Anchoring intrinsically disordered proteins to multiple targets: Lessons from N-terminus of the p53 protein

International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 1410-1430

  Huang, Yongqi ^a,b   Liu, Zhirong ^a,b  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Anchor residue; Binding promiscuity; Intrinsically disordered proteins; MDM2; Molecular recognition features; p53; Taz2

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN P53; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEIN; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN MDM2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR RECOGNITION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; TRANSACTIVATION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMAL; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR DOCKING; MOLECULAR GENETICS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; BINDING SITES; HUMANS; INTRINSICALLY DISORDERED PROTEINS; MOLECULAR DOCKING SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS C-MDM2; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN P53;

EID: 79952260271     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14220067     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijms12021410     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Larsen, T.A.; Olson, A.J.; Goodsell, D.S. Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. Structure 1998, 6, 421-427.
2. Lo Conte, L.; Chothia, C.; Janin, J. The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 285, 2177-2198.
3. Ma, B.Y.; Elkayam, T.; Wolfson, H.; Nussinov, R. Protein-protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 5772-5777.
4. Bai, H.J.; Ma, W.Z.; Liu, S.Y.; Lai, L.H. Dynamic property is a key determinant for protein-protein interactions. Proteins 2008, 70, 1323-1331.
5. Zhang, Q.C.; Petrey, D.; Norel, R.; Honig, B.H. Protein interface conservation across structure space. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 10896-10901.
6. Rajamani, D.; Thiel, S.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C.J. Anchor residues in protein-rotein interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 11287-11292.
7. Kimura, S.R.; Brower, R.C.; Vajda, S.; Camacho, C.J. Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition. Biophys. J. 2001, 80, 635-642.
8. Li, X.; Keskin, O.; Ma, B.; Nussinov, R.; Liang, J. Protein-protein interactions: Hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: Implications for docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 344, 781-795.
9. Camacho, C.J. Modeling side-chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets. Proteins 2005, 60, 245-251.
10. Smith, G.R.; Sternberg, M.J.E.; Bates, P.A. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein-protein complexes with an application to protein-protein docking. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 347, 1077-1101.
11. Yogurtcu, O.N.; Erdemli, S.B.; Nussinov, R.; Turkay, M.; Keskin, O. Restricted mobility of conserved residues in protein-protein interfaces in molecular simulations. Biophys. J. 2008, 94, 3475-3485.
12. Ben-Shimon, A.; Eisenstein, M. Computational mapping of anchoring spots on protein surfaces. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 402, 259-277.
13. Csermely, P.; Palotai, R.; Nussinov, R. Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: An extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2010, 35, 539-546.
14. Wlodarski, T.; Zagrovic, B. Conformational selection and induced fit mechanism underlie specificity in noncovalent interactions with ubiquitin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 19346-19351.
15. Fink, A.L. Compact intermediate states in protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 1995, 24, 495-522.
16. Wright, P.E.; Dyson, H.J. Intrinsically unstructured proteins: Re-assessing the protein structure-function paradigm. J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 293, 321-331.
17. Uversky, V.N.; Gillespie, J.R.; Fink, A.L. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins 2000, 41, 415-427.
18. Dunker, A.K.; Lawson, J.D.; Brown, C.J.; Williams, R.M.; Romero, P.; Oh, J.S.; Oldfield, C.J.; Campen, A.M.; Ratliff, C.M.; Hipps, K.W.; Ausio, J.; Nissen, M.S.; Reeves, R.; Kang, C.; Kissinger, C.R.; Bailey, R.W.; Griswold, M.D.; Chiu, W.; Garner, E.C.; Obradovic, Z. Intrinsically disordered protein. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2001, 19, 26-59.
19. Dunker, A.K.; Obradovic, Z. The protein trinity-linking function and disorder. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 805-806.
20. Tompa, P. Intrinsically unstructured proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2002, 27, 527-533.
21. Uversky, V.N. Natively unfolded proteins: A point where biology waits for physics. Protein Sci. 2002, 11, 739-756.
22. Uversky, V.N. What does it mean to be natively unfolded? Eur. J. Biochem. 2002, 269, 2-12.
23. Dunker, A.K.; Brown, C.J.; Lawson, J.D.; Iakoucheva, L.M.; Obradovic, Z. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 6573-6582.
24. Dunker, A.K.; Brown, C.J.; Obradovic, Z. Identification and functions of usefully disordered proteins. Adv. Protein Chem. 2002, 62, 25-49.
25. Tompa, P.; Csermely, P. The role of structural disorder in the function of RNA and protein chaperones. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 1169-1175.
