Science without literacy: a ship without a sail?

Cambridge Journal of Education

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 203-218

  Osborne, Jonathan ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3142719093     PISSN: 0305764X     EISSN: 14693577     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03057640220147559     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. BARTHES, R., 1972. Mythologies, Edited by: Lavers, A., New York, NY: HiIl & Wang.
2. BRAMER, R., and CLEMENS, H., 1980. Physik als Fremdsprache. Pkysikunterricht, 14(3): 76
3. BYRNE, M., JOHNSTONE, A.H., and POPE, A., 1994. Reasoning in science: a language problem revealed?. School Science Review, 75(272): 103–107.
4. CASSELLS, J.R.T., and JOHNSTONE, A.H., 1980. Understanding Non-technical Words in Science, London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
5. CASSELLS, J.R.T., and JOHNSTONE, A.H., 1985. Words that Matter in Science, London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
6. CHINN, C.A., and BREWER, W.F., 1993. The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquistion. A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63: 1–49.
7. CHINN, C.A., and BREWER, W.F., 1998. An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6): 623–654.
8. COLE, S., 1992. Making Science: between nature and society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. DAVIES, F., and GREENE, T., 1984. Reading for Learning in the Sciences, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.
10. DE BOER, G., 2000. Scientific literacy: another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6): 582–601.
11. DE CASTELL, S., LUKE, A., and MACLENNAN, D., 1986. “ On defining literacy ”. In Literacy, Society and Schooling, Edited by: DE CASTELL, S., LUKE, A., and EGAN, K., 3–14. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. DRIVER, R., LEACH, J., MILLAR, R., and SCOTT, P., 1996. Young Peace's Images of Science, Buckingham: Open University Press.
13. DUNBAR, K., 1994. “ How scientists really reason: scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories ”. In Mechanisms of Insight, Edited by: STERNBERG, RJ., and DAVIDSON, J., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. EDWARDS, D., and MERCER, N., 1987. Common Knowledge: the development of understanding in the classroom, London: Methuen.
15. FARRELL, M.P., and VENTURA, F., 1998. Words and understanding in physics. Language and Education, 12(4): 243–253.
16. FRYE, N., 1957. Anatomy of Criticism, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
17. GAON, S., and NORRIS, S., 2001. The undecideabk grounds of scientific expertise: science education and the limits of intellectual independence. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 35(2): 187–201.
18. GARDNER, P.L., 1975. Logical connectives in science-a summary of the findings. Research in Science Education, 7: 9–24.
19. GARRATT, J., OVERTON, T., and THRELFALL, T., 1999. A Question of Chemistry: creative problems for critical thinkers, Harlow: Pearson.
20. GEE, J., 1996. Social Linguistics and Literacies, 2nd Edn, London: Taylor & Francis.
21. GlERE, R., 1991. Understanding Scientific Reasoning, 3rd Edn, Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
22. GOLDSWORTHY, A., WATSON, R., and WOOD-ROBINSON, V., 1999. Getting to Grips with Graphs, Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
23. GOLDSWORTHY, A., WATSON, R., and WOOD-ROBINSON, V., 2000. Developing Understanding in Scientific Enquiry, Hatfield: Association for Science Education.
24. GREENE, M.T., 1997. What cannot be said in science. Nature, 388: 619–620.
25. HANSON, M.R., 1958. Patterns of Discovery, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. HARRE, R., 1986. Varieties of Realism: a rationale for the natural sciences, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
27. HARRIS, D., and TAYLOR, M., 1983. Discovery learning in school science: the myth and the reality. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(3): 277–289.
28. HODSON, D., 1990. A critical look at practical work in school science. School Science Review, 70(256): 33–40.
29. HODSON, D., 1991. Practical work in science: time for reappraisal. Studies in Science Education, 19: 175–184.
30. HOGAN, K., and MAGLIENTI, M., 2001. Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6): 663–687.
31. HOLLINS, M., 2001. Keeping school science in step with the changing world of the 21st century. Education in Science, 194: 22–23.
32. KlNTGEN, E.R., 1988. Literacy literacy. Visible Language, 1(2/3): 149–168.
33. KOSLOWSKI, B., 1996. Theory and Evidence: the development of scientific reasoning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. KUHN, T.E., 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
35. KUHN, D., AMSEL, E., and O'LOUGHLIN, M., 1988. The Development of Scientific Thinking Skuls, San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. LEACH, J., and PAULSEN, A., eds. 1999. Practical Work in Science Education: recent research studies, Frederiksberg: Roskilde University Press.
37. LEMKE, J.L., 1990. Talking Science: language, learning and values, Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
38. LEMKE, J., 1998. Teaching AU the Languages of Science: words, symbols, images and actions Available at: http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/papers/barcelon.htm
