Typicality effects in face and object perception: Further evidence for the attractor field model

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 619-627

  Tanaka, James W ^a   Corneille, Olivier ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547828742     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193919     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. BARTLETT, J. C., HURRY, S., & THORLEY, W. (1984). Typicality and familiarity of faces. Memory A Cognition, 12, 219-228.
2. BARTLETT, M. S. (in press). Information maximization in face processing. Neurocomputing.
3. BARTLETT, M. S., & TANAKA, J. W. (2007). An attractor field model of face representation: Effects of typicality and image morphing. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4. BUSEY, T. A. (1998). Physical and psychological representations of faces: Evidence from morphing. Psychological Science, 9, 476-483.
5. CORNEILLE, O., GOLDSTONE, R. L., QUELLER, S., & POTTER, T. (2006). Asymmetries in categorization, perceptual discrimination, and visual search for reference and nonreference exemplars. Memory A Cognition, 34, 556-567.
6. DIAMOND, R., & CAREY, S. (1986). Why faces are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
7. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1994). Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 178-200.
8. GOLDSTONE, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 585-612.
9. IVERSON, P., & KUHL, P. K. (1995). Mapping the perceptual magnet effect for speech using signal detection theory and multidimensional scaling. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 553-562.
10. JOLIŒUR, P., GLUCK, M. A., & KOSSLYN, S. M. (1984). Pictures and names: Making the connection. Cognitive Psychology, 16, 243-275.
11. KANWISHER, N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 759-763.
12. KRUMHANSL, C. L. (1978). Concerning the applicability of geometric models to similarity data: The interrelationship between similarity and spatial density. Psychological Review, 85, 445-463.
13. KUHL, P. K. (1991). Human adults and human infants show a "perceptual magnet effect" for the prototypes of speech categories, monkeys do not. Perception A Psychophysics, 50, 93-107.
14. LIGHT, L. L., KAYRA-STUART, F., & HOLLANDER, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning A Memory, 5, 212-228.
15. MURPHY, G., & BROWNELL, H. (1985). Category differentiation in object recognition: Typicality constraints on the basic category advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, A Cognition, 11, 70-84.
16. TANAKA, J. W. (2001). The entry point of face recognition: Evidence for face expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 534-543.
17. TANAKA, J. W., GILES, M., KREMEN, S., & SIMON, V. (1998). Mapping attractor fields in face space: The atypicality bias in face recognition. Cognition, 68, 199-220.
18. TANK, D. W., & HOPFIELD, J. J. (1987). Collective computation in neuronlike circuits. Scientific American, 257, 104-114.
19. TARR, M. J., & GAUTHIER, I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 764-769.
20. TARR, M. J., & WILLIAMS, P. (1996). RSVP: A software package for experimental psychology using the Apple Macintosh OS. Providence, RI: Brown University, Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences.
21. VALENTINE, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
22. VALENTINE, T., & BRUCE, V. (1986). The effect of race inversion and encoding activity upon face recognition. Acta Psychologica, 61, 259-273.
23. VOKEY, J. R., & READ, J. D. (1992). Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces. Memory A Cognition, 20,291-302.
24. WOLBERG, G. (1990). Digital image warping. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Science Society Press.