The hedgehog and the fox: A discussion of the approaches to the analysis of ICT reforms in teacher education of Larry Cuban and Yrjö Engeström

Mind, Culture, and Activity

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 83-104

  Rasmussen, Ingvill ^a   Ludvigsen, Sten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 62949121774     PISSN: 10749039     EISSN: 15327884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10749030802477390     Document Type: Note

References (38)

1. Barowy, W., & Jouper, C. (2004). The complex of school change: Personal and systemic codevelopment. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 9-24
2. Becker, H. J. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? [Online]. Education Policy Analysis, 8(51). Retrieved January 2008 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51/
3. Benan, B. (2004). Rapport om erfaringer, utfordringer og suksesfaktorer i PLUTO prosjektene [Report about experiences, challenges and success factors in the PLUTO projects]. Oslo, Norway: Network for IT-Research and Ccompetence in Education (ITU)
4. Bergquist, K. (1990). Doing schoolwork. Task premisses and joint activity in the comprehensive classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Communication Studies, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
5. Berlin, I. (1998). The hedgehog and the fox. In H. Hardy & R. Hausheer (Eds.), The proper study of mankind: An anthology of essays by Isaiah Berlin (pp. 436-499). London: Pimlico, Random House
6. Cochran-Smith, M., & Fries, K. (2005). Researching teacher education in changing times: Politics and paradigms. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. M. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education (pp. 69-111). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
7. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change. Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85-105). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
8. Cuban, L. (1993). How teachers taught: Constancy and change in American classrooms 1880-1990. New York: Teachers College Press
9. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
10. Cuban, L., & Usdan, M. (2003). Fast and top down: Systemic reform and student achievement in San Diego City Schools. In L. Cuban & M. Usdan (Eds.), Powerful reforms with shallow roots: Improving America's urban schools (pp. 77-95). New York: Teachers College Press
11. Dysthe, O. (2007). How a reform affects writing in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 32(2), 237-252
12. Engelsen, K. S. (2006). Gjennom fokustrengsel. Lærerutdanningen i møte med IKT og nye vurderingsformer [Through focus crash. Teacher education meeting ICT and new forms of evaluation]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
13. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
14. Engeström, Y. (1995). Innovative organizational learning in medical and legal settings. In L. W. Martin, K. Nelson & E. Tobach (Eds.), Sociocultural psychology: Theory and practice of doing knowledge (pp. 326-356). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
15. Engeström, Y. (2007). Putting Vygotsky to work: The change laboratory as an application of double stimulation. In H. Daniels, M. Cole, & J. Wertsch (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky (pp. 363-382). New York: Cambridge University Press
16. Engeström, Y., Lompscher, J., & Rückriem, G. (Eds.). (2005). Putting activity theory to work. Contributions from developmental work research. Berlin, Germany: Lehmanns Media
17. Eriksen, O. (2003). IKT som endringsfaktor i læ rerutdanningen [ICT as a catalyst for change in teacher education]. Halden, Norway: Høyskolen i Østfold avd. for lærerutdanning
18. Foot, K. A. (2002). Pursuing an evolving object: A case study in object formation and identification. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 9(2), 132-149
19. Gallup, T. (2003). Qualitative survey. Teacher education - ITU. Oslo, Norway: Network for IT-Research and Competence in Eeducation (ITU)
20. Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the Internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30, 22-26
21. Hasu, M. (2005). In search of sensitive ethnography of change: Tracing the invisible handoffs from technology developers to users. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(2), 90-112
22. Hauge, T. E. (2006). Portfolios and ICT as a means of professional learning in teacher education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 32, 23-36
23. Hubbard, L., Mehan, H., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Reform as learning. School reform, organizational culture, and community politics in San Diego. New York: Routledge
24. Jackson, P. W. (Ed.). (1988). Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice, Berkeley, CA: McCutchan
25. Kaptelinin, V., & Miettinen, R. (Eds.). (2005). Perspectives on the object of activity [Special issue]. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 12(1)
26. Kozma, R. B., & McGhee, R. (2003). ICT and innovative classroom practice. In R. B. Kozma (Ed.), Technology, innovation, and educational change. A global perspective (pp. 43-80). Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education
27. Leontiev, A. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
28. Ludvigsen, S., & Flo, C. (2002). Innovasjon i lærerutdanningen: Hvordan skapes endring [Innovation in teacher education: How does changes come about]. In S. Ludvigsen & T. H. Løkensgaard (Eds.), Et utdanninssystem i endring. IKT og læring (pp. 83-104). Oslo, Norway: Gyldendal Akademisk
29. Ludvigsen, S. R., Rasmussen, I., Krange, I., Moen, A., & Middleton, D. (in press). Temporalities of learning in intersecting trajectories of participation. In S. R. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen, & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning in social practises. ICT and new artifact - transformation of social and cultural practices. Amsterdam: Pergamon
30. Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform. How school remakes mind and society. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
31. Ottesen, E. (2006). Talk in practice. Analysing student teachers' and mentors' discourse in internship. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
32. Rasmussen, I. (2005). Project work and ICT: Studying learning as participation trajectories. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
33. Ravitch, D. (2000). Left back: A century of failed school reforms. New York: Simon & Schuster
34. Roth, W.-M. (2004). Activity theory and education: An introduction. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 11(1), 1-8
35. Roth, W.-M. (2005). Doing qualitative research. Praxis of method. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense Publishers
36. Roth, W.-M., & Lee, Y.-J. (2001). Vygotsky's neglected legacy: Cultural-historical activity theory. Review of Educational Reseach, 77(2), 186-232
37. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1996). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), CSCL: Theory and practice of an emerging paradigm (pp. 249-268). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
38. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage