View-specific coding of face shape

Psychological Science

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 501-505

  Jeffery, Linda ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^a   Busey, Tom ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; VISION;

FACE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 33744948295     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01735.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885-2899.
2. Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P.C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
3. Bruce, V., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. (1987). The basis of the 3/4 view advantage in face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 1, 109-120.
4. Bülthoff, H.H., & Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60-64.
5. Busey, T.A., & Zaki, S.R. (2004). The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations. Memory & Cognition, 32, 916-931.
6. Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron, 45, 793-800.
7. Grill-Spector, K., Kushnir, T., Edelman, S., Avidan, G., Itzchak, Y., & Malach, R. (1999). Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron, 24, 187-203.
8. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., & Gobbini, M.I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 223-233.
9. Haxby, J.V., Hoffman, E.A., & Gobbini, M.I. (2002). Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication. Biological Psychiatry, 51, 59-67.
10. Hayward, W.G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 425-427.
11. Hayward, W.G., & Tarr, M.J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
12. Jiang, F., Blanz, V., & O'Toole, A.J. (2006). Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science, 17, 493-500.
13. Kourtzi, Z., & Grill-Spector, K. (2005). fMRI adaptation: A tool for studying visual representations in the primate brain. In C.W.G. Clifford & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Fitting the mind to the world,' Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision (pp. 173-188). Ox-ford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89-94.
15. Liu, C.H., & Chaudhuri, A. (2002). Reassessing the 3/4 view effect in face recognition. Cognition, 83, 31-48.
16. Newell, F.N., Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1999). Recognizing unfamiliar faces: The effects of distinctiveness and view. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 509-534.
17. Perrett, D.I., Hietanen, J.K., Oram, M.W., & Benson, P.J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences, 335, 23-30.
18. Perrett, D.I., Oram, M.W., Harries, M.H., Bevan, R., Hietanen, J.K., Benson, P.J., & Thomas, N.J. (1991). Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 159-173.
19. Perrett, D.I., Smith, P.A., Potter, D.D., Mistlin, A.J., Head, A.S., Milner, A.D., & Jeeves, M.A. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the. Royal Society of London; Series B, Biological Sciences, 223, 293-317.
20. Persistence of Vision Raytracer. (2003-2004). POV-Ray [Computer software]. Available from http://www.povray.org/
21. Rhodes, G., & Jeffery, L. (in press). Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research.
22. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T.L., Clifford, C.W.G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14, 558-566.
23. Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T.L., Jaquet, E., Winkler, C., & Clifford, C.W. (2004). Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Current Biology, 14, 2119-2123.
24. Suzuki, S. (2005). High-level pattern coding revealed by brief shape aftereffects. In C.W.G. Clifford & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision (pp. 135-172). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
25. Tarr, M.J., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
26. Troje, N.F., & Bülthoff, H.H. (1996). Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research, 36, 1761-1771.
27. Troje, N.F., & Kersten, D. (1999). Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception, 28, 483-487.
28. Wang, G., Tanaka, K., & Tanifuji, M. (1996). Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Science, 272, 1665-1668.
29. Watson, T.L., & Clifford, C.W.G. (2003). Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception, 32, 1109-1116.
30. Webster, M.A., & MacLin, O.H. (1999). Figurai aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647-653.
31. Zhao, L., & Chubb, C. (2001). The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research, 41, 2979-2994.