Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair pathway choice

Cell Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 134-147

  Shrivastav, Meena ^a   De Haro, Leyma P ^a   Nickoloff, Jac A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

ATM; Chromatin; DNA repair; DNA PK; Genome stability; Homologous recombination; Non homologous end joining

Indexed keywords

ATM PROTEIN; CELL CYCLE PROTEIN; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; DNA DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; NUCLEAR PROTEIN; PRKDC PROTEIN, HUMAN; PROTEIN SERINE THREONINE KINASE; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL CYCLE; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; DNA REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; YEAST;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; CHROMOSOME ABERRATIONS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA REPAIR; DNA-ACTIVATED PROTEIN KINASE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; PROTEIN-SERINE-THREONINE KINASES; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TUMOR SUPPRESSOR PROTEINS; YEASTS;

EUKARYOTA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 38049155945     PISSN: 10010602     EISSN: 17487838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2007.111     Document Type: Article

References (147)

1. Shen Z, Nickoloff JA. Mammalian homologous recombination repair and cancer intervention. In: Wei Q, Li L, Chen DJ, eds. DNA Repair, Genetic Instability, and Cancer. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co., 2007:119-156.
2. Paques F, Haber JE. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 1999; 63:349-404.
3. Franco S, Alt FW, Manis JP. Pathways that suppress programmed DNA breaks from progressing to chromosomal breaks and translocations. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1030-1041.
4. Chaudhuri J, Basu U, Zarrin A, et al. Evolution of the immunoglobulin heavy chain class switch recombination mechanism. Adv Immunol 2007; 94:157-214.
5. Keeney S, Neale MJ. Initiation of meiotic recombination by formation of DNA double-strand breaks: mechanism and regulation. Biochem Soc Trans 2006; 34:523-525.
6. Murnane JP. Telomeres and chromosome instability. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1082-1092.
7. Acilan C, Potter DM, Saunders WS. DNA repair pathways involved in anaphase bridge formation. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2007; 46:522-531.
8. Ward J. The nature of lesions formed by ionizing radiation. In: Nickoloff JA, Hoekstra MF, eds. DNA Damage and Repair: DNA Repair in Higher Eukaryotes. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1998:65-84.
9. Limoli CL, Giedzinski E, Bonner WM, Cleaver JE. UV-induced replication arrest in the xeroderma pigmentosum variant leads to DNA double-strand breaks, γ-H2AX formation, and Mre11 relocalization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:233-238.
10. Bosco EE, Mayhew CN, Hennigan RF, et al. RB signaling prevents replication-dependent DNA double-strand breaks following genotoxic insult. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:25-34.
11. Degrassi F, Fiore M, Palitti F. Chromosomal aberrations and genomic instability induced by topoisomerase-targeted anti tumour drugs. Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents 2004; 4:317-325.
12. Su TT. Cellular responses to DNA damage : one signal, multiple choices. Annu Rev Genet 2006; 40:187-208.
13. Rothstein R, Michel B, Gangloff S. Replication fork pausing and recombination or "gimme a break". Genes Dev 2000; 14:1-10.
14. Clikeman JA, Khalsa GJ, Barton SL, Nickoloff JA. Homologous recombinational repair of double-strand breaks in yeast is enhanced by MAT heterozygosity through yKu-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Genetics 2001; 157:579-589.
15. Lin Y, Lukacsovich T, Waldman AS. Multiple pathways for repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian chromosomes. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:8353-8360.
16. Burma S, Chen BP, Murphy M, Kurimasa A, Chen DJ. ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:42462-42467.
17. Collis SJ, DeWeese TL, Jeggo PA, Parker AR. The life and death of DNA-PK. Oncogene 2005; 24:949-961.
18. Cui X, Yu Y, Gupta S, et al. Autophosphorylation of DNA-dependent protein kinase regulates DNA end processing and may also alter double-strand break repair pathway choice. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:10842-10852.
19. Shao RG, Cao CX, Zhang H, et al. Replication-mediated DNA damage by camptothecin induces phosphorylation of RPA by DNA-dependent protein kinase and dissociates RPA:DNA-PK complexes. EMBO J 1999; 18:1397-1406.
20. Burma S, Chen DJ. Role of DNA-PK in the cellular response to DNA double-strand breaks. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:909-918.
