Eight issues for learning scientists about education and the economy

Journal of the Learning Sciences

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-49

  Roschelle, Jeremy ^a   Bakia, Marianne ^a   Toyama, Yukie ^a   Patton, Charles ^a  

^a Center for Technology in Learning   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79551714946     PISSN: 10508406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10508406.2011.528318     Document Type: Article

References (187)

1. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
2. Adelman, C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3. Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and achievement gap in 47 countries. Educational Researcher, 36, 369-387.
4. Aldeman, C. (2010). College- and career-ready: Using outcome data to hold high schools accountable for student success. Washington, DC: Education Center.
5. Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147-173.
6. Apple, M. W. (Ed.). (1982). Cultural and economic reproduction in education. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
7. Appleton, S., Atherton, P., & Bleaney, M. (2008). International school test scores and economic growth (Discussion Paper No. 08/04). Nottingham, England: University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
8. Arenius, P., & De Clercq, D. (2004). Regional variation in opportunity recognition: A network-based approach (Working Paper Steunpunt OOI). Retrieved from http://www.ondernemerschap.be/Upload/Documents/STOOI/Working%20Papers/2004/WP_regional_variation.pdf
9. Assessment & Teaching of 21st Century Skills. (2010). Status report as of January 2010 [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.atc21s.org/Documents/January2010StatusReport.pdf
10. Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (1997). Policy perils of international comparisons: The TIMSS case. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 22-28.
11. Autor, D. H., Levy, F., & Murnane, R. J. (2003). The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4, 1280-1333.
12. Baker, D., & LeTendre, G. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Baldi, S., Jin, Y., Skemer, M., Green, P., & Herget, P. (2007). Highlights from PISA 2006: Performance of U.S. 15 year-old students in science and mathematics literacy in an international context. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
14. Banks, J. A., Au, K. H., Ball, A. F., Bell, P., Gordon, E. W., Gutierrez, K. D., Zhou, M. (2007). Learning in and out of school in diverse environments: Life-long, life-wide, life-deep. Seattle, WA: The LIFE Center.
15. Barab, S. A., Dodge, T., Thomas, M., Jackson, C., & Tuzun, H. (2007). Our designs and the social agendas they carry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16, 263-305.
16. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 1, 86-107.
17. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world's best-performing school systems come out on top. Retrieved from McKinsey & Company website: http://www.mckinsey.com/App_Media/Reports/SSO/Worlds_School_Systems_Final.pdf
18. Baron, R. (2006). Opportunity recognition as pattern recognition: How entrepreneurs "connect the dots" to identify new business opportunities. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20, 104-119.
19. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193-224.
20. Barron, B., Martin, C., & Roberts, E. (2007). Sparking self-sustained learning: Report on a design experiment to build technological fluency and bridge divides. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(1), 75-105.
21. Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Takeuchi, L., & Fithian, R. (2009). Parents as learning partners in the development of technological fluency. International Journal of Learning and Media, 1(2), 55-77.
22. Becker, G. (1993). Human capital (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
23. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24. Bennett, R. E., Persky, H., Weiss, A. R., & Jenkins, F. (2007). Problem solving in technology-rich environments: A report from the NAEP technology-based assessment project (NCES Report No. 2007-466). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
25. Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (2003). Learning to work creatively with knowledge. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. Entwistle, & J. van Merrienboer (Eds.), Unravelling basic components and dimensions of powerful learning environments (pp. 55-68). Chicago, IL: Open Court.
26. Berg, I. (1971). Education for jobs: The great training robbery. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
27. Berman, P., & McLaughlin, M.W. (1976). Implementation of educational innovation. The Educational Forum, 40, 345-370.
28. Bills, D. (2003). Credentials, signals, and screens: Explaining the relationship between schooling and job assignment. Review of Educational Research, 73, 441-469.
29. Bils, M., & Klenow, P. (2000). Does schooling cause growth? American Economic Review, 90, 1160-1183.
30. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149-164.
31. Boe, E. E., & Shin, S. (2005). Is the United States really losing the international horse race in academic achievement? Phi Delta Kappan, 86, 688-695.
