Proteomics of human embryonic stem cells

Proteomics

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 675-690

  Hughes, Chris S ^a   Nuhn, Amelia A ^a   Postovit, Lynne M ^a   Lajoie, Gilles A ^a  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell biology; Cell signaling; Human embryonic stem cells; MS

Indexed keywords

B CELL RECEPTOR ASSOCIATED PROTEIN 31; BONE MORPHOGENETIC PROTEIN 4; BRAIN ABUNDANT, MEMBRANE ATTACHED SIGNAL PROTEIN 1; CD81 ANTIGEN; CD9 ANTIGEN; CELL MARKER; COATED VESICLE MEMBRANE PROTEIN; CONNEXIN 43; COXSACKIE VIRUS AND ADENOVIRUS RECEPTOR PRECURSOR; CSE1 CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION 1 LIKE PROTEIN; DESMOGLEIN 2 PREPROPROTEIN; F11 RECEPTOR PRECURSOR PROTEIN; GLYPICAN 4; GTPASE RAB14; HERMES ANTIGEN; LYSOSOME ASSOCIATED MEMBRANE PROTEIN 1; MARCKS PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; PHOSPHOPEPTIDE; PODOCALYXIN LIKE PROTEIN 1; PROGESTERONE RECEPTOR MEMBRANE COMPONENT 1; PROTEIN CDC42; PROTEOME; RAB PROTEIN; RAB13 PROTEIN; SODIUM POTASSIUM ATPASE ALPHA 1 SUBUNIT ISOFORM A PROPROTEIN; SODIUM POTASSIUM ATPASE BETA 3 SUBUNIT; SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 1, MEMBER 5 PROTEIN; SOLUTE CARRIER FAMILY 7, MEMBER 5 PROTEIN; SYNAPTOPHYSIN LIKE 1 ISOFORM B PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FRACTIONATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL MATURATION; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL TYPE; CYTOLOGY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; EPIGENETICS; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MASS SPECTROMETRY; MATRIX ASSISTED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY; MICROENVIRONMENT; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POLYACRYLAMIDE GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN SYNTHESIS; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SUMOYLATION;

EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HUMANS; PROTEOMICS;

EID: 79551493736     PISSN: 16159853     EISSN: 16159861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201000407     Document Type: Review

References (127)

1. Ahn, S.-M., Simpson, R., Lee, B., Genomics and proteomics in stem cell research: the road ahead. Anal. Cell Biol. 2010, 43, 1-14.
2. Thomson, J. A., Itskovitz-Eldor, J., Shapiro, S. S., Waknitz, M. A. et al., Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998, 282, 1145-1147.
3. Ludwig, T., Thompson, J. A., Defined, feeder-independent medium for human embryonic stem cell culture. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 2007, Chapter 1, Unit 1C 2.
4. Ludwig, T. E., Bergendahl, V., Levenstein, M. E., Yu, J. et al., Feeder-independent culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Methods 2006, 3, 637-646.
5. Hoffman, L. M., Carpenter, M. K., Characterization and culture of human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 699-708.
6. Bhattacharya, B., Miura, T., Brandenberger, R., Mejido, J. et al., Gene expression in human embryonic stem cell lines: unique molecular signature. Blood 2004, 103, 2956-2964.
7. Boiani, M., Scholer, H. R., Regulatory networks in embryo-derived pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 6, 872-884.
8. Boyer, L. A., Lee, T. I., Cole, M. F., Johnstone, S. E. et al., Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 2005, 122, 947-956.
9. Brandenberger, R., Khrebtukova, I., Thies, R. S., Miura, T. et al., MPSS profiling of human embryonic stem cells. BMC Dev. Biol. 2004, 4, 10.
10. Carpenter, M. K., Rosler, E., Rao, M. S., Characterization and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cloning Stem Cells 2003, 5, 79-88.
11. Richards, M., Tan, S. P., Tan, J. H., Chan, W. K., Bongso, A., The transcriptome profile of human embryonic stem cells as defined by SAGE. Stem Cells 2003, 22, 51-64.
12. Sperger, J. M., Chen, X., Draper, J. S., Antosiewicz, J. E. et al., Gene expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and human pluripotent germ cell tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 13350-13355.
