Damage-induced localized hypermutability

Cell Cycle

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 1073-1085

  Burch, Lauranell H ^a   Yang, Yong ^a,c   Sterling, Joan F ^a   Roberts, Steven A ^a   Chao, Frank G ^a   Xu, Hong ^a   Zhang, Leilei ^a   Walsh, Jesse ^b   Resnick, Michael A ^a   Mieczkowski, Piotr A ^b   Gordenin, Dmitry A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

DNA damage and repair; Double strand breaks; Evolution; Hypermutability; Single strand DNA

Indexed keywords

DEAMINASE; DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; IMMUNOGLOBULIN; LYSINE; MESYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; NUCLEOTIDE; PYRIMIDINE DIMER; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

ALLELIC IMBALANCE; ANTIBODY AFFINITY; BASE PAIRING; CELL DEATH; CELL DENSITY; CELL DIVISION; CELL LINE; CHROMOSOME 5; DNA DAMAGE; DNA DEGRADATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EUKARYOTE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENE INACTIVATION; GENE MUTATION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; INDEL MUTATION; LOCALIZED HYPERMUTABILITY; MISMATCH REPAIR; MUTAGENESIS; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; OPEN READING FRAME; REPORTER GENE; REVIEW; RNA CAPPING; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOMATIC HYPERMUTATION; TAXON; TELOMERE; TEMPERATURE; TRANSLATION INITIATION; UBIQUITINATION; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION; YEAST CELL;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 79953652263     PISSN: 15384101     EISSN: 15514005     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/cc.10.7.15319     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Friedberg EC, Walker GC, Siede W, Wood RD, Schultz RA, Ellenberger T. DNA repair and mutagenesis. Washington: ASM Press 2006.
2. Kunkel TA, Bebenek K. DNA replication fidelity. Annu Rev Biochem 2000; 69:497-529.
3. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 1998; 148:1667-86. (Pubitemid 28180696)
4. Kondrashov FA, Kondrashov AS. Measurements of spontaneous rates of mutations in the recent past and the near future. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2010; 365:1169-76.
5. Roach JC, Glusman G, Smit AF, Huff CD, Hubley R, Shannon PT, et al. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science 2010; 328:636-9.
6. Drake JW. Avoiding dangerous missense: thermophiles display especially low mutation rates. PLoS Genet 2009; 5:1000520.
7. Drake JW. The distribution of rates of spontaneous mutation over viruses, prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Ann NY Acad Sci 1999; 870:100-7. (Pubitemid 29349334)
8. Romero PA, Arnold FH. Exploring protein fitness landscapes by directed evolution. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:866-76.
9. Camps M, Herman A, Loh E, Loeb LA. Genetic constraints on protein evolution. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2007; 42:313-26. (Pubitemid 47537270)
10. Kogenaru M, de Vos MG, Tans SJ. Revealing evolutionary pathways by fitness landscape reconstruction. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2009; 44:169-74.
11. Weinreich DM, Watson RA, Chao L. Perspective: Sign epistasis and genetic constraint on evolutionary trajectories. Evolution 2005; 59:1165-74. (Pubitemid 40870413)
12. DePristo MA, Weinreich DM, Hartl DL. Missense meanderings in sequence space: a biophysical view of protein evolution. Nat Rev Genet 2005; 6:678-87. (Pubitemid 41192319)
13. Wright S. The roles of mutation, inbreeding, cross-breading and selection in evolution. Proceedings of The Sixth International Congress on Genetics 1932; 356-66.
14. Povolotskaya IS, Kondrashov FA. Sequence space and the ongoing expansion of the protein universe. Nature 2010; 465:922-6.
15. Colgin LM, Hackmann AF, Emond MJ, Monnat RJ Jr. The unexpected landscape of in vivo somatic mutation in a human epithelial cell lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:1437-42. (Pubitemid 34136511)
