Integrating literacy and science in biology Teaching and learning impacts of reading apprenticeship professional development

American Educational Research Journal

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 647-717

  Greenleaf, Cynthia L ^a   Litman, Cindy ^a   Hanson, Thomas L ^a   Rosen, Rachel ^a,c   Boscardin, Christy K ^b   Herman, Joan ^b   Schneider, Steven A ^d   Madden, Sarah ^d   Jones, Barbara ^b  

^a WestEd   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

^d WestEd   (United States)

Author keywords

academic literacy; disciplinary literacy; professional development; reading comprehension; science literacy; STEM

Indexed keywords

EID: 79955829877     PISSN: 00028312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3102/0002831210384839     Document Type: Article

References (177)

1. Abell S.A.Twenty years later Does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea?.International Journal of Science Education.2008;30 (10) 1405-1416.
2. ACT.(2006).Reading between the lines What the ACT reveals about college readinessin reading.Retrieved from http: //www.act.org/path/policy/pdf/reading_report.pdf
3. Allington R.L.Literacy for a diverse society Perspectives, practices, and policies.Hiebert E.H., ed.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 1991:237-252.
4. Allington R.L.,McGill-Franzen A.School response to reading failure Chapter 1 and special education students in Grades 2, 4, and 8.Elementary School Journal.1989;89 529-542.
5. Alvermann D.,Moore D.Handbook of reading research.Barr R.Kamil M.L.Mosenthal P.Pearson P.D., ed.New York, NY Longman; 1991: 951-983.
6. Project 2061 Benchmarks for science literacy.New York, NY Oxford University Press; 1993
7. Aschbacher, P.R.(1999).Developing indicators of classroom practice to monitor andsupport school reform (CSE Tech.Rep.No.513).Los Angeles: University ofCalifornia, Los Angeles/Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, andStudent Testing.
8. Baker L.Science learning Processes and applications.Santa C.Alvermann D., ed.Newark, DE International Reading Association; 1991 2-13.
9. Ball D.,Cohen D.Teaching as the learning profession Handbook of policy and practice.Darling-Hammond L.Sykes D., ed.San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass; 1999
10. Barton, P.(2003).Parsing the achievement gap: Baselines for tracking progress.Policyinformation report of the Educational Testing Service.Princeton, NJ: EducationalTesting Service.Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/research/pic
11. Baumann J.F.,Duffy A.M.Engaged reading for pleasure and learning A report from the National Reading Research Center.Athens, GA National Reading Research Center; 1997
12. Bayer A.S.Collaborative apprenticeship learning Language and thinking across the curriculum, K-12.Mountain View, CA Mayfield; 1990
13. Beck I.L.,McKeown M.G.,Hamilton R.L.,Kucan L.Questioning the author An approach for enhancing student engagement with text.Newark, DE International Reading Association; 1997
14. Borko H.Professional development and teacher learning Mapping the terrain.Educational Researcher.2004;33 (8) 3-15.
15. Boston M.D.,Smith M.S.Transforming secondary mathematics teaching Increasing the cognitive demands of instructional tasks used in teachers' classrooms.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.2009;40 (2) 119-156.
16. Bransford J.,Derry S.,Berliner D.,Hammerness K.Preparing teachers for a changing world.Darling-Hammond L.Bransford J., ed.San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass; 2005 40-87.
17. How people learn Brain, mind, experience, and school.Bransford J.D.Brown A.L.Cocking R.R., ed.Washington, DC National Academy Press; 1999
18. Brown J.S.,Collins A.,Newman S.Knowing, learning and instruction Essays in honor of Robert Glaser.Resnick L.B., ed.Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; 1989 453-494.
19. Bybee R.W.Achieving scientific literacy Using the National Science Education standards to provide equal opportunities for all students to learn scienceScience Teacher.1995;62 (7) 28-33.