13. Wei, C. L., Miura, T., Robson, P., Lim, S. K. et al., Transcriptome profiling of human and murine ESCs identifies divergent paths required to maintain the stem cell state. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 166-185.
14. Mitsui, K., Tokuzawa, Y., Itoh, H., Segawa, K. et al., The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 2003, 113, 631-642.
15. Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Review - mass spectrometry and protein analysis. Science 2006, 312, 212-217.
16. Kelleher, N. L., Top-down proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 196a-203a.
17. Siuti, N., Kelleher, N. L., Decoding protein modifications using top-down mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 817-821.
18. Forner, F., Foster, L. J., Toppo, S., Mass spectrometry data analysis in the proteomics era. Curr. Bioinformatics 2007, 2, 63-93.
19. Lam, H., Deutsch, E. W., Eddes, J. S., Eng, J. K. et al., Building consensus spectral libraries for peptide identification in proteomics. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 873-875.
20. Bendall, S. C., Hughes, C., Campbell, J. L., Stewart, M. H. et al., An enhanced mass spectrometry approach reveals human embryonic stem cell growth factors in culture. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 421-432.
21. Fang, Y., Robinson, D. P., Foster, L. J., Quantitative analysis of proteome coverage and recovery rates for upstream fractionation methods in proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 9, 1902-1912.
22. Mueller, L. N., Brusniak, M. Y., Mani, D. R., Aebersold, R., An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 51-61.
23. Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy. Nat. Biotechnol. 2010, 28, 710-721.
24. Mann, M., Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 7, 952-958.
25. Ong, S. E., Blagoev, B., Kratchmarova, I., Kristensen, D. B. et al., Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2002, 1, 376-386.
26. Ross, P. L., Huang, Y. L. N., Marchese, J. N., Williamson, B. et al., Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2004, 3, 1154-1169.
27. Miura, T., Luo, Y., Khrebtukova, I., Brandenberger, R. et al., Monitoring early differentiation events in human embryonic stem cells by massively parallel signature sequencing and expressed sequence tag scan. Stem Cells Dev. 2004, 13, 694-715.
28. Van Hoof, D., Mummery, C. L., Heck, A. J., Krijgsveld, J., Embryonic stem cell proteomics. Exp. Rev. Proteomics 2006, 3, 427-437.
29. Baharvand, H., Fathi, A., van Hoof, D., Salekdeh, G. H., Concise review: trends in stem cell proteomics. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 1888-1903.
30. Van Hoof, D., Heck, A. J., Krijgsveld, J., Mummery, C. L., Proteomics and human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 2008, 1, 169-182.
31. Baharvand, H., Hajheidari, M., Ashtiani, S. K., Salekdeh, G. H., Proteomic signature of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2006, 6, 3544-3549.
32. Van Hoof, D., Passier, R., Ward-Van Oostwaard, D., Pinkse, M. W. et al., A quest for human and mouse embryonic stem cell-specific proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2006, 5, 1261-1273.
33. Niwa, H., Miyazaki, J., Smith, A. G., Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat. Genetics 2000, 24, 372-376.
34. Takahashi, K., Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M. et al., Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861-872.
35. Graumann, J., Hubner, N. C., Kim, J. B., Ko, K. et al., Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and proteome quantitation of mouse embryonic stem cells to a depth of 5, 111 proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 672-683.
36. Ong, S. E., Mann, M., A practical recipe for stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Nat. Protoc. 2006, 1, 2650-2660.
37. Van Hoof, D., Pinkse, M. W., Oostwaard, D. W., Mummery, C. L. et al., An experimental correction for arginine-to-proline conversion artifacts in SILAC-based quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 2007, 4, 677-678.
38. Bendall, S. C., Hughes, C., Stewart, M. H., Doble, B. et al., Prevention of amino acid conversion in SILAC experiments with embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 1587-1597.
39. Collier, T. S., Sarkar, P., Rao, B., Muddiman, D. C., Quantitative top-down proteomics of silac labeled human embryonic stem cells. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2010, 21, 879-889.
40. Prokhorova, T. A., Rigbolt, K. T., Johansen, P. T., Henningsen, J. et al., Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) and quantitative comparison of the membrane proteomes of self-renewing and differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2009, 8, 959-970.
