2001. Mechanism of activation of ERK2 by dual phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 276:99-103.
35. Roeder, G. S., and J. M. Bailis. 2000. The pachytene checkpoint. Trends Genet. 16:395-403.
36. Schwacha, A., and N. Kleckner. 1995. Identification of double Holliday junctions as intermediates in meiotic recombination. Cell 83:783-791.
37. Schwartz, M. F., J. K. Duong, Z. Sun, J. S. Morrow, D. Pradhan, and D. F. Stern. 2002. Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell 9:1055-1065.
38. Shinohara, A., and M. Shinohara. 2004. Roles of RecA homologues Rad51 and Dmc1 during meiotic recombination. Cytogenet Genome Res. 107:201- 207.
39. Sikorski, R. S., and P. Hieter. 1989. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 122:19-27.
40. Smith, A. V., and G. S. Roeder. 1997. The yeast Red1 protein localizes to the cores of meiotic chromosomes. J. Cell Biol. 136:957-967.
41. Sweeney, F. D., F. Yang, A. Chi, J. Shabanowitz, D. F. Hunt, and D. Durocher. 2005. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation. Curr. Biol. 15:1364-1375.
42. Thompson, D. A., and F. W. Stahl. 1999. Genetic control of recombination partner preference in yeast meiosis. Isolation and characterization of mutants elevated for meiotic unequal sister-chromatid recombination. Genetics 153:621-641.
43. Tsubouchi, H., and G. S. Roeder. 2006. Budding yeast Hed1 down-regulates the mitotic recombination machinery when meiotic recombination is impaired. Genes Dev. 20:1766-1775.
44. Tsubouchi, H., and G. S. Roeder. 2003. The importance of genetic recombination for fidelity of chromosome pairing in meiosis. Dev. Cell 5:915-925.
45. Wan, L., T. de los Santos, C. Zhang, K. Shokat, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2004. Mek1 kinase activity functions downstream of RED1 in the regulation of meiotic DSB repair in budding yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:11-23.
46. Wiltzius, J. J., M. Hohl, J. C. Fleming, and J. H. Petrini. 2005. The Rad50 hook domain is a critical determinant of Mrell complex functions. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12:403-407.
47. Woltering, D., B. Baumgartner, S. Bagchi, B. Larkin, J. Loidl, T. de los Santos, and N. M. Hollingsworth. 2000. Meiotic segregation, synapsis, and recombination checkpoint functions require physical interaction between the chromosomal proteins Redlp and Hoplp. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:6646-6658.
48. Wu, T.-C., and M. Lichten. 1994. Meiosis-induced double-strand break sites determined by yeast chromatin structure. Science 263:515-518.
49. Xu, L., B. M. Weiner, and N. Kleckner. 1997. Meiotic cells monitor the status of the interhomolog recombination complex. Genes Dev. 11:106-118.
50. Xu, Y. J., M. Davenport, and T. J. Kelly. 2006. Two-stage mechanism for activation of the DNA replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 in fission yeast. Genes Dev. 20:990-1003.
51. Yves-Masson, J., and S. C. West. 2001. The Rad51 and Dmc1 recombinases: a non-identical twin relationship. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26:131-136.