Fracture strength of restored premolars

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 121-124

  Camacho, Guilherme Brião ^b   Gonçalves, Mariane ^a,d   Nonaka, Tomio ^a   Osório, Angela Brys ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RIBEIRÃO PRETO   (Brazil)

^b Unit III

^c Pelotas Federal University Pelotas   (Brazil)

^d Department of Dental Materials and Prosthesis ^*  (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; COMPOSITE DENTAL RESIN; DENTAL ALLOY; POLYURETHAN; RESIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MASTICATION; PREMOLAR TOOTH; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOOTH FRACTURE;

ACRYLIC RESINS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; BITE FORCE; COMPOSITE RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES; TOOTH FRACTURES;

EID: 34249660552     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Phillips RW. Skinner dental materials, 9th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 1991, Chap. 26. (In Portuguese).
2. Tidehag P, Gunne J. A 2-year clinical follow-up study of IPS Empress ceramic inlays. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:456-460.
3. Giordano RA, Pelletier L, Campbell S, Pober R. Flexural strength of an infused ceramic, glass ceramic, and feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:411-418.
4. Seghi RR, Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Relative fracture toughness and hardness of new dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:145-150.
5. Me Lean JW. New dental ceramics and esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1995;7:141-149.
6. Sehgi RR, Sorensen JA. Relative flexural strength of six new ceramic materials. Jnt J Prosthodont 1995;8:239-246.
7. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke, FJ, Wilson NH. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:167-171.
8. Vale WA. Cavity preparation. Irish Dent. Rev 1956;15:33-41.
9. Vale WA. High speed cutting in dentistry. Med World 1958;89:429-432.
10. Mondelli J, Vieira DF. The strength of Class n amalgam restorations with and without pins. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:179-188.
11. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, Navarro MF, Scares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent 1980;43:419-422.
12. Larsen TD, Douglas WH, Geistfeld RE. Effect of prepared cavities on the strength of teeth. Oper Dent 1981;6:2-5.
13. Re GJ, Norling BK. Fracturing molars with axial forces. J Dent Res 1981;60:805-808.
14. Steinberg R, Matsson L. Clinical evaluation of glass ceramic inlays (Dicor). Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:91-97.
15. Vieira GF, Ferreira AM, Garófalo JC, Agra CM. Indirect esthetic restorations in posterior teeth - Inlays/onlays. São Paulo: Editora Santos, 1995; Chap. 4. (In Portuguese).
16. De Rijk WG. The fracture resistance of all-ceramic crowns on supporting structures with different elastic moduli. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:462-467.
17. Lopes LM, Leitão JG, Douglas WH. Effect of a new inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991;22:641-645.
18. Eakle WS, Staninec M, Lacy AM. Effect of bonded amalgam on the fracture resistance of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:257-260.
19. Dias de Souza GM, Pereira GD, Dias CT, Paulillo LA. Fracture resistance of premolars with bonded class II amalgam. Oper Dent 2002;27:349-353.
20. Staninec M, Holt M. Tensile adhesion and microleakage of resin bonded amalgam restoration. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:397-402.
21. Teixeira LC, Goncalves M. Large amalgam restorations. In: Mooney B. Operative dentistry. 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Ed. Panamericana, 1999;1091 (In Spanish).
22. Freitas CR, Miranda MI, De Andrade MF, Flores VH, Vaz LG, Guimaraes C. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restorations of Class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int 2002;33:589-594.
23. Garone Netto N, Burger RC. Metallic and esthetic inlays and onlays. São Paulo: Livraria Editora Santos, 1998 (In Portuguese).
24. Nasedkin NJ. Ceramic inlays and onlays: Update. J Can DentAssoc 1995;61:676-682.
25. Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Esthetic porcelain and composite resin inlays and onlays in posterior teeth. Chicago: Quintessence, 1996 (In Portuguese).
26. Trope M, Langer I, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture or restored endodontically treated premolars. Dent Traumatol 1986;2:35-38.
27. Fialho ES, Silva EV, Graff CS, Loguercio AD, Camacho GB, Busato ALS. Evaluation of marginal leakage of amalgam restorations: Mercury versus gallium. Braz Oral Res 2000;14:5-63.
28. Alavi AA, Kianimanesh N. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents. Oper Dent 2002;27:19-24.
29. Mota CS, Demarco FF, Camacho GB, Powers JM. Microleakage in ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements. J Adhes Dent 2003;5:63-70.