41. Ginis, I., Luo, Y. Q., Miura, T., Thies, S. et al., Differences between human and mouse embryonic stem cells. Dev. Biol. 2004, 269, 360-380.
42. Daheron, L., Opitz, S. L., Zaehres, H., Lensch, M. W. et al., LIF/STAT3 signaling fails to maintain self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2004, 22, 770-778.
43. Chadwick, K., Wang, L., Li, L., Menendez, P. et al., Cytokines and BMP-4 promote hematopoietic differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Blood 2003, 102, 906-915.
44. Stewart, M. H., Bendall, S. C., Bhatia, M., Deconstructing human embryonic stem cell cultures: niche regulation of self-renewal and pluripotency. J. Mol. Med. 2008, 86, 875-886.
45. Richards, M., Tan, S., Fong, C. Y., Biswas, A. et al., Comparative evaluation of various human feeders for prolonged undifferentiated growth of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2003, 21, 546-556.
46. Xu, C., Inokuma, M. S., Denham, J., Golds, K. et al., Feeder-free growth of undifferentiated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2001, 19, 971-974.
47. Lim, J. W. E., Bodnar, A., Proteome analysis of conditioned medium from mouse embryonic fibroblast feeder layers which support the growth of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2002, 2, 1187-1203.
48. Chin, A. C. P., Fong, W. J., Goh, L. T., Philp, R. et al., Identification of proteins from feeder conditioned medium that support human embryonic stem cells. J. Biotechnol. 2007, 130, 320-328.
49. Gonzalez, R., Jennings, L. L., Knuth, M., Orth, A. P. et al., Screening the mammalian extracellular proteome for regulators of embryonic human stem cell pluripotency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 3552-3557.
50. Prowse, A. B. J., McQuade, L. R., Bryant, K. J., Van Dyk, D. D. et al., A proteome analysis of conditioned media from human neonatal fibroblasts used in the maintenance of human embryonic stem cells. Proteomics 2005, 5, 978-989.
51. Prowse, A. B. J., McQuade, L. R., Bryant, K. J., Marcal, H., Gray, P. P., Identification of potential pluripotency determinants for human embryonic stem cells following proteomic analysis of human and mouse fibroblast conditioned media. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 3796-3807.
52. Beattie, G. M., Lopez, A. D., Bucay, N., Hinton, A. et al., Activin A maintains pluripotency of human embryonic stem cells in the absence of feeder layers. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 489-495.
53. James, D., Levine, A. J., Besser, D., Hemmati-Brivanlou, A., TGFbeta/activin/nodal signaling is necessary for the maintenance of pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells. Development 2005, 132, 1273-1282.
54. Ludwig, T. E., Levenstein, M. E., Jones, J. M., Berggren, W. T. et al., Derivation of human embryonic stem cells in defined conditions. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 185-187.
55. Bendall, S. C., Stewart, M. H., Menendez, P., George, D. et al., IGF and FGF cooperatively establish the regulatory stem cell niche of pluripotent human cells in vitro. Nature 2007, 448, 1015-1021.
56. Kleinman, H. K., Martin, G. R., Matrigel: basement membrane matrix with biological activity. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2005, 15, 378-386.
57. Kleinman, H. K., McGarvey, M. L., Liotta, L. A., Robey, P. G. et al., Isolation and characterization of type IV procollagen, laminin, and heparan sulfate proteoglycan from the EHS sarcoma. Biochemistry 1982, 21, 6188-6193.
58. Vukicevic, S., Kleinman, H. K., Luyten, F. P., Roberts, A. B. et al., Identification of multiple active growth factors in basement membrane Matrigel suggests caution in interpretation of cellular activity related to extracellular matrix components. Exp. Cell Res. 1992, 202, 1-8.
59. Hughes, C. S., Postovit, L. M., Lajoie, G. A., Matrigel: a complex protein mixture required for optimal growth of cell culture. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1886-1890.
60. Klimanskaya, I., Chung, Y., Meisner, L., Johnson, J. et al., Human embryonic stem cells derived without feeder cells. Lancet 2005, 365, 1636-1641.
61. Meng, G. L., Liu, S. Y., Li, X. Y., Krawetz, R., Rancourt, D. E., Extracellular matrix isolated from foreskin fibroblasts supports long-term xeno-free human embryonic stem cell culture. Stem Cells Dev. 2010, 19, 547-556.