21. Chan DW, Ye RQ, Veillette CJ, Lees-Miller SP. DNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites in Ku 70/80 heterodimer. Biochemistry 1999; 38:1819-1828.
22. Karmakar P, Piotrowski J, Brosh RM, et al. Werner protein is a target of DNA-dependent protein kinase in vivo and in vitro, and its catalytic activities are regulated by phosphorylation. J Biol Chem 2002; 277:18291-18302.
23. Yannone SM, Roy S, Chan DW, et al. Werner syndrome protein is regulated and phosphorylated by DNA-dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:38242-38248.
24. Stucki M, Jackson SP. γH2AX and MDC1: anchoring the DNA-damage-response machinery to broken chromosomes. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:534-543.
25. Riballo E, Kuhne M, Rief N, et al. A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to γ-H2AX foci. Mol Cell 2004; 16:715-724.
26. Jeggo PA, O'Neill P. The Greek goddess, Artemis, reveals the secrets of her cleavage. DNA Repair (Amst) 2002; 1:771-777.
27. Nick McElhinny SA, Havener JM, Garcia-Diaz M, et al. A gradient of template dependence defines distinct biological roles for family X polymerases in nonhomologous end joining. Mol Cell 2005; 19:357-366.
28. Durant ST, Nickoloff JA. Good timing in the cell cycle for precise DNA repair by BRCA1. Cell Cycle 2005; 4:1216-1222.
29. Huang TT, D'Andrea AD. Regulation of DNA repair by ubiquitylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2006; 7:323-334.
30. Wang M, Wu W, Wu W, et al. PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34:6170-6182.
31. Daley JM, Palmbos PL, Wu D, Wilson TE. Nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2005; 39:431-451.
32. Lees-Miller SP, Meek K. Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining. Biochimie 2003; 85:1161-1173.
33. Burma S, Chen BP, Chen DJ. Role of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) in maintaining genomic integrity. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1042-1048.
34. Rouse J, Jackson SP. Interfaces between the detection, signaling, and repair of DNA damage. Science 2002; 297:547-551.
35. Strathern JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand break repair. Genetics 1995; 140:965-972.
36. Nickoloff JA. Recombination: mechanisms and roles in tumorigenesis. In: Bertino JR, ed. Encyclopedia of Cancer. 2nd Edition. San Diego, USA: Elsevier Science, 2002:49-59.
37. Rrogh BO, Symington LS. Recombination proteins in yeast. Annu Rev Genet 2004; 38:233-271.
38. West SC. Molecular views of recombination proteins and their control. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4:435-445.
39. Champion MD, Hawley RS. Playing for half the deck: the molecular biology of meiosis. Nat Cell Biol 2002; 4(Suppl): s50-s56.
40. Myung K, Datta A, Chen C, Kolodner RD. SGS1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae homologue of BLM and WRN, suppresses genome instability and homeologous recombination. Nat Genet 2001; 27:113-116.
41. Cheok CF, Bachrati CZ, Chan KL, et al. Roles of the Bloom's syndrome helicase in the maintenance of genome stability. Biochem Soc Trans 2005; 33:1456-1459.
42. Signon L, Malkova A, Naylor ML, Klein H, Haber JE. Genetic requirements for RAD51- and RAD54-independent break-induced replication repair of a chromosomal double-strand break. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21:2048-2056.
43. Krishna S, Wagener BM, Liu HP, et al. Mre11 and Ku regulation of double-strand break repair by gene conversion and break-induced replication. DNA Repair (Amst) 2007; 6:797-808.
44. Dronkert MLG, Beverloo HB, Johnson RD, et al. Mouse RAD54 affects DNA double-strand break repair and sister chromatid exchange. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:3147-3156.
45. Essers J, Hendriks RW, Swagemakers SM, et al. Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Cell 1997; 89:195-204.
46. + mutant of the chicken DT40 cell line. Cell 1997; 89:185-193.
47. Sonoda E, Hochegger H, Saberi A, Taniguehi Y, Takeda S. Differential usage of non-homologous end-joining and homologous recombination in double strand break repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1021-1029.
48. Yang H, Jeffrey PD, Miller J, et al. BRCA2 function in DNA binding and recombination from a BRC A2-DSS1 -ssDNA structure. Science 2002; 297:1837-1848.
49. Zhang Y, Rowley JD. Chromatin structural elements and chromosomal translocations in leukemia. DNA Repair (Amst) 2006; 5:1282-1297.
