Protein design with fragment databases

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 452-459

  Verschueren, Erik ^a   Vanhee, Peter ^b,c   van der Sloot, Almer M ^a   Serrano, Luis ^a,d   Rousseau, Frederic ^b,c   Schymkowitz, Joost ^b,c  

^a CENTRE FOR GENOMIC REGULATION CRG   (Spain)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^c VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

ACCURACY; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; PDZ DOMAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 80052089195     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: 1879033X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. Nair R., Liu J., Soong T.-T., Acton T.B., Everett J.K., Kouranov A., Fiser A., Godzik A., Jaroszewski L., Orengo C., et al. Structural genomics is the largest contributor of novel structural leverage. J Struct Funct Genomics 2009, 10:181-191.
2. Prieto C., De Las Rivas J. Structural domain-domain interactions: assessment and comparison with protein-protein interaction data to improve the interactome. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2010, 78:109-117.
3. Potapov V., Cohen M., Schreiber G. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details. Protein Eng Des Sel: PEDS 2009, 22:553-560.
4. Vanhee P., van der Sloot A.M., Verschueren E., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. Computational design of peptide ligands. Trends Biotechnol 2011, 1-9.
5. Poole A.M., Ranganathan R. Knowledge-based potentials in protein design. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006, 16:508-513.
6. Dunbrack R.L. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002, 12:431-440.
7. Lovell S.C., Word J.M., Richardson J.S., Richardson D.C. The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 2000, 40:389-408.
8. Krivov G.G., Shapovalov M.V., Dunbrack R.L. Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4. Proteins 2009, 77:778-795.
9. Porter C.T., Bartlett G.J., Thornton J.M. The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:D129-133.
10. Vanhee P., Verschueren E., Baeten L., Stricher F., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. BriX: a database of protein building blocks for structural analysis, modeling and design. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 39:D435-D442.
11. Vanhee P., Stricher F., Baeten L., Verschueren E., Lenaerts T., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. Struct/Fold Des 2009, 17:1128-1136.
12. Andreeva A., Howorth D., Chandonia J.M., Brenner S.E., Hubbard T.J., Chothia C., Murzin A.G. Data growth and its impact on the SCOP database: new developments. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:D419-425.
13. Stein A., Ceol A., Aloy P. 3did: identification and classification of domain-based interactions of known three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 39:D718-D723.
14. Simons K.T., Kooperberg C., Huang E., Baker D. Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and Bayesian scoring functions. J Mol Biol 1997, 268:209-225.
15. Baeten L., Reumers J., Tur V., Stricher F., Lenaerts T., Serrano L., Rousseau F., Schymkowitz J. Reconstruction of protein backbones from the BriX collection of canonical protein fragments. PLoS Comput Biol 2008, 4:e1000083.
16. Le Q., Pollastri G., Koehl P. Structural alphabets for protein structure classification: a comparison study. J Mol Biol 2009, 387:431-450.
17. Budowski-Tal I., Nov Y., Kolodny R. FragBag, an accurate representation of protein structure, retrieves structural neighbors from the entire PDB quickly and accurately. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 107:3481-3486.
18. Fernandez-Fuentes N., Dybas J.M., Fiser A. Structural characteristics of novel protein folds. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000750.
19. Fernandez-Fuentes N., Oliva B., Fiser A. A supersecondary structure library and search algorithm for modeling loops in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2006, 34:2085-2097.
20. Hildebrand P.W., Goede A., Bauer R.A., Gruening B., Ismer J., Michalsky E., Preissner R. SuperLooper-a prediction server for the modeling of loops in globular and membrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:W571-574.
21. Harrington S.E., Ben-Tal N. Structural Determinants of Transmembrane Helical Proteins. Struct/Fold Des 2009, 17:1092-1103.
22. Grigoryan G., DeGrado W.F. Probing designability via a generalized model of helical bundle geometry. J Mol Biol 2011, 405:1079-1100.
23. Testa O.D., Moutevelis E., Woolfson D.N. CC+: a relational database of coiled-coil structures. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D315-322.
24. Tuncbag N., Gursoy A., Guney E., Nussinov R., Keskin O. Architectures and functional coverage of protein-protein interfaces. J Mol Biol 2008, 381:785-802.
25. Best R.B., Lindorff-Larsen K., DePristo M.A., Vendruscolo M. Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006, 103:10901-10906.
26. Friedland G.D., Kortemme T. Designing ensembles in conformational and sequence space to characterize and engineer proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2010, 20:377-384.
27. Mandell D.J., Kortemme T. Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 1-9.
28. Lauck F., Smith C.A., Friedland G.F., Humphris E.L., Kortemme T. RosettaBackrub-a web server for flexible backbone protein structure modeling and design. Nucleic Acids Rese 2010, 38:W569-W575.
