Analysis of replication profiles reveals key role of RFC-Ctf18 in yeast replication stress response

Nature Structural and Molecular Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1391-1397

  Crabbé, Laure ^a,c   Thomas, Aubin ^a   Pantesco, Véronique ^b   De Vos, John ^b   Pasero, Philippe ^a   Lengronne, Armelle ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS   (France)

^b UNIV MONTPELLIER   (France)

^c SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; PROTEIN CTF18; REPLICATION FACTOR C; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; ENZYME ACTIVATION; EUKARYOTE; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE MUTATION; GENE REPRESSION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STRESS;

CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA, SINGLE-STRANDED; HYDROXYUREA; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 78549290265     PISSN: 15459993     EISSN: 15459985     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nsmb.1932     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Raghuraman, M.K. & Brewer, B.J. Molecular analysis of the replication program in unicellular model organisms. Chromosome Res. 18, 19-34 (2010).
2. Tourrière, H. & Pasero, P. Maintenance of fork integrity at damaged DNA and natural pause sites. DNA Repair (Amst.) 6, 900-913 (2007).
3. Labib, K. & Hodgson, B. Replication fork barriers: pausing for a break or stalling for time? EMBO Rep. 8, 346-353 (2007).
4. Branzei, D. & Foiani, M. The checkpoint response to replication stress. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1038-1046 (2009).
5. Zegerman, P. & Diffey, J.F.X. DNA replication as a target of the DNA damage checkpoint. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 1077-1088 (2009).
6. Friedel, A.M., Pike, B.L. & Gasser, S.M. ATR/Mec1: coordinating fork stability and repair. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 21, 237-244 (2009).
7. Alcasabas, A.A. et al. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 958-965 (2001).
8. Putnam, C.D., Jaehnig, E.J. & Kolodner, R.D. Perspectives on the DNA damage and replication checkpoint responses in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. DNA Repair (Amst.) 8, 974-982 (2009).
9. Alabert, C., Bianco, J.N. & Pasero, P. Differential regulation of homologous recombination at DNA breaks and replication forks by the Mrc1 branch of the S-phase checkpoint. EMBO J. 28, 1131-1141 (2009).
10. Pan, X. et al. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124, 1069-1081 (2006).
11. Shimada, K., Pasero, P. & Gasser, S.M. ORC and the intra-S-phase checkpoint: a threshold regulates Rad53p activation in S phase. Genes Dev. 16, 3236-3252 (2002).
12. Cimprich, K.A. & Cortez, D. ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 616-627 (2008).
13. Bellaoui, M. et al. Elg1 forms an alternative RFC complex important for DNA replication and genome integrity. EMBO J. 22, 4304-4313 (2003).
14. Kanellis, P., Agyei, R. & Durocher, D. Elg1 forms an alternative PCNA-interacting RFC complex required to maintain genome stability. Curr. Biol. 13, 1583-1595 (2003).
15. Ben-Aroya, S., Koren, A., Liefshitz, B., Steinlauf, R. & Kupiec, M. ELG1, a yeast gene required for genome stability, forms a complex related to replication factor C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9906-9911 (2003).
16. Raghuraman, M.K. et al. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294, 115-121 (2001).
17. Katou, Y. et al. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424, 1078-1083 (2003).
18. Knott, S.R., Viggiani, C.J., Tavare, S. & Aparicio, O.M. Genome-wide replication profles indicate an expansive role for Rpd3L in regulating replication initiation timing or effciency, and reveal genomic loci of Rpd3 function in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 23, 1077-1090 (2009).
19. Yabuki, N., Terashima, H. & Kitada, K. Mapping of early fring origins on a replication profle of budding yeast. Genes Cells 7, 781-789 (2002).
20. Feng, W. et al. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifes origins of replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 8, 148-155 (2006).
21. Nieduszynski, C.A., Knox, Y. & Donaldson, A.D. Genome-wide identifcation of replication origins in yeast by comparative genomics. Genes Dev. 20, 1874-1879 (2006).
22. Nieduszynski, C.A., Hiraga, S., Ak, P., Benham, C.J. & Donaldson, A.D. OriDB: a DNA replication origin database. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, D40-D46 (2007).
23. Santocanale, C. & Diffey, J.F.A. Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-fring origins of DNA replication. Nature 395, 615-618 (1998).
24. Tourrière, H., Versini, G., Cordon-Preciado, V., Alabert, C. & Pasero, P. Mrc1 and tof1 promote replication fork progression and recovery independently of Rad53. Mol. Cell 19, 699-706 (2005).
25. Garcia, V., Furuya, K. & Carr, A.M. Identifcation and functional analysis of TopBP1 and its homologs. DNA Repair (Amst.) 4, 1227-1239 (2005).
26. Melo, J.A., Cohen, J. & Toczyski, D.P. Two checkpoint complexes are independently recruited to sites of DNA damage in vivo. Genes Dev. 15, 2809-2821 (2001).
