Cognitive Niches: An Ecological Model of Strategy Selection

Psychological Review

Volumn 118, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 393-437

  Marewski, Julian N ^a   Schooler, Lael J ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACT R; Decision making; Memory; Simple heuristics; Strategy selection

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEMORY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; TIME;

COGNITION; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNING; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79960470253     PISSN: 0033295X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024143     Document Type: Article

References (168)

1. Adelman J.S., Brown G.D.A. Modeling lexical decision: The form of frequency and diversity effects. Psychological Review 2008, 115:214-227. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.214.
2. Alba J.W., Marmorstein H. The effects of frequency knowledge on consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Research 1987, 14:14-25. doi: 10.1086/209089.
3. Anderson J.R. The adaptive character of thought 1990, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
4. Anderson J.R. Rules of the mind 1993, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
5. Anderson J.R., Betz J. A hybrid model of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2001, 8:629-647. doi: 10.3758/BF03196200.
6. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Byrne M.D., Douglass S., Lebiere C., Qin Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychological Review 2004, 111:1036-1060. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1036.
7. Anderson J.R., Bothell D., Lebiere C., Matessa M. An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:341-380. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1997.2553.
8. Anderson J.R., Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought 1998, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
9. Anderson J.R., Milson R. Human memory: An adaptive perspective. Psychological Review 1989, 96:703-719. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.703.
10. Anderson J.R., Schooler L.J. Reflections of the environment in memory. Psychological Science 1991, 2:396-408. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00174.x.
11. Atkinson R.C., Juola J.F. Search and decision processes in recognition memory. Contemporary developments in mathematical psychology 1974, 1:243-293. Freeman, San Francisco, CA. D.H. Krantz, R.C. Atkinson, R.D. Lucek, P. Suppes (Eds.).
12. Beach L.R., Mitchell T.R. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review 1978, 3:439-449. doi: 10.2307/257535.
13. Begg I.M., Anas A., Farinacci S. Dissociation of processes in belief: Source recollection, statement familiarity, and the illusion of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:446-458. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.446.
14. Brighton H. Robust inference with simple cognitive models. AAAI Spring Symposium: Cognitive science principles meet AI-hard problems 2006, 17-22. American Association for Artificial Intelligence, Menlo Park, CA. C. Lebiere, R. Wray (Eds.).
15. Bröder A. Decision making with the " adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:611-625. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.4.611.
16. Bröder A., Gaissmaier W. Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multi-attribute decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:895-900. doi: 10.3758/BF03194118.
17. Bröder A., Newell B.R. Challenging some common beliefs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:205-214.
18. Bröder A., Schiffer S. Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:277-293. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.277.
19. Bröder A., Schiffer S. Stimulus format and working memory in fast and frugal strategy selection. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2006, 19:361-380. doi: 10.1002/bdm.533.
20. Bruner J.S. On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review 1957, 64:123-152. doi: 10.1037/h0043805.
21. Brunswik E. Representative design and probabilistic theory in a functional psychology. Psychological Review 1955, 62:193-217. doi: 10.1037/h0047470.
22. Burgess C., Lund K. Modelling parsing constraints with high-dimensional context space. Language and Cognitive Processes 1997, 12:177-210. doi: 10.1080/016909697386844.
23. Busemeyer J.R. Violations of the speed-accuracy tradeoff relation: Decreases in decision accuracy with increases in decision time. Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making 1993, 181-193. Plenum Press, New York, NY. O. Svenson, A.J. Maule (Eds.).
24. Busemeyer J.R., Myung I.J. An adaptive approach to human decision making: Learning theory, decision theory, and human performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1992, 121:177-194. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.2.177.
25. Busemeyer J.R., Townsend J.T. Decision field theory: A dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychological Review 1993, 100:432-459. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.432.
26. Chater N., Oaksford M., Nakisa R., Redington M. Fast, frugal and rational: How rational norms explain behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 90:63-86. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00508-3.
27. Christensen-Szalanski J.J. Problem solving strategies: A selection mechanism, some implications, and some data. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1978, 22:307-323. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(78)90019-3.