20. Bybee R.W.Achieving scientific literacy From purposes to practices.Portsmouth, NH Heinemann; 1997
21. Calfee R.,Miller R.G.Paper distributed at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 2004 San Diego, CA; 2004.
22. Construction of California's 1999 School Characteristics Index and similar schools ranks.Sacramento, CA Author, Office of Policy and Evaluation; 2000
23. Camburn E.,Rowan B.,Taylor J.E.Distributed leadership in schools The case of elementary schools adopting comprehensive school reform modelsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.2003;25 347-373.
24. Time to act An agenda for advancing adolescent literacy for college and career success.New York, NY Carnegie Corporation of New York; 2010
25. Ten big effects of the No Child Left Behind act on public schools.Washington, DC Author; 2006
26. Cervetti G.,Pearson P.D.,Bravo M.A.,Barber J.Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom.Douglas R.Klentschy M.Worth K., ed.Arlington, VA National Science Teachers Association Press; 2006 221-244.
27. Clare L.Using teachers' assignments as an indicator of classroom practice.Los Angeles University of California, Los Angeles/Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing; 2000
28. Clare L.,Aschbacher P.Exploring the technical quality of using assignments and student work as indicators of classroom practiceEducational Assessment.2001;7 39-59.
29. Clark K.,Borko H.Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Hoines M.J.Fuglestad A., ed.Bergen, Norway Bergen University College; 2004 223-230.
30. Cohen, D., & Ball, D.(2000).Instructional innovation: Reconsidering the story.TheStudy of Instructional Improvement working paper.Retrieved from http://www.sii.soe.umich.edu/documents/InstructionalInnovation.pdf
31. Conley M.W.Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potentialHarvard Educational Review.2008;78 (1) 84-108.
32. Cook T.D.,Campbell D.T.Quasi-experimentation Design and analysis issues in field settings.Chicago, IL Rand-McNally; 1979
33. Cunningham A.,Stanovich K.What reading does for the mindAmerican Educator.1998; 8-15.
34. Darling-Hammond L.,Sykes G.Wanted A national teacher supply policy for education The right way to meet the "highly qualified teacher" challengeEducation Policy Analysis Archives.2003;11 (33) 1-57.
35. Darling-Hammond L.,Wei R.C.,Andree A.,Richardson N.,Orphanos S.Professional learning in the learning profession A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.Dallas, TX National Staff Development Council; 2009
36. Davidson J.,Koppenhaver D.Adolescent literacy What works and why.2nd ed.New York, NY Garland; 1993
37. Delpit L.D.Other people's children Cultural conflict in the classroom.New York, NY New Press; 1995
38. Desimone L.M.Improving impact studies of teachers' professional development Toward better conceptualizations and measuresEducational Researcher.2009;38 (3) 181-199.
39. Desimone L.M.,Garet M.,Birman B.,Porter A.,Yoon K.S.How do district management and implementation strategies relate to the quality of the professional development that districts provide to teachers?Teachers College Record.2002;104 (7) 1265-1312.
40. Digisi L.L.,Willett J.B.What high school biology teachers say about their textbook use A descriptive studyJournal of Research in Science Teaching.1995;32 123-142.
41. Donahue P.L.,Voelkl K.E.,Campbell J.R.,Mazzeo J.The NAEP 1998 reading report card for the nation and the states.Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics; 1999
42. How people learn Bridging research and practice.Donovan S.M.Bransford J.D.Pellegrino J.W., ed.Washington, DC National Academy Press; 1999
43. Duffy G.G.,Roehler L.R.,Meloth M.S.,Vavrus L.G.,Book C.,Putnam J.,Wesselman R.The relationship between explicit verbal explanations during reading skill instruction and student awareness and achievement A study of reading teacher effectsReading Research Quarterly.1986;21 (3) 237-252.
44. Duke N.3.6 minutes per day The scarcity of informational texts in first gradeReading Research Quarterly.2000;35 (2) 202-224.
45. Durkin D.What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instructionReading Research Quarterly.1978;14 (4) 481-533.