50. Karanjawala ZE, Grawunder U, Hsieh CL, Lieber MR. The nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway is important for chromosome stability in primary fibroblasts. Curr Biol 1999; 9:1501-1504.
51. Ferguson DO, Sekiguchi JM, Chang S, et al. The nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA repair is required for genomic stability and the suppression of translocations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:6630-6633.
52. Zha S, Alt FW, Cheng HL, Brush JW, Li G. Defective DNA repair and increased genomic instability in Cernunnos-XLF-deficient murine ES cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:4518-4523.
53. Sharpless NE, Ferguson DO, O'Hagan RC, et al. Impaired nonhomologous end-joining provokes soft tissue sarcomas harboring chromosomal translocations, amplifications, and deletions. Mol Cell 2001; 8:1187-1196.
54. Tong WM, Cortes U, Hande MP, et al. Synergistic role of Ku80 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in suppressing chromosomal aberrations and liver cancer formation. Cancer Res 2002; 62:6990-6996.
55. Sugawara N, Haber JE. Characterization of double-strand break-induced recombination: homology requirements and single-stranded DNA formation. Mol Cell Biol 1992; 12:563-575.
56. Lee SE, Moore JK, Holmes A, et al. Saccharomyces Ku70, Mre11/Rad50, and RPA proteins regulate adaptation to G2/M arrest after DNA damage. Cell 1998; 94:399-409.
57. Bressan DA, Baxter BK, Petrini JHJ. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 protein complex facilitates homologous recombination-based double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:7681-7687.
58. Moreau S, Ferguson JR, Symington LS. The nuclease activity of Mre11 is required for meiosis but not for mating type switching, end joining, or telomere maintenance. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:556-566.
59. Ivanov EL, Sugawara N, White CI, Fabre F, Haber JE. Mutations in XRS2 and RAD50 delay but do not prevent mating-type switching in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:3414-3425.
60. Milne GT, Jin S, Shannon KB, Weaver DT. Mutations in two Ku homologs define a DNA end-joining repair pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:4189-4198.
61. Moore JK, Haber JE. Cell-cycle and genetic requirements of two pathways of nonhomologous end-joining repair of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1996; 16:2164-2173.
62. Kramer KM, Brock JA, Bloom K, Moore JK, Haber JE. Two different types of double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are repaired by similar RAD-independent, nonhomologous recombination events. Mol Cell Biol 1994; 14:1293-1301.
63. Hammarsten O, DeFazio LG, Chu G. Activation of DNA-dependent protein kinase by single-stranded DNA ends. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:1541-1550.
64. Budman J, Chu G. Processing of DNA for nonhomologous end-joining by cell-free extract. EMBO J 2005; 24:849-860.
65. Boulton SJ. Cellular functions of the BRCA tumour-suppressor proteins. Biochem Soc Trans 2006; 34:633-645.
66. Brenneman MA. BRCA1 and BRCA2 in DNA repair and genome stability. In: Nickoloff JA, Hoekstra MF, eds. DNA Damage and Repair, Vol 3: Advances from Phage to Humans. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2001:237-267.
67. Jung D, Giallourakis C, Mostoslavsky R, Alt FW. Mechanism and control of V(D)J recombination at the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus. Annu Rev Immunol 2006; 24:541-570.
68. Cremer T, Cremer M, Dietzel S, et al. Chromosome territories - a functional nuclear landscape. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2006; 18:307-316.
69. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 2002; 295:1306-1311.
70. Mortimer RK. Radiobiological and genetic studies on a polyploid series (haploid to hexaploid) of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Radiat Res 1958; 9:312-326.
71. Astrom SU, Okamura SM, Rine J. Yeast cell-type regulation of DNA repair. Nature 1999; 397:310.
72. Lee SE, Paques F, Sylvan J, Haber JE. Role of yeast SIR genes and mating type in directing DNA double-strand breaks to homologous and non-homologous repair paths. Curr Biol 1999; 9:767-770.
73. Nickoloff JA, Haber JE. Mating-type control of DNA repair and recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In: Nickoloff JA, Hoekstra MF, eds. DNA Damage and Repair, Vol 3: Advances from Phage to Humans. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2001:107-124.
