Aftereffects for Face Attributes With Different Natural Variability: Adapter Position Effects and Neural Models

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 570-592

  Robbins, Rachel ^a   McKone, Elinor ^a   Edwards, Mark ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

adaptation; aftereffects; face recognition; face space; neural models

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; VISION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; FACE; FEMALE; FIGURAL AFTEREFFECT; HUMANS; MALE; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 34547441900     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.3.570     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Atick J.J., Griffin P.A., and Redlich A.N. The vocabulary of shape: Principal shapes for probing perception and neural response. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 7 (1996) 1-5
2. Bartlett J.C., and Searcy J. Inversion and configuration of faces. Cognitive Psychology 25 (1993) 281-316
3. Blakemore C., and Campbell. On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology 203 (1969) 237-260
4. Carbon C.-C., and Leder H. The Mona Lisa effect: Is "our" Lisa fame or fake?. Perception 35 (2006) 411-414
5. Clifford, C., Wenderoth, P., & Spehar, B. (2000). A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision. Proceedings of the Royal Society London, B, 267, 1705-1710.
6. Cohen J., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., and Provost J. PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 25 (1993) 257-271
7. Farkas L.G., Hreczko T.A., and Katic M.J. Craniofacial norms in North American Caucasians from birth (one year) to young adulthood. In: Farkas L.G. (Ed). Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. (1994), Raven Press, New York 241-335
8. Fechner G. Elements of psychophysics 1 (1966), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (Original work published 1860)
9. Freiwald W.A., Tsao D.Y., Tootell R.B.H., and Livingstone M.S. Single-unit recording in an fMRI-identified macaque face patch: II. Coding along multiple feature axes [Abstract] (2005), Society for Neuroscience, Washington, DC
10. Gibson J.J. Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: II. Simultaneous contrast and the areal restriction of the aftereffect. Journal of Experimental Psychology 20 (1937) 553-569
11. Hreczko T.A., and Farkas L.G. Norms of the craniofacial asymmetries in North American Caucasians. In: Farkas L.G. (Ed). Anthropometry of the head and face. 2nd ed. (1994), Raven Press, New York 359-380
12. Hsu S.-M., and Young A.W. Adaptation effects in facial expression recognition. Visual Cognition 11 (2004) 871-899
13. Hubel D.H., and Wiesel T.N. Sequence regularity and geometry of orientation columns in the monkey striate cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology 158 (1974) 267-293
14. Kanwisher N., McDermott J., and Chun M.M. The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience 17 (1997) 4302-4311
15. Kevin Raner Software. MacCurveFit (Version 1.5.5 for PowerMacs) [Computer software] (1993), Author, Mt. Waverley, Victoria, Australia
16. Kourtzi Z., and Kanwisher N. Representation of perceived object shape by the human lateral occipital complex. Science 293 (2001, August 24) 1506-1509
17. Leder H., and Bruce V. Local and relational aspects of face distinctiveness. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology 51 A (1998) 449-473
18. Leopold D.A., Bondar I.V., and Giese M.A. Norm-based face encoding by single neurons in the monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature 442 (2006, August 3) 572-575
19. Leopold D.A., O'Toole A.J., Vetter T., and Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nature Neuroscience 4 (2001) 89-94
20. Leopold, D. A., Rhodes, G., Muller, K., & Jeffery, L. (2005). The dynamics of visual adaptation to faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 272, 897-904.
21. Little, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2005). Sex-contingent face after-effects suggest distinct neural populations code male and female faces. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 272, 2283-2287.
22. Loffler G., Yourganov G., Wilkinson F., and Wilson H.R. fMRI evidence of the neural representation of faces. Nature Neuroscience 8 (2005) 1386-1390
23. MacLin O.H., and Webster M.A. Influence of adaptation on the perception of distortions in natural images. Journal of Electronic Imaging 10 (2001) 100-109
24. Maddess T., McCourt M.E., Blakeslee B., and Cunningham R.B. Factors governing the adaptation of cells in Area-17 of the cat visual cortex. Biological Cybernetics 59 (1988) 229-236
25. Mather G. The movement aftereffect and a distribution-shift model for coding the direction of visual movement. Perception 9 (1980) 379-392