16. Wang J, Gonzalez KD, Scaringe WA, Tsai K, Liu N, Gu D, et al. Evidence for mutation showers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:8403-8. (Pubitemid 47175500)
17. Chen Z, Feng J, Buzin CH, Sommer SS. Epidemiology of doublet/multiplet mutations in lung cancers: evidence that a subset arises by chronocoordinate events. PLoS One 2008; 3:3714.
18. Chen Z, Feng J, Saldivar JS, Gu D, Bockholt A, Sommer SS. EGFR somatic doublets in lung cancer are frequent and generally arise from a pair of driver mutations uncommonly seen as singlet mutations: one-third of doublets occur at five pairs of amino acids. Oncogene 2008; 27:4336-43. (Pubitemid 352010002)
19. Kashuba VI, Pavlova TV, Grigorieva EV, Kutsenko A, Yenamandra SP, Li J, et al. High mutability of the tumor suppressor genes RASSF1 and RBSP3 (CTDSPL) in cancer. PLoS One 2009; 4:5231.
20. Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. Yeast ARMs (DNA atrisk motifs) can reveal sources of genome instability. Mutat Res 1998; 400:45-58.
21. Zhao J, Bacolla A, Wang G, Vasquez KM. Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010; 67:43-62.
22. Hassa PO, Hottiger MO. An epigenetic code for DNA damage repair pathways? Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 83:270-85.
23. Harris RS, Longerich S, Rosenberg SM. Recombination in adaptive mutation. Science 1994; 264:258-60. (Pubitemid 24189119)
24. Rosenberg SM, Longerich S, Gee P, Harris RS. Adaptive mutation by deletions in small mononucleotide repeats. Science 1994; 265:405-7. (Pubitemid 24259975)
25. Rattray AJ, Strathern JN. Error-prone DNA polymerases: when making a mistake is the only way to get ahead. Annu Rev Genet 2003; 37:31-66. (Pubitemid 38041420)
26. Strathern JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair. Genetics 1995; 140:965-72.
27. Galhardo RS, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM. Mutation as a stress response and the regulation of evolvability. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 2007; 42:399-435. (Pubitemid 47537269)
28. Ponder RG, Fonville NC, Rosenberg SM. A switch from high-fidelity to error-prone DNA double-strand break repair underlies stress-induced mutation. Mol Cell 2005; 19:791-804. (Pubitemid 41316673)
29. Yang Y, Sterling J, Storici F, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. Hypermutability of damaged single-strand DNA formed at double-strand breaks and uncapped telomeres in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000264.
30. Hicks WM, Kim M, Haber JE. Increased mutagenesis and unique mutation signature associated with mitotic gene conversion. Science 2010; 329:82-5.
31. Deem A, Keszthelyi A, Blackgrove T, Vayl A, Coffey B, Mathur R, et al. Break-Induced Replication Is Highly Inaccurate. PLoS Biol 2011; 9:1000594.
32. Rattray AJ, Shafer BK, McGill CB, Strathern JN. The roles of REV3 and RAD57 in double-strand-break- repair-induced mutagenesis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2002; 162:1063-77. (Pubitemid 35417502)
33. Morrison A, Johnson AL, Johnston LH, Sugino A. Pathway correcting DNA replication errors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J 1993; 12:1467-73. (Pubitemid 23112800)
34. Liu M, Schatz DG. Balancing AID and DNA repair during somatic hypermutation. Trends Immunol 2009; 30:173-81.
35. Odegard VH, Schatz DG. Targeting of somatic hypermutation. Nat Rev Immunol 2006; 6:573-83. (Pubitemid 44134090)
36. Liu M, Duke JL, Richter DJ, Vinuesa CG, Goodnow CC, Kleinstein SH, et al. Two levels of protection for the B cell genome during somatic hypermutation. Nature 2008; 451:841-5. (Pubitemid 351253166)
37. Unniraman S, Schatz DG. Strand-biased spreading of mutations during somatic hypermutation. Science 2007; 317:1227-30.
38. Lindahl T, Barnes DE. Repair of endogenous DNA damage. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 2000; 65:127-33. (Pubitemid 32611934)
39. Resnick MA, Setlow JK. Repair of pyrimidine dimer damage induced in yeast by ultraviolet light. J Bacteriol 1972; 109:979-86.
