XP BOND in self-curing mode used for luting porcelain restorations. Part B: Placement and 6-month report

Journal of Adhesive Dentistry

Volumn 9, Issue , 2007, Pages 279-282

  Ferrari, Marco ^a   Raffaelli, Ornella ^a   Cagidiaco, Maria Crysanti ^a   Grandini, Simone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Bonding; Ceramic crowns; Clinical trial; Self curing

Indexed keywords

DENTAL PORCELAIN;

CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL INLAY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; SURFACE PROPERTY;

DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL PORCELAIN; HUMANS; INLAYS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 34248176870     PISSN: 14615185     EISSN: 17579988     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a12219     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:19-24.
2. Bergman MA. The clinical performance of ceramic inlays: a review. Aust Dent J 1999;44:157-168.
3. Dagostin A, Ferrari M. In vivo bonding mechanism of an experimental dual cure enamel-dentin bonding system. Am J Dent 2001;14:105-108.
4. Davidson CL. Luting cement, the stronghold or the weak link in ceramic restorations. Adv Engineer Mater 2001;3:763-767.
5. Fabianelli A, Goracci C, Bertelli E, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. A clinical trial of Empress II Porcelain inlays luted to vital teeth with a self-light-curing adesive system and a self-curing resin cement. J Adhes Dent 2006;8:427-431.
6. Ferrari M, Mason PN. Adaptability and microleakage of indirect resin inlays:an in vivo investigation. Quintessence Int 1993;24:861-865.
7. Ferrari M, Mason PN, Fabianelli A, Cagidiaco MC, Kugel G, Davidson CL. Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of class II indirect porcelain restorations. Am J Dent 1999;12:134-142.
8. Ferrari M, Dagostin A, Fabianelli A. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a self curing resin system. Dent Mater 2003;19:270-276.
9. Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Petschelt A. Technique sensitivity of dentin bonding: effect of application mistakes on bond strength and marginal adaptation. Oper Dent 2000;25:324-330.
10. Hahn P, Schaller HG, Hafner P, Hellwig E. Effect of different luting procedures on the seating of ceramic inlays. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:1-8.
11. Hickel R, Manhart J. Longevity of dental restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001;3:45-64.
12. Krämer N, Frankenberger R, Pelka M, Petschelt A. IPS Empress inlays and onlays after four years- a clinical study. J Dent 1999;28:325-331.
13. Krämer N, Lohbauer U, Frankenberger R. Adhesive luting of indirect restorations. Am J Dent 2000;13:60-76.
14. Krämer N, Frankenberger R. Clinical performance of bonded leucite -reinforced glass ceramic inlays and onlays after eight years. Dent Mater 2005;21:262-271.
15. Lee IB, Um CM. Thermal analysis on the cure speed of dual cured resin cements under porcelain inlays. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:186-197.
16. Manhart J, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Chen HY, Hickel R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4:192-198.
17. Manhart J, Chen HY, Neuerer P, Scheibenbogen-Fuchsbrunner A, Hickel R. Three-year clinical evaluation of composite and ceramic inlays. Am J Dent 2001;14:95-99.
18. Milleding P, Örtengren U, Karlsson S. Ceramic inlay systems: some clinical aspects. J Oral Rehabil 1995;22:571-580.
19. Molin MK, Karlsson SL. A randomized 5-year clinical evaluation of 3 ceramic inlay systems. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:194-200.
20. Raffaelli O, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Ferrari M. XP BOND in self-curing mode used for luting porcelain restorations. Part A: Microtensile test. J Adhes Dent 2007;9:275-278.