26. Dyson, H.J.; Wright, P.E. Intrinsically unstructured proteins and their functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 197-208.
27. Radivojac, P.; Iakoucheva, L.M.; Oldfield, C.J.; Obradovic, Z.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophys. J. 2007, 92, 1439-1456.
28. Huang, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.R. Intrinsically disordered proteins: The new sequence-structure-function relations. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2010, 26, 2061-2072.
29. Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Understanding protein non-folding. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2010, 1804, 1231-1264.
30. Turoverov, K.K.; Kuznetsova, I.M.; Uversky, V.N. The protein kingdom extended: Ordered and intrinsically disordered proteins, their folding, supramolecular complex formation, and aggregation. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2010, 102, 73-84.
31. He, B.; Wang, K.J.; Liu, Y.L.; Xue, B.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Predicting intrinsic disorder in proteins: An overview. Cell Res. 2009, 19, 929-949.
32. Tompa, P.; Fuxreiter, M. Fuzzy complexes: Polymorphism and structural disorder in protein-protein interactions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2008, 33, 2-8.
33. Galea, C.A.; Wang, Y.; Sivakolundu, S.G.; Kriwacki, R.W. Regulation of cell division by intrinsically unstructured proteins: Intrinsic flexibility, modularity, and signaling conduits. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 7598-7609.
34. Shoemaker, B.A.; Portman, J.J.; Wolynes, P.G. Speeding molecular recognition by using the folding funnel: The fly-casting mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97, 8868-8873.
35. Huang, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.R. Kinetic advantage of intrinsically disordered proteins in coupled folding-binding process: A critical assessment of the "fly-casting" mechanism. J. Mol. Biol. 2009, 393, 1143-1159.
36. Mittag, T.; Kay, L.E.; Forman-Kay, J.D. Protein dynamics and conformational disorder in molecular recognition. J. Mol. Recognit. 2010, 23, 105-116.
37. Huang, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.R. Nonnative interactions in coupled folding and binding processes of intrinsically disordered proteins. PLoS ONE 2010, e15375.
38. Patil, A.; Kinoshita, K.; Nakamura, H. Hub promiscuity in protein-protein interaction networks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1930-1943.
39. Receveur-Bréchot, V.; Bourhis, J.-M.; Uversky, V.N.; Canard, B.; Longhi, S. Assessing protein disorder and induced folding. Proteins 2006, 62, 24-45.
40. Mittag, T.; Forman-Kay, J.D. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2007, 17, 3-14.
41. Chen, H.M.; Rhoades, E. Fluorescence characterization of denatured proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, 18, 516-524.
42. Eliezer, D. Biophysical characterization of intrinsically disordered proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2009, 19, 23-30.
43. Uversky, V.; Longhi, S. Instrumental Analysis of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins: Assessing Structure and Conformation; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2010.
44. Csizmók, V.; Bokor, M.; Bánki, P.; Klement, T.; Medzihradszky, K.F.; Friedrich, P.; Tompa, K.A.; Tompa, P. Primary contact sites in intrinsically unstructured proteins: The case of calpastatin and microtubule-associated protein 2. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 3955-3964.
45. Oldfield, C.J.; Cheng, Y.; Cortese, M.S.; Brown, C.J.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Comparing and combining predictors of mostly disordered proteins. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 1989-2000.
46. Mohan, A.; Oldfield, C.J.; Radivojac, P.; Vacic, V.; Cortese, M.S.; Dunker, A.K.; Uversky, V.N. Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 362, 1043-1059.
47. Vacic, V.; Oldfield, C.J.; Mohan, A.; Radivojac, P.; Cortese, M.S.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 2351-2366.
48. Cheng, Y.G.; Oldfield, C.J.; Meng, J.W.; Romero, P.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Mining a-helix-forming molecular recognition features with cross species sequence alignments. Biochemistry 2007, 46, 13468-13477.
49. Fuxreiter, M.; Simon, I.; Friedrich, P.; Tompa, P. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 338, 1015-1026.
50. Dancheck, B.; Naim, A.C.; Peti, W. Detailed structural characterization of unbound protein phosphatase 1 inhibitors. Biochemistry 2008, 47, 12346-12356.
51. Yoon, M.-K.; Venkatachalam, V.; Huang, A.; Choi, B.-S.; Stultz, C.M.; Chou, J.J. Residual structure within the disordered C-terminal segment of p21(Waf1/Cip1/Sdi1) and its implications for molecular recognition. Protein Sci. 2009, 18, 337-347.
