Interplay of replication checkpoints and repair proteins at stalled replication forks

DNA Repair

Volumn 6, Issue 7, 2007, Pages 994-1003

  Branzei, Dana ^a,b   Foiani, Marco ^a,b  

^a FIRC INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR ONCOLOGY   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Checkpoints; DNA repair and recombination; Replication forks

Indexed keywords

CHECKPOINT KINASE 2; DNA; DNA DIRECTED DNA POLYMERASE ETA; PROTEIN RAD1; RAD50 PROTEIN; RAD51 PROTEIN; RAD52 PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE PROGRESSION; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOMAL INSTABILITY; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPLICATION; DNA STRUCTURE; EUKARYOTIC CELL; GENETIC STABILITY; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ANIMALS; CELL CYCLE; CELL CYCLE PROTEINS; DNA DAMAGE; DNA REPAIR; DNA REPAIR ENZYMES; DNA REPLICATION; HUMANS;

EUKARYOTA; SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 34249946978     PISSN: 15687864     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.02.018     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Raveendranathan M., Chattopadhyay S., Bolon Y.T., Haworth J., Clarke D.J., and Bielinsky A.K. Genome-wide replication profiles of S-phase checkpoint mutants reveal fragile sites in yeast. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 3627-3639
2. Raghuraman M.K., Winzeler E.A., Collingwood D., Hunt S., Wodicka L., Conway A., Lockhart D.J., Davis R.W., Brewer B.J., and Fangman W.L. Replication dynamics of the yeast genome. Science 294 (2001) 115-121
3. Diffley J.F. Regulation of early events in chromosome replication. Curr. Biol. 14 (2004) R778-R786
4. Lucas I.A., and Raghuraman M.K. The dynamics of chromosome replication in yeast. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 55 (2003) 1-73
5. Diffley J.F., and Labib K. The chromosome replication cycle. J. Cell Sci. 115 (2002) 869-872
6. Donaldson A.D., and Blow J.J. The regulation of replication origin activation. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 9 (1999) 62-68
7. Donaldson A.D., Fangman W.L., and Brewer B.J. Cdc7 is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate replication origins. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 491-501
8. Huang D., and Koshland D. Chromosome integrity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the interplay of DNA replication initiation factors, elongation factors, and origins. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 1741-1754
9. Ide S., Watanabe K., Watanabe H., Shirahige K., Kobayashi T., and Maki H. Abnormality in initiation program of DNA replication is monitored by the highly repetitive rDNA array on chromosome XII in budding yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. (2006)
10. Waga S., and Stillman B. The DNA replication fork in eukaryotic cells. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67 (1998) 721-751
11. Baker T.A., and Bell S.P. Polymerases and the replisome: machines within machines. Cell 92 (1998) 295-305
12. Falaschi A. Eukaryotic DNA replication: a model for a fixed double replisome. Trends Genet. 16 (2000) 88-92
13. Kitamura E., Blow J.J., and Tanaka T.U. Live-cell imaging reveals replication of individual replicons in eukaryotic replication factories. Cell 125 (2006) 1297-1308
14. Meister P., Taddei A., and Gasser S.M. In and out of the replication factory. Cell 125 (2006) 1233-1235
15. Katou Y., Kanoh Y., Bando M., Noguchi H., Tanaka H., Ashikari T., Sugimoto K., and Shirahige K. S-phase checkpoint proteins Tof1 and Mrc1 form a stable replication-pausing complex. Nature 424 (2003) 1078-1083
16. Nedelcheva M.N., Roguev A., Dolapchiev L.B., Shevchenko A., Taskov H.B., Stewart A.F., and Stoynov S.S. Uncoupling of unwinding from DNA synthesis implies regulation of MCM helicase by Tof 1/Mrc1/Csm3 checkpoint complex. J. Mol. Biol. 347 (2005) 509-521
17. Alcasabas A.A., Osborn A.J., Bachant J., Hu F., Werler P.J., Bousset K., Furuya K., Diffley J.F., Carr A.M., and Elledge S.J. Mrc1 transduces signals of DNA replication stress to activate Rad53. Nat. Cell Biol. 3 (2001) 958-965
18. Lopes M., Foiani M., and Sogo J.M. Multiple mechanisms control chromosome integrity after replication fork uncoupling and restart at irreparable UV lesions. Mol. Cell 21 (2006) 15-27
19. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The DNA damage response during DNA replication. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 17 (2005) 568-575
20. Branzei D., and Foiani M. The Rad53 signal transduction pathway: Replication fork stabilization, DNA repair, and adaptation. Exp. Cell Res. 312 (2006) 2654-2659
21. Pellicioli A., and Foiani M. Signal transduction: how Rad53 kinase is activated. Curr. Biol. 15 (2005) R769-R771
22. Desany B.A., Alcasabas A.A., Bachant J.B., and Elledge S.J. Recovery from DNA replicational stress is the essential function of the S-phase checkpoint pathway. Genes Dev. 12 (1998) 2956-2970
23. Tercero J.A., Longhese M.P., and Diffley J.F. A central role for DNA replication forks in checkpoint activation and response. Mol. Cell 11 (2003) 1323-1336
24. Sogo J.M., Lopes M., and Foiani M. Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects. Science 297 (2002) 599-602
25. Lopes M., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., Newlon C.S., and Foiani M. The DNA replication checkpoint response stabilizes stalled replication forks. Nature 412 (2001) 557-561
26. Tercero J.A., and Diffley J.F. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint. Nature 412 (2001) 553-557
27. Cobb J.A., Bjergbaek L., Shimada K., Frei C., and Gasser S.M. DNA polymerase stabilization at stalled replication forks requires Mec1 and the RecQ helicase Sgs1. EMBO J. 22 (2003) 4325-4336
28. Lucca C., Vanoli F., Cotta-Ramusino C., Pellicioli A., Liberi G., Haber J., and Foiani M. Checkpoint-mediated control of replisome-fork association and signalling in response to replication pausing. Oncogene 23 (2004) 1206-1213
29. Feng W., Collingwood D., Boeck M.E., Fox L.A., Alvino G.M., Fangman W.L., Raghuraman M.K., and Brewer B.J. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat. Cell Biol. 8 (2006) 148-155
30. Cotta-Ramusino C., Fachinetti D., Lucca C., Doksani Y., Lopes M., Sogo J., and Foiani M. Exo1 processes stalled replication forks and counteracts fork reversal in checkpoint-defective cells. Mol. Cell 17 (2005) 153-159
31. Lemoine F.J., Degtyareva N.P., Lobachev K., and Petes T.D. Chromosomal translocations in yeast induced by low levels of DNA polymerase a model for chromosome fragile sites. Cell 120 (2005) 587-598
32. Admire A., Shanks L., Danzl N., Wang M., Weier U., Stevens W., Hunt E., and Weinert T. Cycles of chromosome instability are associated with a fragile site and are increased by defects in DNA replication and checkpoint controls in yeast. Genes Dev. 20 (2006) 159-173
33. Myung K., Datta A., and Kolodner R.D. Suppression of spontaneous chromosomal rearrangements by S phase checkpoint functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cell 104 (2001) 397-408
34. Cha R.S., and Kleckner N. ATR homolog Mec1 promotes fork progression, thus averting breaks in replication slow zones. Science 297 (2002) 602-606
35. Casper A.M., Nghiem P., Arlt M.F., and Glover T.W. ATR regulates fragile site stability. Cell 111 (2002) 779-789
36. Glover T.W. Common fragile sites. Cancer Lett. 232 (2006) 4-12
37. Santocanale C., and Diffley J.F. A Mec1- and Rad53-dependent checkpoint controls late-firing origins of DNA replication. Nature 395 (1998) 615-618
38. Shirahige K., Hori Y., Shiraishi K., Yamashita M., Takahashi K., Obuse C., Tsurimoto T., and Yoshikawa H. Regulation of DNA-replication origins during cell-cycle progression. Nature 395 (1998) 618-621
39. Dohrmann P.R., and Sclafani R.A. Novel role for checkpoint Rad53 protein kinase in the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 174 (2006) 87-99
40. Gunjan A., and Verreault A. A Rad53 kinase-dependent surveillance mechanism that regulates histone protein levels in S. cerevisiae. Cell 115 (2003) 537-549
41. Kai M., and Wang T.S. Checkpoint activation regulates mutagenic translesion synthesis. Genes Dev. 17 (2003) 64-76
42. Paulovich A.G., Armour C.D., and Hartwell L.H. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9, RAD17, RAD24 and MEC3 genes are required for tolerating irreparable, ultraviolet-induced DNA damage. Genetics 150 (1998) 75-93