32. Bourdieu, P. (1974). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities. In J. Eggleston (Ed.), Contemporary research in the sociology of education (pp. 32-46). London, England: Methuen.
33. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2002). Schooling in capitalist America revisited. Sociology of Education, 75(2), 1-18.
34. Bransford, J. D., Barron, B., Pea, R., Meltzoff, A., Kuhl, P., Bell, P., Sabelli, N. (2006). Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 19-34). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
36. Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in evaluating complex interventions in classroom settings. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
37. Brown, J. S. (1991). Research that reinvents the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(1), 102-112.
38. Brown, J. S., & Adler, R. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. Educause Review, 43(1), 16-32. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Review/EDUCAUSEReviewMagazineVolume43/MindsonFireOpenEducationtheLon/162420
39. Brown, J. S., & Thomas, D. (2008, February 14). The gamer disposition [Web log post]. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2008/02/the_gamer_disposition.html
40. Bryk, A. S., Nagaoka, J. K., & Newmann, F. M. (2000). Chicago classroom demands for authentic intellectual work. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
41. Burris, C. C., Heubert, J. P., & Levin, H. M. (2006). Accelerating mathematics achievement using heterogeneous grouping. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 103-134.
42. Butz, W., Bloom, G., Gross, M., Kelly, K., Kofner, A., & Rippen, H. (2003). Is there a shortage of scientists and engineers? How would we know? (Rand Issue Paper No. 241). Retrieved from RAND website: http://www.rand.org/pubs/issue_papers/IP241/
43. Carlson, C. R., & Wilmot, W. W. (2006). Innovation: The five disciplines for creating what customers want. New York, NY: Crown Business.
44. Carneiro, P., Crawford, C., & Goodman, A. (2007). The impact of early cognitive and non-cognitive skills on later outcomes. London, England: Centre for the Economics of Education, London School of Economics.
45. Carnoy, M. (2009). Policy research in education: The economic view. In D. N. Plank, G. Sykes, & B. Schneider (Eds.), Handbook of education policy research (pp. 27-39). New York, NY: Routledge.
46. Cavanaugh, S. (2009, January 21). Standards help Minnesota vie with top nations. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2009/01/21/18minnesota.h28.html
47. Chew, S., & Chew, R. (2003). Promoting innovation in Singapore: Changing the mindset. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 3(3), 249-266.
48. Clarke, J., & Dede, C. (2009). Robust designs for scalability. In L. Moller, J. B. Huett, & D. M. Harvey (Eds.), Learning and instructional technologies for the 21st century: Visions of the future (pp. 27-48). New York, NY: Springer.
49. Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9-13.
50. Cohen, D., & Soto, M. (2007). Growth and human capital: Good data, good results. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 51-76.
51. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
52. Collins, A., Hawkins, J., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1994). Three different views of students: The role of technology in assessing student performance. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3, 205-217.
53. Commission of the European Communities. (2005). Working together for growth and jobs: A new start for the Lisbon Strategy. Brussels, Belgium: Author.
54. Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Hadley, W. H. (2001). Cognitive tutors: From the research classroom to all classrooms. In P. S. Goodman (Ed.), Technology enhanced learning: Opportunities for change (pp. 235-263). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Council on Competitiveness. (2005). Innovate America. Retrieved from http://www.compete.org/publications/detail/202/innovate-america
56. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. NewYork, NY: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.
57. Dede, C., Honan, J. P., & Peters, L. C. (Eds.). (2005). Scaling up success: Lessons learned from technology-based educational improvement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
58. Desjardins, R. (2004). Determinants of literacy proficiency: A lifelong, lifewide learning perspective. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(3), 205-245.
59. Dialogue: Thanksgiving for innovation. (2002). The Economist, 364(8291), 14-15. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/node/1324709
60. Diez, J., & Kiese, M. (2006). Scaling innovation in south east Asia: Empirical evidence from Singapore, Pengang (Malaysia), and Bangkok. Regional Studies, 40, 1005-1023.