28. Cisek P. Cortical mechanisms of action selection: The affordance competition hypothesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 2007, 362:1585-1599. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2007.2054.
29. Coates S.L., Butler L.T., Berry D.C. Implicit memory: A prime example for brand consideration and choice. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2004, 18:1195-1211. doi: 10.1002/acp.1044.
30. Coates S.L., Butler L.T., Berry D.C. Implicit memory and consumer choice: The mediating role of brand familiarity. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2006, 20:1101-1116. doi: 10.1002/acp.1262.
31. Cokely E.T., Kelley C.M., Gilchrist A.H. Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2006, 13:991-997. doi: 10.3758/BF03213914.
32. Coyle T.R., Read L.E., Gaultney J.F., Bjorklund D.F. Giftedness and variability in strategy processing on a multitrial memory task: Evidence for stability in gifted cognition. Learning and Individual Differences 1998, 10:273-290. doi: 10.1016/S1041-6080(99)80123-X.
33. Dawes R.M. The robust beauty of improper linear models in decision making. American Psychologist 1979, 34:571-582. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.34.7.571.
34. Dawes R.M., Corrigan B. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 1974, 81:95-106. doi: 10.1037/h0037613.
35. Dhami M.K., Hertwig R., Hoffrage U. The role of representative design in an ecological approach to cognition. Psychological Bulletin 2004, 130:959-988. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.6.959.
36. Dougherty M.R.P., Franco-Watkins A.N., Thomas R. Psychological plausibility of the theory of probabilistic mental models and the fast and frugal heuristics. Psychological Review 2008, 115:199-211. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.199.
37. Dougherty M.R.P., Gettys C.F., Ogden E.E. Minerva-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review 1999, 106:180-209. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.1.180.
38. Dror I.E., Busemeyer J.R., Basola B. Decision making under time pressure: An independent test of sequential sampling models. Memory & Cognition 1999, 27:713-725. doi: 10.3758/BF03211564.
39. Einhorn H.J. The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin 1970, 73:221-230. doi: 10.1037/h0028695.
40. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1975, 13:171-192. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(75)90044-6.
41. Einhorn H.J., Hogarth R.M. Behavioral decision theory: Processes of judgement and choice. Annual Review of Psychology 1981, 32:53-88. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000413.
42. Eisenberg P., Becker C.A. Semantic context effects in visual word recognition, sentence processing, and reading: Evidence for semantic strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1982, 8:739-756. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.8.5.739.
43. Erdfelder E., Küpper-Tetzel C.E., Mattern S.D. Threshold models of recognition and the recognition heuristic. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:7-22.
44. Erev I., Roth A.E. Simple reinforcement learning models and reciprocation in the prisoner's dilemma game. Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox 2001, 215-231. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. G. Gigerenzer, R. Selten (Eds.).
45. Fishburn P.C. Lexicographic additive differences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1980, 21:191-218. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(80)90037-1.
46. Fu W.-T., Anderson J.R. From recurrent choice to skill learning: A reinforcement-learning model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:184-206. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.184.
47. Gaissmaier W. The mnemonic decision maker: How search in memory shapes decision making (Doctoral dissertation, Free University, Berlin, Germany) 2007, Retrieved from http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000005913.
48. Gaissmaier W., Marewski J.N. Forecasting elections with mere recognition from lousy samples. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:73-88.
49. Gaissmaier W., Schooler L.J., Rieskamp J. Simple predictions fueled by capacity limitations: When are they successful?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:966-982. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.966.
50. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.
51. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 1996, 103:650-669. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650.
52. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D.G. The recognition heuristic: A decade of research. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:100-121.
53. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Goldstein D.G. Fast and frugal heuristics are plausible models of cognition: Reply to Dougherty, Franco-Watkins, and Thomas (2008). Psychological Review 2008, 115:230-239. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.1.230.
54. Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U., Kleinbölting H. Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review 1991, 98:506-528. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.98.4.506.
55. Gigerenzer G., Todd P.M. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, the ABC Research Group, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
56. Ginossar Z., Trope Y. Problem solving in judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 52:464-474. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.464.
57. Glöckner A., Betsch T. Modeling option and strategy choices with connectionist networks: Towards an integrative model of automatic and deliberate decision making. Judgment and Decision Making 2008, 3:215-228.
