Sub-angstrom modeling of complexes between flexible peptides and globular proteins

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 78, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2029-2040

  Raveh, Barak ^a,b   London, Nir ^a   Schueler Furman, Ora ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Linear binding motifs; Peptide docking; Peptide mediated interactions; Peptide protein interactions; Rosetta flexpepdock; Short peptides

Indexed keywords

GLOBULAR PROTEIN; PEPTIDE; CAPSID PROTEIN; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEX; PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BINDING COMPETITION; COMPUTER MODEL; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PDZ DOMAIN; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SUB ANGSTROM MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE;

CAPSID PROTEINS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HIV; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MONTE CARLO METHOD; MULTIPROTEIN COMPLEXES; PDZ DOMAINS; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77953573815     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.22716     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Pawson T, Nash P. Assembly of cell regulatory systems through protein interaction domains. Science 2003;300:445-452.
2. Petsalaki E, Russell RB. Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008;19:344-350.
3. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005;6:197-208.
4. Dyson HJ, Wright PE. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002;12:54-60.
5. Vacic V, Oldfield CJ, Mohan A, Radivojac P, Cortese MS, Uversky VN, Dunker AK. Characterization of molecular recognition features. Mo RFs, and their binding partners. J Proteome Res 2007;6:2351-2366.
6. Fuxreiter M, Tompa P, Simon I. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics 2007;23:950-956.
7. Naider F, Anglister J. Peptides in the treatment of AIDS. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:473-482.
8. Hayouka Z, Rosenbluh J, Levin A, Loya S, Lebendiker M, Veprintsev D, Kotler M, Hizi A, Loyter A, Friedler A. Inhibiting HIV-1 integrase by shifting its oligomerization equilibrium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:8316-8321.
9. Monfregola L, Vitale RM, Amodeo P, De Luca S. A SPR strategy for high-throughput ligand screenings based on synthetic peptides mimicking a selected subdomain of the target protein: a proof of concept on HER2 receptor. Bioorg Med Chem 2009;17:7015-7020.
10. Rubinstein M, Niv MY. Peptidic modulators of protein-protein interactions: progress and challenges in computational design. Biopolymers 2009;91:505-513.
11. Parthasarathi L, Casey F, Stein A, Aloy P, Shields DC. Approved drug mimics of short peptide ligands from protein interaction motifs. J Chem Inf Model 2008;48:1943-1948.
12. Grigoryan G, Reinke AW, Keating AE. Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. Nature 2009;458: 859-864.
13. Simon RJ, Kania RS, Zuckermann RN, Huebner VD, Jewell DA, Banville S, Ng S, Wang L, Rosenberg S, Marlowe CK, Spellmeyer DC, Tans R, Frankel AD, Santi DV, Cohen FE, Bartlett PA. Peptoids: a modular approach to drug discovery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:9367-9371.
14. Sillerud LO, Larson RS. Design and structure of peptide and peptidomimetic antagonists of protein-protein interaction. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2005;6:151-169.
15. Eichler J. Peptides as protein binding site mimetics. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2008;12:707-713.
16. Zhang Y. Protein structure prediction: when is it useful? Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:145-155.
17. Vajda S, Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein-protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009;19:164-170.
18. Cesareni G, Panni S, Nardelli G, Castagnoli L. Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains? FEBS Lett 2002; 513:38-44.
19. Niv MY, Weinstein H. A flexible docking procedure for the exploration of peptide binding selectivity to known structures and homology models of PDZ domains. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:14072-14079.
20. Bordner AJ, Abagyan R. Ab initio prediction of peptide-MHC binding geometry for diverse class I MHC allotypes. Proteins 2006;63: 512-526.
21. Sudol M. Structure and function of the WW domain. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1996;65:113-132, 1996.
22. Songyang Z, Fanning AS, Fu C, Xu J, Marfatia SM, Chishti AH, Crompton A, Chan AC, Anderson JM, Cantley LC. Recognition of unique carboxyl-terminal motifs by distinct PDZ domains. Science 1997;275:73-77.
23. Madden DR, Gorga JC, Strominger JL, Wiley DC. The three-dimensional structure of HLA-B27 at 2.1 A resolution suggests a general mechanism for tight peptide binding to MHC. Cell 1992;70:1035-1048.
24. Mandell JG, Falick AM, Komives EA. Identification of protein-protein interfaces by decreased amide proton solvent accessibility. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:14705-14710.
25. Morrison KL, Weiss GA. Combinatorial alauine-scanuing. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2001;5:302-307.
26. Petsalaki E, Stark A, Garcia-Urdiales E, Russell RB. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5:e1000335.
27. Brenke R, Kozakov D, Chuang GY, Beglov D, Hall D, Landon MR, Mattos C, Vajda S. Fragment-based identification of druggable 'hot spots' of proteins using Fourier domain correlation techniques. Bioinformatics 2009;25:621-627.
28. Capra JA, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM, Singh M, Funkhouser TA. Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure. PLoS Comput Biol 2009;5: e1000585.
