Visual adaptation and face perception

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 366, Issue 1571, 2011, Pages 1702-1725

  Webster, Michael A ^a   Macleod, Donald I A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; After effects; Colour vision; Face perception; Neural coding

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; COLOR; DATA PROCESSING; FUNCTIONAL GROUP; NEUROLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

ADAPTATION; COLOR VISION; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; COLOR VISION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SENSORY THRESHOLDS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 79955761587     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0360     Document Type: Review

References (217)

1. Russell, R., Sinha, P., Biederman, I. & Nederhouser, M. 2006 Is pigmentation important for face recognition? Evidence from contrast negation. Perception 35, 749-759. (doi:10.1068/p5490)
2. McKone, E., Kanwisher, N. & Duchaine, B. C. 2007 Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends Cogn. Sci. 11, 8-15. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002)
3. Gibson, J. J. & Radner, M. 1937 Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies. J. Exp. Psych. 20, 453-467. (doi:10.1037/h0059826)
4. Kohler, W. & Wallach, H. 1944 Figural aftereffects: an investigation of visual processes. Proc. Am. Phil. Soc. 88, 269-357.
5. Webster, M. A. 2003 Pattern selective adaptation in color and form perception. In The visual neurosciences (eds L. M. Chalupa & J. S. Werner), vol. 2, pp. 936-947. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Graham, N. V. 1989 Visual pattern analyzers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
7. Clifford, C. W. G. & Rhodes, G. 2005 Fitting the mind to the world: adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision, Advances in visual cognition series, vol. 2. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8. Rhodes, G., Robbins, R., Jaquet, E., McKone, E., Jeffery, L. & Clifford, C.W.G. 2005 Adaptation and face perception-how aftereffects implicate norm based coding of faces. In Fitting the mind to the world: adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision (eds C. W. G. Clifford & G. Rhodes), Advances in visual cognition series, vol. 2, pp. 213-240. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Valentine, T. 1991 A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 43, 161-204.
10. Russell, J. A. & Fehr, B. 1987 Relativity in the perception of facial expressions. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 116, 223-237. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.116.3.223)
11. O'Leary, A. & McMahon, M. 1991 Adaptation to form distortion of a familiar shape. Percept. Psychophys. 49, 328-332. (doi:10.3758/BF03205988)
12. Webster, M. A. & MacLin, O. H. 1999 Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonom. Bull. Rev. 6, 647-653. (doi:10.3758/BF03212974)
13. MacLin, O. H. & Webster, M. A. 2001 Influence of adaptation on the perception of distortions in natural images. J. Electron. Imag. 10, 100-109.(doi:10.1117/1.1330573)
14. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G. & Nakayama, K. 2003 Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychol. Sci. 14, 558-566. (doi:10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1465.x)
15. Buckingham, G., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Welling, L. L. M., Conway, C. A., Tiddeman, B. P. & Jones, B. 2006 Visual adaptation to masculine and feminine faces influences generalized preferences and perceptions of trustworthiness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 381-389. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.03.001)
16. Leopold, D. A., O'Toole, A. J., Vetter, T. & Blanz, V. 2001 Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 89-94. (doi:10.1038/82947)
17. Guo, X. Y. M., Oruc, I. & Barton, J. J. S. 2009 Crossorientation transfer of adaptation for facial identity is asymmetric: a study using contrast-based recognition thresholds. Vis. Res. 49, 2254-2260. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.012)
18. Hurlbert, A. 2001 Trading faces. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 3-5. (doi:10.1038/82877)
19. Anderson, N. D. & Wilson, H. R. 2005 The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vis. Res. 45, 1815-1828. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.012)
20. Davidenko, N., Witthoft, N. & Winawer, J. 2008 Gender aftereffects in face silhouettes reveal facespecific mechanisms. Vis. Cogn. 16, 99-103.
21. Susilo, T., McKone, E. & Edwards, M. 2010 What shape are the neural response functions underlying opponent coding in face space? A psychophysical investigation. Vis. Res. 50, 300-314. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.11.016)
22. Seyama, J. & Nagayama, R. S. 2009 Probing the uncanny valley with the eye size aftereffect. Presence 18, 321-339. (doi:10.1162/pres.18.5.321)
23. Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y. & Duhamel P. 2004 Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 428, 557-561. (doi:10.1038/nature02420)
24. Hsu, S. M. & Young, A. W. 2004 Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Vis. Cogn. 11, 871-899. (doi:10.1080/13506280444000030)
25. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. & O'Toole, A. J. 2006 Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: a view from the other side of the mean. Psychol. Sci. 17, 493-500. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01734.x)
