Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2-peptide interactions

Nucleic Acids Research

Volumn 37, Issue 14, 2009, Pages 4629-4641

  Wunderlich, Zeba ^a   Mirny, Leonid A ^b  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN SH2;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER MODEL; COMPUTER PREDICTION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; VALIDITY;

GENOMICS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PHOSPHOPEPTIDES; PHOSPHOTYROSINE; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 69049083531     PISSN: 03051048     EISSN: 13624962     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp394     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Yaffe,M.B. (2002) Phosphotyrosine-binding domains in signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 3, 177-186.
2. Jones,R.B., Gordus,A., Krall,J.A. and MacBeath,G. (2006) A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature, 439, 168-174.
3. Brannetti,B., Via,A., Cestra,G., Cesareni,G. and Helmer-Citterich,M. (2000) SH3-SPOT: An algorithm to predict preferred ligands to different members of the SH3 gene family. J. Mol. Biol., 298, 313-328.
4. Grigoryan,G. and Keating,A.E. (2006) Structure-based prediction of bZIP partnering specificity. J. Mol. Biol., 355, 1125-1142.
5. Hou,T., Chen,K., McLaughlin,W.A., Lu,B. and Wang,W. (2006) Computational analysis and prediction of the binding motif and protein interacting partners of the Abl SH3 domain. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e1.
6. Schleinkofer,K., Wiedemann,U., Otte,L., Wang,T., Krause,G., Oschkinat,H. and Wade,R.C. (2004) Comparative structural and energetic analysis of WW domain-peptide interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 344, 865-881.
7. Wollacott,A.M. and Desjarlais,J.R. (2001) Virtual interaction profiles of proteins. J. Mol. Biol., 313, 317-342.
8. Bergamin,E., Wu,J. and Hubbard,S.R. (2006) Structural basis for phosphotyrosine recognition by suppressor of cytokine signaling-3. Structure, 14, 1285-1292.
9. Frese,S., Schubert,W.D., Findeis,A.C., Marquardt,T., Roske,Y.S., Stradal,T.E. and Heinz,D.W. (2006) The phosphotyrosine peptide binding specificity of Nck1 and Nck2 Src homology 2 domains. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 18236-18245.
10. Hu,J. and Hubbard,S.R. (2006) Structural basis for phosphotyrosine recognition by the Src homology-2 domains of the adapter proteins SH2-B and APS. J. Mol. Biol., 361, 69-79.
11. Waksman,G., Shoelson,S.E., Pant,N., Cowburn,D. and Kuriyan,J. (1993) Binding of a high affinity phosphotyrosyl peptide to the Src SH2 domain: crystal structures of the complexed and peptide-free forms. Cell, 72, 779-790.
12. Sheinerman,F.B., Al-Lazikani,B. and Honig,B. (2003) Sequence, structure and energetic determinants of phosphopeptide selectivity of SH2 domains. J. Mol. Biol., 334, 823-841.
13. Henriques,D.A., Ladbury,J.E. and Jackson,R.M. (2000) Comparison of binding energies of SrcSH2-phosphotyrosyl peptides with structure-based prediction using surface area based empirical parameterization. Protein Sci., 9, 1975-1985.
14. Lee,J.K., Moon,T., Chi,M.W., Song,J.S., Choi,Y.S. and Yoon,C.N. (2003) An investigation of phosphopeptide binding to SH2 domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 306, 225-230.
15. McLaughlin,W.A., Hou,T. and Wang,W. (2006) Prediction of binding sites of peptide recognition domains: An application on Grb2 and SAP SH2 domains. J. Mol. Biol., 357, 1322-1334.
16. Suenaga,A., Hatakeyama,M., Ichikawa,M., Yu,X., Futatsugi,N., Narumi,T., Fukui,K., Terada,T., Taiji,M., Shirouzu,M. et al. (2003) Molecular dynamics, free energy, and SPR analyses of the interactions between the SH2 domain of Grb2 and ErbB phosphotyrosyl peptides. Biochemistry, 42, 5195-5200.
17. Sanchez,I.E., Beltrao,P., Stricher,F., Schymkowitz,J., Ferkinghoff-Borg,J., Rousseau,F. and Serrano,L. (2008) Genome-wide prediction of SH2 domain targets using structural information and the FoldX algorithm. PLoS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000052.
