Modeling the structure of bound peptide ligands to major histocompatibility complex

Protein Science

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 2523-2532

  Tong, Joo Chuan ^a   Tan, Tin Wee ^a   Ranganathan, Shoba ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^b MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Epitope prediction; Flexible docking; Immunology; Major histocompatibility complex; Monte Carlo

Indexed keywords

DOCKING PROTEIN; EPITOPE; LIGAND; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 1; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGEN CLASS 2; PEPTIDE;

ARTICLE; CALPHA ROOT MEAN SQUARE DIFFERENCE; LIGAND BINDING; LOOP CLOSURE; MAJOR HISTOCOMPATIBILITY COMPLEX; MODEL REFINEMENT; MOLECULAR MODEL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PEPTIDE DOCKING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PSEUDO BROWNIAN RIGID BODY DOCKING PROCEDURE; STEREOCHEMISTRY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; TECHNIQUE;

COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY TECHNIQUES; DATABASES, PROTEIN; EPITOPES; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS I; HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS CLASS II; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING;

EID: 4344589929     PISSN: 09618368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1110/ps.04631204     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Abagyan, R. and Totrov, M. 1999. Ab initio folding of peptides by the optimal-bias Monte Carlo minimization procedure. J. Comput. Phys. 151: 402-421.
2. Alluvia, Y., Schueler, O., and Margalit, H. 1995. Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J. Mol. Biol. 249: 244-250.
3. Bhasin. M. and Raghava, G.P.S. 2004. Analysis and prediction of affinity of TAP binding peptides using cascade SVM. Protein Sci. 13: 596-607.
4. Brown, J.H., Jardetzky, T.S., Gorga, J.C., Stern, L.J., Urban, R.G., Strominger, J.L., and Wiley, D.C. 1993. Three-dimensional structure of the human class II histocompatibility antigen HLA-DRI. Nature 364: 33-39.
5. Brusic, V., Rudy, G., Honeyman, M., Hammer, J., and Harrison, L. 1998. Prediction of MHC class II-binding peptides using an evolutionary algorithm and artificial neural network. 1998. Bioinformatics 14: 121-130.
6. Brusic, V., Petrovsky, N., Zhang, G., and Bajic, V.B. 2002. Prediction of promiscuous peptides that bind HLA class I molecules, Immunol. Cell Biol. 80: 280-285.
7. Caflisch, A., Niederer, P., and Anliker, M. 1992. Monte Carlo docking of oligopeptides to proteins. Proteins 13: 223-230.
8. Davenport, M.P., Ho Shon, I., and Hill, A.V. 1995. An empirical method for the prediction of T-cell epitopes. Immunogenetics 42: 392-397.
9. Desmet, J., Maeyer, M.D., Spriet, J., and Lasters, I. 2000. Flexible docking of peptide ligands to proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 143: 359-376.
10. Dönnes, P. and Elofsson, A. 2002. Prediction of MHC class I binding peptides, using SVMHC. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 1-8.
11. Falk, K., Rotzschke, O., Stevanovic, S., Jung, G., and Rammensee, H.G. 1991. Allele-specific motifs revealed by sequencing of self-peptides eluted from MHC molecules. Nature 351: 290-296.
12. Fernández-Recio, J., Totrov, M., and Abagyan, R. 2002. Soft protein-protein docking in internal coordinates. Protein Sci. 11: 280-291.
13. Flower, D.R. 2003. Databases and data mining for computational vaccinology. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Devel. 6: 396-400.
14. Godkin, A.J., Davenport, M.P., Willis, A., Jewell, D.P., and Hill, A.V. 1998. Use of complete eluted peptide sequence data from HLA-DR and -DQ molecules to predict T cell epitopes and the influence of the nonbinding terminal regions of ligands in epitope selection. J. Immunol. 161: 850-858.
15. Govindarajan, K.R., Kangueane, P., Tan, T.W., and Ranganathan, S. 2003. MPID: MHC-peptide interaction database for sequence-structure-function information on peptides binding to MHC molecules. Bioinformatics 19: 309-310.
16. Gulukota, K., Sidney. J., Sette, A., and DeLisi, C. 1997. Two complementary methods for predicting peptides binding major histocompatibility complex molecules. J. Mol. Biol. 267: 1258-1267.
17. Guo, H.C., Jardetzky, T.S., Garrett, T.P.J., Lane, W.S., Strominger, J.L., and Wiley, D.C. 1992. Different length peptides bind to HLA-Aw68 similarly at their ends but bulge out in the middle. Nature 360: 364-366.
18. Klein, J. 1986. Natural history of the major histocompatibility complex. J. Wiley & Sons, New York.
19. Lim, S.K., Kim, S., Lee, H.G., Lee, K.Y., Kwon, T.J., and Kim, K. 1996. Selection of peptides that bind to the HLA-A2.1 molecule by molecular modeling. Mol. Immunol. 33: 221-230.
20. Mamitsuka, H. 1998. Predicting peptides that bind to MHC molecules using supervised learning of Hidden Markov Models. Proteins 33: 460-474.
21. Michielin, O. and Karplus, M. 2002. Binding free energy differences in a TCR-peptide-MHC complex induced by a peptide mutation: A stimulation analysis. J. Mol. Biol. 324: 547-569.
22. Michielin, O., Luescher, I., and Karplus, M. 2000. Modeling the TCR-MHC-peptide complex. J. Mol. Biol. 300: 1205-1235.
23. Nemethy, G., Gibson, K.D., Palmer, K.A., Yoon, C.N., Paterlini, G., Zagari, A., Rumsey, S., and Scheraga, H.A. 1992. Energy parameters in polypeptides, 10: Improved geometric parameters and nonbonded interactions for use in the ECEPP/3 algorithm, with application to praline-containing peptides. J. Phys. Chem. 96: 6472-6484.
24. Parker, K.C., Bednarek, M.A., and Coligan, I.E. 1994. Scheme for ranking potential HLA-A2 binding peptides based on independent binding of individual peptide side-chains. J. Immunol. 152: 163-175.
25. Rammensee, H., Bachmann, J., Emmerich, N.P., Bachor, O.A., and Stevanović, S. 1999. SYFPEITHI: Database for MHC ligands and peptide motifs. Immunogenetics 50: 213-219.
26. Rognan, D., Laumoeller, S.L., Holm, A., Buus, S., and Tschinke, V. 1999. Predicting binding affinities of protein ligands from three-dimensional models: Application to peptide binding to class I major histocompatibility proteins. J. Med. Chem. 42: 4650-4658.
27. Rosenfeld, R., Zheng, Q., Vajda, S., and DeLisi, C. 1993. Computing the structure of bound peptides: Application to antigen recognition by class I major histocompatibility complex receptors. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 515-521.
28. -. 1995. Flexible docking of peptides to class I major- histocompatibility-complex receptors. Genet. Anal. 12: 1-21.
29. Sali, A. and Blundell, T.L. 1993. Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. J. Mol. Biol. 234: 779-815.
30. Sezerman, U., Vajda, S., and DeLisi, C. 1996. Free energy mapping of class I MHC molecules and structural determination of bound peptides. Protein Sci. 5: 1272-1281.
31. Stern, L.J. and Wiley, D.C. 1994. Antigenic peptide binding by class I and class II histocompatibility proteins. Structure 2: 245-251.
32. Stern, L.J., Brown, J.H., Jardetzky, T.S., Gorga, J.C., Urban, R.G., Strominger, J.L., and Wiley, D.C. 1994. Crystal structure of the human class II MHC protein HLA-DRI complexed with an influenza virus peptide. Nature 368: 215-221.