Collaboration: The social context of theory development

Personality and Social Psychology Review

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 164-172

  Levine, John M ^a,b   Moreland, Richard L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042723705     PISSN: 10888683     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0802_10     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 425-460). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
2. Argots, L., & Kane, A. (2003). Learning from direct and indirect experience in organizations: The effects of experience content, timing, and distribution. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 277-303). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Arrow, H., McGrath, J. E., & Berdahl, J. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Bar-Tal, D. (2000). Shared beliefs in a society: Social psychological analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The hand-book of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp.193-281). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
6. Camacho, L. M., & Paulus, P. B. (1995). The role of social anxiousness in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1071-1080.
7. Clark, M. S. (1984). Record keeping in two types of relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 549-557.
8. Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
10. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
11. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. Sternberg & J. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: On-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 461-493). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Farrell, M. P. (2001). Collaborative circles: Friendship dynamics and creative work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 45-99). New York: Academic.
15. Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition (Vol. 3, pp. 28-84). New York: Guilford.
16. Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., Gavin, J. H., & Florey, A. T. (2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
17. Hogg, M. A. (1992). The social psychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
18. Holmes, J. G., & Murray, S. L. (1996). Conflict in close relationships. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 622-654). New York: Guilford.
19. Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 87-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. John-Steiner, V. (2000). Creative collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press.
21. Larson, J. R., Jr., & Christensen, C. (1993). Groups as problem-solving units: Toward a new meaning of social cognition, British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 5-30.
22. Laughlin, P. R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E. H. Witte & J. H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Consensual action by small groups (Vol. 1, pp. 61-80). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23. Laughlin, P. R., & Ellis, A. L. (1986). Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 177-189.
24. Levine, J. M., Choi, H.-S., & Moreland, R. L. (2003). Newcomer innovation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 202-224). New York: Oxford University Press.
25. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1994). Group socialization: Theory and research. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-336). Chichester, England: Wiley.
26. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 415-469). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
27. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1999). Knowledge transmission in work groups: Helping newcomers to succeed. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 267-296). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust and solidarity: (Vol. 19, pp. 203-228). Amsterdam: JAI-Elsevier.
29. Levine, J. M., Moreland, R. L., & Hausmann, L. R. M. (in press). Managing group composition: Inclusive and exclusive role transitions. In D. Abrams, J. M. Marques, & M.A. Hogg (Eds.), The social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
30. Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 585-612.
31. Levine, J. M., & Thompson, L. (1996). Conflict in groups. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp.745-776). New York: Guilford.
32. Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Calvini, G. (1999). Contexts of cryptomnesia: May the source be with you. Social Cognition, 17, 273-297.
33. Maddox, B. (2002). Rosalind Franklin: The dark lady of DNA. New York: HarperCollins.
34. Milliken, F. J., Bartel, C. A., & Kurtzberg, T. R. (2003). Diversity and creativity in work groups: A dynamic perspective on the affective and cognitive processes that link diversity and performance. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 32-62). New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Moreland, R. L. (1987). The formation of small groups. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes: Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 80-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Moreland, R. L. (1996). Lewin's legacy for small-groups research. Systems Practice, 9, 7-26.
37. Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and organizations. In L. L. Thompson, J. M. Levine, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 3-31). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
38. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic.
39. Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Socialization in organizations and work groups. In M. E. Turner (Ed.), Groups at work: Theory and research (pp. 69-112). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1996). Creating the ideal-group: Composition effects at work. In E. Witte & J. Davis (Eds.), Understanding group behavior: Vol. 2. Small group processes and interpersonal relations (pp. 11-35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
41. Moscovici, S. (2001). Social representations: Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.
42. Mullen, B., Johnson, C., & Salas, E. (1991). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: A meta-analytic integration. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 3-24.
43. Neale, M. A., Mannix, E. A., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (Eds.). (1998). Research on managing groups and teams: Composition (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
44. Nemeth, CJ., & Nemeth-Brown, B. (2003). Better than individuals? The potential benefits of dissent and diversity for group creativity. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 63-84). New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Nijstad, B. A., Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (2003). Cognitive stimulation and interference in idea-generating groups. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 137-159). New York: Oxford University Press.
46. O'Reilly, C. A., Williams, K. Y., & Barsade, S. (1998). Group demography and innovation: Does diversity help? In M. A. Neale, E. Mannix, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 183-207). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
47. Parks, C. D., & Sanna, L. J. (1999). Group performance and interaction. Boulder, CO: Westview.
48. Patnoe, S. (1988). A narrative history of experimental social psychology: The Lewin tradition. New York: Springer-Verlag.
49. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2003). Enhancing ideational creativity in groups: Lessons from research on brainstorming. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 110-136). New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., & Camacho, L. M. (1993). Perception of performance in group brainstorming: The illusion of group productivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 78-89.
51. Pycior, H. M., Slack, N. G., & Abir-Am, P. G. (Eds.). (1996). Creative couples in the sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
52. Ross, M., & Sicoly, F. (1979). Egocentric biases in availability and attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 322-336.
53. Rusbult, C. E., & Van Lange, P. A. M. (1996). Interdependence processes. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp.564-596). New York: Guilford.
54. Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 161-176.
55. Sherif, M. (1967). Group conflict and co-operation: Their social psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan-Paul.
56. Stasser, G., & Birchmeier, Z. (2003). Group creativity and collective choice. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 85-109). New York: Oxford University Press.
57. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.
58. Stroebe, W., Diehl, M., & Abakoumkin, G. (1992). The illusion of group effectivity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 643-650.
59. Sutton, R. I., & Hargadon, A. (1996). Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 685-718.
60. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
61. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 181-227). San Diego, CA: Academic.
62. Thagard, P. (1998). Ulcers and bacteria II: Instruments, experiments, and social interactions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 29, 317-342.
63. Tindale, R. S., Meisenhelder, H. M., Dykema-Engblade, A. A., & Hogg, M. A. (2001). Shared cognition in small groups. In M. A. Hogg & R. S. Tindale (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 1-30). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
64. Uglow, J. S. (2002). The lunar men: Five friends whose curiosity changed the world. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.
65. Watson, J. D. (1968). The double helix. New York: Signet.
66. Wegner, D. (1995). A computer network model of human transactive memory. Social Cognition, 13, 319-339.
67. West, M. A. (2003). Innovation implementation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 245-276). New York: Oxford University Press.
68. Wicklund, R. A. (1989). The appropriation of ideas. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (2nd ed., pp. 393-423). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
69. Williams, K. Y., & O'Reilly, C. (1998). Demography and diversity in organizations: A review of 40 years of research. In B. Staw & R. Sutton (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 20, pp. 77-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.