Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: Opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 3070-3077

  Jeffery, Linda ^a   Rhodes, Gillian ^a   Busey, Tom ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Aftereffects; Contingent aftereffects; Face; Tuning; View

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; NERVE FUNCTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; NEURONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMETRICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL CORTEX;

EID: 35348967332     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.08.018     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Benton C.P., Jennings S.J., and Chatting D.J. Viewpoint dependence in adaptation to facial identity. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3313-3325
2. Biederman I., and Bar M. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects. Vision Research 39 (1999) 2885-2899
3. Biederman I., and Gerhardstein P.C. Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Buelthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1506-1514
4. Bülthoff H.H., and Edelman S. Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 89 (1992) 60-64
5. Burton A.M., Bruce V., and Hancock P.J.B. From pixels to people: A model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science 23 (1999) 1-31
6. Busey T.A., and Zaki S.R. The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations. Memory and Cognition 32 (2004) 916-931
7. Chen C.-C., Kao K.-L.C., and Tyler C.W. Face configuration processing in the human brain: The role of symmetry. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 1423-1432
8. De Souza W.C., Eifuku S., Tamura R., Nishijo H., and Ono T. Differential characteristics of face neuron responses within the anterior superior temporal sulcus of macaques. Journal of Neurophysiology 94 (2005) 1252-1266
9. Eger E., Schweinberger S.R., Dolan R.J., and Henson R.N. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence. Neuroimage 26 (2005) 1128-1139
10. Eifuku S., De Souza W.C., Tamura R., Nishijo H., and Ono T. Neuronal correlates of face identification in the monkey anterior temporal cortical areas. Journal of Neurophysiology 91 (2004) 358-371
11. Fang F., and He S. Viewer-centered object representation in the human visual system revealed by viewpoint aftereffects. Neuron 45 (2005) 793-800
12. Fang F., Murray S.O., and He S. Duration-dependent fMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex 17 (2007) 1402-1411
13. Grill-Spector K., Kushnir T., Edelman S., Avidan G., Itzchak Y., and Malach R. Differential processing of objects under various viewing conditions in the human lateral occipital complex. Neuron 24 (1999) 187-203
14. Hancock P.J.B., Bruce V., and Burton A.M. Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4 (2000) 330-337
15. Hayward W.G. After the viewpoint debate: Where next in object recognition?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7 (2003) 425-427
16. Hayward W.G., and Tarr M.J. Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 1511-1521
17. Jaquet, E., & Rhodes, G. (in press). Face aftereffects indicate dissociable, but not distinct, coding of male and female faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, in press.
18. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W.G. (in press-a). Opposite aftereffects for Chinese and Caucasian faces are selective for social category information and not just physical face differences. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, doi:10.1080/17470210701467870.
19. Jaquet, E., Rhodes, G., & Hayward, W.G. (in press-b). Race-contingent aftereffects suggest distinct perceptual norms for different race faces. Visual Cognition, doi:10.1080/13506280701350647.
20. Jeffery L., Rhodes G., and Busey T. View-specific coding of face shape. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 501-505
21. Jiang F., Blanz V., and O'Toole A.J. Probing the visual representation of faces with adaptation: A view from the other side of the mean. Psychological Science 17 (2006) 493-500
22. Jiang F., Blanz V., and O'Toole A.J. The role of familiarity in three-dimensional view-transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research 47 (2007) 525-531
23. Leopold D.A., Bondar I.V., and Giese M.A. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 442 (2006) 572-575
24. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., and Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 89-94
25. Little A.C., DeBruine L.M., and Jones B.C. Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 272 (2005) 2283-2287
26. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., and Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1386-1390
27. Logothetis N.K., Pauls J., and Poggio T. Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys. Current Biology 5 (1995) 552-563
28. McCollough C. Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science 149 (1965) 1115-1116
29. Perrett D.I., Hietanen J.K., Oram M.W., and Benson P.J. Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 335 (1992) 23-30
30. Perrett D.I., Oram M., and Ashbridge E. Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalisation of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition 67 (1998) 111-145
31. Perrett D.I., Oram M.W., Harries M.H., Bevan R., Hietanen J.K., Benson P.J., et al. Viewer-centred and object-centred coding of heads in the macaque temporal cortex. Experimental Brain Research 86 (1991) 159-173
32. Perrett D.I., Smith P.A., Potter D.D., Mistlin A.J., Head A.S., Milner A.D., et al. Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London - Series B: Biological Sciences 223 (1985) 293-317
33. Persistence of Vision Raytracer. (2003-2004). POV-Ray [Computer software]. Available from: http://www.povray.org/.
34. Pourtois G., Schwartz S., Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., and Vuilleumier P. Portraits or People? Distinct representations of face identity in the human visual cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 1043-1057
35. Pourtois G., Schwartz S., Seghier M.L., Lazeyras F., and Vuilleumier P. View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: An event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage 24 (2005) 1214-1224
36. Rhodes G., and Jeffery L. Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity. Vision Research 46 (2006) 2977-2987
37. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., and Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 558-566
38. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Jaquet E., Winkler C., and Clifford C.W. Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Current Biology 14 (2004) 2119-2123
39. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 1019-1025
40. Riesenhuber M., and Poggio T. Models of object recognition. Nature Neuroscience 3 (2000) 1199-1204
41. Rolls E.T., Baylis G.C., Hasselmo M.E., and Nalwa V. The effect of learning on the face selective responses of neurons in the cortex in the superior temporal sulcus of the monkey. Experimental Brain Research 76 (1989) 153-164
42. Tarr M.J. News on views: Pandemonium revisited. Nature Neuroscience 2 (1999) 932-935
43. Tarr M.J., and Buelthoff H.H. Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 1494-1505
44. Troje N.F., and Bülthoff H.H. Face recognition under varying poses: The role of texture and shape. Vision Research 36 (1996) 1761-1771
45. Troje N.F., and Bülthoff H.H. How is bilateral symmetry of human faces used for recognition of novel views?. Vision Research 38 (1998) 79-89
46. Vetter T., Poggio T., and Bülthoff H.H. The importance of symmetry and virtual views in three-dimensional object recognition. Current Biology 4 (1994) 18-23
47. Wang G., Tanaka K., and Tanifuji M. Optical imaging of functional organization in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Science 272 (1996) 1665-1668
48. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., and Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural face categories. Nature 428 (2004) 557-561
49. Webster M.A., and MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 6 (1999) 647-653
50. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., and Webster M.A. Stimulus selectivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 420-437