40. Santos JH, Meyer JN, Mandavilli BS, Van Houten B. Quantitative PCR-based measurement of nuclear and mitochondrial DNA damage and repair in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol 2006; 314:183-99.
41. Wheatcroft R, Cox BS, Haynes RH. Repair of UV-induced DNA damage and survival in yeast. I. Dimer excision. Mutat Res 1975; 30:209-18.
42. Pachkowski BF, Tano K, Afonin V, Elder RH, Takeda S, Watanabe M, et al. Cells deficient in PARP-1 show an accelerated accumulation of DNA single strand breaks, but not AP sites, over the PARP- 1-proficient cells exposed to MMS. Mutat Res 2009; 671:93-9.
43. Friedberg EC. Suffering in silence: the tolerance of DNA damage. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2005; 6:943-53. (Pubitemid 41778713)
44. Plosky BS, Woodgate R. Switching from high-fidelity replicases to low-fidelity lesion-bypass polymerases. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2004; 14:113-9. (Pubitemid 38520137)
45. Yang Y, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. A single-strand specific lesion drives MMS-induced hyper-mutability at a double-strand break in yeast. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:914-21.
46. Waters LS, Minesinger BK, Wiltrout ME, D'Souza S, Woodruff RV, Walker GC. Eukaryotic translesion polymerases and their roles and regulation in DNA damage tolerance. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2009; 73:134-54.
47. McKay BC, Stubbert LJ, Fowler CC, Smith JM, Cardamore RA, Spronck JC. Regulation of ultraviolet light-induced gene expression by gene size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:6582-6.
48. Venter JC, Adams MD, Myers EW, Li PW, Mural RJ, Sutton GG, et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science 2001; 291:1304-51. (Pubitemid 32173090)
49. Booth C, Griffith E, Brady G, Lydall D. Quantitative amplification of single-stranded DNA (QAOS) demonstrates that cdc13-1 mutants generate ssDNA in a telomere to centromere direction. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:4414-22. (Pubitemid 33064782)
50. Lydall D. Hiding at the ends of yeast chromosomes: telomeres, nucleases and checkpoint pathways. J Cell Sci 2003; 116:4057-65. (Pubitemid 37337080)
51. Mimitou EP, Symington LS. DNA end resection: many nucleases make light work. DNA Repair (Amst) 2009; 8:983-95.
52. Pfeifer GP. Formation and processing of UV photoproducts: effects of DNA sequence and chromatin environment. Photochem Photobiol 1997; 65:270-83.
53. Chan GL, Doetsch PW, Haseltine WA. Cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and (6-4) photoproducts block polymerization by DNA polymerase I. Biochemistry 1985; 24:5723-8. (Pubitemid 16203008)
54. Doetsch PW, Chan GL, Haseltine WA. T4 DNA polymerase (3′-5′) exonuclease, an enzyme for the detection and quantitation of stable DNA lesions: the ultraviolet light example. Nucleic Acids Res 1985; 13:3285-304.
55. Flibotte S, Edgley ML, Chaudhry I, Taylor J, Neil SE, Rogula A, et al. Whole-genome profiling of mutagenesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics 2010; 185:431-41.
56. Larrea AA, Lujan SA, Nick McElhinny SA, Mieczkowski PA, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA, et al. Genome-wide model for the normal eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:17674-9.
57. Lynch M, Sung W, Morris K, Coffey N, Landry CR, Dopman EB, et al. A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105:9272-7.
58. Nishant KT, Singh ND, Alani E. Genomic mutation rates: what high-throughput methods can tell us. Bioessays 2009; 31:912-20.
59. Nishant KT, Wei W, Mancera E, Argueso JL, Schlattl A, Delhomme N, et al. The Baker's Yeast Diploid Genome Is Remarkably Stable in Vegetative Growth and Meiosis. PLoS Genet 2010; 6.
60. Parkhomchuk D, Amstislavskiy V, Soldatov A, Ogryzko V. Use of high throughput sequencing to observe genome dynamics at a single cell level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009; 106:20830-5.
61. Zanders S, Ma X, Roychoudhury A, Hernandez RD, Demogines A, Barker B, et al. Detection of Heterozygous Mutations in the Genome of Mismatch Repair Defective Diploid Yeast Using a Bayesian Approach. Genetics 2010.