26. O'Neil, S. F., Webster, S. M. & Webster, M. A. In press. Adaptation and the perception of facial age. Vis. Cogn.
27. Greenlee, M. W., Georgeson, M. A., Magnussen, S. & Harris, J. P. 1991 The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vis. Res. 31, 223-236. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-J)
28. Ghuman, A. S., McDaniel, J. R. & Martin, A. 2010 Face adaptation without a face. Curr. Biol. 20, 32-36. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.10.077)
29. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Muller, K. M. & Jeffery, L. 2005 The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 897-904. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2004.3022)
30. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Clifford, C. W. & Leopold, D. A. 2007 The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects. Vis. Res. 47, 2291-2296. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.012)
31. Vul, E., Krizay, E. & MacLeod, D. I. 2008 The Mc-Collough effect reflects permanent and transient adaptation in early visual cortex. J. Vis. 8(12), 4, 1-12. (doi:10.1167/8.12.4)
32. Suzuki, S. & Cavanagh, P. 1998 A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 24, 1315-1341. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.24.5.1315)
33. Kovacs, G., Zimmer, M., Harza, I. & Vidnyanszky, Z. 2007 Adaptation duration affects the spatial selectivity of facial aftereffects. Vis. Res. 47, 3141-3149. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.019)
34. Carbon, C. C., Strobach, T., Langton, S. R. H., Harsanyi, G., Leder, H. & Kovacs, G. 2007 Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lasting. Memory Cogn. 35, 1966-1976. (doi:10.3758/BF03192929)
35. Morikawa, K. 2005 Adaptation to asymmetrically distorted faces and its lack of effect on mirror images. Vis. Res. 45, 3180-3188. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2005.08.004)
36. McKone, E., Edwards, M., Robbins, R. & Anderson, R. 2005 The stickiness of face adaptation aftereffects. J. Vis. 5, 822a. (doi:10.1167/5.8.822)
37. Carbon, C. C. & Leder, H. 2006 Last but not least: the Mona Lisa effect: is 'our' Lisa fame or fake? Perception 35, 411-414. (doi:10.1068/p5452)
38. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. & O'Toole, A. J. 2007 The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation. Vis. Res. 47, 525-531. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.10.012)
39. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. & O'Toole, A. J. 2009 Three-dimensional information in face representations revealed by identity aftereffects. Psychol. Sci. 20, 318-325. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02285.x)
40. Kohn, A. & Movshon, J. A. 2003 Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MTof the macaque. Neuron 39, 681-691. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00438-0)
41. Kovacs, G., Zimmer, M., Harza, I., Antal, A. & Vidnyanszky, Z. 2005 Position-specificity of facial adaptation. Neuroreport 16, 1945-1949. (doi:10.1097/01.wnr.0000187635.76127.bc)
42. Yamashita, J. A., Hardy, J. L., De Valois, K. K. & Webster, M. A. 2005 Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 31, 420-437. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.420)
43. Zhao, L. & Chubb, C. 2001 The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vis. Res. 41, 2979-2994. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00202-4)
44. Afraz, A. & Cavanagh, P. 2009 The gender-specific face aftereffect is based in retinotopic not spatiotopic coordinates across several natural image transformations. J. Vis. 9, 11-17. (doi:10.1167/9.10.10)
45. Afraz, S. R. & Cavanagh, P. 2008 Retinotopy of the face aftereffect. Vis. Res. 48, 42-54. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.10.028)
46. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J. & Chun, M. M. 1997 The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. J. Neurosci. 17, 4302-4311.
