Designing ensembles in conformational and sequence space to characterize and engineer proteins

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 377-384

  Friedland, Gregory D ^a,b   Kortemme, Tanja ^c  

^a JOINT BIOENERGY INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SANDIA NATIONAL LABORATORIES   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BASIC LEUCINE ZIPPER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; BETA LACTAMASE; DNA; MYOGLOBIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE SYNTHESIS; GENE TECHNOLOGY; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; HUMANS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN ENGINEERING; PROTEINS;

EID: 77955579347     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2010.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Dahiyat B.I., Mayo S.L. De novo protein design: fully automated sequence selection. Science 1997, 278:82-87.
2. Mandell D.J., Kortemme T. Computer-aided design of functional protein interactions. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5:797-807.
3. Lockless S.W., Ranganathan R. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. Science 1999, 286:295-299.
4. Xia Y., Levitt M. Simulating protein evolution in sequence and structure space. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004, 14:202-207.
5. Bershtein S., Goldin K., Tawfik D.S. Intense neutral drifts yield robust and evolvable consensus proteins. J Mol Biol 2008, 379:1029-1044.
6. Kang S.G., Saven J.G. Computational protein design: structure, function and combinatorial diversity. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2007, 11:329-334.
7. Boehr D.D., Nussinov R., Wright P.E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat Chem Biol 2009, 5:789-796.
8. Tokuriki N., Tawfik D.S. Protein dynamism and evolvability. Science 2009, 324:203-207.
9. Desjarlais J.R., Handel T.M. Side-chain and backbone flexibility in protein core design. J Mol Biol 1999, 290:305-318.
10. Fu X., Apgar J.R., Keating A.E. Modeling backbone flexibility to achieve sequence diversity: the design of novel alpha-helical ligands for Bcl-xL. J Mol Biol 2007, 371:1099-1117.
11. Kuhlman B., Baker D. Native protein sequences are close to optimal for their structures. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:10383-10388.
12. Desmet J., Maeyer M.D., Hazes B., Lasters I. The dead-end elimination theorem and its use in protein side-chain positioning. Nature 1992, 356:539-542.
13. Looger L.L., Hellinga H.W. Generalized dead-end elimination algorithms make large-scale protein side-chain structure prediction tractable: implications for protein design and structural genomics. J Mol Biol 2001, 307:429-445.
14. Shah P.S., Hom G.K., Mayo S.L. Preprocessing of rotamers for protein design calculations. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1797-1800.
15. Georgiev I., Donald B.R. Dead-end elimination with backbone flexibility. Bioinformatics 2007, 23:i185-194.
16. Georgiev I., Lilien R.H., Donald B.R. The minimized dead-end elimination criterion and its application to protein redesign in a hybrid scoring and search algorithm for computing partition functions over molecular ensembles. J Comput Chem 2008, 29:1527-1542.
17. Gordon D.B., Hom G.K., Mayo S.L., Pierce N.A. Exact rotamer optimization for protein design. J Comput Chem 2003, 24:232-243.
18. Treynor T.P., Vizcarra C.L., Nedelcu D., Mayo S.L. Computationally designed libraries of fluorescent proteins evaluated by preservation and diversity of function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007, 104:48-53.
19. Fromer M., Yanover C., Linial M. Design of multispecific protein sequences using probabilistic graphical modeling. Proteins 2009.
20. Ollikainen N., Sentovich E., Coelho C., Kuehlmann A., Kortemme T. SAT-based protein design. International Conference on Computer-Aided Design 2009, 128-135.
21. Larson S.M., England J.L., Desjarlais J.R., Pande V.S. Thoroughly sampling sequence space: large-scale protein design of structural ensembles. Protein Sci 2002, 11:2804-2813.
22. Ding F., Dokholyan N.V. Emergence of protein fold families through rational design. PLoS Comput Biol 2006, 2:e85.
23. Mandell D.J., Kortemme T. Backbone flexibility in computational protein design. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009, 20:420-428.
24. Best R.B., Lindorff-Larsen K., DePristo M.A., Vendruscolo M. Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:10901-10906.
25. Chen Y., Campbell S.L., Dokholyan N.V. Deciphering protein dynamics from NMR data using explicit structure sampling and selection. Biophys J 2007, 93:2300-2306.
26. Kuhlman B., Dantas G., Ireton G.C., Varani G., Stoddard B.L., Baker D. Design of a novel globular protein fold with atomic-level accuracy. Science 2003, 302:1364-1368.
27. Saunders C.T., Baker D. Recapitulation of protein family divergence using flexible backbone protein design. J Mol Biol 2005, 346:631-644.
28. Davis I.W., Arendall W.B., Richardson D.C., Richardson J.S. The backrub motion: how protein backbone shrugs when a sidechain dances. Structure 2006, 14:265-274.
29. Smith C.A., Kortemme T. Backrub-like backbone simulation recapitulates natural protein conformational variability and improves mutant side-chain prediction. J Mol Biol 2008, 380:742-756.
30. Mandell D.J., Coutsias E.A., Kortemme T. Sub-angstrom accuracy in protein loop reconstruction by robotics-inspired conformational sampling. Nat Methods 2009, 6:551-552.
31. Kortemme T., Joachimiak L.A., Bullock A.N., Schuler A.D., Stoddard B.L., Baker D. Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004, 11:371-379.
32. Chevalier B.S., Kortemme T., Chadsey M.S., Baker D., Monnat R.J., Stoddard B.L. Design, activity, and structure of a highly specific artificial endonuclease. Mol Cell 2002, 10:895-905.
33. Grigoryan G., Reinke A.W., Keating A.E. Design of protein-interaction specificity gives selective bZIP-binding peptides. Nature 2009, 458:859-864.