58. Glöckner A., Betsch T., Schindler N. Coherence shifts in probabilistic inference tasks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2010, 23:439-462. doi: 10.1002/bdm.668.
59. Gluck K.A., Ball J.T., Krusmark M.A. Cognitive control in a computational model of the Predator pilot. Integrated models of cognitive systems 2007, 13-28. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. W. Gray (Ed.).
60. Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. Models of ecological rationality: The recognition heuristic. Psychological Review 2002, 109:75-90. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.75.
61. Gray W.D., Sims C.R., Fu W.-T., Schoelles M.J. The soft constraints hypothesis: A rational analysis approach to resource allocation for interactive behavior. Psychological Review 2006, 113:461-482. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.113.3.461.
62. Griffiths T.L., Steyvers M., Tenenbaum J.B. Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review 2007, 114:211-244. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.211.
63. Gronlund S.D., Ratcliff R. The time course of item and associative information: Implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1989, 15:846-858. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.846.
64. Hammerstein P., Hagen E.H., Herz A.V.M., Herzel H. Robustness: A key to evolutionary design. Biological Theory 2006, 1:90-93. doi: 10.1162/biot.2006.1.1.90.
65. Haruvy E., Stahl D.O. Equilibrium selection and bounded rationality in symmetric normal-form games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2007, 62:98-119. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2005.05.002.
66. Haruvy E., Stahl D.O., Wilson P.W. Modeling and testing for heterogeneity in observed strategic behavior. Review of Economics and Statistics 2001, 83:146-157. doi: 10.1162/003465301750160117.
67. Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G., Hoffrage U. The reiteration effect in hindsight bias. Psychological Review 1997, 104:194-202. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.194.
68. Hertwig R., Herzog S.M., Schooler L.J., Reimer T. Fluency heuristic: A model of how the mind exploits a by-product of information retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2008, 34:1191-1206. doi: 10.1037/a0013025.
69. Hertwig R., Pachur T., Kurzenhäuser S. Judgments of risk frequencies: Tests of possible cognitive mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2005, 31:621-642. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.621.
70. Hertwig R., Todd P.M. More is not always better: The benefits of cognitive limits. Thinking: Psychological perspectives on reasoning, judgment and decision making 2003, 213-231. Wiley, Chichester, England. D. Hardman, L. Macchi (Eds.).
71. Herzog S.M., Hertwig R. The wisdom of ignorant crowds: Predicting sport outcomes by mere recognition. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:58-72.
72. Higgins E.T. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles 1996, 133-168. Guilford Press, New York, NY. E.T. Higgins, A. Kruglanski (Eds.).
73. Hilbig B.E., Pohl R.F. Ignorance- vs. evidence-based decision making: A decision time analysis of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2009, 35:1296-1305. doi: 10.1037/a0016565.
74. Hintzman D.L., Curran T. Retrieval dynamics of recognition and frequency judgments: Evidence for separate processes of familiarity and recall. Journal of Memory and Language 1994, 33:1-18. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1001.
75. Hoffrage U., Hertwig R. Which world should be represented in representative design?. Information sampling and adaptive cognition 2006, 381-408. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY. K. Fiedler, P. Juslin (Eds.).
76. Hogarth R.M., Karelaia N. Take-the-best and other simple strategies: Why and when they work " well" with binary cues. Theory and Decision 2006, 61:205-249. doi: 10.1007/s11238-006-9000-8.
77. Hogarth R.M., Karelaia N. Heuristics and linear models of judgment: Matching rules and environments. Psychological Review 2007, 114:733-758. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.733.
78. Howes A., Lewis R.L., Vera A.H. Rational adaptation under task and processing constraints: Implications for testing theories of cognition and action. Psychological Review 2009, 116:717-751. doi: 10.1037/a0017187.
79. Howes A., Vera A., Lewis R.L. Bounding rational analysis: Constraints on asymptotic performance. Integrated models of cognitive systems 2007, 403-413. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. W.D. Gray (Ed.).
80. Huber O. Information-processing operators in decision making. Process and structure in human decision making 1989, 3-21. Wiley, New York, NY. H. Montgomery, O. Svenson (Eds.).
