Checkpoint-dependent and -independent roles of Swi3 in replication fork recovery and sister chromatid cohesion in fission yeast

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Rapp, Jordan B ^a   Noguchi, Chiaki ^a   Das, Mukund M ^a   Wong, Lisa K ^a   Ansbach, Alison B ^a   Holmes, Allyson M ^b   Arcangioli, Benoit ^b   Noguchi, Eishi ^a  

^a DREXEL UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b INSTITUT PASTEUR   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAMPTOTHECIN; CHECKPOINT KINASE 1; CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; CHECKPOINT KINASE RAD3; DNA; FUNGAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN SWI1; PROTEIN SWI3; SWI1 SWI3 COMPLEX PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; DNA BINDING PROTEIN; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEIN; SWI3 PROTEIN, S POMBE;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELETION MUTANT; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPLICATION; DNA SYNTHESIS; FRAMESHIFT MUTATION; FUNGUS ISOLATION; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PREDICTION; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SISTER CHROMATID; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTATION; PHYSIOLOGY; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EUKARYOTA; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCETACEAE;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; MUTATION; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES; SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SISTER CHROMATID EXCHANGE;

EID: 78149434444     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013379     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Branzei D, Foiani M (2007) Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 994-1003.
2. Heller RC, Marians KJ (2006) Replisome assembly and the direct restart of stalled replication forks. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 932-943.
3. Lambert S, Froget B, Carr AM (2007) Arrested replication fork processing: interplay between checkpoints and recombination. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 1042-1061.
4. Branzei D, Foiani M (2008) Regulation of DNA repair throughout the cell cycle. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 9: 297-308.
5. Paulsen RD, Cimprich KA (2007) The ATR pathway: fine-tuning the fork. DNA Repair (Amst) 6: 953-966.
6. Aguilera A, Gomez-Gonzalez B (2008) Genome instability: a mechanistic view of its causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet 9: 204-217.
7. Carr AM (2002) DNA structure dependent checkpoints as regulators of DNA repair. DNA Repair (Amst) 1: 983-994.
8. Nyberg KA, Michelson RJ, Putnam CW, Weinert TA (2002) TOWARD MAINTAINING THE GENOME: DNA Damage and Replication Checkpoints. Annu Rev Genet 36: 617-656.
9. Boddy MN, Russell P (2001) DNA replication checkpoint. Curr Biol 11: R953-R956.
10. Walworth NC, Bernards R (1996) rad-dependent response of the chk1-encoded protein kinase at the DNA damage checkpoint. Science 271: 353-356.
11. Zeng Y, Forbes KC, Wu Z, Moreno S, Piwnica-Worms H, et al. (1998) Replication checkpoint requires phosphorylation of the phosphatase Cdc25 by Cds1 or Chk1. Nature 395: 507-510.
12. Boddy MN, Furnari B, Mondesert O, Russell P (1998) Replication checkpoint enforced by kinases Cds1 and Chk1. Science 280: 909-912.
13. Lindsay HD, Griffiths DJ, Edwards RJ, Christensen PU, Murray JM, et al. (1998) S-phase-specific activation of Cds1 kinase defines a subpathway of the checkpoint response in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genes Dev 12: 382-395.
14. Lopes M, Cotta-Ramusino C, Pellicioli A, Liberi G, Plevani P, et al. (2001) The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412: 557-561.
15. Paciotti V, Clerici M, Scotti M, Lucchini G, Longhese MP (2001) Characterization of mec1 kinase-deficient mutants and of new hypomorphic mec1 alleles impairing subsets of the DNA damage response pathway. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3913-3925.
16. Sogo JM, Lopes M, Foiani M (2002) Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297: 599-602.
17. Tercero JA, Diffley JF (2001) Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412: 553-557.
18. Tercero JA, Longhese MP, Diffley JF (2003) A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol Cell 11: 1323-1336.
19. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, Du LL, Russell P (2003) Swi1 prevents replication fork collapse and controls checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol Cell Biol 23: 7861-7874.
20. Noguchi E, Noguchi C, McDonald WH, Yates JR 3rd, Russell P (2004) Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 8342-8355.
21. Lisby M, Mortensen UH, Rothstein R (2003) Colocalization of multiple DNA double-strand breaks at a single Rad52 repair centre. Nat Cell Biol 5: 572-577.
