The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 17, 2007, Pages 2291-2296

  Rhodes, Gillian ^a   Jeffery, Linda ^a   Clifford, Colin W G ^b   Leopold, David A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aftereffects; Face perception; Visual perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ADAPTATION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION; VISUAL MEMORY; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547123363     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.05.012     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abbonizio G., Langley K., and Clifford C.W.G. Contrast adaptation may enhance contrast discrimination. Spatial Vision 16 (2002) 45-58
2. Afraz S.-R., and Cavanagh P. Is the "face aftereffect" retinotopic or spatiotopic?. Journal of Vision 6 6 (2006) 882 (Abstract)
3. Barlow H.B. A theory about the functional role and synaptic mechanism of visual after-effects. In: Blakemore C. (Ed). Vision: Coding and Efficiency (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. In: Clifford C.W.G., and Rhodes G. (Eds). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and after-effects in high-level vision (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford
5. Clifford C.W.G., Ma Wyatt A., Arnold D.H., Smith S.T., and Wenderoth P. Orthogonal adaptation improves orientation discrimination. Vision Research 41 (2001) 151-159
6. Fang F., and He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 45 5 (2005) 793-800
7. Frisby J.P. Seeing: Illusion mind and brain (1980), Oxford University Press, Oxford
8. Gauthier I., Tarr M.J., Moylan J., Skudlarski P., Gore J.C., and Anderson A.W. The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12 (2000) 495-504
9. George N., Dolan R.J., Fink G.R., Baylis G.C., Russell C., and Driver J. Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 574-580
10. Grill-Spector K., Knouf N., and Kanwisher N. The fusiform area subserves face perception, not generic within-category discrimination. Nature Neuroscience 7 (2004) 555-562
11. Harris J.P., and Calvert J.E. Contrast, spatial frequency, and test duration effects on the tilt aftereffect: Implications for underlying mechanisms. Vision Research 29 (1989) 129-135
12. Hershenson M. Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration. Perception and Psychophysics 45 (1989) 251-257
13. Hsu S.-M., and Young A.W. Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Visual Cognition 11 (2004) 871-899
14. Ibbotson M.R. Physiological mechanisms of adaptation in the visual system. In: Clifford C.W.G., and Rhodes G. (Eds). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 15-45
15. Jenkins R., Beaver J.D., and Calder A.J. I thought you were looking at me. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 506-513
16. Kanwisher N., and Yovel G. The fusiform face area: A cortical region specialized for the perception of faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 361 (2006) 2109-2128
17. Kohn A., and Movshon J.A. Neuronal adaptation to visual motion in area MT of the macaque. Neuron 39 (2003) 681-691
18. Kovács G., Zimmer M., Harza I., Antal A., and Vidnyánszky Z. Position-specificity of facial adaptation. Neuroreport 16 (2005) 1945-1949
19. Krauskopf J. The magnitude of figural after-effects as a function of the duration of the test period. American Journal of Psychology 67 (1954) 684-690
20. Leopold D.A., Bondar I., and Giese M.A. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 442 (2006) 572-575
21. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., and Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 89-94
22. Leopold D.A., Rhodes G., Müller K.-M., and Jeffery L. The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 272 (2005) 897-904
23. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., and Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1386-1390
24. MacLin O.H., and Webster M.A. Influence of adaptation on the perception of distortions in natural images. Journal of Electronic Imaging 10 (2001) 100-109
25. Magnussen S., and Johnsen T. Temporal aspects of spatial adaptation. A study of the tilt aftereffect. Vision Research 26 (1986) 661-672
26. Phinney R.E., Bowd C., and Patterson R. Direction-selective coding of stereoscopic (cyclopean) motion. Vision Research 37 (1997) 865-869
27. Regan D., and Beverley K.I. Postadaptation orientation discrimination. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2 (1985) 147-155
28. Rhodes G. The evolution of facial attractiveness. Annual Review of Psychology 57 (2006) 199-226
29. Rhodes G., and Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2977-2987
30. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., and Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 558-566
31. Rotshtein P., Henson R.N.A., Treves A., Driver J., and Dolan R.J. Morphing Marilyn into Maggie dissociates physical and identity face representations in the brain. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 107-113
32. Sekuler R. Visual motion perception. In: Carterette E.C., and Friedman M.P. (Eds). Handbook of perception: Vol. V. Seeing (1975), Academic Press, New York 387-433
33. Suzuki S. High-level pattern coding revealed by brief shape aftereffects. In: Clifford C.W.G., and Rhodes G. (Eds). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high-level vision (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford 135-172
34. Watson T.L., and Clifford C.W.G. Pulling faces: An investigation of the face-distortion aftereffect. Perception 32 (2003) 1109-1116
35. Watson T.L., Rhodes G., and Clifford C.W.G. Improved facial identity recognition following adaptation. Journal of Vision 6 6 (2006) 873 (Abstract)
36. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., and Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural face categories. Nature 428 (2004) 557-560
37. Webster M.A., and MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (1999) 647-653
38. Werblin F.S. The control of sensitivity in the retina. Scientific American 228 (1973) 70-79
39. Winkielman P., Halberstadt J., Fazendeiro T., and Catty S. Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the eye. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 799-806
40. Wolfe J.M. Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects. Vision Research 24 (1984) 1959-1964
41. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., and Webster M.A. Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 420-437
42. Yarbus A.L. Eye movements and vision (1967), Plenum Press, New York
43. Zhao L., and Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2979-2994