47. Watson, T. L. & Clifford, C. W. G. 2003 Pulling faces: an investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception 32, 1109-1116. doi:10.1068/p5082)
48. Yin, R. K. 1969 Looking at upside-down faces. J. Exp. Psychol. 81, 141. (doi:10.1037/h0027474)
49. Freire, A., Lee, K. & Symons, L. A. 2000 The faceinversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: direct evidence. Perception 29, 159-170. (doi:10.1068/p3012)
50. Maurer, D., Grand, R. L. & Mondloch, C. J. 2002 The many faces of configural processing. Trends Cogn. Sci. 6, 255-260. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4)
51. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Jaquet, E., Winkler, C. & Clifford, C. W. G. 2004 Orientationcontingent face aftereffects and implications for facecoding mechanisms. Curr. Biol. 14, 2119-2123. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.11.053)
52. Watson, T. L. & Clifford, C. W. G. 2006 Orientation dependence of the orientation-contingent face aftereffect. Vis. Res. 46, 3422-3429. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.026)
53. Kanwisher, N., Tong, F. & Nakayama, K. 1998 The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition 68, B1-B11. (doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00035-3)
54. Yovel, G. & Kanwisher, N. 2005 The neural basis of the behavioral face-inversion effect. Curr. Biol. 15, 2256-2262. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.072)
55. Rhodes, G., Evangelista, E. & Jeffery, L. 2009 Orientation-sensitivity of face identity aftereffects. Vis. Res. 49, 2379-2385. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.010)
56. Susilo, T., McKone, E. & Edwards, M. 2009 Solving the upside-down puzzle: inverted face aftereffects derive from shape-generic rather than face-specific mechanisms. J. Vis. 9, 451. (doi:10.1167/9.8.451)
57. Campbell, J. & Burke, D. 2009 Evidence that identitydependent and identity-independent neural populations are recruited in the perception of five basic emotional facial expressions. Vis. Res. 49, 1532-1540. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.009)
58. Ellamil, M., Susskind, J. M. & Anderson, A. K. 2008 Examinations of identity invariance in facial expression adaptation. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 8, 273-281. (doi:10.3758/CABN.8.3.273)
59. Fox, C. J. & Barton, J. J. 2007 What is adapted in face adaptation? The neural representations of expression in the human visual system. Brain Res. 1127, 80-89. (doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.09.104)
60. Xu, H., Dayan, P., Lipkin, R. M. & Qian, N. 2008 Adaptation across the cortical hierarchy: low-level curve adaptation affects high-level facial-expression judgments. J. Neurosci. 28, 3374-3383. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0182-8.2008)
61. Butler, A., Oruc, I., Fox, C. J. & Barton, J. J. 2008 Factors contributing to the adaptation aftereffects of facial expression. Brain Res. 1191, 116-126. (doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.10.101)
62. Kovacs, G., Zimmer, M., Banko, E., Harza, I., Antal A. & Vidnyanszky, Z. 2006 Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. Cereb. Cortex 16, 742-753. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj020)
63. Winkler, C. & Rhodes, G. 2005 Perceptual adaptation affects attractiveness of female bodies. Br. J. Psychol. 96, 141-154. (doi:10.1348/000712605X36343)
64. Hills, P. J., Elward, R. L. & Lewis, M. B. 2008 Identity adaptation is mediated and moderated by visualization ability. Perception 37, 1241-1257. (doi:10.1068/p5834)
65. Ryu, J. J., Borrmann, K. & Chaudhuri, A. 2008 Imagine Jane and identify John: face identity aftereffects induced by imagined faces. PLoS ONE 3, e2195. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002195)
66. DeBruine, L. M., Welling, L. L. M. & Jones, B. C. 2010 Opposite effects of visual versus imagined presentation of faces on subsequent sex perception. Vis. Cogn. 18, 816-828. (doi:10.1080/13506281003691357)
67. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Perrett, D. I., Schneider, A., Welling, L. & Conway, C. 2008 Sex-contingent face aftereffects depend on perceptual category rather than structural encoding. Cognition 107, 353-365. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.018)
68. Rotshtein, P., Henson, R. N., Treves, A., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. J. 2005 Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 107-113. (doi:10.1038/nn1370)
69. Xu, X., Yue, X., Lescroart, M. D., Biederman, I. & Kim, J. G. 2009 Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): image or person? Vis. Res. 49, 2800-2807. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.021)
70. He, S. & MacLeod, D. I. 2001 Orientation-selective adaptation and tilt after-effect from invisible patterns. Nature 411, 473-476. (doi:10.1038/35078072)
71. Vul, E. & MacLeod, D. I. 2006 Contingent aftereffects distinguish conscious and preconscious color processing. Nat. Neurosci. 9, 873-874. (doi:10.1038/nn1723)
72. Moradi, F., Koch, C. & Shimojo, S. 2005 Face adaptation depends on seeing the face. Neuron 45, 169-175. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.018)
73. Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. J. 2001 Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study. Neuron 30, 829-841. (doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00328-2)
74. Tamietto, M. & de Gelder, B. 2010 Neural bases of the non-conscious perception of emotional signals. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 11, 697-709. (doi:10.1038/nrn2889)
75. Hong, S. W., Yang, E. & Blake, R. 2010 Adaptation aftereffects to facial expressions suppressed from visual awareness. J. Vis. 10(12), 24, 1-13. (doi:10.1167/10.12.24)
76. Eimer, M., Kiss, M. & Nicholas, S. 2010 Response profile of the face-sensitive N170 component: a rapid adaptation study. Cereb. Cortex 20, 2442-2452. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp312)
77. Jacques, C., d'Arripe, O. & Rossion, B. 2007 The time course of the inversion effect during individual face discrimination. J. Vis. 7, 1-9. (doi:10.1167/7.3.1)
78. Kloth, N., Schweinberger, S. R. & Kovacs, G. 2010 Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 2345-2356. (doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21329)