61. Dodgson, M. (2000). The management of technological innovation: An international and strategic approach. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
62. Dohm, A., & Schniper, L. (2007). Employment outlook: 2006-16: Occupational employment projections to 2016. Monthly Labor Review Online, 130(11), 86-125. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2007/11/contents.htm
63. Drucker, P. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
64. Ehrenreich, B. (1990). Fearing of falling: The inner life of the middle class. New York, NY: Pantheon.
65. Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation: A guide to the literature. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1-27). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
66. Federation of American Scientists. (2006). Summit on educational games: Harnessing the power of video games for learning. Washington, DC: Author.
67. Field, J., & Spence, L. (2000). Informal learning and social capital. In F. Coffield (Ed.), The necessity of informal learning (pp. 32-42). Bristol, England: Policy Press.
68. Fishman, B., Marx, R., Blumenfeld, P., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (2004). Creating a framework for research on systemic technology innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 43-76.
69. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
70. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
71. Giroux, H. (1981). Ideology, culture and the process of schooling. London, England: Falmer.
72. Giroux, H. A. (1989). Schooling for democracy: Critical pedagogy in the modern age. London, England: Routledge.
73. Godhino, M. M., & Fagerberg, J. (2004). Innovation and catching-up. In J. Fagerberg, D. Mowery, & R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 514-542). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
74. Goldin, C., & Lawrence, K. (2008). The race between education and technology. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
75. Gravemeijer, K. (2010, June). Instructional design, theory and practice in mathematics education. Keynote presentation at the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL.
76. Grubb, W. N. (2008). Multiple resources, multiple outcomes: Testing the "improved" school finance with NELS88. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 104-144.
77. Grubb, W. N., & Lazerson, M. (2004). The education gospel: The economic power of schooling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
78. Guarino, H. (2008). TIMSS results place Massachusetts among world leaders in math and science. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu/news/news.aspx?id=4457
79. Hansen, W., Hollanders, H., Van Looy, B., & Tijssen, R. (2007). Linking human resources in science and technology and scientific performance: The use of existing data to develop new indicators to analyze the scientific base of high and medium high technology manufacturing industries. Retrieved from the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development website: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/34/27/37759954.pdf
80. Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45-62.
81. Hanushek, E. A., & Kimko, D. (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. American Economic Review, 90, 1184-1208.
82. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4122). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=960379
83. Hargadon, A. (2008). Creativity that works. In J. Zhou & C. E. Shalley (Eds.), Handbook of organizational creativity (pp. 323-345). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
84. Harwell, M., Post, T. R., Cutler, A., Maeda, Y., Anderson, E., Norman, K.W., & Medhanie, A. (2009). The preparation of students from National Science Foundation-funded and commercially developed high school mathematics curricula for their first university mathematics course. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 203-231.
85. Hatano, G. (1988). Social and motivational bases for mathematical understanding. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 41, 55-70.
86. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise. In H. Stevenson, H. Azuma, & K. Hakuta (Eds.), Child development and education in Japan (pp. 262-272). New York, NY: Freeman.
87. Haveman, R. H., & Wolfe, B. (1984). Schooling and economic well-being: The role of nonmarket effects. Journal of Human Resources, 19, 378-407.
88. Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24, 411-482.
89. Hill, H. C. (2007). Mathematical knowledge of middle school teachers: Implications for the No Child Left Behind policy initiative. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(2), 95-114.
90. Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers' mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371-406.
91. Hmelo, C. E., & Evensen, D. H. (2000). Introduction. In D. H. Evensen & C. E. Hmelo (Eds.), Problem-based learning: A research perspective on learning interactions (pp. 185-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
92. Hoyles, C., Noss, R., Kent, P., & Bakker, A. (2010). Improving mathematics at work: The need for techno-mathematical literacies. London, England: Routledge.
