Student-directed assessment of knowledge building using electronic portfolios

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 175-220

  Van Aalst, Jan ^a   Chan, Carol K K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250002274     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508400701193697     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barab, S. A., Kling, R., & Gray, J. S. (2004). Introduction: Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. S. Gray (Eds.), Designing virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 1-15). New York: Cambridge University Press.
2. Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problems and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 271-311.
3. Bell, P., Hoadley, C. M., & Linn, M. C. (2004). Design-based research in education. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & P. Bell (Eds.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 73-85). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
4. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
5. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1996). Rethinking learning. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling (pp. 485-513). Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.
6. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
7. Bielaczyc, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, Vol. II (pp. 269-292). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy, and Practice, 5, 7-44.
9. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
10. Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229-270). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
12. Burtis, J. (1998). The analytic toolkit. Canada: University of Toronto, The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Knowledge Building Research Team.
13. Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2004). Learning, assessment, and collaboration in computer-supported environments. In J. W. Strijbos, P. A. Kirschner, & R. Martens (Eds.), What we know about CSCL in higher education: And implementing it in higher education (pp. 87-112). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
14. Cognition & Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). The Jasper project: Lessons in curriculum, instruction, assessment, and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 347-361). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.
17. Dillenbourg, P., Eurelings, A., & Hakkarainen, K. (Eds.). (2001). European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: Proceedings of the first European conference on computer-supported collaborative learning, the Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
18. Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the challenges of inquiry-based learning through technology and curriculum design. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 391-450.
19. Edelson, D., Pea, R., & Gomez, L. (1996). Constructivism in the collaboratory. In B.G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design (pp. 151-164). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
20. Fishman, B., Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 43-76.
21. Gipps, C. (2002) Sociocultural perspectives on assessment. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century (pp. 73-83). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
22. Greeno, J. G., Reder, L. M., & Simon, H. A. (2000). Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educational Researcher, 29(4), 11-13.
23. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000a). Effective discussion through a computer-mediated anchored forum. The Journal of the Learning Sciences. 9, 437-469.
24. Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000b). Computer-supported collaborative learning in engineering: The challenge of scaling up assessment. In M. J. Jacobson & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science and mathematics education: Advanced designs for technologies of learning (pp. 227-257). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
25. Hacker, J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
26. Hewitt, J. (2003). How habitual online practices affect the development of asynchronous discussion threads. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 28, 31-45.
27. Hickey, D. T., Kindfield, A. C., Horwitz, P., & Christie, M. A. (2003). Integrating curriculum, instruction, assessment and evaluation in a technology-supported Genetics Learning Environment. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 495-538.
28. King, A. (1995). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Journal of Educational Research, 31, 338-368.
29. Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., et al. (2003). Problem-based learning meets case-based reasoning in the middle-school science classroom: Putting Learning by Design™ into practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 495-547.
30. Koschmann, T. D. (Ed.). (1996). CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Koschmann, T. D., Hall, R., & Miyake, N. (Eds.). (2002). CSCL2: Carrying forward the conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32. Land, S. M., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2003). Scaffolding reflection and articulation of scientific explanation in a rich, project-based learning environment: An investigation of Progress Portfolio. Educational Technology Research and Development, 51, 65-84.
33. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
34. Law, N., & Wong, E. (2003). Developmental trajectory in knowledge building: An investigation. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 57-66). Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer-support for collaborative learning. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
35. Lee, E. Y. C., Chan, C. K. K., & van Aalst, J. (2006). Student assessing their own collaborative knowledge building. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 1, 277-307.
36. Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487-509.
37. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
38. Niu, H. (2006). Exploring participation in knowledge building: An analysis of online discussions in mainstream and honors social studies courses. Unpublished master's thesis, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada.
39. Paavola, S., Lipponen, L., & Hakkarainen, K. (2004). Models of innovative knowledge communities and three metaphors of learning. Review of Educational Research, 74, 557-576.
40. Reeve, T. C. (2000). Alternative assessment approaches for online learning environments in higher education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 101-111.
41. Roschelle, J. (1992). Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 235-276.
42. Salomon, G, (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67-98). Chicago: Open Court.
44. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York, NY: Cambridge Univesity Press.
45. Sfard, A. (1998). On two metaphors for learning and the dangers of choosing one. Educational Researcher, 27(2), 4-13.
46. Shepard, L. E. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 1-14.
47. Stahl, G. (Ed.). (2002). Computer support for collaborative learning: Foundation for a CSCL community. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
48. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
49. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). "Mapping to know": The effects of representative guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86, 264-286.
50. van Aalst, J. (2006). Rethinking the nature of online work in asynchronous learning networks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 279-288.
51. van Aalst, J., & Chan, C. K. K. (2001). Beyond "sitting next to each other": A design experiment on knowledge building in teacher education. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings, & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), European perspectives on computer-supported collaborative learning: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Maastricht, March 22-24, 2001 (pp. 20-28). the Netherlands: University of Maastricht.
52. Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. J., Zech, L., & The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1998). SMART Environments that support monitoring, reflection and revision. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 305-346). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
53. White, B. Y., & Fredericksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, Modeling and metacognition: Making science accessible to all learners. Cognition and Instruction, 16, 3-118.
54. Wolf, D. Bixby, J., Glenn, J., & Gardner, H. (1991). To use their minds well: Investigating new forms of student assessment. Review of Research in education, 17, 31-74.
55. Young, C. A., & Figgins, M. A. (2002). The Folio in action: Using a web-based electronic portfolio to reinvent traditional notions of inquiry, research, and portfolios. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2, 144-169.