43. Ira G., Pellicioli A., Balijja A., Wang X., Fiorani S., Carotenuto W., Liberi G., Bressan D., Wan L., Hollingsworth N.M., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. DNA end resection, homologous recombination and DNA damage checkpoint activation require CDK1. Nature 431 (2004) 1011-1017
44. Ogiwara H., Ui A., Onoda F., Tada S., Enomoto T., and Seki M. Dpb11, the budding yeast homolog of TopBP1, functions with the checkpoint clamp in recombination repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 34 (2006) 3389-3398
45. Paques F., and Haber J.E. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63 (1999) 349-404
46. McIlwraith M.J., Vaisman A., Liu Y., Fanning E., Woodgate R., and West S.C. Human DNA polymerase eta promotes DNA synthesis from strand invasion intermediates of homologous recombination. Mol. Cell 20 (2005) 783-792
47. Kawamoto T., Araki K., Sonoda E., Yamashita Y.M., Harada K., Kikuchi K., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Nozaki K., Hashimoto N., and Takeda S. Dual roles for DNA polymerase eta in homologous DNA recombination and translesion DNA synthesis. Mol. Cell 20 (2005) 793-799
48. Hirano Y., and Sugimoto K. ATR homolog Mec1 controls association of DNA polymerase zeta-Rev1 complex with regions near a double-strand break. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 586-590
49. Sabbioneda S., Minesinger B.K., Giannattasio M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., and Jinks-Robertson S. The 9-1-1 checkpoint clamp physically interacts with polzeta and is partially required for spontaneous polzeta-dependent mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 280 (2005) 38657-38665
50. Lisby M., Barlow J.H., Burgess R.C., and Rothstein R. Choreography of the DNA damage response: spatiotemporal relationships among checkpoint and repair proteins. Cell 118 (2004) 699-713
51. Bashkirov V.I., King J.S., Bashkirova E.V., Schmuckli-Maurer J., and Heyer W.D. DNA repair protein Rad55 is a terminal substrate of the DNA damage checkpoints. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 4393-4404
52. Boddy M.N., Lopez-Girona A., Shanahan P., Interthal H., Heyer W.-D., and Russell P. Damage tolerance protein Mus81 associates with the FHA1 domain of checkpoint kinase Cds1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20 (2000) 8758-8766
53. Brush G.S., and Kelly T.J. Phosphorylation of the replication protein A large subunit in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae checkpoint response. Nucleic Acids Res. 28 (2000) 3725-3732
54. D'Amours D., and Jackson S.P. The yeast Xrs2 complex functions in S phase checkpoint regulation. Genes Dev. 15 (2001) 2238-2249
55. Liberi G., Chiolo I., Pellicioli A., Lopes M., Plevani P., Muzi-Falconi M., and Foiani M. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 5027-5038
56. Usui T., Ogawa H., and Petrini J.H.J. A DNA damage response pathway controlled by Tel1 and the Mre11 complex. Mol. Cell 7 (2001) 1255-1266
57. Yuan Z.M., Huang Y., Ishiko T., Nakada S., Utsugisawa T., Kharbanda S., Wang R., Sung P., Shinohara A., Weichselbaum R., and Kufe D. Regulation of Rad51 function by c-Abl in response to DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem. 273 (1998) 3799-3802
58. Flott S., and Rouse J. Slx4 becomes phosphorylated after DNA damage in a Mec1 /Tel1-dependent manner and is required for repair of DNA alkylation damage. Biochem. J. 391 (2005) 325-333
59. Roberts T.M., Kobor M.S., Bastin-Shanower S.A., Ii M., Horte S.A., Gin J.W., Emili A., Rine J., Brill S.J., and Brown G.W. Slx4 regulates DNA damage checkpoint-dependent phosphorylation of the BRCT domain protein Rtt107/Esc4. Mol. Biol. Cell 17 (2006) 539-548
60. Kai M., Boddy M.N., Russell P., and Wang T.S. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates Mus81 to preserve genome integrity during replication stress. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 919-932
61. Boddy M.N., Shanahan P., McDonald W.H., Lopez-Girona A., Noguchi E., Yates I.J., and Russell P. Replication checkpoint kinase Cds1 regulates recombinational repair protein Rad60. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23 (2003) 5939-5946
62. Krejci L., Van Komen S., Li Y., Villemain J., Reddy M.S., Klein H., Ellenberger T., and Sung P. DNA helicase Srs2 disrupts the Rad51 presynaptic filament. Nature 423 (2003) 305-309