29. Hu X, Lee MS, Wallqvist A. Interaction of the disordered Yersinia effector protein YopE with its cognate chaperone SycE. Biochemistry 2009;48:11158-11160.
30. Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins 2006;65:15-26.
31. Arun Prasad P, Gautham N. A new peptide docking strategy using a mean field technique with mutually orthogonal Latin square sampling. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2008;22:815-829.
32. Hetenyi C, van der Spoel D. Efficient docking of peptides to proteins without prior knowledge of the binding site. Protein Sci 2002; 11:1729-1737.
33. Tong JC, Tan TW, Ranganathan S. Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex. Protein Sci 2004;13:2523-2532.
34. Fagerberg T, Cerottini JC, Michielin O. Structural prediction of peptides bound to MHC class I. J Mol Biol 2006;356:521-546.
35. Staneva I, Wallin S. All-Atom Monte Carlo Approach to ProteinPeptide Binding. J Mol Biol 2009;393:1118-1128.
36. Fernandez-Ballester G, Beltrao P, Gonzalez JM, Song YH, Wilmanns M, Valencia A, Serrano L. Structure-based prediction of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SH3-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 2009;388: 902-916.
37. Chaudhury S, Gray JJ. Identification of structural mechanisms of HIV-1 protease specificity using computational peptide docking: implications for drug resistance. Structure 2009;17:1636-1648.
38. Liu Z, Dominy BN, Shakhnovich EI. Structural mining: self-consistent design on flexible protein-peptide docking and transferable binding affinity potential. J Am Chem Soc 2004;126:8515-8528.
39. Antes I. DynaDock: A new molecular dynamics-based algorithm for protein-peptide docking including receptor flexibility. Proteins 2010;78:1084-1104.
40. Das R, Baker D. Macromolecular modeling with rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 2008;77:363-382.
41. Li Z, Scheraga HA. Monte Carlo-minimization approach to the multiple-minima problem in protein folding. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987;84:6611-6615.
42. Neduva V, Linding R, Su-Angrand I, Stark A, de Masi F, Gibson TJ, Lewis J, Serrano L, Russell RB. Systematic discovery of new recognition peptides mediating protein interaction networks. PLoS Biol 2005;3:e405.
43. Puntervoll P, Linding R, Gemund C, Chabanis-Davidson S, Mattingsdal M, Cameron S, Martin DM, Ausiello G, Brannetti B, Costantini A, Ferre F, Maselli V, Via A, Cesareni G, Diella F, SupertiFurga G, Wyrwicz L, Ramu C, McGuigan C, Gudavalli R, Letunic I, Bork P, Rychlewski L, Kuster B, Helmer-Citterich M, Hunter WN, Aasland R, Gibson TJ. ELM server: a new resource for investigating short functional sites in modular eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:3625-3630.
44. Stein A, Pache RA, Bernado P, Pons M, Aloy P. Dynamic interactions of proteins in complex networks: a more structured view. FEBS J 2009;276:5390-5405.
45. Massova I, Kollman PA. Computational alanine scanning to probe protein-protein interactions: a novel approach to evaluate binding free energies. J Am Chem Soc 1999;121:8133-8143.
46. Kortemme T, Kim DE, Baker D. Computational alanine scanning of protein-protein interfaces. Sci STKE 2004;2004:12.
47. Guerois R, Nielsen JE, Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 2002;320:369-387.
48. London N, Movshovitz-Attias D, Schueler-Furman O. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure 2009; 18: 188-199.
49. Greenfield N, Fasman GD. Computed circular dichroism spectra for the evaluation of protein conformation. Biochemistry 1969;8:4108-4116.
50. Smith CA, Kortemme T. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 2008;380:742-756.
51. Canutescu AA, Dunbrack RL, Jr. Cyclic coordinate descent: a robotics algorithm for protein loop closure. Protein Sci 2003;12:963-972.
52. Mandell DJ, Coutsias EA, Kortemme T. Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nat Methods 2009;6:551-552.
53. Vanhee P, Stricher F, Baeten L, Verschueren E, Lenaerts T, Serrano L, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz J. Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Structure 2009;17:1128-1136.
54. Henrich S, Salo-Ahen OM, Huang B, Rippmann FF, Cruciani G, Wade RC. Computational approaches to identifying and characterizing protein binding sites for ligand design. J Mol Recognit 2009;23:209-219.
55. Dunbrack RL, Jr., Cohen FE. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci 1997;6:1661-1681.
56. Gray JJ, Moughon S, Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Kuhlman B, Rohl CA, Baker D. Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003;331:281-299.
57. Wang C, Schueler-Furman O, Baker D. Improved side-chain modeling for protein-protein docking. Protein Sci 2005;14:1328-1339.
58. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Baker D. Progress in protein-protein docking: atomic resolution predictions in the CAPRI experiment using RosettaDock with an improved treatment of side-chain flexibility. Proteins 2005;60:187-194.
59. Davidon WC. Variable metric method for minimization. SIAM, Journal on Optim 1991;1:1-17.
60. Kuhlman. B, Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:10383-10388.
61. Rohl CA, Strauss CE, Misura KM, Baker D. Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 2004;383:66-93.
62. Frishman D, Argos P. Knowledge-based protein secondary structure assignment. Proteins 1995;23:566-579.
63. Kontoyianni M, McClellan LM, Sokol GS. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms. J Med Chem 2004;47:558-565.
64. Siew N, Elofsson A, Rychlewski L, Fischer D. MaxSub: an automated measure for the assessment of protein structure prediction quality. Bioinformatics 2000;16:776-785.