79. Harris, A. & Nakayama, K. 2007 Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG. Cereb. Cortex 17, 63-70. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj124)
80. Harris, A. & Nakayama, K. 2008 Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts. Cereb. Cortex 18, 467-476. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm078)
81. Furl, N., van Rijsbergen, N. J., Treves, A., Friston, K. J. & Dolan, R. J. 2007 Experience-dependent coding of facial expression in superior temporal sulcus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 13485-13489. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0702548104)
82. Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. & Martin, A. 2006 Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 14-23. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006)
83. Krekelberg, B., Boynton, G. M. & van Wezel, R. J. A. 2006 Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals. Trends Neurosci. 29, 250-256. (doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.02.008)
84. Fang, F., Murray, S. O. & He, S. 2007 Durationdependent fMRI adaptation and distributed viewercentered face representation in human visual cortex. Cereb. Cortex 17, 1402-1411. (doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl053)
85. Furl, N., van Rijsbergen, N. J., Treves, A. & Dolan, R. J. 2007 Face adaptation aftereffects reveal anterior medial temporal cortex role in high level category representation. Neuroimage 37, 300-310. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.057)
86. Ng, M., Ciaramitaro, V. M., Anstis, S., Boynton, G. M. & Fine, I. 2006 Selectivity for the configural cues that identify the gender, ethnicity, and identity of faces in human cortex. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19 552-19 557. (doi:10.1073/pnas.0605358104)
87. Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F. & Wilson, H. R. 2005 FMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nat. Neurosci. 8, 1386-1390. (doi:10.1038/nn1538)
88. Winston, J. S., Henson, R. N., Fine-Goulden, M. R. & Dolan, R. J. 2004 FMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. J. Neurophysiol. 92, 1830-1839. (doi:10.1152/jn.00155.2004)
89. Andrews, T. J. & Ewbank, M. P. 2004 Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe. Neuroimage 23, 905-913. (doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.060)
90. Andrews, T. J., Davies-Thompson, J., Kingstone, A. & Young, A. W. 2010 Internal and external features of the face are represented holistically in face-selective regions of visual cortex. J. Neurosci. 30, 3544-3552. (doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4863-09.2010)
91. Nishimura, M., Doyle, J., Humphreys, K. & Behrmann M. Probing the face-space of individuals with prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 48, 1828-1841. (doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.03.007)
92. Susilo, T. & McKone, E. 2010 Impaired face recognition despite normal face-space coding and holistic processing: evidence from a developmental prosopagnosic. J. Vis. 10, 590. (doi:10.1167/10.7.590)
93. Barrett, S. E. & O'Toole, A. J. 2009 Face adaptation to gender: does adaptation transfer across age categories? Vis. Cogn. 17, 700-715. (doi:10.1080/13506280802332197)
94. Jaquet, E. & Rhodes, G. 2008 Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 34, 101-112. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.101)
95. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G. & Hayward, W. G. 2008 Racecontingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces. Vis. Cogn. 16, 734-753. (doi:10.1080/13506280701350647)
96. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Jones, B. C. 2005 Sexcontingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 2283-2287. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3220)
97. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. & Waitt, C. 2008 Category contingent aftereffects for faces of different races, ages and species. Cognition 106, 1537-1547. (doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.06.008)
98. Bestelmeyer, P. E. G., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C. & Welling, L. L. M. 2009 Face aftereffects suggest interdependent processing of expression and sex and of expression and race. Vis. Cogn. 18, 255-274. (doi:10.1080/13506280802708024)
99. Fox, C. J., Oruc, I. & Barton, J. J. 2008 It doesn't matter how you feel. The facial identity aftereffect is invariant to changes in facial expression. J. Vis. 8, 11-13. (doi:10.1167/8.3.11)
100. Benton, C. P., Etchells, P. J., Porter, G., Clark, A. P., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Nikolov, S. G. 2007 Turning the other cheek: the viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 2131-2137. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0473)
101. Benton, C. P., Jennings, S. J. & Chatting, D. J. 2006 Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity. Vis. Res. 46, 3313-3325. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.002)
102. Burke, D., Taubert, J. & Higman, T. 2007 Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces. Vis. Res. 47, 2164-2169. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018)
103. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G. & Busey, T. 2006 View-specific coding of face shape. Psychol. Sci. 17, 501-505. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01735.x)
104. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G. & Busey, T. 2007 Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views. Vis. Res. 47, 3070-3077. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.018)
105. Fang, F. & He, S. 2005 Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 45, 793-800. (doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.01.037)
106. Bi, T., Su, J., Chen, J. & Fang, F. 2009 The role of gaze direction in face viewpoint aftereffect. Vis. Res. 49, 2322-2327. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.07.002)
107. McCollough-Howard, C. & Webster, M. A. 2009 McCollough effect. Scholarpedia: encyclopedia of computational neuroscience. See http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/McCollough_effect.
