Binding free energy landscape of domain-peptide interactions

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 8, 2011, Pages

  Staneva, Iskra ^a   Wallin, Stefan ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDING ENERGY; C (PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE); ENERGY BARRIERS; FREE ENERGY; TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION;

BINDING FREE ENERGY; BINDING PROCESS; CLASS I; CLASS II; FREE ENERGY BARRIER; FREE ENERGY LANDSCAPE; PDZ DOMAINS; PEPTIDE RECOGNITION; PROTEIN DOMAINS; UBIQUITOUS PROTEIN;

PEPTIDES;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY BALANCE; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PDZ DOMAIN; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PROCESS MODEL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE; THERMODYNAMICS; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; KINETICS; METABOLISM;

PEPTIDE; POLYPEPTIDE C;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; KINETICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PDZ DOMAINS; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FOLDING; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 80052312953     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002131     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Dyson HJ, Wright PE, (2005) Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 6: 197-208.
2. Radivojac P, Iakoucheva LM, Oldfield CJ, Obradovic Z, Uversky VN, et al. (2007) Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophys J 92: 1439-1456.
3. Petsalaki E, Russell RB, (2008) Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 19: 344-350.
4. Pawson T, Nash P, (2003) Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 300: 445-452.
5. Bhattacharyya RP, Remenyi A, Yeh BJ, Lim WA, (2006) Domains, motifs, and scaffolds: the role of modular interactions in the evolution and wiring of cell signaling circuits. Annu Rev Biochem 75: 655-680.
6. Russell RB, Aloy P, (2008) Targeting and tinkering with interaction networks. Nat Chem Biol 4: 666-673.
7. Smock RG, Gierasch LM, (2009) Sending signals dynamically. Science 324: 198-203.
8. Neduva V, Russell RB, (2006) Peptides mediating interaction networks: new leads at last. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 465-471.
9. Rubinstein M, Niv MY, (2009) Peptidic modulators of protein-protein interactions: progress and challenges in computational design. Biopolymers 91: 505-513.
10. Desmet J, Wilson IA, Joniau M, De Maeyer M, Lasters I, (1997) Computation of the binding of fully flexible peptides to proteins with flexible side chains. FASEB J 11: 164-172.
11. Liu Z, Dominy BN, Shakhnovich EI, (2004) Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential. J Am Chem Soc 126: 8515-8528.
12. Tong JC, Tan TW, Ranganathan S, (2004) Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex. Protein Sci 13: 2523-2532.
13. Niv MY, Weinstein H, (2005) A flexible docking procedure for the exploration of peptide binding selectivity to known structures and homology models of PDZ domains. J Am Chem Soc 127: 14072-14079.
14. Raveh B, London N, Schueler-Furman O, (2010) Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins. Proteins 78: 2029-2040.
15. King CA, Bradley P, (2010) Structure-based prediction of protein-peptide specificity in Rosetta. Proteins 78: 3437-3449.
16. Kaufmann K, Shen N, Mizoue L, Meiler J, (2011) A physical model for PDZdomain/peptide interactions. J Mol Model 17: 315-324.
17. Hetnyi C, van der Spoel D, (2002) Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci 11: 1729-1737.
18. Petsalaki E, Stark A, García-Urdiales E, Russell RB, (2009) Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000335.
19. Wunderlich Z, Mirny LA, (2009) Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 4629-4641.