46. Taking science to school Learning and teaching science in Grades K-8.Duschl R.A.Schweingruber H.A.Shouse A.W., ed.Washington, DC National Academies Press; 2006
47. Dweck C.,Molden D.Handbook of competence and motivation.Elliot A.Dweck C., ed.New York, NY Guilford; 2005 122-140.
48. Fennema E.,Carpenter T.P.,Franke M.L.,Levi L.,Jacobs V.R.,Empson S.B.A longitudinal study of learning to use children's thinking in mathematics instructionJournal for Research in Mathematics Education.1996;27 (4) 403-434.
49. Fielding L.G.,Pearson D.P.Reading comprehension What worksEducational Leadership.1994;51 62-68.
50. Fishman B.J.,Marx R.W.,Best S.,Tal R.T.Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reformTeaching and Teacher Education.2003;19 643-658.
51. Freedman S.W.,Flower L.,Hull G.,Hayes J.R.Ten years of research Achievements of the National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy.Berkeley, CA National Center for the Study of Writing; 1995
52. Fullan M.The new meaning of educational change.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 1991
53. Garet M.S.,Porter A.C.,Desimone L.,Birman B.F.,Yoon K.S.What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachersAmerican Educational Research Journal.2001;38 915-945.
54. Gee J.Critical issues Reading and the new literacy studies Reframing the National Academy of Science report on readingJournal of Literacy Research.1999;31 (3) 355-374.
55. Goldstein H.Multilevel models in educational and social research.London, UK New York Griffin Oxford University Press; 1987
56. Greenleaf, C.(2006, February).Fostering metacognitive conversation in professionalcommunities and subject-area classrooms.Adolescent Literacy in Perspective, pp.2-5.Retrieved from http://www.ohiorc.org/adlit
57. Greenleaf C.,Brown W.,Litman C.Bridging the gap Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in Grades 4-12.Strickland D.Alvermann D., ed.Newark, NJ International Reading Association; 2004
58. Greenleaf C.,Hinchman K.Reimagining our inexperienced adolescent readers From struggling, striving, marginalized, and reluctant to thrivingJournal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.2009;53 (1) 4-13.
59. Greenleaf C.,Hull G.,Reilly B.Learning from our diverse students Helping teachers rethink problematic teaching and learning situationsTeaching and Teacher Education.1994;10 (5) 521-541.
60. Greenleaf C.,Katz M.Bakhtinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning.Freedman S.W.Ball A.F., ed.Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press; 2004 172-202.
61. Greenleaf C.,Schoenbach R.Close readings A study of key issues in the use of literacy learning cases for the professional development of secondary teachers.Final report to the Spencer and MacArthur Foundations Professional Development Research and Documentation Program.Oakland, CA Strategic Literacy Initiative, WestEd; 2001
62. Greenleaf C.,Schoenbach R.Improving reading achievement through professional development.Strickland D.S.Kamil M.L., ed.Norwood, MA Christopher-Gordon Publishers, Inc; 2004 85-96.
63. Greenleaf C.,Schoenbach R.,Cziko C.,Mueller F.Apprenticing adolescents to academic literacyHarvard Educational Review.2001;71 (1) 79-129.
64. Grigg W.S.,Lauko M.A.,Brockway D.M.The nation's report card Science 2005.Washington, DC Government Printing Office; 2006
65. Grossman P.,Wineburg S.,Woolworth S.Toward a theory of teacher communityTeachers College Record.2001;103 942-1012.
66. Groves F.Science vocabulary load of selected secondary science textbooksSchool Science and Mathematics.1995;95 (5) 231-235.
67. Guskey T.R.Professional development and teacher changeTeachers and Teaching Theory and Practice.2002;8 (3/4) 381-391.