108. Durgin, F. H. 1996 Visual aftereffect of texture density contingent on color of frame. Percept. Psychophys. 58, 207-223. (doi:10.3758/BF03211876)
109. Treisman, A. M. & Gelade, G. 1980 A featureintegration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 12, 97-136. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90005-5)
110. Lee, K., Byatt, G. & Rhodes, G. 2000 Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework. Psychol. Sci. 11, 379-385. (doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00274)
111. Rhodes, G. & McLean, I. G. 1990 Distinctiveness and expertise effects with homogeneous stimuli: towards a model of configural coding. Perception 19, 773-794. (doi:10.1068/p190773)
112. Rhodes, G., Brennan, S. & Carey, S. 1987 Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces. Cogn. Psychol. 19, 473-497. (doi:10.1016/0010-0285(87)90016-8)
113. Leopold, D. A., Bondar, I. V. & Giese, M. A. 2006 Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 442, 572-575. (doi:10.1038/nature04951)
114. Nosofsky, R. M. 1986 Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 115, 39-61. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.39)
115. Valentine, T. & Endo, M. 1992 Towards an exemplar model of face processing: the effects of race and distinctiveness. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 44, 671-703.
116. Blakemore, C. & Campbell, F. W. 1969 On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. J. Physiol. 203, 237-260.
117. Calder, A. J., Jenkins, R., Cassel, A. & Clifford, C. W. G. 2008 Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 137, 244-261. (doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.244)
118. Jenkins, R., Beaver, J. D. & Calder, A. J. 2006 I thought you were looking at me: direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychol. Sci. 17, 506-513. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01736.x)
119. Webster, M. A. & Leonard, D. 2008 Adaptation and perceptual norms in color vision. J. Optic. Soc. Am. A 25, 2817-2825. (doi:10.1364/JOSAA.25.002817)
120. Eisner, A. & Macleod, D. I. 1981 Flicker photometric study of chromatic adaption: selective suppression of cone inputs by colored backgrounds. J. Optic. Soc. Am. 71, 705-717. (doi:10.1364/JOSA.71.000705)
121. Robbins, R., McKone, E. & Edwards, M. 2007 Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 33, 570-592. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.570)
122. Rhodes, G. & Jeffery, L. 2006 Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vis. Res. 46, 2977-2987. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.03.002)
123. Tsao, D. Y. & Freiwald, W. A. 2006 What's so special about the average face? Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 391-393. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.009)
124. Benton, C. P. & Burgess, E. C. 2008 The direction of measured face aftereffects. J. Vis. 8, 1-6. (doi:10.1167/8.15.1)
125. Regan, D. & Hamstra, S. J. 1992 Shape discrimination and the judgement of perfect symmetry: dissociation of shape from size. Vis. Res. 32, 1845-1864. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90046-L)
126. Suzuki, S. 2005 High-level pattern coding revealed by brief shape aftereffects. In Fitting the mind to the world: adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision. Advances in visual cognition series (eds C. Clifford & G. Rhodes), vol. 2, pp. 138-172. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
127. Blakemore, C. & Sutton, P. 1969 Size adaptation: a new aftereffect. Science 166, 245-247. (doi:10.1126/science.166.3902.245)
128. Field, D. J. & Brady, N. 1997 Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vis. Res. 37, 3367-3383. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00181-8)
129. Webster, M. A., Georgeson, M. A. & Webster, S. M. 2002 Neural adjustments to image blur. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 839-840. (doi:10.1038/nn906)
130. MacLeod, D. I. A. & von der Twer, T. 2003 The pleistochrome: optimal opponent codes for natural colours. In Colour perception: from light to object (eds D. Heyer & R. Mausfeld), pp. 155-184. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
131. Yuille, A. L. & Grzywacz, N. M. 1989 A winner-take-all mechanism based on presynaptic inhibition feedback. Neural Comput. 1, 334-347. (doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.3.334)
132. Nishimura, M., Maurer, D., Jeffery, L., Pellicano, E. & Rhodes, G. 2008 Fitting the child's mind to the world: adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity in 8-yearolds. Dev. Sci. 11, 620-627. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00706.x)
133. Dacey, D. M., Lee, B. B., Stafford, D. K., Pokorny, J. & Smith, V. C. 1996 Horizontal cells of the primate retina: cone specificity without spectral opponency. Science 271, 656-659. (doi:10.1126/science.271.5249.656)
134. He, S. & MacLeod, D. I. A. 1997 Contrast-modulation flicker: dynamics and spatial resolution of the light adaptation process. Vis. Res. 38, 985-1000. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00290-3)
135. MacLeod, D. I. A., Williams, D. R. & Makous, W. 1992 A visual nonlinearity fed by single cones. Vis. Res. 32, 347-363. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90144-8)