81. Hume D.L. A treatise of human nature 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, (Original work published 1740).
82. Hutchinson J.M.C., Gigerenzer G. Simple heuristics and rules of thumb: Where psychologists and behavioural biologists might meet. Behavioural Processes 2005, 69:97-124. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2005.02.019.
83. Jacoby L.L. A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language 1991, 30:513-541. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(91)90025-F.
84. Jacoby L.L., Brooks L.R. Nonanalytic cognition: Memory, perception and concept learning. Psychology of learning and motivation 1984, 18:1-47. Academic Press, New York, NY. G.H. Bower (Ed.).
85. Jacoby L.L., Dallas M. On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1981, 110:306-340. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.110.3.306.
86. Jacoby L.L., Kelley C.M., Brown J., Jasechko J. Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1989, 56:326-338. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.56.3.326.
87. Johnson J.G., Raab M. Take-the-first: Option generation and resulting choices. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 2003, 91:215-229. doi: 10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00027-X.
88. Juslin P., Persson M. PROBabilities from Exemplars (PROBEX): A " lazy" algorithm for probabilistic inference from generic knowledge. Cognitive Science 2002, 26:563-607. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2605_2.
89. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist 2003, 58:697-720. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.9.697.
90. Katsikopoulos K.V., Martignon L. Naïve heuristics for paired comparisons: Some results on their relative accuracy. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 2006, 50:488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jmp.2006.06.001.
91. Kitano H. Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics 2004, 5:826-837.
92. Koriat A. How do we know that we know? The accessibility model of feeling of knowing. Psychological Review 1993, 100:609-639. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.609.
93. Landauer T.K., Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104:211-240. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211.
94. Lee M.D., Cummins T.D.R. Evidence accumulation in decision making: Unifying the " take the best" and " rational" models. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2004, 11:343-352. doi: 10.3758/BF03196581.
95. Lovett M.C., Anderson J.R. History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection. Cognitive Psychology 1996, 31:168-217. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1996.0016.
96. Mandler G. Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review 1980, 87:252-271. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.87.3.252.
97. Marewski J.N. Ecologically rational strategy selection (Doctoral dissertation, Free University, Berlin, Germany) 2008, Retrieved from http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000019008?lang=en.
98. Marewski J.N. On the theoretical precision and strategy selection problem of a single-strategy approach: A comment on Glöckner, Betsch, and Schindler (2010). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2010, 23:463-467. doi: 10.1002/bdm.680.
99. Marewski J.N., Gaissmaier W., Gigerenzer G. Good judgments do not require complex cognition. Cognitive Processing 2010, 11:103-121. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0337-0.
100. Marewski J.N., Gaissmaier W., Gigerenzer G. We favor formal models of heuristics rather than loose lists of dichotomies: A Reply to Evans and Over. Cognitive Processing 2010, 11:177-179. doi: 10.1007/s10339-009-0340-5.
101. Marewski J.N., Gaissmaier W., Schooler L.J., Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. Do voters use episodic knowledge to rely on recognition?. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2009, 2232-2237. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX. N.A. Taatgen, H. van Rijn (Eds.).
102. Marewski J.N., Gaissmaier W., Schooler L.J., Goldstein D.G., Gigerenzer G. From recognition to decisions: Extending and testing recognition-based models for multi-alternative inference. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2010, 17:287-309. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.3.287.
103. Marewski J.N., Olsson H. Beyond the null ritual: Formal modeling of psychological processes. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology 2009, 217:49-60.
104. Marewski J.N., Pohl R.F., Vitouch O. Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (Vol. 1). Judgment and Decision Making 2010, 5:207-215.
105. Marewski J.N., Pohl R.F., Vitouch O. Recognition-based judgments and decisions: Introduction to the special issue (II). Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:1-6.
106. Marewski J.N., Schooler L.J., Gigerenzer G. Five principles for studying people's use of heuristics. Acta Psychologica Sinica 2010, 42:72-87. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00072.
107. Martignon L., Hoffrage U. Why does one-reason decision making work? A case study in ecological rationality. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, 119-140. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, the ABC Research Group (Eds.).