52. Marsh, J.A.; Dancheck, B.; Ragusa, M.J.; Allaire, M.; Forman-Kay, J.D.; Peti, W. Structural diversity in free and bound states of intrinsically disordered protein phosphatase 1 regulators. Structure 2010, 18, 1094-1103.
53. Gunasekaran, K.; Tsai, C.-J.; Nussinov, R. Analysis of ordered and disordered protein complexes reveals structural features discriminating between stable and unstable monomers. J. Mol. Biol. 2004, 341, 1327-1341.
54. Mészáros, B.; Tompa, P.; Simon, I.; Dosztányi, Z. Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372, 549-561.
55. Oldfield, C.J.; Meng, J.W.; Yang, J.Y.; Yang, M.Q.; Uversky, V.N.; Dunker, A.K. Flexible nets: Disorder and induced fit in the associations of p53 and 14-3-3 with their partners. BMC Genomics 2008, 9, S1.
56. Solt, I.; Magyar, C.; Simon, I.; Tompa, P.; Fuxreiter, M. Phosphorylation-induced transient intrinsic structure in the kinase-inducible domain of CREB facilitates its recognition by the KIX domain of CBP. Proteins 2006, 64, 749-757.
57. Ganguly, D.; Chen, J.H. Atomistic details of the disordered states of KID and pKID. Implications in coupled binding and folding. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 5214-5223.
58. Joerger, A.C.; Fersht, A.R. Structural biology of the tumor suppressor p53. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2008, 77, 557-582.
59. Lee, H.; Mok, K.H.; Muhandiram, R.; Park, K.-H.; Suk, J.-E.; Kim, D.-H.; Chang, J.; Sung, Y.C.; Choi, K.Y.; Han, K.-H. Local structural elements in the mostly unstructured transcriptional activation domain of human p53. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 29426-29432.
60. Espinoza-Fonseca, L.M.; Trujillo-Ferrara, J.G. Transient stability of the helical pattern of region F19-L22 of the N-terminal domain of p53: A molecular dynamics simulation study. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2006, 343, 110-116.
61. L-binding motif. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 12159-12168.
62. Kussie, P.H.; Gorina, S.; Marechal, V.; Elenbaas, B.; Moreau, J.; Levine, A.J.; Pavletich, N.P. Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 1996, 274, 948-953.
63. Chen, H.-F.; Luo, R. Binding induced folding in p53-MDM2 complex. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2930-2937.
64. Lowry, D.F.; Stancik, A.; Shrestha, R.M.; Daughdrill, G.W. Modeling the accessible conformations of the intrinsically unstructured transactivation domain of p53. Proteins 2008, 71, 587-598.
65. Dunbrack, R.L.; Cohen, F.E. Bayesian statistical analysis of protein side-chain rotamer preferences. Protein Sci. 1997, 6, 1661-1681.
66. Dastidar, S.G.; Lane, D.P.; Verma, C.S. Modulation of p53 binding to MDM2: Computational studies reveal important roles of Tyr100. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10, S6.
67. Dastidar, S.G.; Madhumalar, A.; Fuentes, G.; Lane, D.P.; Verma, C.S. Forces mediating protein-protein interactions: A computational study of p53 "approaching" MDM2. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2010, 125, 621-635.
68. Uhrinova, S.; Uhrin, D.; Powers, H.; Watt, K.; Zheleva, D.; Fischer, P.; McInnes, C.; Barlow, P.N. Structure of free MDM2 N-terminal domain reveals conformational adjustments that accompany p53-binding. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 350, 587-598.
69. Li, C.; Pazgier, M.; Li, C.Q.; Yuan, W.R.; Liu, M.; Wei, G.; Lu, W.-Y.; Lu, W. Systematic mutational analysis of peptide inhibition of the p53-MDM2/MDMX interactions. J. Mol. Biol. 2010, 398, 200-213.
70. Zondlo, S.C.; Lee, A.E.; Zondlo, N.J. Determinants of specificity of MDM2 for the activation domains of p53 and p65: Proline27 disrupts the MDM2-binding motif of p53. Biochemistry 2006, 45, 11945-11957.
71. Guharoy, M.; Janin, J.; Robert, C.H. Side-chain rotamer transitions at protein-protein interfaces. Proteins 2010, 78, 3219-3225.
72. Sivakolundu, S.G.; Bashford, D.; Kriwacki, R.W. Disordered p27Kip1 exhibits intrinsic structure resembling the Cdk2/Cyclin A-bound conformation. J. Mol. Biol. 2005, 353, 1118-1128.
73. Jensen, M.R.; Houben, K.; Lescop, E.; Blanchard, L.; Ruigrok, R.W.H.; Blackledge, M. Quantitative conformational analysis of partially folded proteins from residual dipolar couplings: application to the molecular recognition element of Sendai virus nucleoprotein. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 8055-8061.