18. Ferraro,E., Via,A., Ausiello,G. and Helmer-Citterich,M. (2006) A novel structure-based encoding for machine-learning applied to the inference of SH3 domain specificity. Bioinformatics, 22, 2333-2339.
19. Zhang,L., Shao,C., Zheng,D. and Gao,Y. (2006) An integrated machine learning system to computationally screen protein databases for protein binding peptide ligands. Mol. Cell Proteomics, 5, 1224-1232.
20. Chen,J.R., Chang,B.H., Allen,J.E., Stiffler,M.A. and MacBeath,G. (2008) Predicting PDZ domain-peptide interactions from primary sequences. Nat. Biotechnol., 26, 1041-1045.
21. Kolesov,G. and Mirny,L.A. (2009) In McDermott,J., Samudrala,R., Bumgarner,R., Montgomery,K. and Ireton,R. (eds), Computational Systems Biology. Vol. 541, Springer, New York.
22. Moult,J. (2005) A decade of CASP: Progress, bottlenecks and prognosis in protein structure prediction. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 15, 285-289.
23. Lehrach,W.P., Husmeier,D. and Williams,C.K. (2006) A regularized discriminative model for the prediction of protein-peptide interactions. Bioinformatics, 22, 532-540.
24. Obenauer,J.C., Cantley,L.C. and Yaffe,M.B. (2003) Scansite 2.0: proteome-wide prediction of cell signaling interactions using short sequence motifs. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3635-3641.
25. Reiss,D.J. and Schwikowski,B. (2004) Predicting protein-peptide interactions via a network-based motif sampler. Bioinformatics, 20(Suppl 1), i274-i282.
26. Wiedemann,U., Boisguerin,P., Leben,R., Leitner,D., Krause,G., Moelling,K., Volkmer-Engert,R. and Oschkinat,H. (2004) Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. J. Mol. Biol., 343, 703-718.
27. Deeds,E.J., Ashenberg,O. and Shakhnovich,E.I. (2006) A simple physical model for scaling in protein-protein interaction networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 103, 311-316.
28. Altuvia,Y. and Margalit,H. (2004) A structure-based approach for prediction of MHC-binding peptides. Methods, 34, 454-459.
29. Altuvia,Y., Schueler,O. and Margalit,H. (1995) Ranking potential binding peptides to MHC molecules by a computational threading approach. J. Mol. Biol., 249, 244-250.
30. Lundegaard,C., Lund,O., Kesmir,C., Brunak,S. and Nielsen,M. (2007) Modeling the adaptive immune system: Predictions and simulations. Bioinformatics, 23, 3265-3275.
31. Donald,J.E., Chen,W.W. and Shakhnovich,E.I. (2007) Energetics of protein-DNA interactions. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, 1039-1047.
32. Endres,R.G., Schulthess,T.C. and Wingreen,N.S. (2004) Toward an atomistic model for predicting transcription-factor binding sites. Proteins, 57, 262-268.
33. Havranek,J.J., Duarte,C.M. and Baker,D. (2004) A simple physical model for the prediction and design of protein-DNA interactions. J. Mol. Biol., 344, 59-70.
34. Morozov,A.V., Havranek,J.J., Baker,D. and Siggia,E.D. (2005) Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 5781-5798.
35. Liu,L.A. and Bader,J.S. (2007) Ab initio prediction of transcription factor binding sites. Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 484-495.
36. Mandel-Gutfreund,Y. and Margalit,H. (1998) Quantitative parameters for amino acid-base interaction: Implications for prediction of protein-DNA binding sites. Nucleic Acids Res., 26, 2306-2312.
37. Kinney,J.B., Tkacik,G. and Callan,C.G. Jr. (2007) Precise physical models of protein-DNA interaction from high-throughput data. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 501-506.
38. Kaplan,T., Friedman,N. and Margalit,H. (2005) Ab initio prediction of transcription factor targets using structural knowledge. PLoS Comput. Biol., 1, e1.
39. Edgar,R.C. (2004) MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, 1792-1797.
40. Berman,H.M., Westbrook,J., Feng,Z., Gilliland,G., Bhat,T.N., Weissig,H., Shindyalov,I.N. and Bourne,P.E. (2000) The Protein Data Bank. Nucleic Acids Res., 28, 235-242.