108. Mata R., Schooler L.J., Rieskamp J. The aging decision maker: Cognitive aging and the adaptive selection of decision strategies. Psychology and Aging 2007, 22:796-810. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.4.796.
109. McAllister D.W., Mitchell T.R., Beach L.R. The contingency model for the selection of decision strategies: An empirical test of the effects of significance, accountability, and reversibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1979, 24:228-244. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(79)90027-8.
110. McElree B., Dolan P.O., Jacoby L.L. Isolating the contributions of familiarity and source information to item recognition: A time course analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1999, 25:563-582. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.563.
111. Newell B.R., Fernandez D. On the binary quality of recognition and the inconsequentiality of further knowledge: Two critical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2006, 19:333-346. doi: 10.1002/bdm.531.
112. Newell B.R., Shanks D.R. Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing " one-reason" decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2003, 29:53-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.53.
113. Nosofsky R.M., Bergert F.B. Limitations of exemplar models of multi-attribute probabilistic inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2007, 33:999-1019. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.6.999.
114. Oaksford M., Chater N. Rational models of cognition 1998, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
115. Oppenheimer D.M. The secret life of fluency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:237-241. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014.
116. Pachur T., Biele G. Forecasting from ignorance: The use and usefulness of recognition in lay predictions of sports events. Acta Psychologica 2007, 125:99-116. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.002.
117. Pachur T., Bröder A., Marewski J.N. The recognition heuristic in memory-based inference: Is recognition a non-compensatory cue?. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2008, 21:183-210. doi: 10.1002/bdm.581.
118. Pachur T., Hertwig R. On the psychology of the recognition heuristic: Retrieval primacy as a key determinant of its use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:983-1002. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.983.
119. Payne J.W. Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 1976, 16:366-387. doi: 10.1016/0030-5073(76)90022-2.
120. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1988, 14:534-552. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.14.3.534.
121. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. The adaptive decision maker 1993, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
122. Payne S.J., Richardson J., Howes A. Strategic use of familiarity in display-based problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2000, 26:1685-1701. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.6.1685.
123. Pleskac T.J. A signal detection analysis of the recognition heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:379-391. doi: 10.3758/BF03194081.
124. Pohl R. Empirical tests of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2006, 19:251-271. doi: 10.1002/bdm.522.
125. Provost F.J., Buchanan B.G. Inductive policy: The pragmatics of bias selection. Machine Learning 1995, 20:35-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00993474.
126. Rapoport A., Wallsten T.S. Individual decision behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 1972, 23:131-176. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ps.23.020172.001023.
127. Ratcliff R. A diffusion model account of response time and accuracy in a brightness discrimination task: Fitting real data and failing to fit fake but plausible data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:278-291. doi: 10.3758/BF03196283.
128. Ratcliff R., McKoon G. Similarity information versus relational information: Differences in the time course of retrieval. Cognitive Psychology 1989, 21:139-155. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(89)90005-4.
129. Ratcliff R., Smith P.L. A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. Psychological Review 2004, 111:333-367. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.333.
130. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:364-382. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3.
131. Reder L.M. Strategy selection in question answering. Cognitive Psychology 1987, 19:90-138. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(87)90005-3.
132. Reimer T., Katsikopoulos K.V. The use of recognition in group decision-making. Cognitive Science 2004, 28:1009-1029. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog2806_6.
133. Rieskamp J. Perspectives on probabilistic inferences: Reinforcement learning and an adaptive network compared. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:1355-1370. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1355.
134. Rieskamp J., Hoffrage U. When do people use simple heuristics, and how can we tell?. Simple heuristics that make us smart 1999, 141-167. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. G. Gigerenzer, P.M. Todd, the ABC Research Group (Eds.).
135. Rieskamp J., Hoffrage U. Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica 2008, 127:258-276. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.05.004.
136. Rieskamp J., Otto P.E. SSL: A theory of how people learn to select strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2006, 135:207-236. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.2.207.
137. Ritter S., Anderson J.R., Koedinger K.R., Corbett A. Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:249-255. doi: 10.3758/BF03194060.
138. Salvucci D.D. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Human Factors 2006, 48:362-380. doi: 10.1518/001872006777724417.
