Original article: The historical and situated nature of design experiments - Implications for data analysis

Journal of Computer Assisted Learning

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 268-279

  Krange, I ^a   Ludvigsen, Sten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

Computer based 3D models; Design experiment; Interaction analysis; Science education; Situated computer supported collaborative learning; Socio cultural interpretations of knowledge constructions

Indexed keywords

EID: 65649150726     PISSN: 02664909     EISSN: 13652729     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00307.x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Anderson C. (2007) Perspectives on science learning. In Handbook of Research on Science Education (eds S.K. Abell N.G. Lederman pp. 3 30. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London.
2. Arnseth H.C. (2004) Discourse and artefacts in learning to argue - analysing the practical management of computer-supported collaborative learning. Unpublished dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
3. Arnseth H.C. Ludvigsen S. (2006) Approaching institutional contexts: systemic versus dialogic research in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1, 167 185.
4. Arnseth H.C. Säljö R. (2007) Making sense of epistemic categories. Analysing students' use of categories of progressive inquiry in computer mediated collaborative activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23, 425 439.
5. Bakthin M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. University of Texas Press, Austin, TX.
6. Barab S., Barnett M., Yamagata-Lynch L., Squire K. Keating T. (2002) Using activity theory to understand the contradictions characterizing a technology-rich introductory astronomy course. Mind, Culture and Activity 9, 76 107.
7. Barab S.A. Squire K. (2004) Design-based research: putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 1 14.
8. Barron B., Martin C., Roberts E., Osipovich A. Ross M. (2002) Assisting and assessing the development of technological fluencies: insights from a project-based approach to teaching computer science. In Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community (ed. G. Stahl pp. 668 699. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Boulder, CO.
9. Brown A.L. (1992) Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2, 141 178.
10. Cobb P., Confrey J., deSessa A., Lehrer R. Schauble L. (2003) Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher 32, 9 13.
11. Collins A. (1992) Towards a design science of education. In New Directions in Educational Technology (eds E. Scanlon T.O. O'Shea pp. 15 22. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
12. Collins A., Joseph D. Bielaczyc K. (2004) Design research: theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences 13, 15 42.
13. Cuban L. (2001) Oversold and Underused. Computers in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. De Jong T. (2006) Scaffolds for scientific discovery learning. In Handling Complexity in Learning Environments: Research and Theory (eds J. Elen D. Clark pp. 107 128. Elsevier Science Publishers, London.
15. De Jong T. van Joolingen R. (1998) Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research 68, 179 201.
16. Engeström Y. (2007) Putting Vygotsky to work: the change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In The Cambridge Companion to VYGOTSKY (eds H. Daniels, M. Cole J.V. Wertsch pp. 363 382. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
17. Engle R.A. Conant F.R. (2002) Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners classroom. Cognition and Instruction 20, 399 483.
18. Fjuk A. (1997) Computer support for distributed collaborative learning. Exploring a complex problem area. Unpublished dissertation, Faculty of Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
19. Fjuk A. Ludvigsen S. (2001) The complexity of distributed collaborative learning: unit of analysis. Paper presented at the E-CSCL, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
20. Furberg A. Ludvigsen S. (2008) Students' meaning making of socioscientific issues in computer mediated settings: exploring learning through interaction trajectories. International Journal of Science Education 30, 1775 1799.
21. Hoadley C. (2004) Methodological alignment in design-based research. Educational Psychologist 39, 203 213.
22. Jiménez-Aleixandre M.P., Bugallo Rodríguez A. Duschl R.A. (2000) 'Doing the lesson' or 'doing science': argument in high school genetics. Science Education 84, 757 792.
23. Jordan B. Henderson A. (1995) Interaction analysis: foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences 4, 39 103.
24. Krange I. (2008). Computer-based 3D models in science education - studying artefacts and students' knowledge constructions. Unpublished dissertation, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
