Three-dimensional information in face representations revealed by identity aftereffects

Psychological Science

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 318-325

  Jiang, Fang ^a   Blanz, Volker ^b   O'Toole, Alice J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; RECOGNITION; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR;

DISCLOSURE; FACIAL EXPRESSION; HUMANS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SOCIAL IDENTIFICATION;

EID: 62349085830     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02285.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Anderson, N.D. Wilson, H.R. (2005). The nature of synthetic face adaptation. Vision Research, 45, 1815 1828.
2. Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115 147.
3. Biederman, I. Bar, M. (1999). One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885 2899.
4. Biederman, I. Gerhardstein, P.C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162 1182.
5. Blanz, V., Grother, P., Phillips, J. Vetter, T. (2005). Face recognition based on frontal views generated from non-frontal images. In CVPR'05: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Vol. 2, pp. 454 461). San Diego, CA : IEEE Computer Society.
6. Blanz, V. Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In SIGGRAPH'99: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques (pp. 187 194). New York : ACM Press/Addison-Wesley.
7. Booth, M.C.A. Rolls, E.T. (1998). View-invariant representations of familiar objects by neurons in the inferior temporal visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 8, 510 523.
8. Bruce, V. Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305 327.
9. Bülthoff, H.H. Edelman, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 89, 60 64.
10. Burton, A.M., Bruce, V. Hancock, P.J.B. (1999). From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1 31.
11. Carbon, C.C. Leder, H. (2005). Face adaptation: Changing stable representations of familiar faces within minutes? Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 1, 1 7.
12. Carbon, C.C., Strobach, T., Langton, S.R.H., Harsányi, G., Leder, H. Kovács, G. (2007). Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: Immediate and long lasting. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1966 1976.
13. Desimone, R., Albright, T.D., Gross, C.G. Bruce, C.J. (1984). Stimulus-selective properties of inferior temporal neurons in the macaque. Journal of Neuroscience, 4, 2051 2068.
14. De Souza, W.C., Eifuku, S., Tamura, R., Nishijo, H. Ono, T. (2005). Differential characteristics of face neuron responses within the anterior superior temporal sulcus of macaques. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 1252 1266.
15. Fang, F. He, S. (2005). Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron, 45, 793 800.
16. Hancock, P.J.B., Bruce, V. Burton, A.M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 330 337.
17. Hasselmo, M.E., Rolls, E.T. Baylis, G.C. (1989). The role of expression and identity in the face selective response of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey. Behavioral Brain Research, 32, 203 218.
18. Hayward, W.G. (2003). After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 425 427.
19. Hill, H. Bruce, V. (1996). Effects of lighting on the perception of facial surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 986 1004.
20. Jeffery, L., Rhodes, G. Busey, T. (2006). View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science, 17, 501 505.
21. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. O'Toole, A.J. (2006). Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science, 17, 493 500.
22. Jiang, F., Blanz, V. O'Toole, A.J. (2007). The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research, 47, 525 531.
23. Leopold, D.A., Bondar, I.V. Giese, M.A. (2006). Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature, 442, 572 575.
24. Leopold, D.A., O'Toole, A.J., Vetter, T. Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 89 94.
25. Liu, Z., Knill, D. Kersten, D. (1995). Object classification for human and ideal observers. Vision Research, 35, 549 568.
26. Loffler, G., Yourganov, G., Wilkinson, F. Wilson, H.R. (2005). fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1386 1390.
27. Logothetis, N., Pauls, J. Poggio, T. (1995). Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology, 5, 552 563.
28. Peissig, J.J. Tarr, M.J. (2007). Visual object recognition: Do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 75 96.
29. Perrett, D.I., Oran, M.V., Harries, M.H., Bevan, R., Hietanen, J.K., Benson, P.J. Thomas, S. (1991). Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 86, 159 173.
30. Poggio, T. Edelman, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263 266.
31. Rolls, E.T., Baylis, G.C., Hasselmo, M.E. Nalwa, V. (1989). The effect of learning on the face selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research, 76, 153 164.
32. Stankiewicz, B.J. (2002). Empirical evidence for independent dimensions in the visual representation of three-dimensional shape. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 913 932.
33. Tarr, M.J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study of the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55 82.
34. Tarr, M.J., Kersten, D. Bülthoff, H.H. (1998). Why the visual recognition system might encode the effects of illumination. Vision Research, 38, 2259 2275.
35. Tarr, M.J. Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233 282.
36. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161 204.
37. Vogels, R. Biederman, I. (2002). Effects of illumination intensity and direction on object coding in macaque inferior temporal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 756 766.
38. Wallis, G. Bülthoff, H.H. (1999). Learning to recognize objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 22 31.
39. Wallraven, C., Schwaninger, A., Schumacher, S. Bülthoff, H.H. (2002). View-based recognition of faces in man and machine: Re-visiting inter-extra-ortho. In H.H. Bülthoff, S.W. Lee, T. Poggio C. Wallraven (Eds.), Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Biologically Motivated Computer Vision (BMCV 2002) (pp. 651 660). Berlin, Germany : Springer.
40. Webster, M.A. MacLin, O.H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 647 653.