139. Schooler L.J., Anderson J.R. The role of process in the rational analysis of memory. Cognitive Psychology 1997, 32:219-250. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1997.0652.
140. Schooler L.J., Hertwig R. How forgetting aids heuristic inference. Psychological Review 2005, 112:610-628. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.610.
141. Sedlmeier P., Hertwig R., Gigerenzer G. Are judgments of the positional frequencies of letters systematically biased due to availability?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1998, 24:754-770. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.754.
142. Shepard R.N. Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:581-601.
143. Siegler R.S. Strategy choice procedures and the development of multiplication skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1988, 117:258-275. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.117.3.258.
144. Simon H.A. Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review 1956, 63:129-138. doi: 10.1037/h0042769.
145. Smith E.E., Patalano A.L., Jonides J. Alternative strategies of categorization. Cognition 1998, 65:167-196. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00043-7.
146. Stahl D.O. Evidence based rule learning in symmetric normal-form games. International Journal of Game Theory 1999, 28:111-130. doi: 10.1007/s001820050101.
147. Stahl D.O. Rule learning in symmetric normal-form games: Theory and evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 2000, 32:105-138. doi: 10.1006/game.1999.0754.
148. Stahl D.O., Wilson P.W. Experimental evidence on players' models of other players. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 1994, 25:309-327. doi: 10.1016/0167-2681(94)90103-1.
149. Stewart N., Chater N., Brown G.D.A. Decision by sampling. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 53:1-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003.
150. Taatgen N.A., Van Rijn H., Anderson J.R. An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: The role of cognition, attention, and learning. Psychological Review 2007, 114:577-598. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.577.
151. Taatgen N., Wallach D. Whether skill acquisition is rule or instance based is determined by the structure of the task. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2002, 2:163-204.
152. Tobii Technology. Tobii Eye Tracker & ClearView Analysis Software: User manual 2005, Author, Danderyd, Sweden.
153. Todd P.M., Gigerenzer G. Précis of Simple heuristics that make us smart. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2000, 23:727-780. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00003447.
154. Tomlinson T., Marewski J.N., Dougherty M.R. Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift. Judgment and Decision Making 2011, 6:89-99.
155. Tulving E., Pearlstone Z. Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 1966, 5:381-391. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(66)80048-8.
156. Tversky A. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review 1969, 76:31-48. doi: 10.1037/h0026750.
157. Tversky A. Elimination by aspects: A theory of choice. Psychological Review 1972, 79:281-299. doi: 10.1037/h0032955.
158. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 1973, 5:207-232. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9.
159. Vicente K.J. Beyond the lens model and direct perception: Toward a broader ecological psychology. Ecological Psychology 2003, 15:241-267. doi: 10.1207/S15326969ECO1503_4.
160. Vilalta R., Drissi Y. A perspective view and survey of meta-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 2002, 18:77-95. doi: 10.1023/A:1019956318069.
161. Volz K.G., Schooler L.J., Schubotz R.I., Raab M., Gigerenzer G., von Cramon D.Y. Why you think Milan is larger than Modena: Neural correlates of the recognition heuristic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:1924-1936. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.11.1924.
162. Wagenmakers E.-J., Brown S. On the linear relation between the mean and the standard deviation of a response time distribution. Psychological Review 2007, 114:830-841. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.830.
163. Wagenmakers E.-J., Zeelenberg R., Steyvers M., Shiffrin R.M., Raaijmakers J.G.W. Nonword repetition in lexical decision: Support for two opposing processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57(A):1191-1210.
164. Walker M. An application of reinforcement learning to dialogue strategy selection in a spoken dialogue system for email. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 2000, 12:387-416.
165. Whittlesea B.W.A. Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1993, 19:1235-1253. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235.
166. Wiltschko R., Wiltschko W. Avian navigation: From historical to modern concepts. Animal Behaviour 2003, 65:257-272. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2003.2054.
167. Winkielman P., Schwarz N., Belli R.F. The role of ease of retrieval and attribution in memory judgments: Judging your memory as worse despite recalling more events. Psychological Science 1998, 9:124-126. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00022.
168. Woodworth R. Experimental psychology 1938, Holt, New York, NY.