Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings

Research in Science Education

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 23-49

  Kelly, Gregory J ^a   Chen, Catherine ^a   Crawford, Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54649083676     PISSN: 0157244X     EISSN: 15731898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF02461640     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Barnes, B. (1978). Interests and the growth of knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
2. Bleicher, R. (1996). High school students learning science in university research laboratories. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 1115-1133.
3. Bloome, D., & Egan-Robertson, A. (1993). The social construction of intertextuality in classroom reading and writing lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 305-333.
4. Bloor, D. (1976). Knowledge and social imagery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
5. Brannigan, A. (1981). The social basis of scientific discoveries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Brilliant-Mills, H. (1993). Becoming a mathematician: Building a situated definition of mathematics. Linguistics and Education, 5, 301-334.
7. Britzman, D. P. (1995). "The question of belief": Writing poststructural ethnography. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8, 229-238.
8. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Subject-matter knowledge and science teaching: A pragmatic approach. In J. E. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 2) (pp. 115-143). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9. Callon, M. (1995). Four models for the dynamics of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 29-63). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
10. Cochran, J. (1997). What's "common" in a common core: How course structure shapes disciplinary knowledge. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 45-55.
11. Collins, H. M. (1981). The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics. Sociology, 9, 205-224.
12. (Reprinted as "The replication of experiments in physics," in B. Barnes & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context: Reading in the sociology of science (pp. 94-116). Cambridge, MA: MIT.)
13. Collins, H. M. (1982). Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. In B. Barnes, & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context: Reading in the sociology of science (pp. 44-64). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.
15. Crawford, T., Chen, C., & Kelly, G. J. (1997). Creating authentic opportunities for presenting science: The influence of audience on student talk. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 1-13.
16. Cunningham, C. M. (1995). The effect of teachers' sociological understanding of science on classroom practice and curriculum innovation. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University, New York, USA.
17. (Dissertation Abstracts International, 56, 2542A.)
18. Cunningham, C. M. (1997). Who Knows? The influences of teachers' sociological understanding of science (SUS) on knowledge, authority, and control in the classroom. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32, 24-34.
19. Duranti, A., & Goodwin, C. (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College.
21. Edwards, A. D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen.
22. Edwards, D. (1993). Concepts, memory, and the organization of pedagogical discourse: A case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 205-225.
23. Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Erickson, F., & Shultz, J. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In J. L. Green, & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147-150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 119-161). New York: Macmillan.
26. Evertson, C., & Green, J. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 162-213). New York: MacMillan.
27. Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society, 4, 133-169.
28. Finkel, E. (1996). Making sense of genetics: Students' knowledge use during problem solving in a high school genetics class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 345-368.
29. Garfinkel, H., Lynch, M., & Livingston, E. (1981). The work of discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 131-158.
30. Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.
31. Gilbert, R. (1992). Text and context in qualitative educational research: Discourse analysis and the problem of contextual explanation. Linguistics & Education, 4, 37-57.
32. Gilbert, G. N., & Mulkay, M. (1984). Opening Pandora's box: A sociological analysis of scientists' discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Green, J., & Dixon, C. (Eds.). (1993). Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group [Special issue]. Linguistics & Education, 5 (3&4).
34. Green, J., & Harker, J. (1988). Multiple perspective analysis of classroom discourse. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35. Green, J., & Meyer, L. (1991). The embeddedness of reading in classroom life: Reading as a situated process. In C. Baker, & A. Luke (Eds.), Toward a critical sociology of reading pedagogy (pp. 141-160). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
36. Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti, & C. Goodwin (Eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 229-252). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38. Hicks, D. (1995). Discourse, learning, and teaching. Review of Research in Education, 21, 49-95.
39. Howe, K., & Eisenhart, M. (1990). Standards for qualitative (and quantitative) research: A prolegomenon. Educational Researcher, 19(4), 2-9.
40. Kelly, G. J., Carlsen, W. S., & Cunningham, C. M. (1993). Science education in sociocultural context: Perspectives from the sociology of science. Science Education, 77, 207-220.
41. Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1996). Students' interaction with computer representations: Analysis of discourse in laboratory groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33, 693-707.
