Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change

Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 96-107

  Moje, Elizabeth Birr ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 57649165528     PISSN: 10813004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/JAAL.52.2.1     Document Type: Note

References (56)

1. Alexander, P.A., & Judy, J.E. (1988). The interaction of domainspecific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58(4), 375-404.
2. Alvermann, D.E. (2001). Reading adolescents' reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44(8), 676-690.
3. Alvermann, D.E., & Moore, D.W. (1991). Secondary school reading. In R. Barr, M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 2, pp. 951-983). White Plains, NY: Longman.
4. Bain, R. (2000). Into the breach: Using research and theory to shape history instruction. In P. Stearns, P. Seixas, & S. Wineburg (Eds.), Knowing, teaching, and learning history: National and international perspectives (pp. 331-353). New York: New York University Press.
5. Bain, R. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in history textbooks and teachers. Teachers College Record, 108(10), 2080-2114. doi:10.1111/j.14679620.2006.00775.x
6. Bass, H. (2008). A vignette of doing mathematics: A metacognitive tour of the production of some elementary mathematics. Unpublished manuscript. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
7. Bean, T.W. (2000). Reading in the content areas: Social constructivist dimensions. In M.L. Kamil, P.B. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 629-644). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Black, R.W. (2005, April). (Tech)tual interaction: The dialogic nature of English language learners' activities in a fanfiction-based website. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
9. Conley, M.W. (2008). Cognitive strategy instruction for adolescents: What we know about the promise, what we don't know about the potential. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 84-108.
10. Cuban, L. (1986). Persistent instruction: Another look at constancy in the classroom. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(1), 7-11.
11. Donahue, P., Daane, M., & Grigg, W. (2003). The nation's report card: Reading highlights 2003 (No. NCES 2004452). Washington DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
12. Finders, M.J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high. New York: Teachers College Press.
13. Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge & the discourse on language (A.M.S. Smith, Trans.). New York: Pantheon.
14. Gee, J.P. (2000/2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W.G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 25, pp. 99-126). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
15. Gee, J.P. (2001, December). Reading in "new times". Paper presented at the National Reading Conference, San Antonio, TX.
16. Gee, J.P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy (Rev. ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Gustavson, L. (2007). Youth learning on their own terms: Creative practices and classroom teaching. New York: Routledge.
18. Halliday, M.A.K., & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer.
19. Hicks, D. (1995). Discourse, learning, and teaching. In M.W. Apple (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 21, pp. 4995). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
20. Holt-Reynolds, D. (1992). Personal history-based beliefs as relevant prior knowledge in course work. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 325-349.
21. Hull, G., & Schultz, K., (Eds.). (2002). School's out! Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
22. Ingalls, R.L. (2005). Taking a page from their books: Negotiating containment and resuscitating rhetoric in writing across academic and spoken-word genres. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
23. Jenkins, H. (2006). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Media consumers in a digital age. New York: New York University Press.
24. Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2002). Cut, paste, and publish: The production and consumption of zines. In D.E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and literacies in a digital world (pp. 164-185). New York: Peter Lang.
25. Leander, K.M., & Lovvorn, J.F. (2006). Literacy networks: Following the circulation of texts, bodies, and objects in the schooling and online gaming of one youth. Cognition and Instruction, 24(3), 291-340. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2403-l
26. Lee, C.D. (2007). Culture, literacy, and learning: Blooming in the midst of the whirlwind. New York: Teachers College Press.
27. Lee, C.D., & Spratley, A. (2006). Reading in the disciplines and the challenges of adolescent literacy. Report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. New York: Carnegie Corporation.
28. Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29. Luke, A. (2001). Foreword. In E.B. Moje & D.G. O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. ix-xii). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Moje, E.B. (1996). "I teach students, not subjects": Teacher-student relationships as contexts for secondary literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(2), 172-195. doi:10.1598/RRQ.31.2.4
