Nuclear mechanics in disease

Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue , 2011, Pages 397-428

  Zwerger, Monika ^a   Ho, Chin Yee ^a   Lammerding, Jan ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Biophysics; Cancer; Lamins; Migration; Muscular dystrophy; Nucleus

Indexed keywords

CANCER; LAMINS; MIGRATION; MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; NUCLEUS;

BIOMECHANICS;

DISEASES;

DNA; LAMIN B; LAMININ; NESPRIN; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PROGERIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

AGING; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CANCER CELL; CANCER GENETICS; CANCER GROWTH; CELL ACTIVITY; CELL AGING; CELL COMPOSITION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL ENCAPSULATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MATURATION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS INCLUSION BODY; CELL NUCLEUS MEMBRANE; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRUCTURE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME; CONGESTIVE CARDIOMYOPATHY; CYTOSKELETON; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM CANCER; DISEASE ACTIVITY; DISEASE COURSE; DNA REPAIR; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE MUTATION; GRANULOPOIESIS; HUMAN; INTRANUCLEAR SPACE; LAMINOPATHY; LEUKEMIA; LEUKOCYTE DISORDER; LUNG CANCER; LYMPHOMA; MECHANICAL STRESS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MUSCLE FUNCTION; MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY; NEOPLASM; NERVE CELL; NEUROMUSCULAR SYNAPSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MECHANICS; NUCLEOLUS; OVARY CANCER; PHOSPHOLIPID BILAYER; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PREMATURE AGING; PROGERIA; PROMYELOCYTIC LEUKEMIA; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN MOTIF; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SKIN CANCER; SMOOTH MUSCLE FIBER; STOMACH CARCINOMA; THALAMUS INTRALAMINAR NUCLEUS; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; DISEASE; HUMANS; NUCLEAR LAMINA; NUCLEAR PROTEINS;

EID: 79960476819     PISSN: 15239829     EISSN: 15454274     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071910-124736     Document Type: Article

References (246)

1. Dahl KN, Kahn SM, Wilson KL,Discher DE. 2004. The nuclear envelope lamina network has elasticity and a compressibility limit suggestive of a molecular shock absorber. J. Cell Sci. 117:4779-86
2. Lammerding J, Schulze PC,Takahashi T, Kozlov S, Sullivan T, et al. 2004. Lamin A/C deficiency causes defective nuclear mechanics and mechanotransduction. J. Clin. Investig. 113:370-78 (Pubitemid 38544181)
3. Naetar N, Korbei B, Kozlov S, Kerenyi MA,DornerD, et al. 2008. Loss of nucleoplasmic LAP2α-lamin A complexes causes erythroid and epidermal progenitor hyperproliferation. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:1341-48
4. Zastrow MS, Vlcek S, Wilson KL. 2004. Proteins that bind A-type lamins: integrating isolated clues. J. Cell Sci. 117:979-87 (Pubitemid 38456080)
5. Gonźalez JM, Navarro-Puche A, Casar B, Crespo P, Andŕes V. 2008. Fast regulation of AP-1 activity through interaction of lamin A/C, ERK1/2, and c-Fos at the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 183:653-66
6. Johnson BR,Nitta RT, Frock RL,Mounkes L, Barbie DA, et al. 2004. A-type lamins regulate retinoblastoma protein function by promoting subnuclear localization and preventing proteasomal degradation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:9677-82
7. Wilson KL, Foisner R. 2010. Lamin-binding proteins. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:a000554
8. Mekhail K, Moazed D. 2010. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:317-28
9. Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. 2007. Cell biology: chromosome territories. Nature 445:379-81
10. Towbin BD, Meister P, Gasser SM. 2009. The nuclear envelope-a scaffold for silencing? Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 19:180-86
11. Chancellor TJ, Lee J, Thodeti CK, Lele T. 2010. Actomyosin tension exerted on the nucleus through nesprin-1 connections influences endothelial cell adhesion, migration, and cyclic strain-induced reorientation. Biophys. J. 99:115-23
12. Hale CM, Shrestha AL, Khatau SB, Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, Hernandez L, et al. 2008. Dysfunctional connections between the nucleus and the actin andmicrotubule networks in laminopathic models. Biophys. J. 95:5462-75
13. Stewart CL, Roux KJ, Burke B. 2007. Blurring the boundary: the nuclear envelope extends its reach. Science 318:1408-12
14. Worman HJ, Fong LG, Muchir A, Young SG. 2009. Laminopathies and the long strange trip from basic cell biology to therapy. J. Clin. Investig. 119:1825-36
15. Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Herrmann H, Aebi U. 2008. Towards an integrated understanding of the structure and mechanics of the cell nucleus. BioEssays 30:226-36 (Pubitemid 351341127)
16. Moroianu J. 1999. Nuclear import and export pathways. J. Cell. Biochem. 32-33(Suppl.):76-83 (Pubitemid 30041813)
17. Schirmer EC, Florens L, Guan T, Yates JR 3rd, Gerace L. 2003. Nuclear membrane proteins with potential disease links found by subtractive proteomics. Science 301:1380-82
18. Dauer WT, Worman HJ. 2009. The nuclear envelope as a signaling node in development and disease. Dev. Cell 17:626-38
19. Ostlund C, Folker ES, Choi JC, Gomes ER, Gundersen GG, Worman HJ. 2009. Dynamics and molecular interactions of linker of nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton (LINC) complex proteins. J. Cell Sci. 122:4099-108
20. Luxton GW, Gomes ER, Folker ES, Vintinner E, Gundersen GG. 2010. Linear arrays of nuclear envelope proteins harness retrograde actin flow for nuclear movement. Science 329:956-59
21. Vaughan A, Alvarez-ReyesM, Bridger JM, Broers JL, Ramaekers FC, et al. 2001. Both emerin and lamin C depend on lamin A for localization at the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Sci. 114:2577-90
22. Stewart C, Burke B. 1987. Teratocarcinoma stem cells and early mouse embryos contain only a single major lamin polypeptide closely resembling lamin B. Cell 51:383-92