39. LONGINO, H., 1990. Science as Social Knowledge, Princetown, NJ: Princetown University Press.
40. MARTIN, J.R., 1998. “ Discourses of science ”. In Reading Science, Edited by: MARTIN, J.R., and VEEL, R., 3–14. London: Routledge.
41. MEAD, M., and METRAUX, R., 1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science, 126: 384–390.
42. MERZYN, G., 1987. The language of school science. International Journal of Science Education, 9(4): 483–489.
43. MlLLAR, R., 1998. “ Rhetoric and reality: what practical work in science education is really for ”. In Practical Work in School Science: which way now?, Edited by: WELLINGTON, J., 16–31. London: Routledge.
44. MlLLAR, R., and OSBORNE, J.F., eds. 1998. Beyond 2000: science education for the future, London: King's College.
45. MONTGOMERY, S.L., 1996. The Scientific Voice, New York, NY: Guilford Press.
46. NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE. 1995. National Science Education Standards, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
47. NORRIS, S., and PHUUPS, L., 1994. Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9): 947–967.
48. NORRIS, S., and PHILLIPS, L., How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. paper presented at the Annual Confemce of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. March26-282001, St Louis, MO.
49. NOTT, M., and SMITH, R., 1995. 'Talking your way out of it', 'rigging' and 'conjuring`: what science teachers do when practicals go wrong. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3): 399–410.
50. OLSON, D.R., 1994. The World on Paper: the conceptual and cognitive implications of writing and reading, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. OSBORNE, J.F., 1997. Practical alternatives. School Science Review, 78(285): 61–66.
52. OSBORNE, J.F., 1998. “ Thinking the unthinkable: science education without a laboratory? ”. In Practical Work in Science: which way now?, Edited by: WELLINGTON, J., 156–173. London: Routledge.
53. OSBORNE, J.F., and COUJNS, S., 2000. Pupils' and Parents' Views of the School Science Curriculum, London: King's College.
54. OSBORNE, J.F., DRIVER, R., and SIMON, S., 1996. Attitudes to Science: a review of research and proposals for studies to inform policy relating to uptake of science, London: King's College.
55. OSBORNE, J.F., ERDURAN, S., SIMON, S., and MONK, M., 2001. Enhancing the quality of argument in school science. School Science Review, 82(301): 63–70.
56. PARIS, S.G., 1998. Situated motivation and informal learning. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2/3): 22–26.
57. PlAGET, J., 1953. The Origins of Intelligence in Children, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
58. PICKERSGILL, S., and LOCK, R., 1991. Students' understanding of selected non-technical words in science. Research in Science and Technological Education, 9(1): 71–79.
59. POSTMAN, N., and WEINGARTNER, C., 1971. Teaching as a Subversive Activity, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
60. PROPHET, B., and TOWSE, P., 1999. Pupils' understanding of some non-technical words in science. School Science Review, 81(295): 79–86.
61. REDDY, M., 1979. “ The conduit metaphor ”. In Metaphor and Thought, Edited by: ORTONY, A., New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
62. REISS, M., 2000. Understanding Science Lessons: five years of science teaching, Buckingham: Open University Press.
63. SCHAUBLE, L., 1990. Belief revision in children: the role of prior knowledge and strategies for generating evidence. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49: 31–57.
64. SHAMOS, M. H., 1995. The Myth of Scientific Literacy, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
65. SHAYER, M., and ADEY, P., 1981. Towards a Science of Science Teaching, London: Heinemann.
66. SIEGEL, H., 1989. The rationality of science, critical thinking and science education. Synthese, 80(1): 9–42.
67. TAYLOR, C., 1996. Defining Science: a rhetoric of demarcation, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
68. THAGARD, P., 1994. Mind, society and the growth of knowledge. Philosophy of Science, 61: 629–645.
69. WATSON, R., and WOOD-ROBINSON, V., 1998. “ Learning to investigate ”. In ASE Guide to Secondary Science Education, Edited by: RATCLIFFE, M., 84–91. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
70. WELLINGTON, J.J., 1981. What's supposed to happen Sir? Some problems with discovery learning. School Science Review, 63: 167–173.
71. WELLINGTON, J., ed. 1998. Practical Work in School Science: which way now?, London: Routledge.
72. WELLINGTON, J., and OSBORNE, J.F., 2001. Language and Literacy in Science Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
73. WENGER, E., 1998. Communities of Practice: learning, meaning and identity, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
74. WOOLNOUGH, B., ed. 1991. Practical Science: the role and reality of practical work in school science, Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
75. WOOLNOUGH, B., and ALLSOP, T., 1986. Practical Work in Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. WRAY, D., and LEWIS, M., 1997. Extending Literacy: children reading and writing non-fiction, London: Routledge.
77. ZIMMERMAN, C., BIZANZ, G.L., and BISANZ, J., Science at the supermarket: what's in print, experts' advice, and students' need to know. paper presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. March28-311999, Boston, MA.