Word cues affect detection but not localization responses

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 65-75

  Karen, Mortier ^a   Van Zoest, Wieske ^b   Meeter, Martlin ^b   Theeuwes, J A N ^b  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; HUMANS; SIGNAL DETECTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77949326126     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.1.65     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BICHOT, N. P., & SCHALL, J. D. (2002). Priming in macaque frontal cortex during popout visual search: Feature-based facilitation and location-based inhibition of return. Journal of Neurosclence, 22, 4675-4685.
2. CHAN, L. K. H., & HAYWARD, W. G. (2009). Feature integration theory revisited: Dissociating feature detection and attentional guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception&Performance, 35, 119-132. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.119
3. COHEN, A, & MAGEN, H. (1999). Intra- and cross-dimensional visual search for single-feature targets. Perception&Psychophysics, 61, 291-307.
4. COHEN, A., & SHOUP, R. (1997). Perceptual dimensional constraints in response selection processes. Cognitive Psychology, 32, 128-181. doi:10.1006/cogp.l997.0648
5. CORBETTA, M., & SHULMAN, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201-215. doi:10.1038/nrn755
6. DONK, M., & VAN ZOEST, W. (2008). Effects of salience are shortlived. Psychological Science, 19, 733-739. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280 .2008.02149.x
7. DUNCAN, J. (1985). Visual search and visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Maim (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 85-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. EGETH, H. (1977). Attention and preattention. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 11, pp. 277-320). New York: Academic Press.
9. FOUND, A., & MÜLLER, H. J. (1996). Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a " dimensionweighting" account Perception&Psychophysics, 58, 88-101.
10. HILLSTROM, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 800-817.
11. KRAMER, A. F., HAHN, S., IRWIN, D. E., & THEEUWES, J. (2000). Age differences in the control of looking behavior Do you know where your eyes have been? Psychological Science, 11, 210-217.
12. KRUMMENACHER, J., MÜLLER, H. J., & HELLER, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception&Psychophysics, 63, 907-917.
13. KRUMMENACHER, J., MÜLLER, H. J., & HELLER, D. (2002). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Redundancy gains in compound tasks. Visual Cognition, 9, 801-837. doi:10.1080/ 13506280143000269
14. KUMADA, T. (2001). Feature-based control of attention: Evidence for two forms of dimension weighting. Perception&Psychophysics, 63, 698-708.
15. Li, Z. (2002). A saliency map in primary visual cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 9-16. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01817-9
16. MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1994). Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features. Memory&Cognition, 22, 657-672.
17. MCPEEK, R. M., MALJKOVIC, V., & NAKAYAMA, K. (1999). Saccades require focal attention and are facilitated by a short-term memory system. Vision Research, 39, 1555-1566. doi:10.1016/S0042 -6989(98)00228-234
18. MEETER, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2006). Cuing the dimension of a distracton Verbal cues of target identity also benefit same-dimension distractor singletons. Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 13, 118-124.
19. MILNER, A. D., & GOODALE, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. MORTIER, K., THEEUWES, J., & STARREVELD, P. A. (2005). Response selection modulates visual search within and across dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 542-557. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.542
21. MÜLLER, H. J., HELLER, D., & ZIEGLER, J. (1995). Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across dimensions. Perception & Psychophysics, 57, 1-17.
22. MÜLLER, H. J., & KRUMMENACHER, J. (2006). Locus of dimension weighting: Preattentive or postselective? Visual Cognition, 14, 490-513. doi:10.1080/13506280500194154
23. MÜLLER, H. J., REIMANN, B., & KRUMMENACHER, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception&Performance, 29, 1021-1035. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.1021
24. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singleton depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 650-657. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.3.650
25. OLIVERS, C. N. L., & MEETER, M. (2006). On the dissociation between compound and present/absent tasks in visual search: Intertrial priming is ambiguity-driven. Visual Cognition, 13, 1-28. doi:10.1080/13506280500308101
26. PALMER, J. (1995). Attention in visual search: Distinguishing four causes of a set-size effect Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 118-123. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.1995.tb00258.x
27. RAUSCHENBERGER, R. (2003). Attentional capture by auto- and allocues. Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 10, 814-842.
28. THEEUWES, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599-606.
29. THEEUWES, J., & GODUN, R. (2001). Attention and oculomotor capture. In C. Folk & B. Gibson (Eds.), Attraction, distraction, and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture (pp. 121-150). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
30. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., & ATCHLEY, P. (1999). Attentional effects on preattentive vision: Spatial precues affect the detection of simple features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 341-347.
31. THEEUWES, J., KRAMER, A. F., HAHN, S., IRWIN, D. E., & ZELINSKY, G. J. (1999). Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 1595-1608. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1595
32. THEEUWES, J., REIMANN, B., & MORTIER, K. (2006). Visual search for featural singletons: No top-down modulation, only bottom-up priming. Visual Cognition, 14, 466-489. doi:10.1080/13506280500195110
33. THEEUWES, J., & VAN DER BURG, E. (2007). The role of spatial and nonspatial information in visual selectioa Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception&Performance, 33, 1335-1351. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.6.1335
34. TREISMAN, A. M. (1988). Features and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201-237. doi:10.1080/02724988843000104
35. UNGERLEJDER, L. G., & MISHKIN, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. VAN ZOEST, W., & DONK, M. (2005). The effects of salience on saccadic target selection. Visual Cognition, 12, 353-375. doi:10.1111/j.1467 -9280.2008.02149.x
37. VAN ZOEST, W., DONK, M., & THEEUWES, J. (2004). The role of stimulusdriven and goal-driven control in saccadic visual selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 746-759. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.746
38. WOLFE, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin&Review, 1, 202-238.
39. WOLFE, J. M., BUTCHER, S. J., LEE, C., & HYLE, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception&Performance, 29, 483-502. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483
40. WOLFE, J. M., HOROWITZ, T. S., KENNER, N., HYLE, M., & VASAN, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of topdown guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411-1426. doi:10.10167/j.visres.2003.11.024