Two-year clinical evaluation of a self-adhesive luting agent for ceramic inlays

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-161

  Peumans, Marleen ^a   Munck, Jan De ^a   Van Landuyt, Kirsten ^a   Poitevin, André ^a   Lambrechts, Paul ^a   Van Meerbeek, Bart ^a  

^a CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adhesive inlays; Clinical trial; Glass ceramics; Luting composite; Self adhesive

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EMPRESS 2; LITHIUM DERIVATIVE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RELYX UNICEM; RESIN CEMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CEMENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; ENDODONTICS; FEMALE; HUMAN; KAPLAN MEIER METHOD; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CEMENTATION; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN SENSITIVITY; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; LITHIUM COMPOUNDS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79955650935     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a17547     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:464-470.
2. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent 2003 ;31:181-188.
3. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Federlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Invest 2005;9:161-167.
4. Al-Assaf J, Chakmackchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007;23:829-839.
5. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J 1999;44:157-168.
6. Bishara SE, Ostby AW, Ajlouni R, Laffoon JF, Warren J. Early shear bond strength of a one-step self-adhesive on orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod 2006;76:689-693.
7. Camacho GB, Gonçalves M, Nonaka T, Osorio AB. Fracture strength of restored premolars. Am J Dent 2007;20:121-124.
8. Cantoro A, Goracci C, Papacchini F, Mazzitelli C, Fadda GM, Ferrari M. Effect of pre-cure temperature on the bonding potential of self-etch and selfadhesive resin cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:577-583.
9. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hikita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-971.
10. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ, Anusavice KJ. Fracture behavior of lithia-disilicate and leucite-based ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:956-962.
11. de Souza Costa CA, Hebling J, Randall RC. Human pulpal response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006;10:954-962.
12. Fabienelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. A clinical trial of Empress II porcelain inlays luted to vital teeth with a dual-curing adhesive system and a self-curing resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:427-431.
13. Faltermeier A, Behr M, Müssig D. A comparative evaluation of bracket bonding with 1-, 2-and 3-component adhesive systems. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:144.e1-144.e5.
14. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137(supplement):22S-31S.
15. Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB, Heys DR, Lampe K. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM generated composite inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:1714-1723.
16. Ferrari M, Raffaeli O, Cagidiaco MC, Grandini S. XP Bond in self-curing mode used for luting porcelain restorations. Part B: Placement and 6-month report. J Adhes Dent 2007;279-282.
17. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-andrinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:185-191.
18. Gerth HUV, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites-A comparartive study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-941.
19. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Clinical and semiquantitative marginal analysis of four tooth-coloured inlay systems. J Dent 1995;23:329-338.
20. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-335.
21. Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze D, Mjör IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting clinical studies of dental restorative materials. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:121-147.
22. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
23. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80.
24. Holderegger C, Sailer I, Schumacher C, Schläpfer R, Hämmerle C, Fischer J. Schear bond strength of resin cements to dentin. Dent Mater 2008; 24:944-950.
25. Kashiwada T, Morita M, Kato S. Abrasion behavior of an experimental resin modified glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2006;84(special issue A):533.
26. Kaytan B, Onal B, Pamir T, Tezel H. Clinical evaluation of indirect resin composite and ceramic onlays over a 24-month period. Gen Dent 2005; 53:329-334.
27. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater 2006;22:13-21.
28. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years-a clinical study. J Dent 1999;27:325-331.
29. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite-reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262-271.
30. Krämer N, Lohbauer R, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13(special number):60D-76D.
31. Kumbuloglu O, Lassila LVJ, User A, Vallitu PK. A study of the physical and chemical properties of four resin composite luting agents. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:357-363.
32. Lacy AM, Laluz J, Watanabe LG, Dellinges M. Effect of porcelain surface treatment on the bond to composite. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:288-291.
33. Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Correlation of in vitro fatigue data and in vivo clinical performance of a glassceramic material. Dent Mater 2008;24:39-44.
34. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:609-621.
35. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Buonocore Memorial Lecture: Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004;29:481-508.
36. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest 2000;4:192-198.
37. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays:a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61.
38. Mehl A, Godescha P, Kunzelmann KH, Hickel R. The margin integrity of composite and ceramic inlays in extensive cavities. Dtsh Zahnartzl Z 1996;51:701-705.
39. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlays systems. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2000; 13:194-200.
40. Pallesen U, van Dijken JWV. An 8-year evaluation of sintered ceramic and glass ceramic inlays processed by the CEREC CAD/CAM system. Eur J Oral Sci 2000;108:239-246.
41. Pelka M, Reinelt C, Krämer N, Fasbender U, Petschelt A. In-vivo abrasion bei IPS Empress inlays. Dtsch Zahnärtzl Z 1995;50:917-919.
42. Piwowarczyk A, Lauer HC. Mechanical properties of luting cements after water storage. Oper Dent 2003;28:535-542.
43. Piwowarczyk A, Bender R, Ottl P, Lauer H. Long-term bond between dualpolymerizing cementing agents and human hard dental tissue. Dent Mater 2007;23:211-217.
44. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2004;20:463-469.
45. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJM, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-387.
46. Saskalauskaite E, Tam LE, McComb D, Flexural strength, elastic modulus, and pH profile of self-etch resin luting cements. J Prosthodont 2008; 17:262-268.
47. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu C. Shear strength of the composite bonded to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-1465.
48. Studer S, Lehner C, Brodbeck U, Schärer P. Short-term results of IPS-Empress inlays and onlays. J Prosthodont 1996;5:277-287.
49. Taschner M, Frankenberger R, Petschelt A, Krämer N. IPS-Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after two years. J Dent Res 2009; 22:55-59.
50. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-460.
51. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P and Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
52. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Willems G, Noack MJ, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Roulet JF, Vanherle G. Marginal adaptation of four tooth colored inlay systems in vivo. J Dent 1992;20:18-26.
53. Walter R, Miguez PA, Pereira PNR. Microtensile bond strength of luting materials to coronal and root dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:165-171.
54. Wolf DM, Powers JM, O’Keefe KL. Bond strength of composite to etched and sandblasted porcelain. Am J Dent 1993;6:155-158.
55. Yang B, Klaus L, Adelung R, Kern M. Micro-tensile bond strength of three luting resins to human regional dentin. Dent Mater 2006;22:45-56.