62. Braam, S. R., Zeinstra, L., Litjens, S., Ward-van Oostwaard, D. et al., Recombinant vitronectin is a functionally defined substrate that supports human embryonic stem cell self-renewal via alpha V beta 5 integrin. Stem Cells 2008, 26, 2257-2265.
63. Hakala, H., Rajala, K., Ojala, M., Panula, S. et al., Comparison of biomaterials and extracellular matrices as a culture platform for multiple, independently derived human embryonic stem cell lines. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15, 1775-1785.
64. Mei, Y., Saha, K., Bogatyrev, S. R., Yang, J. et al., Combinatorial development of biomaterials for clonal growth of human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 768-778.
65. Akopian, V., Andrews, P. W., Beil, S., Benvenisty, N. et al., Comparison of defined culture systems for feeder cell free propagation of human embryonic stem cells. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 2010, 46, 247-258.
66. Gerecht, S., Burdick, J. A., Ferreira, L. S., Townsend, S. A. et al., Hyaluronic acid hydrogel for controlled self-renewal and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11298-11303.
67. Anderson, D. G., Levenberg, S., Langer, R., Nanoliter-scale synthesis of arrayed biomaterials and application to human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004, 22, 863-866.
68. Huangfu, D. W., Maehr, R., Guo, W. J., Eijkelenboom, A. et al., Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compounds. Nat. Biotechnol. 2008, 26, 795-797.
69. Kochegarov, A., Small molecules for stem cells. Exp. Opinion Therapeutic Patents 2009, 19, 275-281.
70. Lukaszewicz, A. I., McMillan, M. K., Kahn, M., Small molecules and stem cells. potency and lineage commitment: the new quest for the fountain of youth. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3439-3453.
71. Shi, Y., Do, J. T., Desponts, C., Hahm, H. S. et al., A combined chemical and genetic approach for the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells, Cell Stem Cell 2008, 3, 119-119.
72. Watanabe, K., Ueno, M., Kamiya, D., Nishiyama, A. et al., A ROCK inhibitor permits survival of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 681-686.
73. Chen, G. K., Hou, Z. G., Gulbranson, D. R., Thomson, J. A., Actin-myosin contractility is responsible for the reduced viability of dissociated human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2010, 7, 240-248.
74. Mohyeldin, A., Garzon-Muvdi, T., Quinones-Hinojosa, A., Oxygen in stem cell biology: a critical component of the stem cell niche. Cell Stem Cell. 2010, 7, 150-161.
75. Simon, M. C., Keith, B., The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 285-296.
76. Hanna, J., Cheng, A. W., Saha, K., Kim, J. et al., Human embryonic stem cells with biological and epigenetic characteristics similar to those of mouse ESCs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 9222-9227.
77. Lengner, C. J., Gimelbrant, A. A., Erwin, J. A., Cheng, A. W. et al., Derivation of Pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations. Cell 2010, 141, 872-883.
78. Yoshida, Y., Takahashi, K., Okita, K., Ichisaka, T., Yamanaka, S., Hypoxia enhances the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5, 237-241.
79. 2 tensions and the prevention of differentiation of hES cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 4783-4788.
80. Heins, N., Englund, M. C. O., Sjoblom, C., Dahl, U. et al., Derivation, characterization, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2004, 22, 367-376.
81. Chen, H. F., Kuo, H. C., Chien, C. L., Shun, C. T. et al., Derivation, characterization and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells: comparing serum-containing versus serum-free media and evidence of germ cell differentiation. Human Reprod. 2007, 22, 567-577.
82. Lagarkova, M. A., Volchkov, P. Y., Lyakisheva, A. V., Philonenko, E. S., Kiselev, S. L., Diverse epigenetic profile of novel human embryonic stem cell lines. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 416-420.
83. Bhattacharya, B., Puri, S., Puri, R. K., A review of gene expression profiling of human embryonic stem cell lines and their differentiated progeny. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2009, 4, 98-106.
84. Adewumi, O., Aflatoonian, B., Ahrlund-Richter, L., Amit, M. et al., Characterization of human embryonic stem cell lines by the International Stem Cell Initiative. Nat. Biotechnol. 2007, 25, 803-816.