23. Sullivan T, Escalante-AlcaldeD, Bhatt H, Anver M, Bhat N, et al. 1999. Loss of A-type lamin expression compromises nuclear envelope integrity leading to muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 147:913-20
24. Padiath QS, Saigoh K, Schiffmann R, Asahara H, Yamada T, et al. 2006. Lamin B1 duplications cause autosomal dominant leukodystrophy. Nat. Genet. 38:1114-23
25. Brussino A, Vaula G, Cagnoli C, Mauro A, Pradotto L, et al. 2009. A novel family with lamin B1 duplication associated with adult-onset leucoencephalopathy. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80:237-40
26. Vergnes LPM, Bergo MO, Young SG, Reue K. 2004. Lamin B1 is required for mouse development and nuclear integrity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10428-33 (Pubitemid 38924942)
27. Coffinier C, Chang SY, NobumoriC,TuY, FarberEA, et al. 2010. Abnormal development of the cerebral cortex and cerebellum in the setting of lamin B2 deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:5076-81
28. Vergnes L, Peterfy M, Bergo MO, Young SG, Reue K. 2004. Lamin B1 is required for mouse development and nuclear integrity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:10428-33 (Pubitemid 38924942)
29. Harborth J, Elbashir SM, Bechert K, Tuschl T, Weber K. 2001. Identification of essential genes in cultured mammalian cells using small interfering RNAs. J. Cell Sci. 114:4557-65
30. Shimi T, Pfleghaar K, Kojima S, Pack CG, Solovei I, et al. 2008. The A-and B-type nuclear lamin networks: microdomains involved in chromatin organization and transcription. Genes Dev. 22:3409-21
31. Broers JL, Bronnenberg NM, Kuijpers HJ, Schutte B, Hutchison CJ, Ramaekers FC. 2002. Partial cleavage ofA-type lamins concurs with their total disintegration from the nuclear lamina during apoptosis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 81:677-91 (Pubitemid 36104763)
32. Moir RD, Yoon M, Khuon S, Goldman RD. 2000. Nuclear lamins A and B1: different pathways of assembly during nuclear envelope formation in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 151:1155-68
33. Aebi U, Cohn J, Buhle L, Gerace L. 1986. The nuclear lamina is a meshwork of intermediate-type filaments. Nature 323:560-64 (Pubitemid 16025383)
34. Goldberg MW,Huttenlauch I, Hutchison CJ, Stick R. 2008. Filaments made from A-and B-type lamins differ in structure and organization. J. Cell Sci. 121:215-25 (Pubitemid 351228454)
35. Scaffidi P, Misteli T. 2006. Lamin A-dependent nuclear defects in human aging. Science 312:1059-63
36. Dahl KN, Scaffidi P, Islam MF, Yodh AG, Wilson KL, Misteli T. 2006. Distinct structural and mechanical properties of the nuclear lamina in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:10271-76 (Pubitemid 44051156)
37. Lammerding J, Fong LG, Ji JY, Reue K, Stewart CL, et al. 2006. Lamins A and C but not lamin B1 regulate nuclear mechanics. J. Biol. Chem. 281:25768-80 (Pubitemid 44401965)
38. Broers JL, Kuijpers HJ, Ostlund C, Worman HJ, Endert J, Ramaekers FC. 2005. Both lamin A and lamin C mutations cause lamina instability as well as loss of internal nuclear lamin organization. Exp. Cell Res. 304:582-92 (Pubitemid 40321134)
39. Lloyd DJ, Trembath RC, Shackleton S. 2002. A novel interaction between lamin A and SREBP1: implications for partial lipodystrophy and other laminopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11:769-77 (Pubitemid 34428644)
40. Dreuillet C, Tillit J, Kress M, Ernoult-Lange M. 2002. In vivo and in vitro interaction between human transcription factor MOK2 and nuclear lamin A/C. Nucleic Acids Res. 30:4634-42
41. Ozaki T, Saijo M, Murakami K, Enomoto H, Taya Y, Sakiyama S. 1994. Complex formation between lamin A and the retinoblastoma gene product: identification of the domain on lamin A required for its interaction. Oncogene 9:2649-53
42. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL,Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, et al. 2009. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326:289-93
43. Raska I, Shaw PJ, Cmarko D. 2006. Structure and function of the nucleolus in the spotlight. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18:325-34 (Pubitemid 44262257)
44. Spector DL, Lamond AI. 2011. Nuclear speckles. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:a000646
45. Deryusheva S, Gall JG. 2004. Dynamics of coilin in Cajal bodies of the Xenopus germinal vesicle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:4810-14
46. Zimber A, Nguyen QD, Gespach C. 2004. Nuclear bodies and compartments: functional roles and cellular signalling in health and disease. Cell. Signal. 16:1085-104 (Pubitemid 38900512)
47. Platani M, Goldberg I, Swedlow JR, Lamond AI. 2000. In vivo analysis of Cajal body movement, separation, and joining in live human cells. J. Cell Biol. 151:1561-74
48. Wang J, Shiels C, Sasieni P, Wu PJ, Islam SA, et al. 2004. Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies associate with transcriptionally active genomic regions. J. Cell Biol. 164:515-26 (Pubitemid 38233313)
49. Bourdeau V, Baudry D, Ferbeyre G. 2009. PML links aberrant cytokine signaling and oncogenic stress to cellular senescence. Front. Biosci. 14:475-85
50. Bernardi R, Pandolfi PP. 2007. Structure, dynamics and functions of promyelocytic leukaemia nuclear bodies. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:1006-16
51. Gieni RS, Hendzel MJ. 2009. Actin dynamics and functions in the interphase nucleus: moving toward an understanding of nuclear polymeric actin. Biochem. Cell Biol. 87:283-306
52. HofmannWA, Johnson T, Klapczynski M, Fan JL, de Lanerolle P. 2006. From transcription to transport: emerging roles for nuclear myosin I. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84:418-26 (Pubitemid 44703646)
53. Young KG, Kothary R. 2005. Spectrin repeat proteins in the nucleus. BioEssays 27:144-52 (Pubitemid 40292386)
54. Pederson T, Aebi U. 2002. Actin in the nucleus:What form and what for? J. Struct. Biol. 140:3-9
55. Zastrow MS, Flaherty DB, Benian GM, Wilson KL. 2006. Nuclear titin interacts with A-and B-type lamins in vitro and in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 119:239-49 (Pubitemid 43210693)