29. Davis I.W., Arendall W.B., Richardson D.C., Richardson J.S. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 2006, 14:265-274.
30. Lo A., Cheng C.W., Chiu Y.Y., Sung T.Y., Hsu W.L. TMPad: an integrated structural database for helix-packing folds in transmembrane proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 39:D347-D355.
31. Chandonia J.-M., Hon G., Walker N.S., Lo Conte L., Koehl P., Levitt M., Brenner S.E. The ASTRAL compendium in 2004. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:D189-192.
32. Choi Y., Deane C.M. FREAD revisited: accurate loop structure prediction using a database search algorithm. Proteins 2010, 78:1431-1440.
33. Mandell D.J., Coutsias E.A., Kortemme T. Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nat Methods 2009, 6:551-552.
34. Vanhee P, Van Durme J, Baeten L, Verschueren E, Rousseau F, Stricher F, Serrano L, Schymkowitz J: Fast and accurate prediction of loop structure and dynamics.
35. van der Kamp M.W., Schaeffer R.D., Jonsson A.L., Scouras A.D., Simms A.M., Toofanny R.D., Benson N.C., Anderson P.C., Merkley E.D., Rysavy S., et al. Dynameomics: a comprehensive database of protein dynamics. Struct/Fold Des 2010, 18:423-435.
36. Petsalaki E., Stark A., García-Urdiales E., Russell R.B. Accurate prediction of peptide binding sites on protein surfaces. PLoS Computat Biol 2009, 5:e1000335.
37. Stein A., Aloy P. Novel peptide-mediated interactions derived from high-resolution 3-dimensional structures. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000789.
38. London N., Movshovitz-Attias D., Schueler-Furman O. The structural basis of peptide-protein binding strategies. Structure 2010, 18:188-199.
39. London N., Raveh B., Movshovitz-Attias D., Schueler-Furman O. Can self-inhibitory peptides be derived from the interfaces of globular protein-protein interactions?. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinform 2010, 78:3140-3149.
40. Vanhee P., Reumers J., Stricher F., Baeten L., Serrano L., Schymkowitz J., Rousseau F. PepX: a structural database of non-redundant protein-peptide complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 38:D545-D551.
41. Siegel J.B., Zanghellini A., Lovick H.M., Kiss G., Lambert A.R., St Clair J.L., Gallaher J.L., Hilvert D., Gelb M.H., Stoddard B.L., et al. Computational design of an enzyme catalyst for a stereoselective bimolecular Diels-Alder reaction. Science 2010, 329:309-313.
42. Zanghellini A., Jiang L., Wollacott A.M., Cheng G., Meiler J., Althoff E.A., Rothlisberger D., Baker D. New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci: Publ Protein Soc 2006, 15:2785-2794.
43. Potapov V., Reichmann D., Abramovich R., Filchtinski D., Zohar N., Ben Halevy D., Edelman M., Sobolev V., Schreiber G. Computational redesign of a protein-protein interface for high affinity and binding specificity using modular architecture and naturally occurring template fragments. J Mol Biol 2008, 384:109-119.
44. Stiffler M.A., Chen J.R., Grantcharova V.P., Lei Y., Fuchs D., Allen J.E., Zaslavskaia L.A., MacBeath G. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 2007, 317:364-369.
45. Tonikian R., Zhang Y., Sazinsky S.L., Currell B., Yeh J.-H., Reva B., Held H.A., Appleton B.A., Evangelista M., Wu Y., et al. A specificity map for the PDZ domain family. PLoS Biol 2008, 6:e239.
46. Smith C.A., Kortemme T. Structure-based prediction of the peptide sequence space recognized by natural and synthetic PDZ domains. J Mol Biol 2010, 402:460-474.
47. Gfeller D., Butty F., Wierzbicka M., Verschueren E., Vanhee P., Huang H., Ernst A., Dar N., Stagljar I., Serrano L., et al. The multiple-specificity landscape of modular peptide recognition domains. Mol Syst Biol 2011, 7:484-495.
48. Fiorentini M., Nielsen A.K., Kristensen O., Kastrup J.S., Gajhede M. Structure of the first PDZ domain of human PSD-93. Acta Crystallogr Sect F, Struct Biol Cryst Commun 2009, 65:1254-1257.
49. Schymkowitz J., Borg J., Stricher F., Nys R., Rousseau F., Serrano L. The FoldX web server: an online force field. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:W382-388.
50. Verschueren E, Vanhee P, Serrano L, Rousseau F, Schymkowitz S: Peptide structure prediction with protein architectures.
51. Grigoryan G., Reinke A.W., Keating A.E. Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. Nature 2009, 458:859-864.
52. Tendulkar A.V., Krallinger M., de la Torre V., Lopez G., Wangikar P.P., Valencia A. FragKB: structural and literature annotation resource of conserved peptide fragments and residues. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e9679.
53. Berkholz D.S., Krenesky P.B., Davidson J.R., Karplus P.A. Protein Geometry Database: a flexible engine to explore backbone conformations and their relationships to covalent geometry. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 38:D320-D325.
54. Golovin A., Henrick K. MSDmotif: exploring protein sites and motifs. BMC Bioinform 2008, 9:312.
55. Velankar S., Alhroub Y., Alili A., Best C., Boutselakis H.C., Caboche S., Conroy M.J., Dana J.M., van Ginkel G., Golovin A., et al. PDBe: Protein Data Bank in Europe. Nucleic Acids Res 2011, 39:D402-410.
56. Samson A.O., Levitt M. Protein segment finder: an online search engine for segment motifs in the PDB. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D224-D228.
57. Pavelka A., Chovancova E., Damborsky J. HotSpot Wizard: a web server for identification of hot spots in protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:W376-W383.