74. Allen C, Kurimasa A, Brennemann MA, Chen DJ, Nickoloff JA. DNA-dependent protein kinase suppresses double-strand break-induced and spontaneous homologous recombination. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99:3758-3763.
75. Pierce AJ, Hu P, Han MG, Ellis N, Jasin M. Ku DNA end-binding protein modulates homologous repair of double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Genes Dev 2001; 15:3237-3242.
76. Delacote F, Han M, Stamato TD, Jasin M, Lopez BS. An xrcc4 defect or Wortmannin stimulates homologous recombination specifically induced by double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30:3454-3463.
77. Ooi SL, Shoemaker DD, Boeke JD. A DNA microarray-based genetic screen for nonhomologous end-joining mutants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science 2001; 294:2552-2556.
78. Valencia M, Bentele M, Vaze MB, et al. NEJ1 controls non-homologous end joining in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 2001; 414:666-669.
79. Kegel A, Sjostrand JO, Astrom SU. Nej1p, a cell type-specific regulator of nonhomologous end joining in yeast. Curr Biol 2001; 11:1611-1617.
80. Valencia-Burton M, Oki M, Johnson J, et al. Different mating-type-regulated genes affect the DNA repair defects of Saccharomyces RAD51, RAD52 and RAD55 mutants. Genetics 2006; 174:41-55.
81. Yamazoe M, Sonoda E, Hochegger H, Takeda S. Reverse genetic studies of the DNA damage response in the chicken B lymphocyte line DT40. DNA Repair (Amst) 2004; 3:1175-1185.
82. Aladjem MI, Itoh N, Utiyama H, Wahl GM. ES cells do not activate p53-dependent stress responses and undergo p53-independent apoptosis in response to DNA damage. Curr Biol 1998; 8:145-155.
83. Mekeel KL, Tang W, Kachnic LA, et al. Inactivation of p53 results in high-rates of homologous recombination. Oncogene 1997; 14:1847-1857.
84. Willers H, McCarthy EE, WuB, et al. Dissociation of p53-mediated suppression of homologous recombination from G1/S cell cycle checkpoint control. Oncogene 2000; 19:632-639.
85. Romanova LY, Willers H, Blagosklonny MV, Powell SN. The interaction of p53 with replication protein A mediates suppression of homologous recombination. Oncogene 2004; 23:9025-9033.
86. Akyuz N, Boehden GS, Susse S, et al. DNA substrate dependence of p53-mediated regulation of double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:6306-6317.
87. Gatz SA, Wiesmuller L. p53 in recombination and repair. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13:1003-1016.
88. Yoon D, Wang Y, Stapleford K, Wiesmuller L, Chen J. P53 inhibits strand exchange and replication fork regression promoted by human Rad51. J Mol Biol 2004; 336:639-654.
89. Orii KE, Lee Y, Kondo N, McKinnon PJ. Selective utilization of nonhomologous end-joining and homologous recombination DNA repair pathways during nervous system development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103:10017-10022.
90. Kadyk LC, Hartwell LH. Sister chromatids are preferred over homologs as substrates for recombinational repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 1992; 132:387-402.
91. Watrin E, Peters JM. Cohesin and DNA damage repair. Exp Cell Res 2006; 312:2687-2693.
92. Takata M, Sasaki MS, Sonoda E, et al. Homologous recombination and non-homologous end-joining pathways of DNA double-strand break repair have overlapping roles in the maintenance of chromosomal integrity in vertebrate cells. EMBO J 1998; 17:5497-5508.
93. Chen FQ, Nastasi A, Shen ZY, et al. Cell cycle-dependent protein expression of mammalian homologs of yeast DNA double-strand break repair genes RAD51 and RAD52. Mutat Res 1997; 384:205-211.
94. Toone WM, Aerne BL, Morgan BA, Johnston LH. Getting started: regulating the initiation of DNA replication in yeast. Annu Rev Microbiol 1997; 51:125-149.
95. Ira G, Pellicioli A, Balijja A, et al. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 2004; 431:1011-1017.
96. Aylon Y, Liefshitz B, Kupiec M. The CDK regulates repair of double-strand breaks by homologous recombination during the cell cycle. EMBO J 2004; 23:4868-4875.
97. Ferreira MG, Cooper JP. The fission yeast Taz1 protein protects chromosomes from Ku-dependent end-to-end fusions. Mol Cell 2001; 7:55-63.