56. Bettinger BT,GilbertDM, AmbergDC. 2004. Actin up in the nucleus. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5:410-15 (Pubitemid 38579478)
57. Jockusch BM, Schoenenberger CA, Stetefeld J, Aebi U. 2006. Tracking down the different forms of nuclear actin. Trends Cell Biol. 16:391-96 (Pubitemid 44118783)
58. Pederson T, Aebi U. 2005. Nuclear actin extends, with no contraction in sight. Mol. Biol. Cell 16:5055-60
59. Schoenenberger CA, Buchmeier S, Boerries M, S̈utterlin R, Aebi U, Jockusch BM. 2005. Conformationspecific antibodies reveal distinct actin structures in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. J. Struct. Biol. 152:157-68 (Pubitemid 41785513)
60. HofmannWA, Johnson T, Klapczynski M, Fan JL, Lanerolle P. 2006. From transcription to transport: emerging roles for nuclear myosin I. Biochem. Cell Biol. 84:418-26 (Pubitemid 44703646)
61. Percipalle P, VisaN. 2006. Molecular functions of nuclear actin in transcription. J. Cell Biol. 172:967-71
62. Moir RD, Spann TP, Herrmann H, Goldman RD. 2000. Disruption of nuclear lamin organization blocks the elongation phase of DNA replication. J. Cell Biol. 149:1179-92
63. Manju K, Muralikrishna B, Parnaik VK. 2006. Expression of disease-causing lamin A mutants impairs the formation of DNA repair foci. J. Cell Sci. 119:2704-14
64. Gotic I, LeschnikM, Kolm U,MarkovicM, Haubner BJ, et al. 2010. Lamina-associated polypeptide 2α loss impairs heart function and stress response in mice. Circ. Res. 106:346-53
65. Fidzianska A, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. 2003. Architectural abnormalities in muscle nuclei. Ultrastructural differences between X-linked and autosomal dominant forms ofEDMD.J. Neurol. Sci. 210:47-51 (Pubitemid 36539403)
66. Kumaran RI, Muralikrishna B, Parnaik VK. 2002. Lamin A/C speckles mediate spatial organization of splicing factor compartments and RNA polymerase II transcription. J. Cell Biol. 159:783-93 (Pubitemid 36008361)
67. Spann TP, Goldman AE, Wang C, Huang S, Goldman RD. 2002. Alteration of nuclear lamin organization inhibits RNA polymerase II-dependent transcription. J. Cell Biol. 156:603-8 (Pubitemid 34839876)
68. Caille N, Thoumine O, Tardy Y, Meister JJ. 2002. Contribution of the nucleus to the mechanical properties of endothelial cells. J. Biomech. 35:177-87 (Pubitemid 34037093)
69. Guilak F, Tedrow JR, Burgkart R. 2000. Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 269:781-86 (Pubitemid 30440377)
70. Kha HN, Chen BK, Clark GM, Jones R. 2004. Stiffness properties for nucleus standard straight and contour electrode arrays. Med. Eng. Phys. 26:677-85 (Pubitemid 39311074)
71. Vaziri A, Mofrad MR. 2007. Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment. J. Biomech. 40:2053-62
72. Dahl KN, Engler AJ, Pajerowski JD, Discher DE. 2005. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys. J. 89:2855-64
73. Schape J, Prausse S, Radmacher M, Stick R. 2009. Influence of lamin A on the mechanical properties of amphibian oocyte nuclei measured by atomic force microscopy. Biophys. J. 96:4319-25
74. Newport JW, Wilson KL, Dunphy WG. 1990. A lamin-independent pathway for nuclear envelope assembly. J. Cell Biol. 111:2247-59
75. Lammerding J, Kamm RD, Lee RT. 2004. Mechanotransduction in cardiac myocytes. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1015:53-70 (Pubitemid 38879479)
76. Meshorer E, Yellajoshula D, George E, Scambler PJ, Brown DT, Misteli T. 2006. Hyperdynamic plasticity of chromatin proteins in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Dev. Cell 10:105-16 (Pubitemid 43025681)
77. Pajerowski JD, Dahl KN, Zhong FL, Sammak PJ, Discher DE. 2007. Physical plasticity of the nucleus in stem cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:15619-24 (Pubitemid 350035348)
78. Rowat AC, Lammerding J, Ipsen JH. 2006. Mechanical properties of the cell nucleus and the effect of emerin deficiency. Biophys. J. 91:4649-64
79. Mazumder A, Shivashankar GV. 2007. Gold-nanoparticle-assisted laser perturbation of chromatin assembly reveals unusual aspects of nuclear architecture within living cells. Biophys. J. 93:2209-16
80. Melling M, Hochmeister S, Blumer R, Schilcher K, Mostler S, et al. 2001. Atomic force microscopy imaging of the human trigeminal ganglion. NeuroImage 14:1348-52
81. Goldman AE, Moir RD, Montag-Lowy M, Stewart M, Goldman RD. 1992. Pathway of incorporation of microinjected lamin A into the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Biol. 119:725-35
82. Maniotis AJ, Chen CS, Ingber DE. 1997. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:849-54 (Pubitemid 27074410)
83. Starr DA, Fridolfsson HN. 2010. Interactions between nuclei and the cytoskeleton are mediated by SUN-KASH nuclear-envelope bridges. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 26:421-44
84. Roux KJ, Crisp ML, Liu Q, Kim D, Kozlov S, et al. 2009. Nesprin 4 is an outer nuclear membrane protein that can induce kinesin-mediated cell polarization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:2194-99
85. ZhangX,Lei K, Yuan X,WuX, Zhuang Y, et al. 2009.SUN1/2and Syne/Nesprin-1/2 complexes connect centrosome to the nucleus during neurogenesis and neuronal migration in mice. Neuron 64:173-87
86. Fridolfsson HN, Starr DA. 2010. Kinesin-1 and dynein at the nuclear envelope mediate the bidirectional migrations of nuclei. J. Cell Biol. 191:115-28
87. Wilhelmsen K, Litjens SH, Kuikman I, Tshimbalanga N, Janssen H, et al. 2005. Nesprin-3, a novel outer nuclear membrane protein, associates with the cytoskeletal linker protein plectin. J. Cell Biol. 171:799-810 (Pubitemid 41746582)
88. Padmakumar VC, Abraham S, Braune S, Noegel AA, Tunggal B, et al. 2004. Enaptin, a giant actinbinding protein, is an element of the nuclear membrane and the actin cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell Res. 295:330-39 (Pubitemid 38490489)
89. Zhen YY, Libotte T, MunckM,Noegel AA, Korenbaum E. 2002. NUANCE, a giant protein connecting the nucleus and actin cytoskeleton. J. Cell Sci. 115:3207-22
90. Haque F, Lloyd DJ, Smallwood DT, Dent CL, Shanahan CM, et al. 2006. SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:3738-51
91. Crisp M, Liu Q, Roux K, Rattner JB, Shanahan C, et al. 2006. Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J. Cell Biol. 172:41-53 (Pubitemid 43042628)