34. Rothlisberger D., Khersonsky O., Wollacott A.M., Jiang L., DeChancie J., Betker J., Gallaher J.L., Althoff E.A., Zanghellini A., Dym O., et al. Kemp elimination catalysts by computational enzyme design. Nature 2008, 453:190-195.
35. Jiang L., Althoff E.A., Clemente F.R., Doyle L., Rothlisberger D., Zanghellini A., Gallaher J.L., Betker J.L., Tanaka F., Barbas C.F., et al. De novo computational design of retro-aldol enzymes. Science 2008, 319:1387-1391.
36. Xiang Z., Honig B. Extending the accuracy limits of prediction for side-chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2001, 311:421-430.
37. Liang S., Grishin N.V. Side-chain modeling with an optimized scoring function. Protein Sci 2002, 11:322-331.
38. Lu M., Dousis A.D., Ma J. OPUS-Rota: a fast and accurate method for side-chain modeling. Protein Sci 2008, 17:1576-1585.
39. Peterson R.W., Dutton P.L., Wand A.J. Improved side-chain prediction accuracy using an ab initio potential energy function and a very large rotamer library. Protein Sci 2004, 13:735-751.
40. Friedland G.D., Linares A.J., Smith C.A., Kortemme T. A simple model of backbone flexibility improves modeling of side-chain conformational variability. J Mol Biol 2008, 380:757-774.
41. Friedland G.D., Lakomek N.A., Griesinger C., Meiler J., Kortemme T. A correspondence between solution-state dynamics of an individual protein and the sequence and conformational diversity of its family. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000393.
42. Kortemme T., Baker D. A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein-protein complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002, 99:14116-14121.
43. Guerois R., Nielsen J.E., Serrano L. Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations. J Mol Biol 2002, 320:369-387.
44. Yin S., Ding F., Dokholyan N.V. Modeling backbone flexibility improves protein stability estimation. Structure 2007, 15:1567-1576.
45. Benedix A., Becker C.M., de Groot B.L., Caflisch A., Bockmann R.A. Predicting free energy changes using structural ensembles. Nat Methods 2009, 6:3-4.
46. Humphris E.L., Kortemme T. Prediction of protein-protein interface sequence diversity using flexible backbone computational protein design. Structure 2008, 16:1777-1788.
47. Grigoryan G., Keating A.E. Structure-based prediction of bZIP partnering specificity. J Mol Biol 2006, 355:1125-1142.
48. Morozov A.V., Havranek J.J., Baker D., Siggia E.D. Protein-DNA binding specificity predictions with structural models. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33:5781-5798.
49. Havranek J.J., Duarte C.M., Baker D. A simple physical model for the prediction and design of protein-DNA interactions. J Mol Biol 2004, 344:59-70.
50. Ashworth J., Baker D. Assessment of the optimization of affinity and specificity at protein-DNA interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:e73.
51. Maerkl S.J., Quake S.R. Experimental determination of the evolvability of a transcription factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:18650-18655.
52. Zanghellini A., Jiang L., Wollacott A.M., Cheng G., Meiler J., Althoff E.A., Rothlisberger D., Baker D. New algorithms and an in silico benchmark for computational enzyme design. Protein Sci 2006, 15:2785-2794.
53. Elber R., Karplus M. Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. Science 1987, 235:318-321.
54. Lange O.F., Lakomek N.A., Fares C., Schroder G.F., Walter K.F., Becker S., Meiler J., Grubmuller H., Griesinger C., de Groot B.L. Recognition dynamics up to microseconds revealed from an RDC-derived ubiquitin ensemble in solution. Science 2008, 320:1471-1475.
55. Havranek J.J., Harbury P.B. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition. Nat Struct Biol 2003, 10:45-52.
56. Ambroggio X.I., Kuhlman B. Computational design of a single amino acid sequence that can switch between two distinct protein folds. J Am Chem Soc 2006, 128:1154-1161.
57. Humphris E.L., Kortemme T. Design of multi-specificity in protein interfaces. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e164.
58. Socolich M., Lockless S.W., Russ W.P., Lee H., Gardner K.H., Ranganathan R. Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold. Nature 2005, 437:512-518.
59. Russ W.P., Lowery D.M., Mishra P., Yaffe M.B., Ranganathan R. Natural-like function in artificial WW domains. Nature 2005, 437:579-583.
60. Pal G., Kouadio J.L., Artis D.R., Kossiakoff A.A., Sidhu S.S. Comprehensive and quantitative mapping of energy landscapes for protein-protein interactions by rapid combinatorial scanning. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:22378-22385.
61. Tokuriki N., Tawfik D.S. Stability effects of mutations and protein evolvability. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009, 19:596-604.
62. Mena M.A., Treynor T.P., Mayo S.L., Daugherty P.S. Blue fluorescent proteins with enhanced brightness and photostability from a structurally targeted library. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24:1569-1571.
63. Meyer M.M., Hochrein L., Arnold F.H. Structure-guided SCHEMA recombination of distantly related beta-lactamases. Protein Eng Des Sel 2006, 19:563-570.
64. Heinzelman P., Snow C.D., Wu I., Nguyen C., Villalobos A., Govindarajan S., Minshull J., Arnold F.H. A family of thermostable fungal cellulases created by structure-guided recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009, 106:5610-5615.
65. Cox J.C., Lape J., Sayed M.A., Hellinga H.W. Protein fabrication automation. Protein Sci 2007, 16:379-390.
66. Fraser J.S., Clarkson M.W., Degnan S.C., Erion R., Kern D., Alber T. Hidden alternative structures of proline isomerase essential for catalysis. Nature 2009, 462:669-673.
67. Wang H.H., Isaacs F.J., Carr P.A., Sun Z.Z., Xu G., Forest C.R., Church G.M. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 2009, 460:894-898.