Masked priming effects are modulated by expertise in the script

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 64, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 902-919

  Perea, Manuel ^a   Mallouh, Reem Abu ^b   García Orza, Javier ^c   Carreiras, Manuel ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VALENCIA   (Spain)

^b BASQUE CENTER ON COGNITION   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MÁLAGA   (Spain)

^d BASQUE FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE   (Spain)

Author keywords

Letter coding; Masked priming; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REACTION TIME; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DECISION MAKING; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; VOCABULARY;

EID: 79958066485     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2010.512088     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Acha, J., & Perea, M. (2008). The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 245-264.
2. Baker, C., Liu, J., Wald, L., Kwong, K., Benner, T., & Kanwisher, N. (2007). Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 9087-9092.
3. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2005). Discontinuous morphology in time: Incremental masked priming in Arabic. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20, 207-260.
4. Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2010). Aralex: A lexical database for Modern Standard Arabic. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 481-487.
5. Bruner, J. S., & O'Dowd, D. (1958). A note on the informativeness of parts of words. Language and Speech, 1, 98-101.
6. Castles, A., Davis, C., & Forster, K. I. (2003). Word recognition development in children: Insights from masked-priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 345-360). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
7. Christianson, K., Johnson, R. L., & Rayner, K. (2005). Letter transpositions within and across morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 31, 1327-1339.
8. Davis, C. J. (1999). The Self-Organising Lexical Acquisition and Recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
9. Davis, C. J. (in press). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review.
10. Duñ abeitia, J. A., Kinoshita, S., Carreiras, M., & Norris, D. (2010). Is morpho-orthographic decomposition purely orthographic? Evidence from masked priming in the same-different task. Language and Cognitive Processes. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/01690965.2010.499215.
11. Duñ abeitia, J.A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). Do transposed-letter similarity effects occur at a morpheme level? Evidence for ortho-morphological decomposition. Cognition, 105, 691-703.
12. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
13. Frost, R. (2009). Reading in Hebrew vs. reading in English: Is there a qualitative difference? In K. Pugh & P. McCradle (Eds.), How children learn to read: Current issues and new directions in the integration of cognition, neurobiology and genetics of reading and dyslexia research and practice (pp. 235-254). New York: Psychology Press.
14. Frost, R., Kugler, T., Deutsch, A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Orthographic structure versus morphological structure: Principles of lexical organization in a given language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 31, 1293-1326.
15. García-Orza, J., Perea, M., and Muñoz, S. (2010). Are transposition effects specific to letters? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 1603-1618.
16. Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115, 577-601.
17. Grainger, J., & Frenck-Mestre, C. (1998). Masked translation priming in bilinguals. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 601-623.
18. Grainger, J., & Van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon (pp. 1-24). New York: Nova Science Publishers.
19. Guerrera, C., & Forster, K. I. (2008). Masked form priming with extreme transposition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 117-142.
20. Jacobs, A. M., Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1995). The incremental priming technique: A method for determining within-condition priming effects. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1101-1110.
21. Johnson, R. L., Perea, M., & Rayner, K. (2007). Transposed-letter effects in reading: Evidence from eye movements and parafoveal preview. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 209-229.
22. Jonides, J., & Mack, R. (1984). On the cost and benefit of cost and benefit. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 29-44.
23. King-Blackburne, L., Palti, D., Perea, M., Kim, J., Huang, C., Yee, D., et al. (2010, June). Attention and reading skill modulate selectivity of left occipitotemporal region. Poster presented at the 16th Annual Meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, Barcelona, Spain.
24. Kinoshita, S., & Lagoutaris, S. (2009, November). Leet priming does not reflect top-down feedback. Paper presented at the 50th Annual Conference of the Psychonomic Society, Boston, MA.
25. Kinoshita, S., & Norris, D. (2009). Transposed-letter priming of pre-lexical orthographic representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1-18.
26. Lupker, S. J., Perea, M., & Davis, C. J. (2008). Transposed letter priming effects: Consonants, vowels and letter frequency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 93-116.
27. McCloskey, M., & Rapp, B. (2000). A visually based developmental reading deficit. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 157-181.
28. Muñoz, S., Perea, M., Garća-Orza, J., & Barber, H. (2010, April). The time course of masked transposition priming for letters and pseudoletters. Poster presented at the 1st Joint Conference of the EPS and SEPEX, Granada, Spain.
29. Norris, D., & Kinoshita, S. (2008). Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: Insights from masked priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 434-455.
30. Norris, D., Kinoshita, S., & van Casteren, M. (2010). A stimulus sampling theory of letter identity and order. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 254-271.
31. O'Connor, R. E., & Forster, K. I. (1981). Criterion bias and search sequence bias in word recognition. Memory and Cognition, 9, 78-92.
32. Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46, 4646-4674.
33. Perea, M., Abu Mallouh, R., & Carreiras, M. (2010). The search of an input coding scheme: Transposed-letter priming in Arabic. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17, 375-380.
34. Perea, M., & Acha, J. (2009). Does letter position coding depend on consonant/vowel status? Evidence with the masked priming technique. Acta Psychologica, 130, 127-137.
35. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2006). Do transposed-letter effects occur across lexeme boundaries? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 418-422.
36. Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Do orthotactics and phonology constrain the transposed-letter effect? Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 69-92.
37. Perea, M., & Estévez, A. (2008). Transposed-letter similarity effects in naming pseudowords: Evidence from children and adults. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 33-46.
38. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003a). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829-841.
39. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003b). Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked form priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: State of the art (pp. 97-120). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
40. Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231-246.
41. Perea, M., Rosa, E., & Gómez, C. (2005). The frequency effect for pseudowords in the lexical decision task. Perception and Psychophysics, 67, 301-314.
42. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). Toward an interactive model of reading. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and Performance VI (pp. 573-603). New York: Academic Press.
43. Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 333-367.
44. Tydgat, I., & Grainger, J. (2009). Serial position effects in the identification of letters, digits and symbols. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 480-498.
45. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2007). Cambridge University vs. Hebrew University: The impact of letter transposition on reading English and Hebrew. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 913-918.
46. Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2009). Letter-transposition effects are not universal: The impact of transposing letters in Hebrew. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 285-302.
47. Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 221-243.