92. Ḿejat A, Misteli T. 2010. LINC complexes in health and disease. Nucleus 1:40-52
93. Razafsky D, Hodzic D. 2009. Bringing KASH under the SUN: the many faces of nucleo-cytoskeletal connections. J. Cell Biol. 186:461-72
94. Stewart-Hutchinson PJ, Hale CM,Wirtz D, Hodzic D. 2008. Structural requirements for the assembly of LINC complexes and their function in cellular mechanical stiffness. Exp. Cell Res. 314:1892-905
95. Zhang Q, Skepper JN, Yang F, Davies JD, Hegyi L, et al. 2001. Nesprins: a novel family of spectrinrepeat-containing proteins that localize to the nuclear membrane in multiple tissues. J. Cell Sci. 114:4485-98
96. Burke B, Roux KJ. 2009. Nuclei take a position: managing nuclear location. Dev. Cell 17:587-97
97. ZhangQ, RagnauthCD, Skepper JN, WorthNF, WarrenDT, et al. 2005. Nesprin-2 is a multi-isomeric protein that binds lamin and emerin at the nuclear envelope and forms a subcellular network in skeletal muscle. J. Cell Sci. 118:673-87 (Pubitemid 40372577)
98. Padmakumar VC, Libotte T, Lu W, Zaim H, Abraham S, et al. 2005. The inner nuclear membrane protein Sun1 mediates the anchorage of Nesprin-2 to the nuclear envelope. J. Cell Sci. 118:3419-30
99. Fridolfsson HN, Ly N, Meyerzon M, Starr DA. 2010. UNC-83 coordinates kinesin-1 and dynein activities at the nuclear envelope during nuclear migration. Dev. Biol. 338:237-50
100. Shao X TH, Lee JP, Oko R, Van Der Hoorn FA. 1999. Spag4, a novel sperm protein, binds outer dense fiber protein Odf1 and localizes to microtubules of manchette and axoneme. Dev. Biol. 211:109-23 (Pubitemid 29315825)
101. Starr DA, Fischer JA. 2005. KASH 'n Karry: the KASH domain family of cargo-specific cytoskeletal adaptor proteins. BioEssays 27:1136-46
102. Hodzic DM, YeaterDB, Bengtsson L,Otto H, Stahl PD. 2004. Sun2 is a novel mammalian inner nuclear membrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 279:25805-12 (Pubitemid 38756845)
103. Wang Q, Du X, Cai Z, Greene MI. 2006. Characterization of the structures involved in localization of the SUN proteins to the nuclear envelope and the centrosome. DNA Cell Biol. 25:554-62 (Pubitemid 46141327)
104. Lei K, Zhang X, Ding X, Guo X, Chen M, et al. 2009. SUN1 and SUN2 play critical but partially redundant roles in anchoring nuclei in skeletalmuscle cells in mice. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:10207-12
105. Olins AL, Hoang TV, Zwerger M, Herrmann H, Zentgraf H, et al. 2009. The LINC-less granulocyte nucleus. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 88:203-14
106. Liu Q, Pante N, Misteli T, Elsagga M, CrispM, et al. 2007. Functional association of Sun1 with nuclear pore complexes. J. Cell Biol. 178:785-98 (Pubitemid 47347364)
107. Haque F, MazzeoD, Patel JT, Smallwood DT, Ellis JA, et al. 2010. MammalianSUNprotein interaction networks at the inner nuclear membrane and their role in laminopathy disease processes. J. Biol. Chem. 285:3487-98
108. Kandert S, Luke Y, Kleinhenz T, Neumann S, Lu W, et al. 2007. Nesprin-2 giant safeguards nuclear envelope architecture in LMNA S143F progeria cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16:2944-59
109. Lee JS, Hale CM, Panorchan P, Khatau SB,George JP, et al. 2007. Nuclear lamin A/C deficiency induces defects in cell mechanics, polarization, and migration. Biophys. J. 93:2542-52
110. Brosig M, Ferralli J, Gelman L, ChiquetM,Chiquet-Ehrismann R. 2010. Interferingwith the connection between the nucleus and the cytoskeleton affects nuclear rotation,mechanotransduction andmyogenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 42:1717-28
111. Puckelwartz MJ, Kessler E, Zhang Y, Hodzic D, Randles KN, et al. 2009. Disruption of nesprin-1 produces an Emery Dreifuss muscular dystrophy-like phenotype in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18:607-20
112. Lei K, Zhang X, Ding X, Guo X, Chen M, et al. 2009. SUN1 and SUN2 play critical but partially redundant roles in anchoring nuclei in skeletalmuscle cells in mice. Proc.Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:10207-12
113. Ḿejat A, Decostre V, Li J, Renou L, Kesari A, et al. 2009. Lamin A/C-mediated neuromuscular junction defects in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. J. Cell Biol. 184:31-44
114. Vander Heyden AB, Naismith TV, Snapp EL, Hodzic D, Hanson PI. 2009. LULL1 retargets TorsinA to the nuclear envelope revealing an activity that is impaired by the DYT1 dystonia mutation. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:2661-72
115. Caille N, Tardy Y, Meister JJ. 1998. Assessment of strain field in endothelial cells subjected to uniaxial deformation of their substrate. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26:409-16 (Pubitemid 128609282)
116. Gomes ER, Jani S, Gundersen GG. 2005. Nuclear movement regulated by Cdc42, MRCK, myosin, and actin flow establishes MTOC polarization in migrating cells. Cell 121:451-63 (Pubitemid 40692304)
117. Friedl P, Weigelin B. 2008. Interstitial leukocyte migration and immune function. Nat. Immunol. 9:960-69
118. Jaalouk DE, Lammerding J. 2009. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10:63-73
119. Grashoff C, Hoffman BD, BrennerMD, Zhou R, ParsonsM, et al. 2010. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466:263-66
120. Bhadriraju K, Yang M, Alom Ruiz S, Pirone D, Tan J, Chen CS. 2007. Activation of ROCK by RhoA is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell Res. 313:3616-23
121. Lecuit T, Lenne PF. 2007. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:633-44 (Pubitemid 47108184)
122. Parsons JT, Horwitz AR, Schwartz MA. 2010. Cell adhesion: integrating cytoskeletal dynamics and cellular tension. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:633-43
123. Blau HM, PavlathGK, Hardeman EC, Chiu CP, Silberstein L, et al. 1985. Plasticity of the differentiated state. Science 230:758-66 (Pubitemid 16193964)
124. Bibikova M, LaurentLC, Ren B, Loring JF, Fan JB. 2008. Unraveling epigenetic regulation in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2:123-34 (Pubitemid 351168715)
125. Bhattacharya D, Talwar S, Mazumder A, ShivashankarGV. 2009. Spatio-temporal plasticity in chromatin organization in mouse cell differentiation and during Drosophila embryogenesis. Biophys. J. 96:3832-39