41. Murzin,A.G., Brenner,S.E., Hubbard,T. and Chothia,C. (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J. Mol. Biol., 247, 536-540.
42. Sayle,R.A. and Milner-White,E.J. (1995) RASMOL: Biomolecular graphics for all. Trends Biochem. Sci., 20, 374.
43. Mirny,L.A. and Shakhnovich,E.I. (1996) How to derive a protein folding potential? A new approach to an old problem. J. Mol. Biol., 264 1164-1179.
44. Goldstein,R.A., Luthey-Schulten,Z.A. and Wolynes,P.G. (1992) Protein tertiary structure recognition using optimized Hamiltonians with local interactions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 89, 9029-9033.
45. Djordjevic,M., Sengupta,A.M. and Shraiman,B.I. (2003) A biophysical approach to transcription factor binding site discovery. Genome Res. 13, 2381-2390.
46. Vendruscolo,M. and Domany,E. (1998) Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J. Chem. Phys., 109, 11101-11108.
47. Vendruscolo,M., Mirny,L.A., Shakhnovich,E.I. and Domany,E. (2000) Comparison of two optimization methods to derive energy parameters for protein folding: Perceptron and Z score. Proteins, 41, 192-201.
48. Pazos,F., Helmer-Citterich,M., Ausiello,G. and Valencia,A. (1997) Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. J. Mol. Biol., 271, 511-523.
49. Miyazawa,S. and Jernigan,R.L. (1999) Self-consistent estimation of inter-residue protein contact energies based on an equilibrium mixture approximation of residues. Proteins, 34, 49-68.
50. Grucza,R.A., Bradshaw,J.M., Mitaxov,V. and Waksman,G. (2000) Role of electrostatic interactions in SH2 domain recognition: Salt-dependence of tyrosyl-phosphorylated peptide binding to the tandem SH2 domain of the Syk kinase and the single SH2 domain of the Src kinase. Biochemistry 39, 10072-10081.
51. Songyang,Z., Shoelson,S.E., Chaudhuri,M., Gish,G., Pawson,T., Haser,W.G., King,F., Roberts,T., Ratnofsky,S., Lechleider,R.J. et al. (1993) SH2 domains recognize specific phosphopeptide sequences. Cell, 72, 767-778.
52. Kuriyan,J. and Cowburn,D. (1997) Modular peptide recognition domains in eukaryotic signaling. Ann. Rev. Biophy. Biomol. Struct., 26, 259.
53. Vendruscolo,M. and Domany,E. (1998) Pairwise contact potentials are unsuitable for protein folding. J. Chem. Phy., 109, 11101-11108.
54. Bock,J.R. and Gough,D.A. (2001) Predicting protein - protein interactions from primary structure. Bioinformatics, 17, 455-460.
55. Gomez,S.M., Noble,W.S. and Rzhetsky,A. (2003) Learning to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Bioinformatics 19, 1875-1881.
56. Li,X., Zhong,S. and Wong,W.H. (2005) Reliable prediction of transcription factor binding sites by phylogenetic verification. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 102, 16945-16950.
57. Liu,B.A., Jablonowski,K., Raina,M., Arce,M., Pawson,T. and Nash,P.D. (2006) The human and mouse complement of SH2 domain proteins-establishing the boundaries of phosphotyrosine signaling. Mol. Cell, 22, 851-868.
58. Diella,F., Gould,C.M., Chica,C., Via,A. and Gibson,T.J. (2008) Phospho.ELM: A database of phosphorylation sites - update 2008. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, D240-D244.
59. Stiffler,M.A., Chen,J.R., Grantcharova,V.P., Lei,Y., Fuchs,D., Allen,J.E., Zaslavskaia,L.A. and MacBeath,G. (2007) PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science, 317, 364-369.
60. Poy,F., Yaffe,M.B., Sayos,J., Saxena,K., Morra,M., Sumegi,J., Cantley,L.C., Terhorst,C. and Eck,M.J. (1999) Crystal structures of the XLP protein SAP reveal a class of SH2 domains with extended, phosphotyrosine-independent sequence recognition. Mol. Cell, 4 555-561.
61. DeLano,W.L. (2007) MacPyMOL: A PyMOL-based molecular graphics application for MacOS X. DeLano Scientific LLC, Palo Alto, CA.