68. Guskey T.R.,Huberman M.Professional development in education New paradigms and practices.Columbia, NY Teachers College Press; 1996
69. Guskey T.R.,Yoon K.S.What works in professional development?Phi Delta Kappan.2009;90 (7) 495-500.
70. Guthrie J.T.,Greaney V.Handbook of reading research.Barr R.Kamil M.L.Mosenthal P.Pearson P.D., ed.New York, NY Longman; 1991 68-96.
71. Guthrie J.T.,McGough K.,Bennett L.,Rice M.E.Developing engaged readers in school and home communities.Baker L.Afflerbach P.Reinking D., ed.Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996 165-190.
72. Guthrie J.T.,Schafer W.D.,Hutchinson S.R.Relations of document literacy and prose literacy to occupational and societal characteristics of young Black and White adultsReading Research Quarterly.1991;26 30-48.
73. Hargreaves A.Teaching in the knowledge society Education in the age of insecurity.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 2003
74. Hart J.,Lee O.Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of English language learnersBilingual Research Journal.2003;27 (3) 475-501.
75. Haycock, K.(2001).Closing the achievement gap.Educational Leadership, 58(6),6-11.Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/readingroom/edlead/0103/haycock.html
76. Heller R.,Greenleaf C.Literacy instruction in the content areas Getting to the core of middle and high school improvement.Washington, DC Alliance for Excellent Education; 2007
77. Hiebert E.Literacy for a diverse society Perspectives, policies, and practices.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 1991
78. Hill C.J.,Bloom H.S.,Black A.R.,Lipsey M.W.Empirical benchmarks for interpreting effect sizes in researchChild Development Perspectives.2008;2 (3) 172-177.
79. Huberman M.Networks that alter teaching Conceptualizations, exchanges and experimentsTeachers and Teaching Theory and Practice.1995;1 (2) 193-211.
80. Huffman D.,Thomas K.,Lawrenz F.Relationship between professional development, teachers' instructional practices, and the achievement of students in science and mathematicsSchool Science and Mathematics.2003;103 (8) 378-387.
81. Hull G.,Rose M.Rethinking remediation Toward a social-cognitive understanding of problematic reading and writingWritten Communication.1989;6 (2) 139-154.
82. Hynd C.Learning from text across conceptual domains.Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998
83. The Black-White test score gap.Jencks C.Phillips M., ed.Washington, DC Brookings Institution; 1998
84. Kamil, M.L., Borman, G.D., Dole, J., Kral, C.C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J.(2008).Improving adolescent literacy Effective classroom and intervention practices.Apractice guide (NCEE 2008-4027).Washington, DC National Center for EducationEvaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education.Retrieved from http //ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc.
85. Kazemi E.,Franke M.L.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education.2004;7 203-235.
86. Kennedy M.Form and substance in inservice teacher education.Madison University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education; 1998
87. Killion J.Scaling the elusive summitJournal of Staff Development.1998;19 (4) 12-16.
88. Klingner J.K.The science of professional developmentJournal of Learning Disabilities.2004;37 (3) 248-255.
89. Knapp M.S.Teaching for meaning in high-poverty classrooms.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 1995
90. Kucan L.,Beck I.L.Thinking aloud and reading comprehension research Inquiry, instruction, and social interactionReview of Educational Research.1997;67 (3) 271-299.
91. Lai M.K.,McNaughton S.,Amituanai-Toloa M.,Turner R.,Hsiao S.Sustained acceleration of achievement in reading comprehension The New Zealand experienceReading Research Quarterly.2009;44 (1) 30-56.
92. Langer J.Beating the odds Teaching middle and high school students to read and write wellAmerican Educational Research Journal.2001;38 837-880.
93. Lave J.,Wenger E.Situated learning Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press; 1991
94. Lee C.D.A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship Teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretationReading Research Quarterly.1995;30 608-630.
95. Lee C.D.,Spratley A.Reading in the disciplines The challenges of adolescent literacy.New York, NY Carnegie Corporation of New York; 2010
96. Lee J.,Grigg W.,Donahue P. The nation's report card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007-496). Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education; 2007
97. Lemke J.L.Talking science Language, learning, and values.Norwood, NJ Ablex; 1990
98. Lemke J.L.International handbook of literacy and technology.McKenna M.G.Labbo L.D.Keiffer R.D.Reinking D., ed.Hillsdale, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; 2006 3-14.