126. Akter R, Rivas D, Geneau G, Drissi H, Duque G. 2009. Effect of lamin A/C knockdown on osteoblast differentiation and function. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24(2):283-93
127. Olins AL, ZwergerM,HerrmannH, ZentgrafH, Simon AJ, et al. 2008. The human granulocyte nucleus: unusual nuclear envelope and heterochromatin composition. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 87:279-90
128. Hoffmann K, Sperling K, Olins AL, Olins DE. 2007. The granulocyte nucleus and lamin B receptor: avoiding the ovoid. Chromosoma 116:227-35 (Pubitemid 46712012)
129. Olins AL, Herrmann H, Lichter P, Kratzmeier M, Doenecke D, Olins DE. 2001. Nuclear envelope and chromatin compositional differences comparing undifferentiated and retinoic acid-and phorbol ester-treated HL-60 cells. Exp. Cell Res. 268:115-27 (Pubitemid 32744643)
130. Yabuki M, Miyake T, Doi Y, Fujiwara T, Hamazaki K, et al. 1999. Role of nuclear lamins in nuclear segmentation of human neutrophils. Physiol. Chem. Phys. Med. NMR 31:77-84 (Pubitemid 129578132)
131. Gaines P, Tien CW, Olins AL, Olins DE, Shultz LD, et al. 2008. Mouse neutrophils lacking lamin B-receptor expression exhibit aberrant development and lack critical functional responses. Exp. Hematol. 36:965-76
132. Olins AL, Olins DE. 2004. Cytoskeletal influences on nuclear shape in granulocytic HL-60 cells. BMC Cell Biol. 5:30
133. ZwergerM, Herrmann H, Gaines P, Olins AL, Olins DE. 2008. Granulocytic nuclear differentiation of lamin B receptor-deficient mouse EPRO cells. Exp. Hematol. 36:977-87
134. Hoffmann K, Dreger CK, Olins AL, Olins DE, Shultz LD, et al. 2002. Mutations in the gene encoding the lamin B receptor produce an altered nuclear morphology in granulocytes (Pelger-Huet anomaly). Nat. Genet. 31:410-14 (Pubitemid 35154452)
135. Olins AL, Rhodes G,Welch DB, Zwerger M, Olins DE. 2010. Lamin B receptor: multi-tasking at the nuclear envelope. Nucleus 1:53-70
136. Duband-Goulet I, Courvalin JC. 2000. Inner nuclear membrane protein LBR preferentially interacts with DNA secondary structures and nucleosomal linker. Biochemistry 39:6483-88
137. Polioudaki H, Kourmouli N, Drosou V, Bakou A, Theodoropoulos PA, et al. 2001. Histones H3/H4 form a tight complex with the inner nuclear membrane protein LBR and heterochromatin protein 1. EMBO Rep. 2:920-25 (Pubitemid 33040581)
138. Pyrpasopoulou A, Meier J, Maison C, Simos G, Georgatos SD. 1996. The lamin B receptor (LBR) provides essential chromatin docking sites at the nuclear envelope. EMBO J. 15:7108-19
139. Worman HJ, Yuan J, Blobel G, Georgatos SD. 1988. A lamin B receptor in the nuclear envelope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:8531-34
140. Guarda A, Bolognese F, Bonapace IM, Badaracco G. 2009. Interaction between the inner nuclear membrane lamin B receptor and the heterochromatic methyl binding protein, MeCP2. Exp. Cell Res. 315(11):1895-903
141. Martins SB, Eide T, Steen RL, Jahnsen T, Skalhegg BS, Collas P. 2000. HA95 is a protein of the chromatin and nuclear matrix regulating nuclear envelope dynamics. J. Cell Sci. 113(Pt. 21):3703-13
142. Ye Q, Callebaut I, Pezhman A,Courvalin JC,WormanHJ. 1997. Domain-specific interactions of human HP1-type chromodomain proteins and inner nuclear membrane protein LBR. J. Biol. Chem. 272:14983-89 (Pubitemid 27251773)
143. Holmer L, Pezhman A, Worman HJ. 1998. The human lamin B receptor/sterol reductase multigene family. Genomics 54:469-76 (Pubitemid 29036234)
144. Prakash A, Sengupta S, Aparna K, Kasbekar DP. 1999. The erg-3 (sterol delta 14,15-reductase) gene of Neurospora crassa: generation of null mutants by repeat-induced point mutation and complementation by proteins chimeric for human lamin B receptor sequences. Microbiology 145(Pt. 6):1443-51
145. Silve S, Dupuy PH, Ferrara P, Loison G. 1998. Human lamin B receptor exhibits sterol C14-reductase activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1392:233-44 (Pubitemid 28288520)
146. Clayton P, Fischer B, Mann A, Mansour S, Rossier E, et al. 2010. Mutations causing Greenberg dysplasia but not Pelger anomaly uncouple enzymatic from structural functions of a nuclear membrane protein. Nucleus 1:354-66
147. Wassif CA, Brownson KE, Sterner AL, Forlino A, Zerfas PM, et al. 2007.HEM dysplasia and ichthyosis are likely laminopathies and not due to 3β-hydroxysterol-14-reductase deficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16:1176-87
148. Gaines P, Berliner N. 2006. Granulocytopoiesis. In Clinical Hematology, ed. NS Young, SL Gerson, KA High, pp. 61-70. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier
149. Park BH, Dolen J, Snyder B. 1977. Defective chemotactic migration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in Pelger-Huet anomaly. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 155:51-54 (Pubitemid 8116027)
150. Wittmann M, Queisser G, Eder A, Wiegert JS, Bengtson CP, et al. 2009. Synaptic activity induces dramatic changes in the geometry of the cell nucleus: interplay between nuclear structure, histone H3 phosphorylation, and nuclear calcium signaling. J. Neurosci. 29:14687-700
151. Buschmann MB, LaVelle A. 1981. Morphological changes of the pyramidal cell nucleolus and nucleus in hamster frontal cortex during development and aging. Mech. Ageing Dev. 15:385-97
152. Haithcock E, Dayani Y, Neufeld E, Zahand AJ, Feinstein N, et al. 2005. Age-related changes of nuclear architecture in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:16690-95 (Pubitemid 41688838)
153. OliveM, Harten I,Mitchell R, Beers J, Djabali K, et al. 2010. Cardiovascular pathology in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria: correlation with the vascular pathology of aging. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 30:2301-9
154. McClintock D, Ratner D, Lokuge M, Owens DM, Gordon LB, et al. 2007. The mutant form of lamin A that causes Hutchinson-Gilford progeria is a biomarker of cellular aging in human skin. PLoS ONE 2:e1269
155. Rodriguez S,Coppede F, SageliusH, ErikssonM. 2009. Increased expression of theHutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome truncated lamin A transcript during cell aging. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 17:928-37