93. Hsi, S., Crowley, K., Duschl, R., Finke, C. L., King, H., & Sabelli, N. (2004). Models of learning and theories of practice for informal learning environments. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Santa Monica, CA (pp. 12-15). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
94. Kaboski, J., & Logan, T. D. (2007). Factor endowments and the returns to skill: New evidence from the American past (Working Paper No. 13589). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
95. Kafai, Y. B., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
96. Kantis, H., & Ishida, M. (2002). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: The creation and development of new firms in Latin America and East Asia. Retrieved from the Inter-American Development Bank website: http://www.iadb.org/sds/sme
97. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75-86.
98. Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Learning by design: Iterations of design challenges for better learning of science skills. Cognitive Studies, 9, 338-350.
99. Kozma, R. (2007). ICT, education reform, and economic growth: A conceptual framework (White Paper No. 9/2007). Santa Clara, CA: Intel.
100. Kozma, R., McGhee, R., Quellmalz, E., & Zalles, D. (2004). Closing the digital divide: Evaluation of the World Links program. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 361-381.
101. Krueger, A., & Lindahl, M. (2001). Education for growth: Why and for whom? Journal of Economic Literature, 39, 1101-1136.
102. Levin, H. (2009). The economic payoff to investing in educational justice. Educational Researcher, 38, 5-20.
103. Levin, H. M., & Belfield, C. R. (2009, October). Some economic consequences of improving mathematics performance. Paper prepared for SRI International, Menlo Park, CA.
104. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2004). Collaboration: The social context of theory development. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(2), 164-172.
105. Lewis, W. (2004). The power of productivity: Wealth, poverty, and the threat to global stability. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
106. Linn, M., Lee, H. S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006, August 25). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049-1050.
107. Lowell, B. L., & Salzman, H. (2007). Into the eye of the storm: Assessing the evidence on science and engineering education, quality, and workforce demand. Retrieved from the Urban Institute website: www.urban.org/publications/411562.html
108. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
109. Lumpkin, G. T., Hills, G., & Shrader, R. (2004). Opportunity recognition. In H. P. Welsch (Ed.), Entrepreneurship: The way ahead (pp. 73-90). New York, NY: Routledge.
110. Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. Elementary School Journal, 97, 341-358.
111. Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., III, & Schmitt, C. L. (2000). African American college students excelling in the sciences: College and post-college outcomes in the Meyerhoff Scholars Program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 629-654.
112. McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15, 153-191.
113. Means, B. (2006). Prospects for transforming schools with technology-supported assessment. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 505-521). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
114. Mervis, J. (2001, December 21). Can universities be bribed to train more scientists? Science, 294, 2466-2467.
115. Meyer, J. W., Kamens, D., Benavot, A., & Kyoung Cha, Y. (1992). School knowledge for the masses: World models and national primacy curricular categories in the 20th century. Washington, DC: Falmer.
116. Murnane, R. J., Willett, J. B., Duhaldeborde, Y., & Tyler, J. H. (2000). How important are the cognitive skills of teenagers in predicting subsequent earnings? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19, 547-568.
117. National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11463
118. National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
119. National Commission on Mathematics and Science Teaching for the 21st Century. (2000). Before it's too late: A report to the nation from the national commission on mathematics and science teaching for the 21st century. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
120. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
121. National Science Board. (2008). Science and engineering indicators 2008. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind08/
122. National Science Foundation. (2008). Innovative technology experiences for students and teachers (ITEST): Program solicitation NSF 09-506. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2009/nsf09506/nsf09506.htm
123. National Summit on Competitiveness. (2005). Investing in US innovation. Retrieved from http://www.mep.nist.gov/documents/pdf/about-mep/reports-studies/competitiveness-innovation.pdf
124. Neal, D. A., & Johnson, W. R. (1996). The role of premarket factors in black-white wage differences. Journal of Political Economy, 104, 869-895.
125. Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., Bowman, C., & Dede, C. (2005). Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual environment. Educational Technology, 45(1), 21-27.
126. Newmann, F. M., Lopez, G., & Bryk, A. S. (1998). The quality of intellectual work in Chicago schools: A baseline report. Chicago, IL: Consortium on Chicago Schools Research.
127. Okada, T., & Simon, H. A. (1997). Collaborative discovery in a scientific domain. Cognitive Science, 21(2), 109-146.
128. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2001). Knowledge management in the learning society. Paris, France: Author.
129. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: Final results from PISA 2003. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/1/60/34002216.pdf
130. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Retrieved from http://www.pisa.oecd.org/document/31/0,2340,en_32252351_32236173_35995743_1_1_1_1,00.html
131. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007). Science competencies for tomorrow's world: Results from PISA 2006. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/15/13/39725224.pdf
132. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2008). 21st century skills, education & competitiveness: A resource and policy guide. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/21st_century_skills_education_and_competitiveness_guide.pdf
133. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). P21 framework definitions document. Retrieved from http://www.21stcenturyskills.org/documents/p21_framework_definitions_052909.pdf
134. Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). From early reading to high school mathematics: Matching case studies of four educational innovations against principles for effective scale up. In B. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale up in education: Issues in practice (pp. 131-139). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
135. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., & Glaser, R. (2001). Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
136. Penuel, W. R., McWilliams, H., McAuliffe, C., Benbow, A., Mably, C., & Hayden, M. M. (2009). Teaching for understanding in earth science: Comparing impacts on planning and instruction in three professional development designs for middle school science teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 415-436.
137. Penuel, W. R., & Riel, M. (2007). The "new" science of networks and the challenge of school change. Phi Delta Kappan, 88, 611-615.
138. Psacharopoulos, G. (2006). The value of investment in education: Theory, evidence, and policy. Journal of Education Finance, 113-136.
139. Psacharopoulos, G., & Patrinos, H. A. (2004). Human capital and rates of return. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education (pp. 1-57). Aldershot, England: Edward Elgar.
140. Public School Forum of North Carolina. (2008). Learning from Singapore. Raleigh, NC: The Center for International Understanding. Retrieved from http://www.ncforum.org/doclib/Singapore_FINAL.pdf
141. Quellmalz, E., Schank, P., Hinojosa, T., & Padilla, C. (1999). Performance assessment links in science. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 6(10). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=6&n=10
142. Quellmalz, E., & Zalles, D. (2000). World links for development: Student assessment Uganda field test. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
143. Ramirez, F. O., Luo, X., Schofer, E., & Meyer, J. W. (2006). Student achievement and national economic growth. American Journal of Education, 113, 1-29.
144. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.
145. Romer, P. M. (2000). Should the government subsidize supply or demand in the market for scientists and engineers? (NBER Working Paper No. 7723). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
146. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2001). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of Children, 10(2), 76-101.
147. Roschelle, J., Singleton, C., Sabelli, N., Pea, R., & Bransford, J. D. (2008). Mathematics worth knowing, resources worth growing, research worth noting: A response to the National Mathematics Advisory Panel report. Educational Researcher, 37, 610-617.
148. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., Hegedus, S., Hopkins, B., Empson, S., Gallagher, L. P. (2010). Integration of technology, curriculum, and professional development for advancing middle school mathematics: Three large scale studies. American Educational Research Journal, 47(4), 833-878.
149. Roschelle, J., Tatar, D., Shechtman, N., & Knudsen, J. (2008). The role of scaling up research in designing for and evaluating robustness. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 68, 149-170.
150. Rose, H. (2006). Do gains in test scores explain labor market outcomes? Economics of Education Review, 25, 430-446.
151. Rowan, B., Chiang, F., & Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees' performance to study the effects of teachers on students' achievement. Sociology of Education, 70, 256-284.
152. Salen, K. (Ed.). (2007). The ecology of games: Connecting youth, games, and learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
153. Sanders, W., & Rivers, J. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Value-Added Assessment Center. Retrieved from www.mccsc.edu/~curriculum/cumulative%20and%20residual%20effects%20of%20teachers.pdf
154. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Introduction: The new science of learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1-16). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
155. Sawyer, R. K. (2008). Optimising learning: Implications of learning sciences research. In Innovating to learning, learning to innovate (pp. 45-65). Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
156. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: Theory, pedagogy, and technology. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 97-115). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
157. Schauble, L., Leinhardt, G., & Martin, L. (1997). A framework for organizing a cumulative research agenda in informal learning contexts. Journal of Museum Education, 22, 3-8.
158. Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R., Wang, H. C., Wiley, D., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
159. Schneider, B., & McDonald, S. K. (Eds.). (2007). Scale-up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
160. Schofer, E., Ramirez, F. O., & Meyer, J. W. (2000). The effects of science on national economic development, 1970 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 65, 866-887.
161. Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. American Economic Review, 51(1), 1-17.
162. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition & Instruction, 16, 475-522.
163. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. A. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning from a modern multidisciplinary perspective (pp. 1-51). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
164. Schwartz, D. L., Lindgren, R., & Lewis, S. (2009). Constructivism in an age of non-constructivist assessments. In T. Duffy & S. Tobias (Eds.), Constructivist instruction: Success or failure (pp. 34-61). New York, NY: Routledge.
165. Schweinhart, L. J., Barnes, H. V., & Weikart, D. P. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry Preschool Study through age 27 (Monographs of the High/Scope Educational Research Foundation No. 10). Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
166. SciMathMN. (2008). Minnesota TIMSS report: December 2008. A preliminary summary of results. Retrieved from http://www.scimathmn.org/timss/timss2007/2007timss_report.pdf
167. Senk, S. L., & Thompson, D. R. (Eds.). (2003). Standards-based school mathematics curricula: What are they? What do students learn? Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
168. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
169. Shaffer, W., Squire, K., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games and the future of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 87, 104-111.
170. Shear, L., Means, B., Mitchell, K., House, A., Gorges, T., Joshi, A., Shkolnik, J. (2008). Contrasting paths to small school reform: Results of a 5-year evaluation of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's national high schools initiative. Teachers College Record, 110, 1986-2039.
171. Sianesi, B., & Van Reenen, J. (2003). The returns to education: Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 17, 157-200.
172. Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
173. Songer, N. B. (2007). Rethinking sustainability of curricular innovations: Notes from urban Detroit. In B. Schneider & S. K. McDonald (Eds.), Scale-up in education: Issues in practice (Vol. 2, pp. 165-182). New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
174. Songer, N. B., Kelcey, B., & Gotwals, A. (2009). How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 610-631.
175. Spillane, J., Diamond, J., Walker, L., Halverson, R., & Jita, L. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 918-940.
176. Steiner, C. J. (1998). Educating for innovation and management: The engineer educators' dilemma. IEEE Transactions on Education, 41(1), 1-7.
177. Stern, D., & Ritzen, J. (1991). Market failure in training: New economic analysis and evidence on training of adult employees. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
178. Stevens, R. R., & Hall, R. (1998). Disciplined perception: Learning to see in technoscience: Talking mathematics in school. In M. Lampert & M. L. Blunk (Eds.), Studies of teaching and learning (pp. 107-149). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
179. Stokes, D. (1997). Pasteur's quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
180. Tan, C. (2006). Creating thinking schools through "knowledge and inquiry": The curriculum challenges for Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 89-105.
181. Tan, J., & Gopinathan, S. (2000). Education reform in Singapore: Towards greater creativity and innovation. Retrieved from http://www.nira.or.jp/past/publ/review/2000summer/tan.pdf
182. Tatar, D., Roschelle, J., Knudsen, J., Shechtman, N., Kaput, J., & Hopkins, B. (2008). Scaling up innovative technology-based mathematics. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 248-286.
183. Teitelbaum, M. S. (2003). Do we need more scientists and engineers? Retrieved from http://www.thepublicinterest.com/archives/2003fall/article2.html
184. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. DRAFT National Education Technology Plan 2010. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/technology/netp-2010
185. Wilson, B. (Ed.). (1996). Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
186. Woolf, S. H. (2008). The meaning of translational research and why it matters. Journal of the American Medical Association, 299, 211-213.
187. Zhang, J., Scardamalia, M., Reeve, R., & Messina, R. (2009). Designs for collective cognitive responsibility in knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18, 7-44.