98. Caspari T, Murray JM, Carr AM. Cdc2-cyclin B kinase activity links Crb2 and Rqh1-topoisomerase III. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1195-1208.
99. Esashi F, Christ N, Gannon J, et al. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 as a regulatory mechanism for recombinational repair. Nature 2005; 434:598-604.
100. Esashi F, Galkin VE, Yu X, Egelman EH, West SC. Stabilization of RAD51 nucleoprotein filaments by the C-terminal region of BRCA2. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007; 14:468-474.
101. Douglas P, Sapkota GP, Morrice N, et al. Identification of in vitro and in vivo phosphorylation sites in the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase. Biochem J 2002; 368:243-251.
102. Chan DW, Chen BP-C, Prithivirasingh S, et al. Autophosphorylation of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is required for rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks. Genes Dev 2002; 16:2333-2338.
103. Chen BP, Chan DW, Kobayashi J, et al. Cell cycle dependence of DNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation in response to DNA double strand breaks. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:14709-14715.
104. Douglas P, Cui X, Block WD, et al. The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit is phosphorylated in vivo on threonine 3950, a highly conserved amino acid in the protein kinase domain. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:1581-1591.
105. Kurimasa A, Kumano S, Boubnov NV, et al. Requirement for the kinase activity of human DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit in DNA strand break rejoining. Mol Cell Biol 1999; 19:3877-3884.
106. Ding Q, Reddy YV, Wang W, et al. Autophosphorylation of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase is required for efficient end processing during DNA double-strand break repair. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:5836-5848.
107. Lee SE, Mitchell RA, Cheng A, Hendrickson EA. Evidence for DNA-PK-dependent and DNA-PK-independent DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mammalian cells as a function of the cell cycle. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17:1425-1433.
108. Roth D, Wilson JH. Relative rates of homologous and nonhomologous recombination in transfected DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1985; 82:3355-3359.
109. Haber JE. Partners and pathways: repairing a double-strand break. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 16:259-264.
110. Baumann P, West SC. Role of the human RAD51 protein in homologous recombination and double-stranded break repair. Trends Biochem Sci 1998; 23:247-251.
111. Haber JE. The many interfaces of Mrell. Cell 1998; 95:583-586.
112. Kim JS, Krasieva TB, Kurumizaka H, et al. Independent and sequential recruitment of NHEJ and HR factors to DNA damage sites in mammalian cells. J Cell Biol 2005; 170:341-347.
113. Chen JJ, Silver D, Cantor S, Livingston DM, Scully R. BRCA1, BRCA2, and Rad51 operate in a common DNA damage response pathway. Cancer Res 1999; 59:S1752-S1756.
114. Chen J, Silver DP, Walpita D, et al. Stable interaction between the products of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 tumor suppressor genes in mitotic and meiotic cells. Mol Cell 1998; 2:317-328.
115. Gudmundsdottir K, Ashworth A. The roles of BRCA1 and BRCA2 and associated proteins in the maintenance of genomic stability. Oncogene 2006; 25:5864-5874.
116. Pauli TT, Cortez D, Bowers B, Elledge SJ, Geliert M. Direct DNA bindingby Brcal. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:6086-6091.
117. Zhuang J, Zhang J, Willers H, et al. Checkpoint kinase 2-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the fidelity of non-homologous end-joining. Cancer Res 2006; 66:1401-1408.
118. Downey M, Durocher D. γH2AX as a checkpoint maintenance signal. Cell Cycle 2006; 5:1376-1381.
119. Downs JA, Lowndes NF, Jackson SP. A role for Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A in DNA repair. Nature 2000; 408:1001-1004.
120. Moore JD, Yazgan O, Ataian Y, Krebs JE. Diverse roles for histone H2A modifications in DNA damage response pathways in yeast. Genetics 2007; 176:15-25.
121. Xie A, Puget N, Shim I, et al. Control of sister chromatid recombination by histone H2AX. Mol Cell 2004; 16:1017-1025.
122. Wu S, Shi Y, Mulligan P, et al. A YY1-INO80 complex regulates genomic stability through homologous recombination-based repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2007 Nov 18; doi:10.1038/nsmb1332.
123. Osley MA, Tsukuda T, Nickoloff JA. ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factors and DNA damage repair. Mutat Res 2007; 618:65-80.