156. Ragnauth CD,WarrenDT, Liu Y,McNair R, Tajsic T, et al. 2010. Prelamin A acts to accelerate smooth muscle cell senescence and is a novel biomarker of human vascular aging. Circulation 121:2200-10
157. Yang SH,Qiao X, Farber E, Chang SY, Fong LG, Young SG. 2008. Eliminating the synthesis of mature lamin A reduces disease phenotypes in mice carrying a Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome allele. J. Biol. Chem. 283:7094-99
158. Moulson CL, Fong LG, Gardner JM, Farber EA, Go G, et al. 2007. Increased progerin expression associated with unusual LMNA mutations causes severe progeroid syndromes. Hum. Mutat. 28:882-89 (Pubitemid 47579938)
159. Yang SH, Andres DA, Spielmann HP, Young SG, Fong LG. 2008. Progerin elicits disease phenotypes of progeria in mice whether or not it is farnesylated. J. Clin. Investig. 118:3291-300
160. Worman HJ, Bonne G. 2007. "Laminopathies": a wide spectrum of human diseases. Exp. Cell Res. 313:2121-33
161. Hegele RA,Cao H, LiuDM, Costain GA, Charlton-Menys V, et al. 2006. Sequencing of the reannotated LMNB2gene reveals novel mutations in patients with acquired partial lipodystrophy. Am. J.Hum.Genet. 79:383-89 (Pubitemid 44141838)
162. Capell BC, Collins FS. 2006. Human laminopathies: nuclei gone genetically awry. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:940-52 (Pubitemid 44871397)
163. Broers JL, Ramaekers FC, Bonne G, Yaou RB, Hutchison CJ. 2006. Nuclear lamins: laminopathies and their role in premature ageing. Physiol. Rev. 86:967-1008 (Pubitemid 44042881)
164. Hutchison CJ, Worman HJ. 2004. A-type lamins: Guardians of the soma? Nat. Cell Biol. 6:1062-67
165. Espada J, Varela I, Flores I, Ugalde AP, Cadinanos J, et al. 2008. Nuclear envelope defects cause stem cell dysfunction in premature-aging mice. J. Cell Biol. 181:27-35 (Pubitemid 351519761)
166. Lees-Miller SP. 2006. Dysfunction of lamin A triggers a DNA damage response and cellular senescence. DNA Repair 5:286-89 (Pubitemid 43069529)
167. Scaffidi P, Misteli T. 2008. Lamin A-dependent misregulation of adult stem cells associated with accelerated ageing. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:452-59
168. Tazir M, Azzedine H, Assami S, Sindou P, Nouioua S, et al. 2004. Phenotypic variability in autosomal recessive axonal Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease due to the R298C mutation in lamin A/C. Brain 127:154-63 (Pubitemid 38055354)
169. Burtner CR, Kennedy BK. 2010. Progeria syndromes and ageing: What is the connection? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:567-78
170. HerrmannH,Bar H, Kreplak L, Strelkov SV,AebiU. 2007. Intermediate filaments: from cell architecture to nanomechanics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8:562-73 (Pubitemid 46985377)
171. Wilson KL, Berk JM. 2010. The nuclear envelope at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 123:1973-78
172. Bione S, Maestrini E, Rivella S, Mancini M, Regis S, et al. 1994. Identification of a novel X-linked gene responsible for Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 8:323-27 (Pubitemid 24375595)
173. Bonne G, Di Barletta MR, Varnous S, Becane HM, Hammouda EH, et al. 1999. Mutations in the gene encoding lamin A/C cause autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Nat. Genet. 21:285-88 (Pubitemid 29124935)
174. Emery AE. 2000. Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy-a 40 year retrospective. Neuromuscul. Disord. 10:228-32 (Pubitemid 30320910)
175. Fidzianska A,Toniolo D, Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I. 1998. Ultrastructural abnormality of sarcolemmal nuclei in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD). J. Neurol. Sci. 159:88-93 (Pubitemid 28365889)
176. Markiewicz E, Venables R, Mauricio Alvarez R, Quinlan R, DorobekM, et al. 2002. Increased solubility of lamins and redistribution of lamin C in X-linked Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy fibroblasts. J. Struct. Biol. 140:241-53 (Pubitemid 36139865)
177. Arimura T, Helbling-Leclerc A, Massart C, Varnous S, Niel F, et al. 2005. Mouse model carrying H222P-Lmna mutation develops muscular dystrophy and dilated cardiomyopathy similar to human striated muscle laminopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:155-69 (Pubitemid 40123471)
178. Mounkes LC, Kozlov SV, Rottman JN, Stewart CL. 2005. Expression of an LMNA-N195K variant of A-type lamins results in cardiac conduction defects and death in mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:2167-80
179. Nikolova V, Leimena C, McMahon AC, Tan JC, Chandar S, et al. 2004. Defects in nuclear structure and function promote dilated cardiomyopathy in lamin A/C-deficient mice. J. Clin. Investig. 113:357-69 (Pubitemid 38544180)
180. Broers JL, Peeters EA, Kuijpers HJ, Endert J, Bouten CV, et al. 2004. Decreased mechanical stiffness in LMNA-/-cells is caused by defective nucleo-cytoskeletal integrity: implications for the development of laminopathies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 13:2567-80
181. Constantinescu D, Gray HL, Sammak PJ, Schatten GP, Csoka AB. 2006. Lamin A/C expression is a marker of mouse and human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 24:177-85
182. Lee JS, Hale CM, Panorchan P, Khatau SB,George JP, et al. 2007. Nuclear lamin A/C deficiency induces defects in cell mechanics, polarization, and migration. Biophys. J. 93:2542-52
183. Frock RL, Kudlow BA, Evans AM, Jameson SA, Hauschka SD, Kennedy BK. 2006. Lamin A/C and emerin are critical for skeletal muscle satellite cell differentiation. Genes Dev. 20:486-500 (Pubitemid 43244402)
184. Zhang Q, Bethmann C,Worth NF, Davies JD, Wasner C, et al. 2007. Nesprin-1 and-2 are involved in the pathogenesis of Emery Dreifuss muscular dystrophy and are critical for nuclear envelope integrity. Hum. Mol. Genet. 16:2816-33
185. Houben F, Ramaekers FC, Snoeckx LH, Broers JL. 2007. Role of nuclear lamina-cytoskeleton interactions in the maintenance of cellular strength. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1773:675-86 (Pubitemid 46660179)