31. Moje, E.B. (1997). Exploring discourse, subjectivity, and knowledge in chemistry class. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2), 35-44.
32. Moje, E.B. (2000). To be part of the story: The literacy practices of gangsta adolescents. Teachers College Record, 102(3), 651-690. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00071
33. Moje, E.B. (2002). But where are the youth? Integrating youth culture into literacy theory. Educational Theory, 52(1), 97-120. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00097.x
34. Moje, E.B. (2008, May). Reading the adolescent reader: Profiles of reader identities, knowledge, strategy, and skill. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Reading Association, Atlanta, GA.
35. Moje, E.B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107-154.
36. Moje, E.B., Peek-Brown, D., Sutherland, L.M., Marx, R.W., Blumenfeld, P., & Krajcik, J. (2004). Explaining explanations: Developing scientific literacy in middle-school project-based science reforms. In D. Strickland & D.E. Alvermann (Eds.), Bridging the gap: Improving literacy learning for preadolescent and adolescent learners in grades 4-12 (pp. 227-251). New York: Carnegie Corporation.
37. Moje, E.B., & Speyer, J. (2008). The reality of challenging texts in high school science and social studies: How teachers can mediate comprehension. In K. Hinchman & H. Sheridan-Thomas (Eds.), Best practices in adolescent literacy instruction (pp. 185-211). New York: Guilford.
38. Moore, D.W. (1996). Contexts for literacy in secondary schools. In D.J. Leu, C.K. Kinzer, & K.A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice (45th yearbook of the National Reading Conference, pp 15-46). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
39. Moore, D.W., & Readence, J.E. (2001). Situating secondary school literacy research. In E.B. Moje & D.G. O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary schools (pp. 3-25). Mahwah, NJ: Earlbaum.
40. New London Group. (1996, Spring). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66, 60-92.
41. O'Brien, D.G., Moje, E.B., & Stewart, R.A. (2001). Exploring the context of secondary literacy: Literacy in people's everyday school lives. In E.B. Moje & D.G. O'Brien (Eds.), Constructions of literacy: Studies of teaching and learning in and out of secondary classrooms (pp. 27-48). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. O'Brien, D.G., & Stewart, R.A. (1990). Preservice teachers' perspectives on why every teacher is not a teacher of reading: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(2), 101-129.
43. O'Brien, D.G., Stewart, R.A., & Moje, E.B. (1995). Why content literacy is difficult to infuse into the secondary school: Complexities of curriculum, pedagogy, and school culture. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(3), 442-463. doi:10.2307/747625
44. Orellana, M.F., Reynolds, J., Dorner, L., & Meza, M. (2003). In other words: Translating or "para-phrasing" as a family literacy practice in immigrant households. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(1), 12-34. doi:10.1598/RRQ.38.1.2
45. Phelps, S.F. (2005). Ten years of research on adolescent literacy, 1994-2004: A review (No. ED-01-CO-0011). Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates.
46. Ratekin, N., Simpson, M., Alvermann, D.E., & Dishner, E.K. (1985). Why teachers resist content reading instruction. Journal of Reading, 28(5), 432-437.
47. Readence, J.E., Bean, T.W., & Baldwin, S.R. (1989). Content area reading: An integrated approach (3rd ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
48. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-61.
49. Sizer, T.R. (1984). Horace's compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
50. Stevens, R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience. In M. Lampert & M. Blunk (Eds.), Talking mathematics in school: Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-150). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
51. Stevens, R., O'Connor, K., Garrison, L., Jocuns, A., & Amos, D. (in press). Becoming an engineer: Toward a three-dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education.
52. Tatum, A.W. (2008). Toward a more anatomically complete model of literacy instruction: A focus on African American male adolescents and texts. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 155-182.
53. Wilson, S.M., & Wineburg, S.S. (1988). Peering at history through different lenses: The role of disciplinary perspectives in teaching history. Teachers College Record, 89(4), 525-539.
54. Wineburg, S.S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and the academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495-519.
55. Wineburg, S.S. (2005). What does NCATE have to say to future history teachers? Not much. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(9), 658-665.
56. Wineburg, S.S., & Martin, D. (2004). Reading and rewriting history. Educational Leadership, 62(1), 42-45.