27. Wang, H. & Elledge, S.J. Genetic and physical interactions between DPB11 and DDC1 in the yeast DNA damage response pathway. Genetics 160, 1295-1304 (2002).
28. Puddu, F. et al. Phosphorylation of the budding yeast 9-1-1 complex is required for Dpb11 function in the full activation of the UV-induced DNA damage checkpoint. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4782-4793 (2008).
29. Kanoh, Y., Tamai, K. & Shirahige, K. Different requirements for the association of ATR-ATRIP and 9-1-1 to the stalled replication forks. Gene 377, 88-95 (2006).
30. Santocanale, C., Sharma, K. & Diffey, J.F. Activation of dormant origins of DNA replication in budding yeast. Genes Dev. 13, 2360-2364 (1999).
31. Ansbach, A.B. et al. RFCCtf18 and the Swi1-Swi3 complex function in separate and redundant pathways required for the stabilization of replication forks to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 595-607 (2008).
32. Naiki, T., Kondo, T., Nakada, D., Matsumoto, K. & Sugimoto, K. Chl12 (Ctf18) forms a novel replication factor C-related complex and functions redundantly with Rad24 in the DNA replication checkpoint pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 5838-5845 (2001).
33. Pan, X. et al. A DNA integrity network in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 124, 1069-1081 (2006).
34. Hanna, J.S., Kroll, E.S., Lundblad, V. & Spencer, F.A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3144-3158 (2001).
35. Mayer, M.L., Gygi, S.P., Aebersold, R. & Hieter, P. Identifcation of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 7, 959-970 (2001).
36. Lengronne, A. et al. Establishment of sister chromatid cohesion at the S. cerevisiae replication fork. Mol. Cell 23, 787-799 (2006).
37. Raveendranathan, M. et al. Genome-wide replication profles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25, 3627-3639 (2006).
38. Paciotti, V., Clerici, M., Scotti, M., Lucchini, G. & Longhese, M.P. Characterization of mec1 kinase-defcient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3913-3925 (2001).
39. Tercero, J.A., Longhese, M.P. & Diffey, J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11, 1323-1336 (2003).
40. Osborn, A.J. & Elledge, S.J. Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53. Genes Dev. 17, 1755-1767 (2003).
41. Foss, E.J. Tof1p regulates DNA damage responses during S phase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 157, 567-577 (2001).
42. Navas, T.A., Zhou, Z. & Elledge, S.J. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell 80, 29-39 (1995).
43. Rogakou, E.P., Boon, C., Redon, C. & Bonner, W.M. Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo. J. Cell Biol. 146, 905-916 (1999).
44. Tuduri, S. et al. Topoisomerase 1 suppresses replication stress and genomic instability by preventing interference between replication and transcription. Nat. Cell Biol. 11, 1315-1324 (2009).
45. Alvino, G.M. et al. Replication in hydroxyurea: it's a matter of time. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 6396-6406 (2007).
46. Szyjka, S.J., Viggiani, C.J. & Aparicio, O.M. Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae. Mol. Cell 19, 691-697 (2005).
47. Vujcic, M., Miller, C.A. & Kowalski, D. Activation of silent replication origins at autonomously replicating sequence elements near the HML locus in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19, 6098-6109 (1999).
48. Shirahige, K. et al. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395, 618-621 (1998).
49. Bando, M. et al. Csm3, Tof1, and Mrc1 form a heterotrimeric mediator complex that associates with DNA replication forks. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 34355-34365 (2009).
50. Mordes, D.A., Nam, E.A. & Cortez, D. Dpb11 activates the Mec1-Ddc2 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18730-18734 (2008).
51. Navadgi-Patil, V.M. & Burgers, P.M. Yeast DNA replication protein Dpb11 activates the Mec1/ATR checkpoint kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 35853-35859 (2008).
52. Masumoto, H., Sugino, A. & Araki, H. Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20, 2809-2817 (2000).
53. Gavin, A.C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631-636 (2006).
54. Singh, N. et al. Coordination of the random asynchronous replication of autosomal loci. Nat. Genet. 33, 339-341 (2003).
55. Bylund, G.O. & Burgers, P.M.J. Replication protein A-directed unloading of PCNA by the Ctf18 cohesion establishment complex. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 5445-5455 (2005).
56. Paulovich, A.G., Margulies, R.U., Garvik, B.M. & Hartwell, L.H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics 145, 45-62 (1997).
57. Nicol, J.W., Helt, G.A., Blanchard, S.G. Jr., Raja, A. & Loraine, A.E. The Integrated Genome Browser: free software for distribution and exploration of genome-scale datasets. Bioinformatics 25, 2730-2731 (2009).
58. Blankenberg, D. et al. Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. in. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 89, 19.10.1-9.10.21 (2010).
59. Pasero, P., Bensimon, A. & Schwob, E. Single-molecule analysis reveals clustering and epigenetic regulation of replication origins at the yeast rDNA locus. Genes Dev. 16, 2479-2484 (2002).