186. Salpingidou G, Smertenko A, Hausmanowa-Petrucewicz I, Hussey PJ, Hutchison CJ. 2007. A novel role for the nuclear membrane protein emerin in association of the centrosome to the outer nuclear membrane. J. Cell Biol. 178:897-904 (Pubitemid 47443314)
187. Merideth MA, Gordon LB, Clauss S, Sachdev V, Smith AC, et al. 2008. Phenotype and course of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 358:592-604 (Pubitemid 351214286)
188. Hennekam RC. 2006. Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome: review of the phenotype. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 140:2603-24
189. Capell BC, Collins FS, Nabel EG. 2007. Mechanisms of cardiovascular disease in accelerated aging syndromes. Circ. Res. 101:13-26 (Pubitemid 47094620)
190. De Sandre-Giovannoli A, Bernard R, Cau P, Navarro C, Amiel J, et al. 2003. Lamin A truncation in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria. Science 300:2055 (Pubitemid 36760124)
191. Eriksson M, Brown WT, Gordon LB, Glynn MW, Singer J, et al. 2003. Recurrent de novo point mutations in lamin A cause Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Nature 423:293-98 (Pubitemid 40852699)
192. GoldmanRD, ShumakerDK, Erdos MR, ErikssonM,Goldman AE, et al. 2004. Accumulation ofmutant lamin A causes progressive changes in nuclear architecture in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:8963-68
193. Verstraeten VL, Ji JY, Cummings KS, Lee RT, Lammerding J. 2008. Increased mechanosensitivity and nuclear stiffness inHutchinson-Gilford progeria cells: effects of farnesyltransferase inhibitors. Aging Cell 7:383-93 (Pubitemid 351663907)
194. GlynnMW, Glover TW. 2005. Incomplete processing of mutant lamin A inHutchinson-Gilford progeria leads to nuclear abnormalities, which are reversed by farnesyltransferase inhibition. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14:2959-69
195. Mallampalli MP, Huyer G, Bendale P, Gelb MH, Michaelis S. 2005. Inhibiting farnesylation reverses the nuclear morphology defect in a HeLa cell model for Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:14416-21 (Pubitemid 41429712)
196. Toth JI, Yang SH, Qiao X, Beigneux AP, Gelb MH, et al. 2005. Blocking protein farnesyltransferase improves nuclear shape in fibroblasts from humans with progeroid syndromes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:12873-78 (Pubitemid 41279458)
197. Yang SH, Meta M, Qiao X, Frost D, Bauch J, et al. 2006. A farnesyltransferase inhibitor improves disease phenotypes in mice with a Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome mutation. J. Clin. Investig. 116:2115-21
198. Stehbens WE, Delahunt B, Shozawa T, Gilbert-Barness E. 2001. Smooth muscle cell depletion and collagen types in progeric arteries. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 10:133-36 (Pubitemid 32685490)
199. Stehbens WE, Wakefield SJ, Gilbert-Barness E, Olson RE, Ackerman J. 1999. Histological and ultrastructural features of atherosclerosis in progeria. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 8:29-39 (Pubitemid 29030463)
200. Varga R, Eriksson M, Erdos MR, Olive M, Harten I, et al. 2006. Progressive vascular smooth muscle cell defects in a mouse model of Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:3250-55
201. Hernandez L, Roux KJ, Wong ES, Mounkes LC, Mutalif R, et al. 2010. Functional coupling between the extracellular matrix and nuclear lamina byWnt signaling in progeria. Dev. Cell 19:413-25
202. Capell BC, OliveM, Erdos MR, Cao K, Faddah DA, et al. 2008. A farnesyltransferase inhibitor prevents both the onset and late progression of cardiovascular disease in a progeria mouse model. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:15902-7
203. Bonne G, Mercuri E, Muchir A, Urtizberea A, Becane HM, et al. 2000. Clinical and molecular genetic spectrum of autosomal dominant Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy due to mutations of the lamin A/C gene. Ann. Neurol. 48:170-80 (Pubitemid 30617035)
204. Savage DB, Soos MA, Powlson A, O'Rahilly S, McFarlane I, et al. 2004. Familial partial lipodystrophy associated with compound heterozygosity for novel mutations in theLMNAgene. Diabetologia 47:753-56 (Pubitemid 38658379)
205. Verstraeten VL, Broers JL, van Steensel MA, Zinn-Justin S, Ramaekers FC, et al. 2006. Compound heterozygosity for mutations in LMNA causes a progeria syndrome without prelamin A accumulation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15:2509-22
206. Gilchrist S, GilbertN, Perry P, Ostlund C, Worman HJ, Bickmore WA. 2004. Altered protein dynamics of disease-associated lamin A mutants. BMC Cell Biol. 5:46
207. Ostlund C, Bonne G, Schwartz K, Worman HJ. 2001. Properties of lamin A mutants found in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy, cardiomyopathy and Dunnigan-type partial lipodystrophy. J. Cell Sci. 114:4435-45
208. Muchir A, Medioni J, Laluc M, Massart C, Arimura T, et al. 2004. Nuclear envelope alterations in fibroblasts from patients with muscular dystrophy, cardiomyopathy, and partial lipodystrophy carrying lamin A/C gene mutations. Muscle Nerve 30:444-50 (Pubitemid 39288147)
209. Raffaele Di Barletta M, Ricci E, Galluzzi G, Tonali P, Mora M, et al. 2000. Different mutations in the LMNA gene cause autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:1407-12
210. Scharner J, Gnocchi VF, Ellis JA, Zammit PS. 2010. Genotype-phenotype correlations in laminopathies: How does fate translate? Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:257-62
211. Shackleton S, Lloyd DJ, Jackson SN, Evans R,NiermeijerMF, et al. 2000. LMNA, encoding lamin A/C, is mutated in partial lipodystrophy. Nat. Genet. 24:153-56 (Pubitemid 30094715)
212. Speckman RA, Garg A, Du F, Bennett L, Veile R, et al. 2000. Mutational and haplotype analyses of families with familial partial lipodystrophy (Dunnigan variety) reveal recurrent missense mutations in the globular C-terminal domain of lamin A/C. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 66:1192-98
213. Vigouroux C, Magre J, Vantyghem MC, Bourut C, Lascols O, et al. 2000. Lamin A/C gene: sexdetermined expression of mutations in Dunnigan-type familial partial lipodystrophy and absence of coding mutations in congenital and acquired generalized lipoatrophy. Diabetes 49:1958-62
