Looking, language, and memory: Bridging research from the visual world and visual search paradigms

Acta Psychologica

Volumn 137, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 138-150

  Huettig, Falk ^a,b   Olivers, Christian N L ^c   Hartsuiker, Robert J ^d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHOLINGUISTICS   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attention; Eye movements; Language processing; Visual search; Visual world paradigm

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; VISION;

ATTENTION; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79957965043     PISSN: 00016918     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.07.013     Document Type: Article

References (165)

1. Allopenna P.D., Magnuson J.S., Tanenhaus M.K. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:419-439.
2. Altmann G.T.M. Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The 'blank screen paradigm'. Cognition 2004, 93:79-87.
3. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 1999, 73:247-264.
4. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. The real-time mediation of visual attention by language and world knowledge: Linking anticipatory (and other) eye movements to linguistic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57:502-518.
5. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. Discourse-mediation of the mapping between language and the visual world: Eye-movements and mental representation. Cognition 2009, 111:55-71.
6. Altmann G.T.M., Mirkovic J. Incrementality and prediction in human sentence processing. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:583-609.
7. Arnold J.E., Fagnano M., Tanenhaus M.K. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2003, 32:25-36.
8. Atkinson J., Campbell F.W., Francis M.R. The magic number 4+/?0. Perception 1976, 5:327-334.
9. Baddeley A. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:417-423.
10. Baddeley A. Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2003, 4(10):829-839.
11. Baddeley A.D., Hitch G. Working memory. Recent advances in learning and motivation 1974, vol. 8:47-90. Academic Press, New York.
12. Baddeley A., Lieberman K. Spatial working memory. Attention and performance, VIII 1980, 521-539. R. Nickerson (Ed.).
13. Belke E., Humphreys G.W., Watson D.G., Meyer A.S., Telling A.L. Top-down effects of semantic knowledge in visual search are modulated by cognitive but not perceptual load. Attention, perception, & psychophysics 2008, 70:1444-1458.
14. Bravo M.J., Farid H. The specificity of the search template. Journal of Vision 2009, 9:1-9.
15. Brooks R.A. Intelligence without reason. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence 1991, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco.
16. Bundesen C. A theory of visual attention. Psychological Review 1990, 97:523-547.
17. Bundesen C., Habekost T., Kyllingsbæk S. A neural theory of visual attention: Bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychological Review 2005, 112:291-328.
18. Burkell J.A., Pylyshyn Z.W. Searching through subsets: A test of the visual indexing hypothesis. Spatial Vision 1997, 11:225-258.
19. Cavanagh P., Alvarez G.A. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2005, 9:349-354.
20. Cave K.R. The FeatureGate model of visual attention. Psychological Research 1999, 62:182-194.
21. Chelazzi L., Miller E.K., Duncan J., Desimone R. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 1993, 363:345-347.
22. Chun M.M., Jiang Y. Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 36:28-71.
23. Collins A.M., Loftus E.F. A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 1975, 82:407-428.
24. Collins A.M., Quillian M.R. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behavior 1969, 8(2):240-248.
25. Cooper R.M. The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology 1974, 6:84-107.
26. Cowan N. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:87-185.
27. Cree G.S., McRae K. Analyzing the factors underlying the structure and computation of the meaning of chipmunk, cherry, chisel, cheese, and cello (and many other such concrete nouns). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2003, 132:163-201.
28. Dahan D., Tanenhaus M.K. Looking at the rope when looking for the snake: Conceptually mediated eye movements during spoken-word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2005, 12:453-459.
29. Dell'Acqua R., Sessa P., Toffanin P., Luria R., Jolicoeur P. Orienting attention to objects in visual short-term memory. Neuropsychologia 2009, 48:419-428.
30. Desimone R., Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 1995, 18:193-222.
31. Downing P.E. Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention. Psychological Science 2000, 11(6):467-473.
32. Downing P.E., Dodds C.M. Competition in visual working memory for control of search. Visual Cognition 2004, 11(6):689-703.
33. Duncan J., Humphreys G.W. Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 1989, 96:433-458.
34. Eberhard K., Spivey-Knowlton M., Sedivy J., Tanenhaus M. Eye movements as a window into real-time spoken language comprehension in natural contexts. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 1995, 24:409-436.
35. Eimer M., Kiss M. An electrophysiological measure of access to representations in visual working memory. Psychophysiology 2010, 47:197-200.
36. Elman J.L., Bates E.A., Johnson M.H., Karmiloff-Smith A., Parisi D., Plunkett K. Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development 1996, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Farah M.J. Psychophysical evidence for shared representational medium for mental images and percepts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1985, 114(1):91-103.
38. Ferreira F., Apel J., Henderson J.M. Taking a new look at looking at nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:405-410.