85. Andrews, P. W., Benvenisty, N., McKay, R., Pera, M. F. et al., The International Stem Cell initiative: toward benchmarks for human embryonic stem cell research. Nat. Biotechnol. 2005, 23, 795-797.
86. Chaerkady, R., Kerr, C. L., Kandasamy, K., Marimuthu, A. et al., Comparative proteomics of human embryonic stem cells and embryonal carcinoma cells. Proteomics 2010, 10, 1359-1373.
87. Dormeyer, W., van Hoof, D., Mummery, C. L., Krijgsveld, J., Heck, A. J., A practical guide for the identification of membrane and plasma membrane proteins in human embryonic stem cells and human embryonal carcinoma cells. Proteomics 2008, 8, 4036-4053.
88. Assou, S., Le Carrour, T., Tondeur, S., Strom, S. et al., A meta-analysis of human embryonic stem cells transcriptome integrated into a web-based expression atlas. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 961-973.
89. Okuda, A., Fukushima, A., Nishimoto, M., Orimo, A. et al., UTF1, a novel transcriptional coactivator expressed in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and extra-embryonic cells. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 2019-2032.
90. Fathi, A., Pakzad, M., Taei, A., Brink, T. C. et al., Comparative proteome and transcriptome analyses of embryonic stem cells during embryoid body-based differentiation. Proteomics 2009, 9, 4859-4870.
91. Baharvand, H., Fathi, A., Gourabi, H., Mollamohammadi, S., Salekdeh, G. H., Identification of mouse embryonic stem cell-associated proteins. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 412-423.
92. Tian, R., Wang, S., Elisma, F., Li, L. et al., Rare cell proteomic reactor applied to SILAC based quantitative proteomic study of human embryonic stem cell differentiation. Mol Cell Proteomics 2010, doi:10.1074.
93. Chaerkady, R., Kerr, C. L., Marimuthu, A., Kelkar, D. S. et al., Temporal analysis of neural differentiation using quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 1315-1326.
94. Liang, J., Wan, M., Zhang, Y., Gu, P. L. et al., Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10, 731-739.
95. Battista, S., Pentimalli, F., Baldassarre, G., Fedele, M. et al., Loss of Hmga1 gene function affects embryonic stem cell lymphohematopoietic differentiation. Faseb J. 2003, 17, 1496-1498.
96. Yocum, A. K., Gratsch, T. E., Leff, N., Strahler, J. R. et al., Coupled global and targeted proteomics of human embryonic stem cells during induced differentiation. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2008, 7, 750-767.
97. Tropepe, V., Hitoshi, S., Sirard, C., Mak, T. W. et al., Direct neural fate specification from embryonic stem cells: a primitive mammalian neural stem cell stage acquired through a default mechanism. Neuron 2001, 30, 65-78.
98. Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B., Aebersold, R., Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4, 1-14.
99. Picotti, P., Lam, H., Campbell, D., Deutsch, E. W. et al., A database of mass spectrometric assays for the yeast proteome. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 913-914.
100. Hewel, J. A., Liu, J., Onishi, K., Fong, V. et al., Synthetic peptide arrays for pathway-level protein monitoring by LC-MS/MS. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 2460-2473.
101. Paradela, A., Albar, J. P., Advances in the analysis of protein phosphorylation. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 1809-1818.
102. Pinkse, M. W. H., Uitto, P. M., Hilhorst, M. J., Ooms, B., Heck, A. J. R., Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal. Chem. 2004, 76, 3935-3943.
103. 2-based phosphopeptide enrichment for automated multidimensional liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 4666-4673.
104. Brill, L. M., Xiong, W., Lee, K. B., Ficarro, S. B. et al., Phosphoproteomic analysis of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5, 204-213.
105. Van Hoof, D., Munoz, J., Braam, S. R., Pinkse, M. W. et al., Phosphorylation dynamics during early differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5, 214-226.
106. Mikesh, L. M., Ueberheide, B., Chi, A., Coon, J. J. et al., The utility of ETD mass spectrometry in proteomic analysis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1764, 1811-1822.
107. Swaney, D. L., McAlister, G. C., Coon, J. J., Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods 2008, 5, 959-964.