22. Lisby M, Rothstein R, Mortensen UH (2001) Rad52 forms DNA repair and recombination centers during S phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98: 8276-8282.
23. Sommariva E, Pellny TK, Karahan N, Kumar S, Huberman JA, et al. (2005) Schizosaccharomyces pombe Swi1, Swi3, and Hsk1 are components of a novel Sphase response pathway to alkylation damage. Mol Cell Biol 25: 2770-2784.
24. Lee BS, Grewal SI, Klar AJ (2004) Biochemical interactions between proteins and mat1 cis-acting sequences required for imprinting in fission yeast. Mol Cell Biol 24: 9813-9822.
25. Gotter AL (2003) Tipin, a novel timeless-interacting protein, is developmentally coexpressed with timeless and disrupts its self-association. J Mol Biol 331: 167-176.
26. Mayer ML, Pot I, Chang M, Xu H, Aneliunas V, et al. (2004) Identification of protein complexes required for efficient sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 15: 1736-1745.
27. Calzada A, Hodgson B, Kanemaki M, Bueno A, Labib K (2005) Molecular anatomy and regulation of a stable replisome at a paused eukaryotic DNA replication fork. Genes Dev 19: 1905-1919.
28. Katou Y, Kanoh Y, Bando M, Noguchi H, Tanaka H, et al. (2003) S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424: 1078-1083.
29. Nedelcheva MN, Roguev A, Dolapchiev LB, Shevchenko A, Taskov HB, et al. (2005) Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J Mol Biol 347: 509-521.
30. Gambus A, Jones RC, Sanchez-Diaz A, Kanemaki M, van Deursen F, et al. (2006) GINS maintains association of Cdc45 with MCM in replisome progression complexes at eukaryotic DNA replication forks. Nat Cell Biol 8: 358-366.
31. Chou DM, Elledge SJ (2006) Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 18143-18147.
32. Gotter AL, Suppa C, Emanuel BS (2007) Mammalian TIMELESS and Tipin are evolutionarily conserved replication fork-associated factors. J Mol Biol 366: 36-52.
33. Unsal-Kacmaz K, Chastain PD, Qu PP, Minoo P, Cordeiro-Stone M, et al. (2007) The human Tim/Tipin complex coordinates an intra-S checkpoint response to UV that slows replication fork displacement. Mol Cell Biol.
34. Yoshizawa-Sugata N, Masai H (2007) Human Tim/Timeless-interacting protein, Tipin, is required for efficient progression of S phase and DNA replication checkpoint. J Biol Chem 282: 2729-2740.
35. Leman AR, Noguchi C, Lee CY, Noguchi E (2010) Human Timeless and Tipin stabilize replication forks and facilitate sister-chromatid cohesion. J Cell Sci 123: 660-670.
36. Wan S, Capasso H, Walworth NC (1999) The topoisomerase I poison camptothecin generates a Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint signal in fission yeast. Yeast 15: 821-828.
37. Ansbach AB, Noguchi C, Klansek IW, Heidlebaugh M, Nakamura TM, et al. (2008) RFCCtf18 and the Swi1-Swi3 complex function in separate and redundant pathways required for the stabilization of replication forks to facilitate sister chromatid cohesion in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Biol Cell 19: 595-607.
38. Edwards RJ, Bentley NJ, Carr AM (1999) A Rad3-Rad26 complex responds to DNA damage independently of other checkpoint proteins. Nat Cell Biol 1: 393-398.
39. Wolkow TD, Enoch T (2002) Fission yeast Rad26 is a regulatory subunit of the Rad3 checkpoint kinase. Mol Biol Cell 13: 480-492.
40. Ding DQ, Yamamoto A, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y (2004) Dynamics of homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase in fission yeast. Dev Cell 6: 329-341.
41. Hiraoka Y, Toda T, Yanagida M (1984) The NDA3 gene of fission yeast encodes beta-tubulin: a cold-sensitive nda3 mutation reversibly blocks spindle formation and chromosome movement in mitosis. Cell 39: 349-358.
42. Hanna JS, Kroll ES, Lundblad V, Spencer FA (2001) Saccharomyces cerevisiae CTF18 and CTF4 are required for sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Cell Biol 21: 3144-3158.
43. Mayer ML, Gygi SP, Aebersold R, Hieter P (2001) Identification of RFC(Ctf18p, Ctf8p, Dcc1p): an alternative RFC complex required for sister chromatid cohesion in S. cerevisiae. Mol Cell 7: 959-970.