39. Folk C.L., Remington R.W. Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:847-858.
40. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Johnston J.C. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 1992, 18:1030-1044.
41. Folk C.L., Remington R.W., Wu S.C. Additivity of abrupt onset effects supports nonspatial distraction, not the capture of spatial attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:308-313.
42. Friedman-Hill S.R., Robertson L.C., Treisman A. Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: Evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions. Science 1995, 269:853-855.
43. Gleitman L., January D., Nappa R., Trueswell J.C. On the give and take between event apprehension and utterance formulation. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57(4):544-569.
44. Grossberg S., Mingolla E., Ross W.D. A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial and object representations. Psychological Review 1994, 101:470-489.
45. Han S.W., Kim M.S. Do the contents of working memory capture attention? Yes, but cognitive control matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1292-1302.
46. Hanna J.E., Tanenhaus M.K. Pragmatic effects on reference resolution in a collaborative task: evidence from eye movements. Cognitive Science 2004, 28:105-115.
47. Henderson J.M., Ferreira F. Scene perception for psycholinguists. The interface of language, vision, and action 2004, Psychology Press, New York, NJ. J.M. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
48. Hoffman J.E. A two-stage model of visual search. Perception & Psychophysics 1979, 25:319-327.
49. Hoover M.A., Richardson D.C. When Facts Go Down the Rabbit Hole: Contrasting Features and Objecthood as Indexes to Memory. Cognition 2008, 108(2):533-542.
50. Horowitz T.S., Wolfe J.M. Visual search has no memory. Nature 1998, 394:575-577.
51. Houtkamp R., Roelfsema P.R. The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and the eyes during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:426-442.
52. Houtkamp R., Roelfsema P.R. Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research 2009, 73:317-326.
53. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. The online processing of ambiguous and unambiguous words in context: Evidence from head-mounted eye-tracking. The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP and beyond 2004, 187-207. Psychology Press, New York, NY. M. Carreiras, C. Clifton (Eds.).
54. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Word meaning and the control of eye fixation: Semantic competitor effects and the visual world paradigm. Cognition 2005, 96:B23-B32.
55. Huettig F., Altmann G.T.M. Visual-shape competition during language-mediated attention is based on lexical input and not modulated by contextual appropriateness. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:985-1018.
56. Huettig F., Hartsuiker R.J. When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: Eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production. Memory & Cognition 2008, 36:341-360.
57. Huettig F., McQueen J.M. The tug of war between phonological, semantic, and shape information in language-mediated visual search. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 54:460-482.
58. Huettig, F., McQueen, J.M. (under revision). Language-mediated visual search is determined by the nature of the information in the visual environment. Memory & Cognition.
59. Huettig F., Quinlan P.T., McDonald S.A., Altmann G.T.M. Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world. Acta Psychologica 2006, 121:65-80.
60. Humphreys G.W., Müller H.J. SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A connectionist model of visual search. Cognitive Psychology 1993, 25:43-110.
61. Intraub H. Rapid conceptual identification of sequentially presented pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1981, 7:604-610.
62. Itti L., Koch C. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research 2000, 40:1489-1506.
63. Jackendoff R. Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution 2002, Oxford University Press.
64. Jackendoff R. A parallel architecture perspective on language processing. Brain Research 2007, 1146:2-22.
65. Kahneman D., Treisman A., Gibbs B. The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology 1992, 24:175-219.
66. Kamide Y., Altmann G.T.M., Haywood S.L. The time course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:133-156.
67. Kanwisher N. Repetition blindness: Type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 1987, 27:117-143.
68. Keysar B., Barr D.J., Balin J.A., Brauner J.S. Taking perspective in conversation: The role of mutual knowledge in comprehension. Psychological Science 2000, 11:32-38.
69. Klein R. Does oculomotor readiness mediate cognitive control of visual attention?. Attention and performance VIII 1980, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ. R.S. Nickerson (Ed.).
70. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The coordinated interplay of scene, utterance, and world knowledge: evidence from eye tracking. Cognitive Science 2006, 30:481-529.
71. Knoeferle P., Crocker M.W. The influence of recent scene events on spoken comprehension: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 2007, 57(4):519-543.
72. Külpe O. Outlines of psychology 1909, Swan Sonnenschein, London.
73. Kuo B.C., Rao A., Lepsien J., Nobre A.C. Searching for targets within the spatial layout of visual short-term memory. The Journal of Neuroscience 2009, 29:8032-8038.
74. Landauer T.K., Dumais S.T. A solution to Plato's problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of acquisition, induction and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review 1997, 104:211-240.
75. Lavie N., Hirst A., Fockert J.W.D., Viding E. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2004, 133(3):339-354.