99. Litman C.,Greenleaf C.Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction.Hinchman K.A.Sheridan-Thomas H.K., ed.New York, NY Guilford; 2008 275-296.
100. Little J.W.Paper presented as an invited address at the biannual conference of the International Study Association on Teachers and Teaching; 2001 Faro, Portugal; 2001.
101. Little J.W.Locating learning in teachers' communities of practice Opening up problems of analysis in records of everyday workTeaching and Teaching Education.2002;18 917-946.
102. Loucks-Horsley S.,Love N.,Styles K.E.,Mundry S.,Hewson P.W.Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics.Thousand Oaks, CA Corwin Press; 2003
103. Loucks-Horsley S.,Matsumoto C.Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and scienceSchool Science and Mathematics.1999;99 (5) 258-271.
104. Manzo A.ReQuest A method for improving reading comprehension through reciprocal questioningJournal of Reading.1969;12 (3) 123-126.
105. Matsumura L.C.Los Angeles University of California, Los Angeles/Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing; 2003
106. McLaughlin M.W.,Talbert J.E.Professional communities and the work of high school teaching.Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press; 2001
107. McMahon M.,McCormack B.Learning from text across conceptual domains.Hynd C., ed.Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum; 1998 227-262.
108. McMurrer J.Choices, changes, and challenges Curriculum and instruction in the NCLB era.Washington, DC Center on Educational Policy; 2007
109. Miller R.G.Creating thoughtful and expressive teachers and students using read-write activities Final report to NSF.IEA-ETS Research Institute; 2004
110. Moje E.B.Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning A call for changeJournal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy.2008;52 (2) 96-107.
111. Moje E.B.,Ciechanowski K.M.,Kramer K.,Ellis L.,Carrilo R.,Collazo T.Working toward third space in content area literacy An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourseReading Research Quarterly.2004;39 (1) 38-70.
112. Moje E.B.,Dillon D.R.,O'Brien D.G.Re-examining the roles of the learner, the text, and the context in secondary literacyJournal of Educational Research.2000;93 165-180.
113. Moje E.B.,Overby M.,Tysvaer N.,Morris K.The complex world of adolescent literacy Myths, motivations, and mysteriesHarvard Educational Review.2008;78 (1) 107-154.
114. Mullis I.V.,Dossey A.,Campbell J.R.,Gentile C.A.,O'Sullivan C.,Latham A.S.NAEP 1992 trends in academic progress.Washington, DC Government Printing Office; 1994
115. Murray D.M.Design and analysis of group randomized trials.New York, NY Oxford University Press; 1998
116. National Assessment of Educational Progress.(2006).The nation's report card Science 2005.Washington, DCAuthor.Retrieved from http //nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006466
117. National Assessment of Educational Progress.(2007).The nation's report card Reading 2007.Washington, DCAuthor.Retrieved from http //nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007496
118. National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2009). NAEP 2008 trends in academic progress (NCES 2009-469). Washington, DC National Center for Education Statistics; 2009
119. Highlights from PISA 2006 Performance of U.S.15-year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context.Washington, DC Author; 2007
120. National science education standards.Washington, DC National Academy Press; 1996
121. National Council of Chief State School Officers & National Governors Association.(2010).Common core standards for English Language Arts and literacy inhistory/social studies and science.Retrieved from http //www.corestandards.org/Standards/K12/
122. Teaching children to read An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC U.S.Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; 2000
123. Fulfilling the promise Biology education in the nation's schools.Washington, DC National Academy Press; 1990.
124. A pedagogy of multiliteracies Designing social futures Harvard Educational Review.1996;66 60-92.
125. Norris S.P.,Phillips L.M.How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacyScience Education.2003;87 224-240.
