Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalising across different views of faces

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 2164-2169

  Burke, Darren ^a   Taubert, Jessica ^a   Higman, Talia ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Face perception; Face recognition; Stereopsis; Viewpoint

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; STEREOSCOPIC VISION; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

ADULT; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 34447297793     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Bar M. Viewpoint dependency in visual object recognition does not necessarily imply viewer-centered representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 13 (2001) 793-799
2. Bennett D., and Vuong Q.C. A stereo advantage in generalising over changes in viewpoint on object recognition tasks. Perception and Psychophysics 68 (2006) 1082-1093
3. Burke D. Combining disparate views of objects: Viewpoint costs are reduced by stereopsis. Visual Cognition 12 (2005) 705-719
4. Fang F., and He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 45 (2005) 793-800
5. Gauthier I., Hayward W.G., Tarr M.J., Anderson A.W., Skudlarski P., and Gore J.C. BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron 34 (2002) 161-171
6. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., and Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24 (1999) 187-203
7. Hancock P.J.B., Bruce V., and Burton M.A. Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 330-337
8. Hayward W.G. After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 425-427
9. Hill H., Schyns P.G., and Akamatzu S. Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition. Cognition 62 (1997) 201-222
10. Jeffrey L., Rhodes G., and Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 501-505
11. Koenderink J.J., van Doorn A.J., and Kappers A.M.L. On so-called paradoxical monocular stereoscopy. Perception 23 (1994) 583-594
12. Lawson R. Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. Acta Psychologica 102 (1999) 221-245
13. Lee Y., Matsumiya K., and Wilson H.R. Size-invariant, but viewpoint-dependent representation of faces. Vision Research 46 (2006) 1901-1910
14. Liu C.H., and Ward J. The use of 3D information in face recogniton. Vision Research 46 (2006) 768-773
15. Liu C.H., Collin C.A., and Chaudhuri A. Does face recognition rely on encoding of 3-D surface? Examining the role of shape-from-shading and shape-from-stereo. Perception 29 (2000) 729-743
16. Liu C.H., Ward J., and Young A.W. Transfer between two- and three-dimensional representations of faces. Visual Cognition 13 (2006) 51-64
17. Logothetis N.K., and Sheinberg D.L. Visual object recognition. Annual Review of Neuroscience 19 (1996) 577-621
18. Newell F.N., Chiroro P., and Valentine T. Recognising unfamiliar faces: The effects of distinctiveness and view. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52A (1999) 509-534
19. O'Toole A.J., Edelman S., and Bulthoff H.H. Stimulus specific effects in face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2351-2363
20. Perrett D.I., Hietanen J.K., Oram M.W., and Benson P.J. Organisation and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Series B, Biological Sciences 335 (1991) 23-31
21. Pike G., Kemp R., Towell N., and Phillips K. Recognizing moving faces: The relative contribution of motion and perspective view information. Visual Cognition 4 (1997) 409-437
22. Stankiewicz B.J. Just another view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 526
23. Tarr M.J., and Cheng Y.D. Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 23-30
24. Tarr M.J., and Pinker S. Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology 21 (1989) 233-282
25. Troje N.F., and Bulthoff H.H. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research 36 (1996) 1761-1771
26. Troje N.F., and Bulthoff H.H. How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views?. Vision Research 38 (1998) 78-89
27. Troje N.F., and Kersten D. Viewpoint-dependent recognition of familiar faces. Perception 28 (1999)
28. Watson T.L., Johnston A., Hill H.C.H., and Troje N.F. Motion as a cue for viewpoint invariance. Visual Cogniton 12 (2005) 1291-1308
29. Watt S.J., Akeley K., Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Focus cues affect perceived depth. Journal of Vision 5 (2005) 834-862
30. Webster M.A., and MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (1999) 647-653
31. Williams, P., & Tarr, M. J. RSVP: Experimental control software for MacOs [Online]. Available: http://www.cog.brown.edu/∼tarr/RSVP/.