42. Kelly, G. J., & Crawford, T. (1997). An ethnographic investigation of the discourse processes of school science. Science Education, 81, 533-559.
43. Kelly, G. J., Crawford, T., & Green, J. (submitted). Common task and uncommon knowledge: Dissenting voices in the discursive construction of physics across small laboratory groups, Linguistics and Education. (Special Issue on Language and Cognition.)
44. Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (1997). Examining how teachers' knowledge and classroom discourse influence opportunities for learning science [Special issue]. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 32(2).
45. Kelly, G. J., & Green, J. (in press). The social nature of knowing: Toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti, & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46. Knorr-Cetina, K., & Mulkay, M. (Eds.). (1983). Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
47. Knorr-Cetina, K. (1995). Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 140-166). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
48. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
49. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Laudan, L. (1990). Science and relativism: Some key controversies in the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic.
52. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331-360.
53. Lemke, J. L. (1988). Genres, semantics, and classroom education. Linguistics and Education, 1, 81-99.
54. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
55. Matthews, M. (Ed.). (1991). History, philosophy, and science teaching: Selected readings. Toronto: OISE Press.
56. Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
57. Merton, R. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: IL: University of Chicago Press.
58. Mishler, E. G. (1986). Research interviewing: Context and narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
59. Mitroff, I. (1974). Norms and countemorms in a select group of Apollo moon scientists. American Sociological Review, 39, 579-595,
60. Mukerji, C. (1989). A fragile power: Scientists and the state. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
61. Mulkay, M. (1975). Norms and ideology in science. Social Science Information, 15, 637-656.
62. (Reprinted in: Mulkay, M. (Ed.). (1991). Sociology of science. Bloomington: Indiana University Press).
63. Mulkay, M., Potter, J., & Yearly, S. (1983). Why an analysis of scientific discourse is needed. In K. Knorr-Cetina, & M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 171-203). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
64. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington D.C.: National Academy Press.
65. Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1995). Critical incidents in the science classroom and the nature of science. The School Science Review, 76, 41-46.
66. Pickering, A. (1982). Interests and analogies. In B. Barnes, & D. Edge (Eds.), Science in context: Readings in the sociology of science (pp. 125-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT.
67. Pinch, T. (1986). Confronting nature. Dordrecht: R. Reidel.
68. Ochs, E. (1979). Introduction: What child language can contribute to pragmatics. In E. Ochs, & B. Schieffelin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 1-17). New York: Academic Press.
69. Rex, L., Green, J. L., & Dixon, C. (in press). What counts when context counts?: The "uncommon" common language of literacy research. Journal of Literacy Research.
70. Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota press.
71. Roth, W.-M. (1995). Authentic school science: Knowing and learning in open-inquiry science laboratories. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
72. Roth, W.-M. (1996). Knowledge diffusion* in a grade 4-5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 179-220.
73. Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From "truth" to "invented reality": A discourse analysis of high school physics students' talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145-179.
74. Roth, W.-M., McGinn, M. K., & Bowen, G. M. (1996). Applications of science and technology studies: Effecting change in science education. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21, 454-484.
75. Roth, W.-M., & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The nature of scientific knowledge, knowing and learning: The perspectives of four physics students. International Journal of Science Education, 15, 27-44.
76. Santa Barbara Classroom Discourse Group. (1992). Do you see what I see? The referential and intertextual nature of classroom life. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 27, 29-36.
77. Science Curriculum Framework and Criteria Committee. (1990). Science framework for California public schools kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education.
78. Shapin, S. (1984). Talking history: Reflections on discourse analysis. ISIS, 75, 125-130.
79. Solomon, J. (1995). Higher level understanding of the nature of science. The School Science Review, 76, 15-22.
80. Solomon, J., Scott, L., & Duveen, J. (1996). Large-scale exploration of pupils' understanding of the nature of science. Science Education, 80, 493-508.
81. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
82. Strike, K. A. (1995). Epistemology and education. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (2nd ed.) (Vol. 4, pp. 1996-2001). Tarrytown, NY: Elsevier Science.
83. Toulmin, S. (1979). The Inwardness of mental life. Critical Inquiry, 6, 1-16.
84. Traweek, S. (1988). Beamtimes and lifetimes: The world of high energy physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
85. Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed.). (G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
86. Woolgar, S. (1980). Discovery: Logic and sequence in scientific text. In K. Knorr, R. Krohn, & R. Whitley (Eds.), The social process of scientific investigation (pp. 239-268). Dordecht, the Netherlands: Reidel.
87. Woolgar, S. (Ed.). (1988). Knowledge and reflexivity: New frontiers in the sociology of knowledge. London: Sage.