126. Oakes J.Keeping track How schools structure inequality.2nd ed.New Haven, CT Yale University Press; 2005
127. Osborne J.Science without literacy A ship without a sail?Cambridge Journal of Education.2002;32 (2) 203-218.
128. Osborne J.Arguing to learn in science The role of collaborative, critical discourseScience.2010;328 463-466.
129. Pajares M.F.Teachers' beliefs and educational research Cleaning up a messy constructReview of Educational Research.1992;62 307-332.
130. Palinscar A.S.,Brown A.L.Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activitiesCognition and Instruction.1984;1 (2) 117-175.
131. Paris S.G.Reinterpreting the development of reading skillsReading Research Quarterly.2005;40 (2) 184-202.
132. Pearson P.D.The first R Every child's right to read.Graves M.van den Broek P.Taylor B.M., ed.New York, NY Teacher's College Press; 1996 259-274.
133. Pearson P.D.,Moje E.,Greenleaf C.Literacy and science Each in the service of the otherScience.2010;328 459-463.
134. Phelps R.,Graham A.,Kerr B.Teachers and ICT Exploring a metacognitive approach to professional developmentAustralasian Journal of Educational Technology.2004;20 (1) 49-68.
135. Porter A.,Garet M.,Desimone L.,Birman B.Providing effective professional development Lessons from the Eisenhower programScience Educator.2003;12 (1) 23-40.
136. Pressley M.Reading instruction that works The case for balanced teaching.New York, NY Guilford Press; 1998
137. Umphrey J.Toward 21st century supports An interview with Linda Darling-HammondPrincipal Leadership.2009;10 (1) 18-21.
138. Raudenbush S.W.,Bryk A.S.Hierarchical linear models Applications and data analysis methods.2nd ed.Newbury Park, CA Sage; 2002
139. Reed D.K.A synthesis of professional development on the implementation of literacy strategies for middle school content area teachersResearch in Middle Level Education Online.2009;32 (10) 1-12.
140. Rentner D.S.,Scott C.,Kober N.,Chudowsky N.,Chudowsky V.,Joftus S.,Zabala D.From the capital to the classroom Year 4 of the No Child Left Behind Act.Washington, DC Center on Education Policy; 2006
141. Teacher change and the staff development process.Richardson V., ed.New York, NY Teachers College Press; 1994
142. Richardson V.The dilemmas of professional developmentPhi Delta Kappan.2003;84 (5) 401-406.
143. Romance N.R.,Vitale M.R.Implementing an in-depth expanded science model in elementary schools Multi-year findings, research issues, and policy implicationsInternational Journal of Science Education.2001;23 (4) 373-404.
144. Romance, N.R.,& Vitale, M.R.(2008, November 12).Perspectives for improvingschool instruction and learning An interdisciplinary model for integratingscience and reading in Grades K-5.Paper presented at the Committee onEducation Workshop on Education lecture series, Chicago, IL.Retrieved from
145. Roth K.Science learning Processes and applications.Santa C.Alvermann D., ed.Newark, DE International Reading Association; 1991 48-63.
146. Rutherford F.J.,Ahlgren A.Science for all Americans.New York, NY Oxford University Press; 1990
147. What adolescents deserve A commitment to students' literacy learning.Rycik J.Irvin J., ed.Newark, DE International Reading Association; 2001
148. Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction Perspectives on theory and practice.Saul W.E., ed.Newark, DE International Reading Association; 2004
149. Schoenbach R.,Greenleaf C.Handbook of adolescent literacy research.Christenbury L.Bomer R.Smagorinsky P., ed.New York, NY Guilford Press; 2009 98-112.
150. Schoenbach R.,Greenleaf C.,Cziko C.,Hurwitz L.Reading for understanding A guide to improving reading in middle and high school classrooms.San Francis.co, CA Jossey-Bass; 1999
151. Scott J.Science and language links Classroom implications.Portsmouth, NH Heinemann; 1993
152. Scribner S.,Cole M.The psychology of literacy.Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press; 1981
153. Shanahan T.,Shanahan C.Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents Rethinking content-area literacyHarvard Educational Review.2008;78 (1) 40-59.