74. Ghosh, R.P.; Nikitina, T.; Horowitz-Scherer, R.A.; Gierasch, L.M.; Uversky, V.N.; Hite, K.; Hansen, J.C.; Woodcock, C.L. Unique physical properties and interactions of the domains of methylated DNA binding protein 2. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 4395-4410.
75. Gely, S.; Lowry, D.F.; Bernard, C.; Jensen, M.R.; Blackledge, M.; Costanzo, S.; Bourhis, J.-M.; Darbon, H.; Daughdrill, G.; Longhi, S. Solution structure of the C-terminal X domain of the measles virus phosphoprotein and interaction with the intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the nucleoprotein. J. Mol. Recognit. 2010, 23, 435-447.
76. Jiao, W.T.; McDonald, D.Q.; Coxon, J.M.; Parker, E.J. Molecular modeling studies of peptide inhibitors highlight the importance of conformational prearrangement for inhibition of calpain. Biochemistry 2010, 49, 5533-5539.
77. Kjaergaard, M.; Teilum, K.; Poulsen, F.M. Conformational selection in the molten globule state of the nuclear coactivator binding domain of CBP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 12535-12540.
78. Ahmad, M.; Gu, W.; Helms, V. Mechanism of fast peptide recognition by SH3 domains. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7626-7630.
79. Fischer, E. Einfluss der configuration auf die wirkung der enzyme. Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges. 1894, 27, 2985-2993.
80. Koshland, D.E. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1958, 44, 98-104.
81. Monod, J.; Wyman, J.; Changeux, J.-P. On the nature of allosteric transitions: A plausible model. J. Mol. Biol. 1965, 12, 88-118.
82. Tsai, C.J.; Kumar, S.; Ma, B.Y.; Nussinov, R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci. 1999, 8, 1181-1190.
83. Boehr, D.D.; Nussinov, R.; Wright, P.E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2009, 5, 789-796.
84. Huang, Y.Q.; Liu, Z.R. Smoothing molecular interactions: The "kinetic buffer" effect of intrinsically disordered proteins. Proteins 2010, 78, 3251-3259.
85. Dunker, A.K.; Garner, E.; Guilliot, S.; Romero, P.; Albrecht, K.; Hart, J.; Obradovic, Z.; Kissinger, C.; Villafranca, J.E. Protein disorder and the evolution of molecular recognition: Theory, predictions and observations. Pac. Symp. Biocomput. 1998, 3, 473-484.
86. Dunker, A.K.; Cortese, M.S.; Romero, P.; Iakoucheva, L.M.; Uversky, V.N. Flexible nets-The roles of intrinsic disorder in protein interaction networks. FEBS J. 2005, 272, 5129-5148.
87. Ngan, C.-H.; Beglov, D.; Rudnitskaya, A.N.; Kozakov, D.; Waxman, D.J.; Vajda, S. The structural basis of pregnane X receptor binding promiscuity. Biochemistry 2009, 48, 11572-11581.
88. Feng, H.; Jenkins, L.M.M.; Durell, S.R.; Hayashi, R.; Mazur, S.J.; Cherry, S.; Tropea, J.E.; Miller, M.; Wlodawer, A.; Appella, E.; Bai, Y. Structural basis for p300 Taz2-p53 TAD1 binding and modulation by phosphorylation. Structure 2009, 17, 202-210.
89. Berendsen, H.J.C.; van der Spoel, D.; van Drunen, R. GROMACS: A message-passing parallel molecular dynamics implementation. Comput. Phys. Commun. 1995, 91, 43-56.
90. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; Spoel, D.v.d.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for highly efficient, load-balanced, and scalable molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435-447.
91. Kaminski, G.A.; Friesner, R.A.; Tirado-Rives, J.; Jorgensen, W.L. Evaluation and reparametrization of the OPLS-AA force field for proteins via comparison with accurate quantum chemical calculations on peptides. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 6474-6487.
92. Berendsen, H.J.C.; Grigera, J.R.; Straatsma, T.P. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 1987, 91, 6269-6271.
93. Darden, T.; York, D.; Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N·log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 10089-10092.
94. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H.J.C.; Fraaije, J.G.E.M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1463-1472.
95. Bussi, G.; Donadio, D.; Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 014101.
96. Parrinello, M.; Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 7182-7190.
97. Kabsch, W.; Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: Pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 1983, 22, 2577-2637.
98. Humphrey, W.; Dalke, A.; Schulten, K. VMD: Visual molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 33-38.