IPS Empress inlays luted with a self-adhesive resin cement after 1 year

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 55-59

  Taschner, Michael ^a   Frankenberger, Roland ^a   García Godoy, Franklin ^b,c   Rosenbusch, Silke ^a   Petschelt, Anselm ^a   Krämer, Norbert ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ERLANGEN   (Germany)

^b NOVA SOUTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c FORSYTH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d DRESDEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM SILICATE; IPS EMPRESS CERAMIC; IPS-EMPRESS CERAMIC; RELY X UNICEM; RESIN CEMENT; VARIOLINK;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; ALUMINUM SILICATES; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PORCELAIN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INLAYS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESIN CEMENTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 66149155458     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Abo-Hamar SE, Hiller KA, Jung H, Ferlin M, Friedl KH, Schmalz G. I. Bond strength of a new universal self-adhesive resin luting cement to dentin and enamel. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:161-167.
2. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: Effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-330.
3. O'Reilly MM, Featherstone JD. Demineralization and reminerali-zation around orthodontic appliances: An in vivo study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:33-40.
4. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrecths P, Vanherle G. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: Current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003;28:215-235.
5. Technical data sheet: Espertise RelyX Unicem 2002, 3M ESPE, Seefeld, Germany.
6. Gerth H, Dammaschke T, Züchner H, Schäfer E. Chemical analysis and bonding reaction of RelyX Unicem and Bifix composites. A comparative study. Dent Mater 2006;22:934-941.
7. Van Meerbeek B, Van Landuyt K, De Munck J, Hashimoto M, Peumans M, Lambrecths P, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater 2005;24:1-13.
8. Wilson AD, Prosser HJ, Powis DM. Mechanism of adhesion of polyelectrolyte cements to hydroxyapatite. J Dent Res 1983;62:590-592.
9. Bott B, Hannig M. Effect of different luting materials on the marginal adaptation of Class I ceramic inlay restorations in vitro. Dent Mater 2003;19:264-269.
10. Federlin M, Krifka S, Herpich M, Hiller KA, Schmalz G. Partial ceramic crowns: Influence of ceramic thickness, preparation design and luting material on fracture resistance and marginal integrity in vitro. Oper Dent 2007;32:251-260.
11. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self-curing resin system. Dent Mater 2003;19:270-276.
12. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, Nikolaenko SA, Naumann M. Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: Marginal quality of self-etch and etch-andrinse adhesives versus self-etch cements. Dent Mater 2008;24:185-191.
13. Hayashi M, Tsuchitani Y, Kawamura Y, Miura M, Takeshige F, Ebisu S. Eight-year clinical evaluation of fired ceramic inlays. Oper Dent 2000;25:473-481.
14. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Yeung CA, Worthington HV. Systematic review of ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig 2003;7:8-19.
15. Krämer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Ceramic inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater 2006;22:13-21.
16. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucitereinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262-271.
17. Krämer N, García-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: In vivo investigations. Am J Dent 2005; 18:75-81.
18. Krämer N, Kunzelmann K-H, Taschner M, Mehl A, García-Godoy F, Frankenberger R. Antagonist enamel wears more than ceramic inlays. J Dent Res 2006;85:1097-1100.
19. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60D-76D.
20. Al-Assaf K, Chakmakchi M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A. Eliades G. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:829-839.
21. Behr M, Rosentritt M, Regnet T, Lang R. Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems. Dent Mater 2004;20:191-197.
22. De Munck J, Vargas M, Van Landuyt K, Hilita K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding of an auto-adhesive luting material to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2004;20:963-971.
23. Escribano N, de la Macorra JC. Microtensile bond strength of self-adhesive luting cements to ceramic. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:337-341.
24. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Monticelli F, Grandini S, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of wall-to-wall adaptation of a self-adhesive resin cement used for luting gold and ceramic inlays. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:33-40.
25. Goracci C, Cury AH, Cantoro A, Papacchini F, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial properties of self-etching and self-adhesive resin cements used to lute composite onlays under different seating forces. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:327-335.
26. Hikita K, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Ikeda T, Van Landuyt K, Maida T, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. Bonding effectiveness of adhesive luting agents to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 2007;23:71-80.
27. Needleman I, Worthington H, Moher D, Schulz K, Altman DG. Improving the completeness and transparency of reports of randomized trials in oral health. The CONSORT Statement. Am J Dent 2008;21:7-12.
28. Krämer N, Taschner M. Lohbauer U, Petschelt A, Frankenberger R. Totally bonded ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. J Adhes Dent 2008;10:307-314.
29. Stewart GP, Jain P, Hodges J. Shear bond strength of resin cements to both ceramic and dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:277-284.
30. Thordrup M, Isidor F, Horsted-Bindslev P. A. 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 2001;32:199-205.
31. Ozcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003;19:725-731.
32. Cobb D, Timmons S, Stanford C, Dawson D, Denehy J, Vargas M, Asmussen C, Wefel J. Clinical outcomes of ceramic inlays/onlays luted with two bonding systems. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Sp Is A):(Abstr 1539).
33. Timmons S, Cobb D, Stanford C, Dawson D, Denehy J, Vargas M, Asmussen C, Wefel J. Post-operative sensitivity of bonded ceramic posterior inlays and onlays. J Dent Res 2004;83 (Sp Is A):(Abstr 1538).
34. Costa CAS, Hebling J, Randall R. Human pulp response to resin cements used to bond inlay restorations. Dent Mater 2006;22:954-962.
35. Costa CAS, Nascimento ABL, Teixera HM. Response of human pulps following acid conditioning and application of a bonding agent in deep cavities. Dent Mater 2002; 18:543-551.
36. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR. Early and intermediate time response of the dental pulp to an acid technique in vivo. Am J Dent 1998;10:35-44.
37. de Mendonca AM, Souza PC, Hebling J, Costa CA. Cytotoxic effects of hard-setting cements applied on the odontoblast cell line MDPC-23. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 2007;104:el02-el08.
38. Frankenberger R, Tay FR. Self-etch vs etch-and-rinse adhesives: Effect of thermo-mechanical fatigue loading on marginal quality of bonded resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:397-412.
39. Rosentritt M, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Influence of cement type on the marginal adaptation of all-ceramic MOD inlays. Dent Mater 2004; 20:463-469.
40. Peumans M, Hikita K, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bond durability of composite luting agents to ceramic when exposed to long-term thermocycling. Oper Dent 2007;32:372-379.
41. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, Tay FR, Ferrari M. Effect of the seating pressure on the adhesive bonding of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2006;19:333-336.
42. Chieffi N, Chersoni S, Papacchini F, Vano M, Goracci C, Davidson CL, Tay FR, Ferrari M. The effect of application sustained seating pressure on adhesive luting procedure. Dent Mater 2007;23:159-164.
43. Furukawa K, Inai N, Tagami J. The effects of luting resin bond to dentin on the strength of dentin supported by indirect resin composite. Dent Mater 2002;18:136-142.
44. Peutzfeld A, Asmussen E. Acomparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay techniques. Oper Dent 1990;15:129-135.
45. Shinkai K, Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF, Katoh Y. Effect of gap dimension on wear resistance of luting agents. Am J Dent 1995;8:149-151.
46. Lu H, Powers J. Color stability of resin cements after accelerated aging. Am J Dent 2004;17:354-358.
47. Van Dijken J. Resin-modified glass ionomer cement and self-cured resin composite luted ceramic inlays. A 5-year clinical evaluation. Dent Mater 2003;19:670-674.