154. Shulman L.Those who understand Knowledge growth in teachingEducational Researcher.1986;15 4-14.
155. Shulman L.Knowledge and teaching Foundations of the new reformHarvard Educational Review.1987;57 114-135.
156. Sizer T.Horace's compromise The dilemma of the American high school.Boston, MA Houghton Mifflin; 1992
157. Snipes J.,Horwitz A.Advancing adolescent literacy in urban schools.Washington, DC Council of the Great City Schools; 2008
158. Snow C.Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about scienceScience.2010;328 450-452.
159. Snow, C.(2002).Reading for understanding Toward a research and developmentprogram in reading comprehension.ArlingtonRAND.Retrieved from http//www.rand.org/publications/MR/MR1465/
160. Somers M.-A.,Corrin W.,Sepanik S.,Salinger T.,Levin J.,Zmach C.The Enhanced Reading Opportunities Study final report The impact of supplementary literacy courses for struggling ninth-grade readers.Washington, DC National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S.Department of Education; 2010
161. Sparks D.,Hirsh S.A new vision for staff development Results-driven education, systems thinking, and constructivism.Oxford, OH National Staff Development Council; 1997
162. Sparks D.The looming danger of a two-tiered professional development systemPhi Delta Kappan.2004;86 304-306.
163. Spillane J.P.External reform initiatives and teachers' efforts to reconstruct their practice The mediating role of teachers' zones of enactmentJournal of Curriculum Studies.1999;31 (2) 143-175.
164. Stanovich K.E.Matthew effects in reading Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacyReading Research Quarterly.1986;21 (4) 360-407.
165. Improving reading achievement through professional development.Strickland D.S.Kamil M.L., ed.Norwood, MA Christopher-Gordon; 2004
166. Supovitz J.A.From the Capitol to the classroom Standards-based reform in the states.Fuhrman S.H., ed.Chicago, IL University of Chicago Press; 2001 81-98.
167. Supovitz J.A.,Mayer D.P.,Kahle J.B.Promoting inquiry-based instructional practice The longitudinal impact of professional development in the context of systemic reformEducational Policy.2000;14 (3) 331-356.
168. Supovitz J.A.,Turner H.M.The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom cultureJournal of Research in Science Teaching.2000;37 963-980.
169. Their M.,Davis B.The new science literacy Using language skills to help students learn science.Portsmouth, NH Heinemann; 2002
170. van den Broek P.Using texts in science education Cognitive processes and knowledge representationScience.2010;328 453-456.
171. vanDriel J.H.,Beijaard D.,Verloop N.Professional development and reform in science education The role of teachers' practical knowledgeJournal of Research in Science Teaching.2001;38 (2) 137-158.
172. Wei R.C.,Darling-Hammond L.,Andree A.,Richardson N.,Orphanos S.Professional learning in the learning profession A status report on teacher development in the United States and abroad.Dallas, TX National Staff Development Council; 2009
173. Weiss I.R.,Pasley J.D.,Smith P.S.,Banilower E.R.,Heck D.J.Looking inside the classroom A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States.Chapel Hill, NC Horizon Research; 2003
174. Whigham M.,Andre T.,Yang E.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching; 2000 New Orleans, LA; 2000.
175. Wilson S.M.,Berne J.Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge An examination of research on contemporary professional developmentReview of Research in Education.1999;24 173-209.
176. Yoon K.S.,Duncan T.,Lee S.W.-Y.,Scarloss B.,Shapley K.Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement.Washington, DC U.S.Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Education Laboratory Southwest; 2007
177. Zech L.K.,Gause-Vega C.L.,Bray M.H.,Secules T.,Goldman S.R.Content-based collaborative inquiry A professional development model for sustaining educational reformEducational Psychologist.2000;35 (3) 207-217.