136. Southall, J. P. C. (ed.) 1962 Helmholtz's treatise on physiological optics. New York, NY: Dover.
137. MacLeod, D. I. 1974 Directionally selective light adaptation: a visual consequence of receptor disarray? Vis. Res. 14, 369-378. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90235-1)
138. Mollon, J. D. 1982 Color vision. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 33, 41-85. (doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000353)
139. Krauskopf, J., Williams, D. R. & Heeley, D. W. 1982 Cardinal directions of color space. Vis. Res. 22, 1123-1131. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90077-3)
140. Webster, M. A. & Mollon, J. D. 1994 The influence of contrast adaptation on color appearance. Vis. Res. 34, 1993-2020. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(94)90028-0)
141. Spetch, M. L., Cheng, K. & Clifford, C. W. G. 2004 Peak shift but not range effects in recognition of faces. Learning Motivation 35, 221-241. (doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2003.11.001)
142. Muskat, J. A., Paras, C. L. & Webster, M. A. 2000 Adaptation to collections of faces. Invest. Ophth. 41, S222.
143. Webster, M. A. & Mollon, J. D. 1991 Changes in colour appearance following post-receptoral adaptation. Nature 349, 235-238. (doi:10.1038/349235a0)
144. Webster, M. A. & Wilson, J. A. 2000 Interactions between chromatic adaptation and contrast adaptation in color appearance. Vis. Res. 40, 3801-3816. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00238-8)
145. Barlow, H. B. 1990 A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual aftereffects. In Visual coding and efficiency (ed. C. Blakemore), pp. 363-375. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
146. Russell, R. 2009 A sex difference in facial contrast and its exaggeration by cosmetics. Perception 38, 1211-1219. (doi:10.1068/p6331)
147. Rolls, E. T. & Baylis, G. C. 1986 Size and contrast have only small effects on the responses to faces of neurons in the cortex of the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Exp. Brain Res. 65, 38-48. (doi:10.1007/BF00243828)
148. Avidan, G., Harel, M., Hendler, T., Ben-Bashat, D., Zohary, E. & Malach, R. 2002 Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. J. Neurophysiol. 87, 3102-3116.
149. Anderson, N. D., Habak, C., Wilkinson, F. & Wilson, H. R. 2007 Evaluating shape after-effects with radial frequency patterns. Vis. Res. 47, 298-308. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.02.013)
150. Suzuki, S. 2001 Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: a high-level aftereffect for convexity? Vis. Res. 41, 3883-3902. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00249-8)
151. Oruc, I. & Barton, J. J. 2010 A novel face aftereffect based on recognition contrast thresholds. Vis. Res. 50, 1845-1854. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.06.005)
152. Werner, J. S. & Schefrin, B. E. 1993 Loci of achromatic points throughout the life span. J. Optic. Soc. Am. A 10, 1509-1516. (doi:10.1364/JOSAA.10.001509)
153. Kay, P. & Regier, T. 2006 Language, thought and color: recent developments. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10, 51-54. (doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.12.007)
154. Rhodes, G. 2006 The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199-226. (doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190208)
155. Webster, M. A., Yasuda, M., Haber, S., Ballardini, N. & Leonard, D. 2007 Adaptation and perceptual norms. In Human vision and electronic imaging (eds B. E. Rogowitz & T. N. Pappas), Proc. SPIE 6492, 1-11. (doi:10.1117/12.730399)
156. Walraven, J. & Werner, J. S. 1991 The invariance of unique white; a possible implication for normalizing cone action spectra. Vis. Res. 31, 2185-2193. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(91)90171-Z)
157. Werner, J. S. & Walraven, J. 1982 Effect of chromatic adaptation on the achromatic locus: the role of contrast, luminance and background color. Vis. Res. 22, 929-943. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90029-3)
158. Bartlett, M. S. 2007 Information maximization in face processing. Neurocomputing 70, 2204-2217. (doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2006.02.025)
159. MacLeod, D. I. A. 2003 Colour discrimination, colour constancy, and natural scene statistics (The Verriest Lecture). In Normal and defective colour vision (eds J. D. Mollon, J. Pokorny & K. Knoblauch), pp. 189-218. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
160. Burton, A.M. & Vokey, J. R. 1998 Theface-space typicality paradox: understanding the face-space metaphor. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A: Hum. Exp. Psychol. 51, 475-483.