26. Mazard A., Schiltz C., and Rossion B. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Neuropsychologia 44 (2006) 912-922
27. McCarthy G., Puce A., Gore J.C., and Allison T. Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 9 (1997) 605-610
28. McKone E., Aitkin A., and Edwards M. Categorical and coordinate relations in faces, or Fechner's law and face-space instead?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 1181-1198
29. McKone, E., & Edwards, M. (2005). [Coding range and not symmetry determines aftereffect size for mouth shift]. Unpublished raw data.
30. Morikawa K. Adaptation to asymmetrically distorted faces and its lack of effect on mirror images. Vision Research 45 (2005) 3180-3188
31. Movshon J.A., and Lennie P. Pattern-selective adaptation in visual cortical neurons. Nature 278 (1979, April 26) 573-599
32. O'Toole A.J., Abdi H., Deffenbacher K.A., and Valentin D. A perceptual learning theory of the information in faces. In: Valentine T. (Ed). Cognitive and computational aspects of face recognition (1995), Routledge, London 159-182
33. Over R. Comparison of normalization theory and neural enhancement explanation of negative aftereffects. Psychological Bulletin 75 (1971) 225-243
34. Perrett, D. I., Smith, P. A. J., Potter, D. D., Mistlin, A. J., Head, A. S., Milner, A. D., & Jeeves, M. A. (1985). Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze direction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 223, 293-317.
35. Regan D., and Hamstra S.J. Shape-discrimination and the judgment of perfect symmetry: Dissociation of shape from size. Vision Research 32 (1992) 1845-1864
36. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Clifford C.W.G., and Nakayama K. Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 558-566
37. Rhodes G., Jeffery L., Watson T.L., Jaquet E., Winkler C., and Clifford C.W. Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face coding mechanisms. Current Biology 14 (2004) 2119-2123
38. Rhodes G., Robbins R., Jaquet E., McKone E., Jeffery L., and Clifford C. Adaptation and face perception: How aftereffects implicate norm based coding of faces. In: Rhodes G., and Clifford C. (Eds). Fitting the mind to the world: Adaptation and aftereffects in high level vision (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England 213-240
39. Rogers B., and Graham M. Motion parallax and the perception of three-dimensional surfaces. In: Ingle D.J., Jeannerod M., and Lee D.N. (Eds). Brain mechanisms and spatial vision (1985), Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, the Netherlands 95-111
40. Simoncelli E.P., and Olhausen B.A. Natural image statistics and neural representation. Annual Review of Neuroscience 24 (2001) 1193-1216
41. Smith A.T., and Edgar G.K. Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception. Vision Research 34 (1994) 253-265
42. Suzuki S. Attention-dependent brief adaptation to contour orientation: A high-level aftereffect for convexity?. Vision Research 41 (2001) 3883-3902
43. Suzuki S. Attentional selection of overlapped shapes: A study using brief shape aftereffects. Vision Research 43 (2003) 549-561
44. Tsao D.Y., Freiwald W.A., Tootell R.B., and Livingstone M.S. A cortical region consisting entirely of face-selective cells. Science 311 (2006, February 3) 670-674
45. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: A 43 (1991) 161-204
46. Valentine T., and Bruce V. The effects of distinctiveness in recognising and classifying faces. Perception 15 (1986) 525-535
47. Watson T., and Clifford C.W.G. Pulling faces: An investigation of the face distortion aftereffect. Perception 32 (2003) 1109-1116
48. Webster M.A., Kaping D., Mizokami Y., and Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 428 (2004, April 1) 557-561
49. Webster M.A., and MacLin O.H. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6 (1999) 647-653
50. Weiss Y., Simoncelli E.P., and Adelson E.H. Motion illusions as optimal percepts. Nature Neuroscience 5 (2002) 598-604
51. Wilson H.R., Ferrera V.P., and Yo C. A psychophysically motivated model for two-dimensional motion perception. Visual Neuroscience 9 (1992) 79-97
52. Wolfe J.M. The vernier aftereffect. Perception 16 (1987) 593-597
53. Yamashita J.A., Hardy J.L., De Valois K.K., and Webster M.A. Stimulus sensitivity of figural aftereffects for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 420-437
54. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. Face perception: Domain specific, not process specific. Neuron 44 (2004) 889-898
55. Yovel G., and Kanwisher N. The neural basis of the behavioural face-inversion effect. Current Biology 15 (2005) 2256-2262
56. Zhao L., and Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Research 41 (2001) 2979-2994