76. Logie R.H. Visuo-spatial working memory 1995, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, UK.
77. Luck S.J., Vogel E.K. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279-281.
78. MacDonald M.C., Christiansen M.H. Reassessing working memory: A comment on Just & Carpenter (1992) and Waters & Caplan (1996). Psychological Review 2002, 109:35-54.
79. MacDonald M.C., Pearlmutter N.J., Seidenberg M.S. The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution. Psychological Review 1994, 101:676-703.
80. Maljkovic V., Nakayama K. Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22(6):657-672.
81. Mandler G., Shebo B.J. Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1982, 111:1-22.
82. Marcus G. Rethinking eliminative connectionism. Cognitive Psychology 1998, 37:243-282.
83. Marcus G. The algebraic mind 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
84. Mayberry M., Crocker M.W., Knoeferle P. Learning to Attend: A Connectionist Model of the Coordinated Interplay of Utterance, Visual Context, and World Knowledge. Cognitive Science 2009, 33:449-496.
85. McDonald, S.A. (2000). Environmental determinants of lexical processing effort. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved December 10, 2004, from http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/publications/thesis/online/IP000007.pdf.
86. McRae K., de Sa V.R., Seidenberg M.S. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1997, 126:99-130.
87. Metzing C., Brennan S.E. When conceptual pacts are broken: Partner-specific effects in the comprehension of referring expressions. Journal of Memory and Language 2003, 49:201-213.
88. Meyer A.S., Belke E., Telling A.L., Humphreys G.W. Early activation of object names in visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2007, 14:710-716.
89. Meyer A.S., Damian M.F. Activation of distractor names in the picture-picture interference paradigm. Memory & Cognition 2007, 35:494-503.
90. Moores E., Laiti L., Chelazzi L. Associative knowledge controls deployment of visual selective attention. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:182-189.
91. Morsella E., Miozzo M. Evidence for a cascade model of lexical access in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2002, 28:555-563.
92. Mortier K., van Zoest W., Meeter M., Theeuwes J. Word cues affect detection but not localization responses. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics 2010, 72:65-75.
93. Müller H.J., Heller D., Ziegler J. Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics 1995, 57:1-17.
94. Müller H., Reimann B., Krummenacher J. Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(5):1021-1035.
95. Neely J.H. Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1977, 106:226-254.
96. Neely J.H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theory. Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition 1991, 264-336. Erlbaum, Hillsadale NJ. D. Besner, G.W. Humphreys (Eds.).
97. Olivers C.N.L. What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2009, 35:1275-1291.
98. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W. Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2003, 29(3):650-657.
99. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology 2003, 47:1-42.
100. Olivers C.N.L., Humphreys G.W., Braithwaite J.J. The preview search task: Evidence for visual marking. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:716-735.
101. Olivers C.N.L., Meeter M. On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity-driven. Visual Cognition 2006, 13:202-222.
102. Olivers C.N.L., Meijer F., Theeuwes J. Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1243-1265.
103. Olivers C.N.L., Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension defined conjunctions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1999, 52A:679-715.
104. Paivio A., Begg I. Pictures and words in visual search. Memory & Cognition 1974, 2:515-521.
105. Palmer J., Verghese P., Pavel M. The psychophysics of visual search. Vision Research 2000, 40:1227-1268.
106. Pashler H. Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics 1988, 44:369-378.
107. Pashler H., Shiu L.P. Do images involuntarily trigger search? A test of Pillsbury's hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1999, 6(3):445-448.
108. Pecher D., Zeelenberg R., Raaijmakers J.G.W. Does pizza prime coin? Perceptual priming in lexical decision and pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language 1998, 38:401-418.
109. Peters J., Goebel R., Roelfsema P.R. Remembered but unused: The accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2009, 1-11.
110. Phillips W.A. On the distinction between sensory storage and short-term visual memory. Perception & Psychophysics 1974, 16:283-290.
111. Pillsbury W.B. Attention 1908, Swan, Sonnenschein, London.
112. Pinto Y., Olivers C.N.L., Theeuwes J. When is search for a static target efficient?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32(1):59-72.
113. Postle B.R. Working memory as an emergent property of the mind and brain. Neuroscience 2006, 139:23-38.
114. Potter M.C. Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 1976, 2:509-522.
115. Pylyshyn Z. The role of location indexes in spatial perception: A sketch of the FINST spatial-index model. Cognition 1989, 32:65-97.
116. Pylyshyn Z. Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition 2001, 80:127-158.
117. Pylyshyn Z., Storm R.W. Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision 1988, 3:179-197.
118. Rensink R.A. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition 2000, 7:17-42.
119. Richardson D.C., Altmann G.T.M., Spivey M.J., Hoover M.A. Much ado about eye movements to nothing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:235-236.
120. Richardson D.C., Spivey M.J. Representation, space and Hollywood squares: Looking at things that aren't there anymore. Cognition 2000, 76:269-295.
