The Face-Space Typicality Paradox: Understanding the Face - Space Metaphor

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 475-483

  Burton, A Mike ^a   Vokey, John R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LETHBRIDGE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0032391454     PISSN: 02724987     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/713755768     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Craw, I. (1995). A manifold model of face and object recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.
2. Hancock, P.J.B., Burton, A.M., & Bruce, V. (1996). Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis. Memory and Cognition, 24, 26-40.
3. Johnston, R.A., & Ellis, H.D. (1995). Age effects in the processing of typical and distinctive faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 447-465.
4. Johnston, R. A., Kanazawa, M., Kato, T., & Oda, M. (1997). Exploring the structure of multidimensional face-space: The effects of age and gender. Visual Cognition, 4, 39-57.
5. Johnston, R.A., Milne, A.B., Williams, C., & Hosie, J. (1997). Do distinctive faces come from outer space? An investigation of the status of a multidimensional face space. Visual Cognition, 4, 59-67.
6. Medin, D.L. (1986). Comment on "Memory storage and retrieval processes in category learning." Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 373-381.
7. O'Toole, A.J., Deffenbacher, K.A., Valentin, D., & Abdi, H. (1994). Structural aspects of face recognition and the other race effect. Memory & Cognition, 22, 208-224.
8. O'Toole, A.J., Abdi, H., Deffenbacher, K. A., and Valentin, D. (1995). Aperceptual learning theory of the information in faces. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.
9. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
10. Valentine, T. (Ed.) (1995). Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.
11. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986a). Recognising familiar faces: The role of distinctiveness and familiarity. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40, 300-305.
12. Valentine, T., & Bruce, V. (1986b). The effect of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception, 15, 525-535.
13. Valentine, T., Chiroro, P., & Dixon, R. (1995). An account of the own-race bias and the contact hypothesis based on a "face-space" model of face recognition. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.
14. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671-703.
15. Vokey, J.R., & Read, J.D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory and Cognition, 20, 291-302.
16. Vokey, J.R., & Read, J.D. (1995). Memorability, familiarity and categorical structure in the recognition of faces. In T. Valentine (Ed.), Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition. London: Routledge.