Position-specificity of facial adaptation

NeuroReport

Volumn 16, Issue 17, 2005, Pages 1945-1949

  Kovács, Gyula ^a   Zimmeer, Márta ^a   Harza, Irén ^a,b   Antal, Andrea ^d   Vidnyánszky, Zoltán ^b,c  

^a BUDAPEST UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND ECONOMICS   (Hungary)

^b SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^c PÁZMÁNY PÉTER CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Face processing; Facial after effect; NI70; Translational invariance

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FACE; FEMALE; HEMISPHERE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NORMAL HUMAN; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; RETINA IMAGE; VISION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADULT; EVOKED POTENTIALS, VISUAL; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 27844605026     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000187635.76127.bc     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Leopold DA, O'Toole AJ, Vetter T, Blanz V. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level after effects. Nat Neurosci 2001; 4:89-94.
2. Webster MA, Kaping D, Mizokami Y, Duhamel P. Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature 2004; 428:557-561.
3. Schwartz EL, Desimone R, Albright TD, Gross CG. Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:5776-5778.
4. Zhao L, Chubb C. The size-tuning of the face-distortion after-effect. Vision Res 2001; 41:2979-2994.
5. Rhodes G, Jeffery L, Watson TL, Jaquet E, Winkler C, Clifford CWG. Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms. Curr Boil 2004; 14:2119-2123.
6. Kovács G, Zimmer M, Banko E, Harza I, Antal A, Vidnyánszky Z. Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body-parts in humans. Cereb Cortex [Advance online; Accessed 24 August 2005].
7. Rousselet GA, Thorpe SJ, Fabre-Thorpe M. How parallel is visual processing in the ventral pathway? Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8:363-370.
8. DiCarlo JJ, Maunsell JHR. Anterior inferior temporal neurons of monkeys engaged in object recognition can be highly sensitive to object retinal position. J Neurophysiol 2003; 89:3264-3278.
9. Rolls ET, Aggelopoulos NC, Zheng F. The receptive fields of inferior temporal cortex neurons in natural scenes. J Neurosci 2003; 23:339-348.
10. OpDeBeeck H, Vogels R. Spatial sensitivity of macaque inferior temporal neurons. J Comp Neurol 2000; 426:505-518.
11. Nasanen R. Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images. Vision Res 1999; 39:3824-3833.
12. Eimer M. Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111:694-705.
13. Rossion B, Gauthier I, Tarr MJ, Despland P, Bruyer R, Linotte S, Crommelinck M. The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport 2000; 11:69-74.
14. Haxby JV, Hoffman EA, Gobbini MI. The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends Cogn Sci 2000; 4:223-233.
15. Rousselet GA, Fabre-Thorpe M, Thorpe SJ. Parallel processing in high-level categorization of natural images. Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:629-630.
16. Rousselet GA, Thorpe SJ, Fabre-Thorpe M. Processing of one, two or four natural scenes in humans: the limits of parallelism. Vision Res 2004; 44:877-894.
17. Chelazzi L, Duncan J, Miller EK, Desimone R. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory guided visual search. J Neurophys 1998; 80:2918-2940.
18. Rossion B, Gauthier I. How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev 2002; 1:62-74.
19. Sekuler AB, Gaspar CM, Gold JM, Bennett PJ. Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Curr Biol 2004; 14:391-396.