121. Rogers T.T., McClelland J.L. Semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
122. Salverda A.P., Dahan D., McQueen J.M. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 2003, 90:51-89.
123. Schneider W., Shiffrin R.M. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review 1977, 84:1-66.
124. Schreij D., Olivers C.N.L. Object representations maintain attentional control settings across space and time. Cognition 2009, 113:111-116.
125. Schreij D., Owens C., Theeuwes J. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings. Percept & Psychophysics 2008, 70(2):208-218.
126. Schreij D., Theeuwes J., Olivers C.N.L. Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: additivity is no evidence for filtering. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2010, 72(3):672-682.
127. Shiffrin R.M., Schneider W. Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 1977, 84:127-881.
128. Smyth M.M., Scholey K.A. Interference in immediate spatial memory. Memory & Cognition 1994, 22(1):1-13.
129. Sorensen D.W., Bailey K.G.D. The world is too much: Effects of array size on the link between language comprehension and eye movements. Visual Cognition 2007, 15:112-115.
130. Soto D., Heinke D., Humphreys G.W., Blanco M.J. Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:248-261.
131. Soto D., Humphreys G.W. Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:730-757.
132. Soto D., Humphreys G.W., Heinke D. Working memory can guide pop-out search. Vision Research 2006, 46:1010-1018.
133. Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs 1960, 74(11). whole issue.
134. Spivey M., Geng J. Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research 2001, 65:235-241.
135. Spivey M.J., Marian V. Cross talk between native and second languages: Partial activation of an irrelevant lexicon. Psychological Science 1999, 10:281-284.
136. Spivey M.J., Richardson D.C., Fitneva S.A. Memory outside of the brain: oculomotor indexes to visual and linguistic Information. The interface of language, vision, and action: Eye movements and the visual world 2004, Psychology Press, New York. J. Henderson, F. Ferreira (Eds.).
137. Spivey M., Tanenhaus M., Eberhard K., Sedivy J. Eye movements and spoken language comprehension: Effects of visual context on syntactic ambiguity resolution. Cognitive Psychology 2002, 45:447-481.
138. Tanenhaus M.K., Magnuson J.S., Dahan D., Chambers C.G. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken language comprehension: Evaluating a linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 2000, 29:557-580.
139. Tanenhaus M.K., Spivey-Knowlton M.J., Eberhard K.M., Sedivy J.C. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632-1634.
140. Theeuwes J. Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics 1991, 50:184-193.
141. Theeuwes J. Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics 1992, 51:599-606.
142. Theeuwes J., Burg E.V.D. The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:1335-1351.
143. Theeuwes J., Olivers C.N.L., Chiszk C.L. Remembering a location makes the eyes curve away. Psychological Science 2005, 16(3):196-199.
144. Theeuwes J., Reimann B., Mortier K. Visual search for featural singletons: no top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition 2006, 14:466-489.
145. Theeuwes J., Van der Burg E. The role of cueing in attentional capture. Visual Cognition 2008, 16:232-247.
146. Treisman A., Gelade G. A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 1980, 12:97-136.
147. Treisman A., Sato S. Conjunction search revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:459-478.
148. Trick L.M., Pylyshyn Z.W. Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review 1994, 101:80-102.
149. Trueswell J.C., Sekerina I., Hill N.M., Logrip M.L. The kindergarten-path effect: Studying on-line sentence processing in young children. Cognition 1999, 73:89-134.
150. Vickery T.J., King L.-W., Jiang Y. Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision 2005, 5:81-92.
151. Watson D.G., Humphreys G.W. Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review 1997, 104:90-122.
152. Weber A., Cutler A. Lexical competition in non-native spoken-word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 2004, 50:1-25.
153. Wilson M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:625-636.
154. Wolfe J.M. Guided Search 2.0. A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1994, 1:202-238.
155. Wolfe J.M. Visual search. Attention 1998, Psychology Press, Hove, UK. H. Pashler (Ed.).
156. Wolfe J.M. Moving towards solutions to some enduring controversies in visual research. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(2).
157. Wolfe J.M., Horowitz T.S., Kenner N., Hyle M., Vasan N. How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research 2004, 44(12):1411-1426.
158. Wolfe J.M., Klempen N., Dahlen K. Post attentive vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2000, 26(2):693-716.
159. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J. Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2007, 33:363-377.
160. Woodman G.F., Luck S.J., Schall J.D. The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex 2007, 17:i118-i124.
161. Woodman G.F., Vogel E.K., Luck S.J. Visual search remains efficient when visual working memory is full. Psychological Science 2001, 12:219-224.
162. Yantis S., Johnson D.N. Mechanisms of attentional priority. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1990, 16:812-825.
163. Yantis S., Jonides J. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1984, 10:601-621.
164. Yee E., Overton E., Thompson-Schill S.L. Looking for meaning: Eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16(5):869-874.
165. Yee E., Sedivy J.C. Eye movements to pictures reveal transient semantic activation during spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2006, 32:1-14.