214. VantyghemMC, Pigny P,Maurage CA, Rouaix-EmeryN, Stojkovic T, et al. 2004. Patients with familial partial lipodystrophy of the Dunnigan type due to a LMNAR482W mutation show muscular and cardiac abnormalities. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89:5337-46
215. Plasilova M, Chattopadhyay C, Pal P, Schaub NA, Buechner SA, et al. 2004. Homozygous missense mutation in the lamin A/C gene causes autosomal recessive Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. J. Med. Genet. 41:609-14 (Pubitemid 39061267)
216. Kirschner J, Brune T, Wehnert M, Denecke J,Wasner C, et al. 2005. p.S143F mutation in lamin A/C: a new phenotype combining myopathy and progeria. Ann. Neurol. 57:148-51 (Pubitemid 40053329)
217. Taimen P, Pfleghaar K, Shimi T, Moller D, Ben-Harush K, et al. 2009. A progeria mutation reveals functions for lamin A in nuclear assembly, architecture, and chromosome organization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:20788-93
218. Benedetti S, Merlini L. 2004. Laminopathies: from the heart of the cell to the clinics. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 17:553-60 (Pubitemid 39410871)
219. Pelger K. 1928. Demonstratie van een paar zeldzaam voorkomende typen van bloedlichaampjesen bespreking der patïenten. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 72:1487
220. Cunningham JM, Patnaik MM, Hammerschmidt DE, Vercellotti GM. 2009. Historical perspective and clinical implications of the Pelger-Huet cell. Am. J. Hematol. 84:116-19
221. Speeckaert MM, Verhelst C, Koch A, Speeckaert R, Lacquet F. 2009. Pelger-Huet anomaly: a critical review of the literature. Acta Haematol. 121:202-6
222. Zink D, Fischer AH, Nickerson JA. 2004. Nuclear structure in cancer cells. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4:677-87 (Pubitemid 39215066)
223. DeMay RM. 1996. The Art and Science of Cytopathology. Chicago: Am. Soc. Clin. Pathol. Press
224. Leman ES, Getzenberg RH. 2002. Nuclear matrix proteins as biomarkers in prostate cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 86:213-23 (Pubitemid 34743378)
225. Lever E, Sheer D. 2010. The role of nuclear organization in cancer. J. Pathol. 220:114-25
226. Luftner D, Possinger K. 2002. Nuclear matrix proteins as biomarkers for breast cancer. Expert Rev.Mol. Diagn. 2:23-31 (Pubitemid 34654408)
227. Coradeghini R, Barboro P, Rubagotti A, Boccardo F, Parodi S, et al. 2006. Differential expression of nuclear lamins in normal and cancerous prostate tissues. Oncol. Rep. 15:609-13
228. Lim SO, Park SJ, Kim W, Park SG, Kim HJ, et al. 2002. Proteome analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 291:1031-37
229. Sun S, Xu MZ, Poon RT, Day PJ, Luk JM. 2010. Circulating lamin B1 (LMNB1) biomarker detects early stages of liver cancer in patients. J. Proteome Res. 9:70-78
230. Moss SF, Krivosheyev V, de Souza A, Chin K, Gaetz HP, et al. 1999. Decreased and aberrant nuclear lamin expression in gastrointestinal tract neoplasms. Gut 45:723-29 (Pubitemid 29492146)
231. Broers JL, Raymond Y, RotMK, Kuijpers H, Wagenaar SS, Ramaekers FC. 1993. Nuclear A-type lamins are differentially expressed in human lung cancer subtypes. Am. J. Pathol. 143:211-20 (Pubitemid 24058175)
232. Hudson ME, Pozdnyakova I, Haines K, MorG, SnyderM. 2007. Identification of differentially expressed proteins in ovarian cancer using high-density protein microarrays. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:17494-99 (Pubitemid 350219866)
233. Tilli CM, Ramaekers FC, Broers JL, Hutchison CJ, Neumann HA. 2003. Lamin expression in normal human skin, actinic keratosis, squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma. Br. J.Dermatol. 148:102-9 (Pubitemid 36114869)
234. Agrelo R, Setien F, Espada J, Artiga MJ, Rodriguez M, et al. 2005. Inactivation of the lamin A/C gene by CpG island promoter hypermethylation in hematologic malignancies, and its association with poor survival in nodal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 23:3940-47
235. Venables RS, McLean S, Luny D, Moteleb E, Morley S, et al. 2001. Expression of individual lamins in basal cell carcinomas of the skin. Br. J. Cancer 84:512-19 (Pubitemid 32215879)
236. Foster CR, Przyborski SA, Wilson RG, Hutchison CJ. 2010. Lamins as cancer biomarkers. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38:297-300
237. Wu Z, Wu L, Weng D, Xu D, Geng J, Zhao F. 2009. Reduced expression of lamin A/C correlates with poor histological differentiation and prognosis in primary gastric carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 28:8
238. Willis ND, Cox TR, Rahman-Casans SF, Smits K, Przyborski SA, et al. 2008. Lamin A/C is a risk biomarker in colorectal cancer. PLoS ONE 3:e2988
239. Schoumacher M, Goldman RD, Louvard D, Vignjevic DM. 2010. Actin, microtubules, and vimentin intermediate filaments cooperate for elongation of invadopodia. J. Cell Biol. 189:541-56
240. Wolf K, Friedl P. 2006. Molecular mechanisms of cancer cell invasion and plasticity. Br. J. Dermatol. 154(Suppl. 1):11-15
241. Wolf K, Wu YI, Liu Y, Geiger J, Tam E, et al. 2007. Multi-step pericellular proteolysis controls the transition from individual to collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:893-904 (Pubitemid 47190444)
242. Dechat T, Pfleghaar K, Sengupta K, Shimi T, Shumaker DK, et al. 2008. Nuclear lamins: major factors in the structural organization and function of the nucleus and chromatin. Genes Dev. 22:832-53 (Pubitemid 351482836)
243. Goldman RD, Gruenbaum Y, Moir RD, Shumaker DK, Spann TP. 2002. Nuclear lamins: building blocks of nuclear architecture. Genes Dev. 16:533-47 (Pubitemid 34212486)
244. Prokocimer M, Margalit A, Gruenbaum Y. 2006. The nuclear lamina and its proposed roles in tumorigenesis: projection on the hematologic malignancies and future targeted therapy. J. Struct. Biol. 155:351-60 (Pubitemid 44376369)
245. Prokocimer M, Davidovich M, Nissim-Rafinia M, Wiesel-Motiuk N, Bar DZ, et al. 2009. Nuclear lamins: key regulators of nuclear structure and activities. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13:1059-85
246. Gravemann S, Schnipper N,Meyer H, Vaya A, Nowaczyk M, et al. 2010. Dosage effect of zero to three functional LBR-genes in vivo and in vitro. Nucleus 1(2):179-89