108. Vermeulen, M., Selbach, M., Quantitative proteomics: a tool to assess cell differentiation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2009, 21, 761-766.
109. Meshorer, E., Misteli, T., Chromatin in pluripotent embryonic stem cells and differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006, 7, 540-546.
110. Azuara, V., Perry, P., Sauer, S., Spivakov, M. et al., Chromatin signatures of pluripotent cell lines. Nat. Cell. Biol. 2006, 8, 532-538.
111. Dai, B., Rasmussen, T. P., Global epiproteomic signatures distinguish embryonic stem cells from differentiated cells. Stem Cells 2007, 25, 2567-2574.
112. Freitas, M. A., Sklenar, A. R., Parthun, M. R., Application of mass spectrometry to the identification and quantification of histone post-translational modifications. J. Cell Biochem. 2004, 92, 691-700.
113. Phanstiel, D., Brumbaugh, J., Berggren, W. T., Conard, K. et al., Mass spectrometry identifies and quantifies 74 unique histone H4 isoforms in differentiating human embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4093-4098.
114. Boyne, M. T., 2nd., Pesavento, J. J., Mizzen, C. A., Kelleher, N. L., Precise characterization of human histones in the H2A gene family by top down mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2006, 5, 248-253.
115. Pesavento, J. J., Bullock, C. R., Leduc, R. D., Mizzen, C. A., Kelleher, N. L., Combinatorial modification of human histone H4 quantitated by two-dimensional liquid chromatography coupled with top down mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 14927-14937.
116. Eliuk, S. M., Maltby, D., Panning, B., Burlingame, A. L., High resolution electron transfer dissociation studies of unfractionated intact histones from murine embryonic stem cells using on-line capillary LC Separation: determination of abundant histone isoforms and post-translational modifications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 824-837.
117. Jung, H. R., Pasini, D., Helin, K., Jensen, O. N., Quantitative mass spectrometry of histones H3.2 and H3.3 in Suz12-deficient mouse embryonic stem cells reveals distinct, dynamic post-translational modifications at Lys-27 and Lys-36. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2010, 9, 838-850.
118. Helbig, A. O., Heck, A. J. R., Slijper, M., Exploring the membrane proteome-Challenges and analytical strategies. J. Proteomics 2010, 73, 868-878.
119. Helbig, A. O., Heck, A. J., Slijper, M., Exploring the membrane proteome - challenges and analytical strategies. J. Proteomics 73, 868-878.
120. McQuade, L. R., Schmidt, U., Pascovici, D., Stojanov, T., Baker, M. S., Improved membrane proteomics coverage of human embryonic stem cells by peptide IPG-IEF. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8, 5642-5649.
121. Foster, L. J., Zeemann, P. A., Li, C., Mann, M. et al., Differential expression profiling of membrane proteins by quantitative proteomics in a human mesenchymal stem cell line undergoing osteoblast differentiation. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 1367-1377.
122. Harkness, L., Christiansen, H., Nehlin, J., Barington, T. et al., Identification of a membrane proteomic signature for human embryonic stem cells independent of culture conditions. Stem Cell Res. 2008, 1, 219-227.
123. Cai, J., Chen, J., Liu, Y., Miura, T. et al., Assessing self-renewal and differentiation in human embryonic stem cell lines. Stem Cells 2006, 24, 516-530.
124. Weitlauf, H. M., Knisley, K. A., Changes in surface antigens on preimplantation mouse embryos. Biol. Reprod. 1992, 46, 811-816.
125. Trzpis, M., McLaughlin, P. M., de Leij, L. M., Harmsen, M. C., Epithelial cell adhesion molecule: more than a carcinoma marker and adhesion molecule. Am. J. Pathol. 2007, 171, 386-395.
126. Ding, S. T., Lilburn, M. S., The ontogeny of fatty acid-binding protein in turkey (Meleagridis gallopavo) intestine and yolk sac membrane during embryonic and early posthatch development. Poult. Sci. 2002, 81, 1065-1070.
127. Dormeyer, W., van Hoof, D., Braam, S. R., Heck, A. J. et al., Plasma membrane proteomics of human embryonic stem cells and human embryonal carcinoma cells. J. Proteome Res. 2008, 7, 2936-2951.