Teacher professional development to improve the science and literacy achievement of english language learners

Bilingual Research Journal

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 475-501

  Hart, Juliet E ^a   Lee, Okhee ^b  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011221686     PISSN: 15235882     EISSN: 15235890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.2003.10162604     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adler, J. (1995). Dilemmas and a paradox—Secondary mathematics teachers’ knowledge of their teaching in multicultural classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 263-274.
2. Adler, J. (1998). A language for teaching dilemmas: Unlocking the complex multilingual secondary mathematics classroom. For the Learning of Mathematics, 18, 24-33.
3. Amaral, O. M., Garrison, L., & Klentschy, M. (2002). Helping English learners increase achievement through inquiry-based science instruction. Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), 213-239.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. August, D., & Hakuta, K. (Eds.). (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
7. Baker, L., & Saul, W. (1994). Considering science and language arts connections: A study of teacher cognition. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1023-1037.
8. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (2003). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
9. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 26(3 & 4), 369-398.
10. Casteel, C. P., & Isom, B. A. (1994). Reciprocal processes in science and literacy learning. The Reading Teacher, 47, 538-545.
11. Chamot, A. U., & O’malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
12. Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2000). Instructional policy and classroom performance: The mathematics reform in California. Teachers College Record, 102(2), 294-343.
13. Collier, V. P. (1989). How long? A synthesis ofresearch on academic achievement in a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 509-531.
14. Craven, J., Hogan, T., & Henry, L. (2001). Science literacy through inquiry, reading and writing in nature. Science Scope, 25 (3), 14, 16-19.
15. Cullison, E. (1995). Second language acquisition vs. learning disability requires specialized expertise. The Special Edge, 8, 9-13.
16. Cummins, J. (1981). Bilingualism and language minority children. Toronto, Canada: OISE Press.
17. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of full information maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 8, 430-457.
18. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Best, S., & Tal, R. (in press). Linking teacher and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education.
19. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (in press). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences.
20. Fradd, S. H., & Lee, O. (1999). Teachers’ roles in promoting science inquiry with students from diverse language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 28, 21-27.
21. Fradd, S. H., Lee, O., Sutman, F. X., & Saxton, M. K. (2002). Materials development promoting science inquiry with English language learners: A case study. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(4), 479-501.
22. Franke, M. L., Carpenter, T., Levi, L., & Fennema, E. (2001). Capturing teachers’ generative change: A follow-up study of professional development in mathematics. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 653-689.
23. García, E. (1999). Student cultural diversity: Understanding and meeting the challenge (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
24. García, E., Bravo, M. A., Dickey, L. M., Chun, K., & Sun-Iminger, X. (2002). Rethinking school reform in the context of cultural and linguistic diversity: Creating a responsive learning community—A case study. In L. Minaya-Rowe (Ed.), Teacher training and effective pedagogy in the context of studentdiversity. Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
25. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.
26. Gee, J. P. (1997, April). Science talk: Language and knowledge in classroom discussion. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL.
27. Graham, J. W., & Schafer, J. L. (1999). On the performance of multiple imputation for multivariate data with small sample size. In Rick H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategiesfor small sample research (pp. 1-29). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Guthrie, J. T., Schafer, W. D., Von Secker, C., & Alban, T. (2000). Contributions of instructional practices to reading achievement in a statewide improvement program. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 211-225.
29. Hewson, P. W., Kahle, J. B., Scantlebury, K., & Davis, D. (2001). Equitable science education in urban middle schools: Do reform efforts make a difference? Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1130-1144.
30. International Reading Association and the National Council of Teachers of English. (1994). Standards for the assessment of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association with National Council of Teachers of English.
31. Kennedy, M. (1998). Form and substance in in-service teacher education (Research Monograph No. 13). Madison, WI: National Institute for Science Education.
32. Lee, O. (2002). Science inquiry for elementary students from diverse backgrounds. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of Research in Education (Vol. 26, pp. 23-69). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
33. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1996). Literacy skills in science performance among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Science Education, 80(6), 651-671.
34. Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language backgrounds. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 12-21.
35. Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
36. Loucks-Horsley, S., Hewson, P. W., Love, N., & Stiles, K. E. (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
37. McLaughlin, M. W., Shepard, L. A., & O’Day, J. A. (1995). Improving education through standards-based reform: A report by the National Academy of Education Panel on Standards-based Education Reform. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, National Academy of Education.
38. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999a). Teacher quality: A report on the preparation and qualifications ofpublic school teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
39. National Center for Education Statistics. (1999b). The condition ofeducation, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Department ofEducation, Office ofEducational Research and Improvement.
40. National Center for Education Statistics. (2000). NAEP 1999 trends in academic progress: Three decades of student performance (Report No. NCES 2000-469). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
42. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
43. Richardson, V., & Placier, P. (2001). Teacher change. In D. V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 905-950). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
44. Rollnick, M. (2000). Current issues and perspectives on second language learning of science. Studies in Science Education, 35, 93-122.
45. Rosebery, A. S., Warren, B., & Conant, F. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21, 61-94.
46. Schleppegrell, M., & Achugar, M. (2003). Learning language and learning history: A functional linguistics approach. TESOL Journal, 12(2), 21-27.
47. Setati, M. (1998). Code-switching in a senior primary class of second-language mathematics learners. For the Learning ofMathematics, 18(1), 34-40.
48. Setati, M., & Adler, J. (2000). Between language and discourses: Language practices in primary multilingual mathematics classrooms in South Africa. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(3), 243-269.
49. Setati, M., Adler, J., Reed, Y, & Bapoo, A. (2002). Incomplete journeys: Code-switching and other language practices in mathematics, science and English language classrooms in South Africa. Language and Education, 16(2), 128-149.
50. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147-177.
51. Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing data problems: A data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545-571.
52. Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher, 31 (7), 15-21.
53. Spillane, J. P., Diamond, J. B., Walker, L. J., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 918-940.
54. Staples, R., & Heselden, R. (2001). Science teaching and literacy, Part 1: Writing. School Science Review, 83, 35-46.
55. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687.
56. Supovitz, J. A., & Zeif, S. G. (2000). Why they stay away. Journal of Staff Development, 21(4), 24-28.
57. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. (1997). ESL standards forpre-K-12 students. Alexandria, VA: Author.
58. Varelas, M., Pappas, C., Barry, A., & O’Neill, A. (2001). Examining language to capture scientific understandings: The case of the water cycle. Science and Children, 38(7), 26-29.
59. Warren, B., Ballenger, C., Ogonowski, M., Rosebery, A., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2001). Re-thinking diversity in learning science: The logic of everyday language. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(5), 529-552.