20. Fernandez-Ballester G, Beltrao P, Gonzalez JM, Song YH, Wilmanns M, et al. (2009) Structure-based prediction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SH3-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 388: 902-916.
21. Hou T, Xu Z, Zhang W, McLaughlin WA, Case DA, et al. (2009) Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a generic structure-based model to decipher the binding specificity of SH3 domains. Mol Cell Proteomics 8: 639-649.
22. Chen JR, Chang BH, Allen JE, Stiffler MA, MacBeath G, (2008) Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nat Biotechnol 26: 1041-1045.
23. Zacharias M, Springer S, (2004) Conformational flexibility of the MHC class I alpha1-alpha2 domain in peptide bound and free states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. Biophys J 87: 2203-2214.
24. Basdevant N, Weinstein H, Ceruso M, (2006) Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study. J Am Chem Soc 128: 12766-12777.
25. Dhulesia A, Gsponer J, Vendruscolo M, (2008) Mapping of two networks of residues that exhibit structural and dynamical changes upon binding in a PDZ domain protein. J Am Chem Soc 130: 8931-8939.
26. Staneva I, Wallin S, (2009) All-atom Monte Carlo approach to protein-peptide binding. J Mol Biol 393: 1118-1128.
27. Irbäck A, Samuelsson B, Sjunnesson F, Wallin S, (2003) Thermodynamics of alphaand beta-structure formation in proteins. Biophys J 85: 1466-1473.
28. Irbäck A, Mohanty S, (2006) PROFASI: A Monte Carlo simulation package for protein folding and aggregation. J Comput Chem 27: 1548-1555.
29. Mitternacht S, Mohanty S, Irbäck A, (2009) An effective all-atom potential for proteins. PMC Biophys 2: 2.
30. Sheng M, Sala C, (2001) PDZ domains and the organization of supramolecular complexes. Annu Rev Neurosci 24: 1-29.
31. Spaller MR, (2006) Act globally, think locally: systems biology addresses the PDZ domain. ACS Chem Biol 1: 207-210.
32. Lee HJ, Zheng JJ, (2010) PDZ domains and their binding partners: structure, specificity, and modification. Cell Commun Signal 8: 8.
33. Tonikian R, Zhang Y, Sazinsky SL, Currell B, Yeh JH, et al. (2008) A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol 6: e239.
34. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, et al. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28: 235-242.
35. Beuming T, Skrabanek L, Niv MY, Mukherjee P, Weinstein H, (2005) PDZBase: a protein-protein interaction database for PDZ-domains. Bioinformatics 21: 827-828.
36. Doyle DA, Lee A, Lewis J, Kim E, Sheng M, et al. (1996) Crystal structures of a complexed and peptide-free membrane protein-binding domain: molecular basis of peptide recognition by PDZ. Cell 85: 1067-1076.
37. Im YJ, Park SH, Rho SH, Lee JH, Kang GB, et al. (2003) Crystal structure of GRIP1 PDZ6-peptide complex reveals the structural basis for class II PDZ target recognition and PDZ domain-mediated multimerization. J Biol Chem 278: 8501-8507.
38. Saro D, Li T, Rupasinghe C, Paredes A, Caspers N, et al. (2007) A thermodynamic ligand binding study of the third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the mammalian neuronal protein PSD-95. Biochemistry 46: 6340-6352.
39. Gianni S, Engström Å, Larsson M, Calosci N, Malatesta F, et al. (2005) The kinetics of PDZ domain-ligand interactions and implications for the binding mechanism. J Biol Chem 280: 34805-34812.
40. Chi CN, Bach A, Engström Å, Wang H, Strømgaard K, et al. (2009) A sequential binding mechanism in a PDZ domain. Biochemistry 48: 7089-7097.
41. Pan L, Wu H, Shen C, Shi Y, Jin W, et al. (2007) Clustering and synaptic targeting of PICK1 requires direct interaction between the PDZ domain and lipid membranes. EMBO J 26: 4576-4587.