62. Westmoreland JW, Summers JA, Holland CL, Resnick MA, Lewis LK. Blunt-ended DNA doublestrand breaks induced by endonucleases PvuII and EcoRV are poor substrates for repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst) 2010; 9:617-26.
63. Louis EJ. The chromosome ends of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1995; 11:1553-73.
64. Sartori AA, Lukas C, Coates J, Mistrik M, Fu S, Bartek J, et al. Human CtIP promotes DNA end resection. Nature 2007; 450:509-14. (Pubitemid 350190253)
65. Shrivastav M, De Haro LP, Nickoloff JA. Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice. Cell Res 2008; 18:134-47.
66. Amundsen SK, Smith GR. Interchangeable parts of the Escherichia coli recombination machinery. Cell 2003; 112:741-4. (Pubitemid 36378878)
67. Boulton SJ. DNA repair: Decision at the break point. Nature 2010; 465:301-2.
68. Hamdan SM, van Oijen AM. Timing, coordination and rhythm: acrobatics at the DNA replication fork. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:18979-83.
69. Lopes M, Foiani M, Sogo JM. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol Cell 2006; 21:15-27. (Pubitemid 43017845)
70. Bjursell G, Gussander E, Lindahl T. Long regions of single-stranded DNA in human cells. Nature 1979; 280:420-3. (Pubitemid 9233623)
71. Ma W, Panduri V, Sterling JF, Van Houten B, Gordenin DA, Resnick MA. The transition of closely opposed lesions to double-strand breaks during long-patch base excision repair is prevented by the coordinated action of DNA polymerase delta and Rad27/ Fen1. Mol Cell Biol 2009; 29:1212-21.
72. Ma W, Resnick MA, Gordenin DA. Apn1 and Apn2 endonucleases prevent accumulation of repair-associated DNA breaks in budding yeast as revealed by direct chromosomal analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 2008; 36:1836-46. (Pubitemid 351505890)
73. Dreszer TR, Wall GD, Haussler D, Pollard KS. Biased clustered substitutions in the human genome: the footprints of male-driven biased gene conversion. Genome Res 2007; 17:1420-30. (Pubitemid 47529426)
74. Duret L, Arndt PF. The impact of recombination on nucleotide substitutions in the human genome. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000071.
75. Lercher MJ, Hurst LD. Human SNP variability and mutation rate are higher in regions of high recombination. Trends Genet 2002; 18:337-40. (Pubitemid 34804439)
76. Pollard KS, Salama SR, King B, Kern AD, Dreszer T, Katzman S, et al. Forces shaping the fastest evolving regions in the human genome. PLoS Genet 2006; 2:168.
77. Berglund J, Pollard KS, Webster MT. Hotspots of biased nucleotide substitutions in human genes. PLoS Biol 2009; 7:26.
78. De S, Babu MM. A time-invariant principle of genome evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:13004-9.
79. Berger MF, Lawrence MS, Demichelis F, Drier Y, Cibulskis K, Sivachenko AY, et al. The genomic complexity of primary human prostate cancer. Nature 2011; 470:214-20.
80. Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Adzhubei I, Thurman RE, Kryukov GV, Mirkin SM, Sunyaev SR. Human mutation rate associated with DNA replication timing. Nat Genet 2009; 41:393-5.
81. Smit A, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker Open-3.0. 1996-2010.
82. Rozen S, Skaletsky H. Primer3 on the WWW for general users and for biologist programmers. Methods Mol Biol 2000; 132:365-86.
83. Nickerson DA, Tobe VO, Taylor SL. PolyPhred: automating the detection and genotyping of single nucleotide substitutions using fluorescence-based resequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25:2745-51. (Pubitemid 27299787)
84. Gonzalez C, Hadany L, Ponder RG, Price M, Hastings PJ, Rosenberg SM. Mutability and importance of a hypermutable cell subpopulation that produces stress-induced mutants in Escherichia coli. PLoS Genet 2008; 4:1000208.
85. Lang GI, Murray AW. Estimating the per-base-pair mutation rate in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2008; 178:67-82. (Pubitemid 351398732)