161. Le Grande, Y. 1949 Les seuils differentiells de couleurs dans la theorie de Young. Rev. Opt. 28, 261-278.
162. Pugh Jr, E. N. & Mollon, J. D. 1979 A theory of the pi1 and pi3 color mechanisms of Stiles. Vis. Res. 19, 293-312. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(79)90175-5)
163. Friele, L. F. C. 1961 Analysis of the Brown and Brown-MacAdam colour discrimination data. Die Farbe 10, 193-224.
164. Nachmias, J. 2008 Judging spatial properties of simple figures. Vis. Res. 48, 1290-1296. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.024)
165. Chaparro, A., Stromeyer 3rd, C. F., Huang, E. P., Kronauer, R. E. & Eskew Jr, R. T. 1993 Colour is what the eye sees best. Nature 361, 348-350. (doi:10.1038/361348a0)
166. Webster, M. A. & Mollon, J. D. 1997 Adaptation and the color statistics of natural images. Vis. Res. 37, 3283-3298. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(97)00125-9)
167. Thornton, J. E. & Pugh Jr, E. N. 1983 Red/green color opponency at detection threshold. Science 219, 191-193. (doi:10.1126/science.6849131)
168. Whittle, P. 1992 Brightness, discriminability and the 'crispening effect'. Vis. Res. 32, 1493-1507. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(92)90205-W)
169. Laughlin, S. B. 1983 Matching coding to scenes to enhance efficiency. In Biological processing of images (eds O. J. Braddick & A. C. Sleigh), pp. 42-52. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
170. Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Vienot, F., Charles-Dominique, P. & Mollon, J. D. 2001 Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356, 229-283. (doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0773)
171. Webster, M. A. 1996 Human colour perception and its adaptation. Network-Comp. Neural 7, 587-634. (doi:10.1088/0954-898X/7/4/002)
172. Lennie, P. & Movshon, J. A. 2005 Coding of color and form in the geniculostriate visual pathway. J. Optic. Soc. Am. A 22, 2013-2033. (doi:10.1364/JOSAA.22.002013)
173. Zaidi, Q. & Shapiro, A. G. 1993 Adaptive orthogonalization of opponent-color signals. Biol. Cybernet. 69, 415-428.
174. Atick, J. J., Li, Z. & Redlich, A. N. 1993 What does post-adaptation color appearance reveal about cortical color representation? Vis. Res. 33, 123-129. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90065-5)
175. Hurvich, L. M. & Jameson, D. 1957 An opponentprocess theory of color vision. Psychol. Rev. 64, 384-404. (doi:10.1037/h0041403)
176. Derrington, A. M., Krauskopf, J. & Lennie, P. 1984 Chromatic mechanisms in lateral geniculate nucleus of macaque. J. Physiol. 357, 241-265.
177. De Valois, R. L. & De Valois, K. K. 1993 A multi-stage color model. Vis. Res. 33, 1053-1065. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90240-W)
178. Mollon, J. D. 2006 Monge (The Verriest Lecture). Vis. Neurosci. 23, 297-309. (doi:10.1017/S0952523806233479)
179. Stoughton, C. M. & Conway, B. R. 2008 Neural basis for unique hues. Curr. Biol. 18, R698-R699. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.06.018)
180. Mollon, J. D. 2009 A neural basis for unique hues? Curr. Biol. 19, R441-R442. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.008)
181. Ekman, P. 1992 Facial expressions of emotion: an old controversy and new findings. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 335, 63-69. (doi:10.1098/rstb.1992.0008)
182. Ekman, P. 1992 An argument for basic emotions. Cogn. Emotion 6, 169-200. (doi:10.1080/02699939208411068)
183. Plutchik, R. 2001 The nature of emotions. Am. Scient. 89, 344-350.
184. Rutherford, M. D., Chattha, H. M. & Krysko, K. M. 2008 The use of aftereffects in the study of relationships among emotion categories. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 34, 27-40. (doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.27)
185. Juricevic, I. & Webster, M. 2008 Adaptation to facial expressions. J. Vis. 8, 712a. (doi:10.1167/8.6.712)
186. Smith, M. L., Cottrell, G. W., Gosselin, F. & Schyns P. G. 2005 Transmitting and decoding facial expressions. Psychol. Sci. 16, 184-189. (doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00801.x)
187. Calder, A. J. & Young, A. W. 2005 Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 641-651. (doi:10.1038/nrn1724)
188. Wilson, H. R., Loffler, G. & Wilkinson, F. 2002 Synthetic faces, face cubes, and the geometry of face space. Vis. Res. 42, 2909-2923. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00362-0)
189. Tanaka, J., Giles, M., Kremen, S. & Simon, V. 1998 Mapping attractor fields in face space: the atypicality bias in face recognition. Cognition 68, 199-220. (doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00048-1)
190. Tanaka, J. W. & Corneille, O. 2007 Typicality effects in face and object perception: further evidence for the attractor field model. Percept. Psychophys. 69, 619-627. (doi:10.3758/BF03193919)
191. Dakin, S. C. & Omigie, D. 2009 Psychophysical evidence for a non-linear representation of facial identity. Vis. Res. 49, 2285-2296. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.06.016)
192. Rhodes, G., Maloney, L. T., Turner, J. & Ewing, L. 2007 Adaptive face coding and discrimination around the average face. Vis. Res. 47, 974-989. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.12.010)
193. Rhodes, G., Watson, T. L., Jeffery, L. & Clifford, C. W. 2010 Perceptual adaptation helps us identify faces. Vis. Res. 50, 963-968. (doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.003)
194. Ng, M., Boynton, G. M. & Fine, I. 2008 Face adaptation does not improve performance on search or discrimination tasks. J. Vis. 8, 1-20. (doi:10.1167/8.1.1)
195. Clifford, C.W., Webster, M. A., Stanley, G. B., Stocker, A. A., Kohn, A., Sharpee, T. O. & Schwartz, O. 2007 Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects. Vis. Res. 47, 3125-3131.