42. Elkins JM, Papagrigoriou E, Berridge G, Yang X, Phillips C, et al. (2007) Structure of PICK1 and other PDZ domains obtained with the help of self-binding C-terminal extensions. Protein Sci 16: 683-694.
43. Dev KK, Nakanishi S, Henley JM, (2004) The PDZ domain of PICK1 differentially accepts protein kinase C-alpha and GluR2 as interacting ligands. J Biol Chem 279: 41393-41397.
44. Madsen KL, Beuming T, Niv MY, Chang CW, Dev KK, et al. (2005) Molecular determinants for the complex binding specificity of the PDZ domain in PICK1. J Biol Chem 280: 20539-20548.
45. Marinari E, Parisi G, (1992) Simulated tempering: a new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhys Lett 19: 451-458.
46. Lyubartsev AP, Martsinovski AA, Shevkunov SV, Vorontsov-Velyaminov PN, (1992) New approach to Monte Carlo calculation of the free energy: Method of expanded ensembles. J Chem Phys 96: 1776-1783.
47. Irbäck A, Potthast F, (1995) Studies of an off-lattice model for protein folding: sequence dependence and improved sampling at finite temperature. J Chem Phys 103: 10298-10305.
48. Gerek ZN, Keskin O, Ozkan SB, (2009) Identification of specificity and promiscuity of PDZ domain interactions through their dynamic behavior. Proteins 77: 796-811.
49. Kong Y, Karplus M, (2009) Signaling pathways of PDZ2 domain: a molecular dynamics interaction correlation analysis. Proteins 74: 145-154.
50. Chen H, Luo R, (2007) Binding induced folding in p53-MDM2 complex. J Am Chem Soc 129: 2930-2937.
51. Chen J, (2009) Intrinsically disordered p53 extreme C-terminus binds to S100B(ββ) through "fly-casting". J Am Chem Soc 131: 2088-2089.
52. Higo J, Nishimura Y, Nakamura H, (2011) A free-energy landscape for coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein in explicit solvent from detailed all-atom computations. J Am Chem Soc In Press.
53. Huang Y, Liu Z, (2011) Anchoring intrinsically disordered proteins to multiple targets: Lessons from N-terminus of the p53 protein. Int J Mol Sci 12: 1410-1430.
54. Wang J, Wang Y, Chu X, Hagen SJ, Han W, et al. (2011) Multi-scaled explorations of binding-induced folding of intrinsically disordered protein inhibitor IA3 to its target enzyme. PLoS Comput Biol 7: e1001118.
55. Forman-Kay JD, (1999) The 'dynamics' in the thermodynamics of binding. Nat Struct Biol 6: 1086-1087.
56. Chang CE, Chen W, Gilson MK, (2007) Ligand configurational entropy and protein binding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 1534-1539.
57. Killian BJ, Kravitz JY, Somani S, Dasgupta P, Pang YP, et al. (2009) Configurational entropy in protein-peptide binding: computational study of Tsg101 ubiquitin E2 variant domain with an HIV-derived PTAP nonapeptide. J Mol Biol 389: 315-335.
58. Levy Y, Cho SS, Onuchic JN, Wolynes PG, (2005) A survey of flexible protein binding mechanisms and their transition states using native topology based energy landscapes. J Mol Biol 346: 1121-1145.
59. Huang Y, Liu Z, (2009) Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: a critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. J Mol Biol 393: 1143-1159.
60. Tsai CJ, Kumar S, Ma B, Nussinov R, (1999) Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci 8: 1181-1190.
61. Elkins JM, Gileadi C, Shrestha L, Phillips C, Wang J, et al. (2010) Unusual binding interactions in PDZ domain crystal structures help explain binding mechanisms. Protein Sci 19: 731-741.
62. Long JF, Feng W, Wang R, Chan LN, Ip FCF, et al. (2005) Autoinhibition of X11/Mint scaffold proteins revealed by the closed conformation of the PDZ tandem. Nat Struct Mol Biol 12: 722-728.
63. Favrin G, Irbäck A, Sjunnesson F, (2001) Monte Carlo update for chain molecules: biased Gaussian steps in torsional space. J Chem Phys 114: 8154-8158.
64. Ferrenberg AM, Swendsen RH, (1989) New Monte Carlo technique for studying phase transitions. Phys Rev Lett 61: 2635-2638.