Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides

Nature

Volumn 458, Issue 7240, 2009, Pages 859-864

  Grigoryan, Gevorg ^a,b   Reinke, Aaron W ^a   Keating, Amy E ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 2; ACTIVATING TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; LEUCINE ZIPPER PROTEIN; PROTEIN C FOS; PROTEIN C JUN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR AP 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR C MAF; X BOX BINDING PROTEIN 1;

LIGAND; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN; TRADE-OFF;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BIOLOGY; ONCOGENE C FOS; ONCOGENE C JUN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN MICROARRAY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY;

AMINO ACID MOTIFS; BASIC-LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DRUG DESIGN; HUMANS; LEUCINE ZIPPERS; PROTEIN ARRAY ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 65249171530     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature07885     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Stiffler, M. A. et al. PDZ domain binding selectivity is optimized across the mouse proteome. Science 317, 364-369 (2007).
2. Jones, R. B., Gordus, A., Krall, J. A. & MacBeath, G. A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature 439, 168-174 (2006).
3. Wiedemann, U. et al. Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. J. Mol. Biol. 343, 703-718 (2004).
4. Newman, J. R. & Keating, A. E. Comprehensive identification of human bZIP interactions with coiled-coil arrays. Science 300, 2097-2101 (2003).
5. Landgraf, C. et al. Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol. 2, E14 (2004).
6. Skerker, J. M., Prasol, M. S., Perchuk, B. S., Biondi, E. G. & Laub, M. T. Twocomponent signal transduction pathways regulating growth and cell cycle progression in a bacterium: a system-level analysis, PLoS Biol. 3, e334 (2005).
7. Havranek, J. J. & Harbury, P. B. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nature Struct. Biol. 10, 45-52 (2003).
8. Kortemme, T. et al. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 11, 371-379 (2004).
9. All, M. H. et al. Design of a heterospecific, tetrameric, 21-residue miniprotein with mixed α/β structure. Structure 13, 225-234 (2005).
10. van der Sloot, A. M. et al. Designed tumor necrosis factor-related apoptoslsinducing ligand variants initiating apoptosis exclusively via the DR5 receptor. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8634-8639 (2006).
11. Yin, H. et al. Computational design of peptides that target transmembrane helices. Science 315, 1817-1822 (2007).
12. Reina, J. et al. Computer-aided design of a PDZ domain to recognize new target sequences. Nature Struct. Biol. 9, 621-627 (2002).
13. Shifman, J. M. & Mayo, S. L. Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13274-13279 (2003).
14. Fu, X., Apgar, J. R. & Keating, A. E. Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel α-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. J. Mol. Biol. 371, 1099-1117 (2007).
15. Bolon, D. N., Grant, R. A., Baker, T. A. & Sauer, R. T. Specificity versus stability in computational protein design. Proc. NatlAcad. Sci. USA 102, 12724-12729 (2005).
16. Kangas, E. & Tidor, B. Electrostatic specificity in molecular ligand design. J. Comput. Phys. 112, 9120-9131 (2000).
17. Deutsch, J. M. & Kurosky, T. New algorithm for protein design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 323-326 (1996).
18. Mason, J. M., Schmitz, M. A., Muller, K. M. & Arndt, K. M. Semirational design of Jun-Fos coiled coils with increased affinity: universal implications for eucine zipper prediction and design. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 8989-8994 (2006).
19. Vinson, C., Acharya, A. & Taparowsky, E. J. Deciphering B-ZIP transcription factor interactions in vitro and in vivo. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1759, 4-12 (2006).
20. Gerdes, M. J ef at. Activator proteln-1 activity regulates epithelial tumor eel identity. Cancer Res. 66, 7578-7588 (2006).
21. Krylov, D., Olive, M. & Vinson, C. Extending dimerizatlon interfaces: the bZIP basic region can form a coiled coil. EMBO J. 14, 5329-5337 (1995).
22. Acharya, A., Rishi, V. & Vinson, C. Stability of 100 homo and heterotypic coiledcoi a-a' pairs for ten amino acids (A, L, I, V, N, K, S, T, E, and R). Biochemistry 45, 11324-11332 (2006).
23. Krylov, D., Barchi, J. & Vinson, C. Inter-helical interactions in the leucine zipper coiled coil dimer: pH and salt dependence of coupling energy between charged amino acids. J. Mol. Biol. 279, 959-972 (1998).
24. Lupas, A. N. & Gruber, M. The structure of α-helica coiled coils. Adv. Protein Chem. 70, 37-78 (2005).
25. Fong, J. H., Keating, A. E. & Singh, M. Predicting specificity in bZIP coi ed-coi protein interactions. Genome Biol. 5, R11 (2004).
26. Grigoryan, G. & Keating, A. E. Structure-based prediction of bZIP partnering specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 355, 1125-1142 (2006).
27. Kingsford, C. L., Chazelle, B. & Singh, M. Solving and analyzing side-chain positioning problems using linear and integer programming. Bioinformaties 21, 1028-1036 (2005).
28. Grlgoryan, G. et al. Ultra-fast evaluation of protein energies directly from sequence. PLOS Comput. Biol. 2, e63 (2006).
29. Zhou, F. et al. Coarse-graining protein energetics in sequence variab es. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 148103 (2005).
30. Mason, J. M., Muller, K. M. & Arndt, K. M. Positive aspects of negative design: simultaneous selection of specificity and interaction stability. Biochemistry 46, 4804-4814 (2007).
31. Hadley, E. B., Testa, O. D., Woolfson, D. N. & Gellman, S. H. Preferred side-chain constellations at antiparallel coiled-coil interfaces. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 530-535 (2008).
32. Apgar, J. R., Hahn, S., Grigoryan, G. & Keating, A. E. Cluster-expansion models flexible-backbone protein energetics, J. Comput. Chem. (in the press).
33. Sanchez, I. E. et al. Genome-wide prediction of SH2 domain targets using structura information and the FoldX algorithm. PLOS Comput. Biol. 4, e1000052 (2008).
34. Kaplan, T., Friedman, N. & Margalit, H. Ab initio prediction of transcription factor targets using structural knowledge. PLOS Comput. Biol. 1, el (2005).
35. Boas, F. E. & Harbury, P. B. Potential energy functions for protein design. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17, 199-204 (2007).
36. Das, R. & Baker, D. Macromolecular modeling with ROSETTA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 77, 363-382 (2008).
37. Zhou, H. & Zhou, Y. Distance-scaled, finite ideal-gas reference state improves structure-derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction. Protein Sci. 11, 2714-2726 (2002).
38. Hoover, D. M. & Lubkowski, J. DNAWorks: an automated method for designing oligonucleotides for PCR-based gene synthesis, Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e43 (2002).