196. Barlow, H. B., Macleod, D. I. & van Meeteren, A. 1976 Adaptation to gratings: no compensatory advantages found. Vis. Res. 16, 1043-1045. (doi:10.1016/0042-6989(76)90241-8)
197. Westheimer, G. & Gee, A. 2002 Orthogonal adaptation and orientation discrimination. Vis. Res. 42, 2339-2343. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00192-X)
198. Clifford, C. W. G., Wyatt, A. M., Arnold, D. H., Smith S. T. & Wenderoth, P. 2001 Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vis. Res. 41, 151-159. (doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00248-0)
199. Regan, D. & Beverley, K. I. 1985 Postadaptation orientation discrimination. J. Optic. Soc. Am. A 2, 147-155. (doi:10.1364/JOSAA.2.000147)
200. Snippe, H. & Koenderink, J. 1992 Discrimination thresholds for channel-coded systems. Biol. Cybernet. 66, 543-551. (doi:10.1007/BF00204120)
201. Pallett, P. M. & MacLeod, D. I. A. 2011 Seeing faces as objects: no face inversion effect with geometrical discrimination. Attention Percept. Psychophys. 73, 504-520. (doi:10.3758/S13414-010-0033-2)
202. Shevell, S. K. & Kingdom, F. A. 2008 Color in complex scenes. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 59, 143-166. (doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093619)
203. Webster, M. A., Werner, J. S. & Field, D. J. 2005 Adaptation and the phenomenology of perception. In Fitting the mind to the world: adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision. Advances in visual cognition series (eds C. Clifford & G. Rhodes), vol. 2, pp. 241-277. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
204. Beer, D., Wortman, J., Horwitz, G. & MacLeod, D. 2005 Compensation of white for macular filtering. J. Vis. 5, 282a. (doi:10.1167/5.8.282)
205. Delahunt, P. B., Webster, M. A., Ma, L. & Werner, J. S. 2004 Long-term renormalization of chromatic mechanisms following cataract surgery. Vis. Neurosci. 21, 301-307. (doi:10.1017/S0952523804213025)
206. Webster, M. A., Halen, K., Meyers, A. J., Winkler, P. & Werner, J. S. 2010 Colour appearance and compensation in the near periphery. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 1817-1825. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1832)
207. Pellicano, E., Jeffery, L., Burr, D. & Rhodes, G. 2007 Abnormal adaptive face-coding mechanisms in children with autism spectrum disorder. Curr. Biol. 17, 1508-1512. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.065)
208. Saxton, T. K., Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C. & Roberts, S. C. 2009 Adolescents' preferences for sexual dimorphism are influenced by relative exposure to ma le and female faces. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 47, 864-868. (doi:10.1016/j.paid.2009.07.005)
209. Apicella, C. L., Little, A. C. & Marlowe, F. W. 2007 Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception 36, 1813-1820. (doi:10.1068/p5601)
210. Tovee, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A. & Mangalparsad, R. 2006 Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 443-456. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.004)
211. Malinowski 1929 The sexual life of savages in northwestern Melanesia. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
212. Atick, J. J., Griffin, P. A. & Redlich, A. N. 1996 The vocabulary of shape: principal shapes for probing perception and neural response. Network-Comp. Neural 7, 1-5. (doi:10.1088/0954-898X/7/1/002)
213. Nestor, A. & Tarr, M. J. 2008 Gender recognition of human faces using color. Psychol. Sci. 19, 1242-1246. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-280.2008.02232.x)
214. Jones, B. C., Little, A. C., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2004 When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception 33, 569-576. (doi:10.1068/p3463)
215. Changizi, M. A., Zhang, Q. & Shimojo, S. 2006 Bare skin, blood and the evolution of primate colour vision. Biol. Lett. 2, 217-221. (doi:10.1098/rsbl.2006.0440)
216. Mollon, J. D. 1989 'Tho' she kneel'd in that place where they grew.' The uses and origins of primate colour vision. J. Exp. Biol. 146, 21-38.
217. Yasuda, M., Webster, S. M. & Webster, M. A. 2007 Color and facial expressions. J. Vis. 7, 946a.