25. Krange I. (2007) Students' conceptual practices in science education - productive disciplinary interactions in a participation trajectory. Cultural Studies in Science Education 2, 171 203.
26. Krange I. Ludvigsen S. (2008) 'What is mean?' Students' procedural and conceptual problem solving in a CSCL environment designed within the field of science education. International Journal of Computer-supported Collaborative Learning 3, 25 51.
27. Kumpulainen K. Wray D. (2002) Classroom Interaction and Social Learning. Routledge/Falmer, London.
28. Lave J. (1988) Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
29. Lehrer R. Schauble L. (2006) Cultivating model-based reasoning in science education. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (ed. R.K. Sawyer pp. 371 387. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
30. Lemke J. (1990) Talking Science - Language, Learning, and Values. Ablex Publishing, London.
31. Linell P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Context in Dialogical Perspectives. John Benjamin Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
32. Linn M. (2004) Using ICT to teach and learn science. In Mediating Science Learning through Information and Communication Technology (eds R. Holliman D. Scanlon pp. 9 26. RoutledgeFarmer, London.
33. Ludvigsen S. (2009) What counts as knowledge: learning to use categories in computer environments. In ICT and Transformation of Learning Practices (ed. R. Säljö) Pergamon Press, Amsterdam, in press.
34. Mason L. (2007) Introduction: bridging the cognitive and sociocultural approaches in research on conceptual change: is it feasable? Educational Psychologist 41, 1 7.
35. Mercer N. (1991) Researching common knowledge: investigating the development of shared understanding in the classroom. In Doing Educational Research (ed. G. Walford pp. 41 58. Routledge, London.
36. Mercer N. Wegerif R. (1999) Is 'exploratory talk' productive talk? In Learning with Computers - Analysing Productive Talk (eds K. Littleton P. Light pp. 79 101. Routledge, London.
37. Moss J. Beatty R. (2006) Knowledge building in mathematics: supporting collaborative learning in pattern problems. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 1, 441 165.
38. Mäkitalo Å., Jakobsson A. Säljö, R. (2009) Learning to reason in the context of socioscientific problems: exploring the demands on students in 'new' classroom activities. In Investigating Classroom Interaction: Methodological Choices and Challenges (eds. K. Kumpulainen M. César), in press.
39. Rabardel P. (2003) From artefact to instrument. Interacting with Computers 15, 641 645.
40. Rabardel P. Bourmaud G. (2003) From computer to instrument system: a developmental perspective. Interacting with Computers 15, 665 691.
41. Rommetveit R. (1984) The role of language in the creation and transmission of social representations. In Social Representations (eds R. Farr S. Moscovici pp. 331 359. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
42. Roschelle J. (1992) Learning by collaborating: convergent conceptual change. The Journal of the Leaning Sciences 2, 235 276.
43. Roth W.M., McGinn M., Woszczyna C. Boutonné S. (1999) Differential participation during science conversations: the interactional of focal, social configurations, and physical arrangements. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 8, 293 347.
44. Ruthven K., Hennessey S. Deaney R. (2008) Constructions of dynamic geometry: a study of interpretative flexibility of educational software in classroom practice. Computers & Education 51, 297 317.
45. Sandoval W. Bell P. (2004) Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist 39, 199 201.
46. Shavelson R., Phillips D., Towne L. Feuer M. (2003) On the science of education design studies. Educational Researcher 32, 25 28.
47. Säljö R. (2000) Lärande i praktiken - ett sosiokulturelt perspektiv. Bokforlaget Prisma, Stockholm.
48. Tabak I. (2004) Reconstructing context: negotiating the tensions between exogenous and endogenous educational design. Educational Psychologist 39, 225 233.
49. Valsiner J. van der Veer R. (2000) The Social Mind. Construction of the Idea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA.
50. Vosniadou S. (1999) Conceptual change research: state of the art and future directions. In New Perspectives on Conceptual Change (eds W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou M. Carretero pp. 3 13. Pergamon, Amsterdam.
51. Vosniadou S. (2007) The cognitive-situative divide and the problem of conceptual change. Educational Psychologist 42, 55 66.
52. Vygotsky L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
53. Vygotsky L. (1986) Thought and Language. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
54. Wertsch J.V. (1991) Voices of the Mind - A Sociocultural Approach to Mediated Action. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
55. Wertsch J.V. (1998) Mind as Action. Oxford University Press, New York.