44. Silverstein RA, Richardson W, Levin H, Allshire R, Ekwall K (2003) A new role for the transcriptional corepressor SIN3; regulation of centromeres. Curr Biol 13: 68-72.
45. Tatebayashi K, Kato J, Ikeda H (1998) Isolation of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad21ts mutant that is aberrant in chromosome segregation, microtubule function, DNA repair and sensitive to hydroxyurea: possible involvement of Rad21 in ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis. Genetics 148: 49-57.
46. Wang SW, Read RL, Norbury CJ (2002) Fission yeast Pds5 is required for accurate chromosome segregation and for survival after DNA damage or metaphase arrest. J Cell Sci 115: 587-598.
47. Williams DR, McIntosh JR (2002) mcl1+, the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of CTF4, is important for chromosome replication, cohesion, and segregation. Eukaryot Cell 1: 758-773.
48. Dalgaard JZ, Klar AJ (2000) swi1 and swi3 perform imprinting, pausing, and termination of DNA replication in S. pombe. Cell 102: 745-751.
49. Kaykov A, Holmes AM, Arcangioli B (2004) Formation, maintenance and consequences of the imprint at the mating-type locus in fission yeast. Embo J 23: 930-938.
50. Krings G, Bastia D (2004) swi1- and swi3-dependent and independent replication fork arrest at the ribosomal DNA of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101: 14085-14090.
51. Pryce DW, Ramayah S, Jaendling A, McFarlane RJ (2009) Recombination at DNA replication fork barriers is not universal and is differentially regulated by Swi1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 4770-4775.
52. Shimmoto M, Matsumoto S, Odagiri Y, Noguchi E, Russell P, et al. (2009) Interactions between Swi1-Swi3, Mrc1 and S phase kinase, Hsk1 may regulate cellular responses to stalled replication forks in fission yeast. Genes Cells 14: 669-682.
53. Warren CD, Eckley DM, Lee MS, Hanna JS, Hughes A, et al. (2004) S-phase checkpoint genes safeguard high-fidelity sister chromatid cohesion. Mol Biol Cell 15: 1724-1735.
54. Strom L, Karlsson C, Lindroos HB, Wedahl S, Katou Y, et al. (2007) Postreplicative formation of cohesion is required for repair and induced by a single DNA break. Science 317: 242-245.
55. Unal E, Heidinger-Pauli JM, Koshland D (2007) DNA double-strand breaks trigger genome-wide sister-chromatid cohesion through Eco1 (Ctf7). Science 317: 245-248.
56. Alfa C, Fantes P, Hyams J, McLeod M, Warbrick E (1993) Experiments with Fission Yeast. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Press.
57. Moreno S, Klar A, Nurse P (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Methods Enzymol 194: 795-823.
58. Noguchi E, Ansbach AB, Noguchi C, Russell P (2009) Assays used to study the DNA replication checkpoint in fission yeast. Methods Mol Biol 521: 493-507.
59. Woods A, Sherwin T, Sasse R, MacRae TH, Baines AJ, et al. (1989) Definition of individual components within the cytoskeleton of Trypanosoma brucei by a library of monoclonal antibodies. J Cell Sci 93(Pt 3): 491-500.
60. Keeney JB, Boeke JD (1994) Efficient targeted integration at leu1-32 and ura4-294 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 136: 849-856.
61. Du L-L, Nakamura T, Moser BA, Russell P (2003) Retention but not recruitment of Crb2 at double-strand breaks requires Rad1 and Rad3 complexes. Mol Cell Biol 23: 6150-6158.
62. Sato M, Dhut S, Toda T (2005) New drug-resistant cassettes for gene disruption and epitope tagging in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Yeast 22: 583-591.
63. Kunkel TA (1985) Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 82: 488-492.
64. al-Khodairy F, Fotou E, Sheldrick KS, Griffiths DJ, Lehmann AR, et al. (1994) Identification and characterization of new elements involved in checkpoint and feedback controls in fission yeast. Mol Biol Cell 5: 147-160.
65. Ichihara Y, Kurosawa Y (1993) Construction of new T vectors for direct cloning of PCR products. Gene 130: 153-154.
66. Noguchi C, Noguchi E (2007) Sap1 promotes the association of the replication fork protection complex with chromatin and is involved in the replication checkpoint in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Genetics 175: 553-566.