124. Downs JA, Nussenzweig MC, Nussenzweig A. Chromatin dynamics and the preservation of genetic information. Nature 2007; 447:951-958.
125. Saberi A, Hochegger H, Szuts D, et al. RAD 18 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase independently suppress the access of non-homologous end joining to double-strand breaks and facilitate homologous recombination-mediated repair. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:2562-2571.
126. Dominguez-Bendala J, Masutani M, MeWhir J. Down-regulation of PARP-1, but not of Ku80 or DNA-PKcs', results in higher gene targeting efficiency. Cell Biol Int 2006; 30:389-393.
127. Allen C, Halbrook J, Nickoloff JA. Interactive competition between homologous recombination and non-homologous end joining. Mol Cancer Res 2003; 1:913-920.
128. Chan DW, Lees-Miller SP. The DNA-dependent protein kinase is inactivated by autophosphorylation of the catalytic subunit. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:8936-8941.
129. Calsou P, Frit P, Humbert O, et al. The DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic activity regulates DNA end processing by means of Ku entry into DNA. J Biol Chem 1999; 274:7848-7856.
130. Merkle D, Douglas P, Moorhead GBG, et al. The DNA-dependent protein kinase interacts with DNA to form a protein-DNA complex that is disrupted by phosphorylation. Biochemistry 2002; 41:12706-12714.
131. Douglas P, Moorhead GBG, Ye RQ, Lees-Miller SP. Protein phosphatases regulate DNA-dependent protein kinase activity. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:18992-18998.
132. Block WD, Yu Y, Merkle D, et al. Autophosphorylation-dependent remodeling of the DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit regulates ligation of DNA ends. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32:4351-4357.
133. Reddy YV, Ding Q, Lees-Miller SP, Meek K, Ramsden DA. Non-homologous end joining requires that the DNA-PK complex undergo an autophosphorylation- dependent rearrangement at DNA ends. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:39408-39413.
134. Convery E, Shin EK, Ding Q, et al. Inhibition of homologous recombination by variants of the catalytic subunit of the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:1345-1350.
135. Peng Y, Woods RG, Beamish H, et al. Deficiency in the catalytic subunit of DNA-dependent protein kinase causes down-regulation of ATM. Cancer Res 2005; 65:1670-1677.
136. Chen BP, UematsuN, Kobayashi J, et al. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is essential for DNA-PKcs phosphorylations at the Thr-2609 cluster upon DNA double strand break. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:6582-6587.
137. Meyn MS. High spontaneous intrachromosomal recombination rates in ataxia-telangiectasia. Science 1993; 260:1327-1330.
138. Morrison C, Sonoda E, Takao N, et al. The controlling role of ATM in homologous recombinational repair of DNA damage. EMBO J 2000; 19:463-471.
139. Luo C-M, Tang W, Mekeel KL, et al. High frequency and error-prone DNA recombination in ataxia telangiectasia cell lines. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:4497-4503.
140. Bolderson E, Scorah J, Helleday T, Smythe C, Meuth M. ATM is required for the cellular response to thymidine induced replication fork stress. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13:2937-2945.
141. Sakamoto S, Iijima K, Mochizuki D, et al. Homologous recombination repair is regulated by domains at the N- and C-terminus of NBSl and is dissociated with ATM functions. Oncogene 2007; 26:6002-6009.
142. Barchi M, Mahadevaiah S, Di Giacomo M, et al. Surveillance of different recombination defects in mouse spermatocytes yields distinct responses despite elimination at an identical developmental stage. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:7203-7215.
143. Wang H, Boecker W, Wang H, et al. Caffeine inhibits homology directed repair of I-Scel induced DNA double-strand breaks. Oncogene 2004; 23:824-834.
144. Hickson I, Zhao Y, Richardson CJ, et al. Identification and characterization of a novel and specific inhibitor of the ataxiatelangiectasia mutated kinase ATM. Cancer Res 2004; 64:9152-9159.
145. Lundin C, Erixon K, Arnaudeau C, et al. Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22:5869-5878.
146. Kuhne M, Riballo E, Rief N, et al. A double-strand break repair defect in ATM-deficient cells contributes to radiosensitivity. Cancer Res 2004; 64:500-508.
147. Bredemeyer AL, Sharma GG, Huang CY, et al. ATM stabilizes DNA double-strand-break complexes during V(D)J recombination. Nature 2006; 442:466-470.