63. Veaute X., Jeusset J., Soustelle C., Kowalczykowski S.C., Le Cam E., and Fabre F. The Srs2 helicase prevents recombination by disrupting Rad51 nucleoprotein filaments. Nature 423 (2003) 309-312
64. Papouli E., Chen S., Davies A.A., Huttner D., Krejci L., Sung P., and Ulrich H.D. Crosstalk between SUMO and Ubiquitin on PCNA Is Mediated by Recruitment of the Helicase Srs2p. Mol. Cell 19 (2005) 123-133
65. Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Sacher M., Hoege C., and Jentsch S. SUMO-modified PCNA recruits Srs2 to prevent recombination during S phase. Nature (2005)
66. Bailly V., Lamb J., Sung P., Prakash S., and Prakash L. Specific complex formation between yeast RAD6 and RAD 18 proteins: a potential mechanism for targeting RAD6 ubiquitin-conjugating activity to DNA damage sites. Genes Dev. 8 (1994) 811-820
67. Hofmann R.M., and Pickart C.M. Noncanonical MMS2-encoded ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme functions in assembly of novel polyubiquitin chains for DNA repair. Cell 96 (1999) 645-653
68. Ulrich H.D., and Jentsch S. Two RING finger proteins mediate cooperation between ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in DNA repair. EMBO J. 19 (2000) 3388-3397
69. Spence J., Sadis S., Haas A.L., and Finley D. A ubiquitin mutant with specific defects in DNA repair and multiubiquitination. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15 (1995) 1265-1273
70. Hoege C., Pfander B., Moldovan G.L., Pyrowolakis G., and Jentsch S. RAD6-dependent DNA repair is linked to modification of PCNA by ubiquitin and SUMO. Nature 419 (2002) 135-141
71. Stelter P., and Ulrich H.D. Control of spontaneous and damage-induced mutagenesis by SUMO and ubiquitin conjugation. Nature 425 (2003) 188-191
72. Branzei D., Seki M., and Enomoto T. Rad18/Rad5/Mms2-mediated polyubiquitination of PCNA is implicated in replication completion during replication stress. Genes Cells 9 (2004) 1031-1042
73. Xiao W., Chow B.L., Broomfield S., and Hanna M. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD6 group is composed of an error-prone and two error-free postreplication repair pathways. Genetics 155 (2000) 1633-1641
74. Gangavarapu V., Haracska L., Unk I., Johnson R.E., Prakash S., and Prakash L. Mms2-Ubc13-dependent and -independent roles of Rad5 ubiquitin ligase in postreplication repair and translesion DNA synthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 7783-7790
75. Pessoa-Brandao L., and Sclafani R.A. CDC7/DBF4 functions in the translesion synthesis branch of the RAD6 epistasis group in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 167 (2004) 1597-1610
76. Prakash L. Characterization of postreplication repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and effects of rad6, rad18, rev3 and rad52 mutations. Mol. Gen. Genet. 184 (1981) 471-478
77. Torres-Ramos C.A., Prakash S., and Prakash L. Requirement of RAD5 and MMS2 for postreplication repair of UV-damaged DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22 (2002) 2419-2426
78. Zhang H., and Lawrence C.W. The error-free component of the RAD6/RAD18 DNA damage tolerance pathway of budding yeast employs sister-strand recombination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102 (2005) 15954-15959
79. Motegi A., Kuntz K., Majeed A., Smith S., and Myung K. Regulation of gross chromosomal rearrangements by ubiquitin and SUMO ligases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26 (2006) 1424-1433
80. Rong L., Palladino F., Aguilera A., and Klein H.L. The hyper-gene conversion hpr5-1 mutation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is an allele of the SRS2/RADH gene. Genetics 127 (1991) 75-85
81. Aboussekhra A., Chanet R., Adjiri A., and Fabre F. Semidominant suppressors of Srs2 helicase mutations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae map in the RAD51 gene, whose sequence predicts a protein with similarities to procaryotic RecA proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12 (1992) 3224-3234
82. Liberi G., Maffioletti G., Lucca C., Chiolo I., Baryshnikova A., Cotta-Ramusino C., Lopes M., Pellicioli A., Haber J.E., and Foiani M. Rad51-dependent DNA structures accumulate at damaged replication forks in sgs1 mutants defective in the yeast ortholog of BLM RecQ helicase. Genes Dev. 19 (2005) 339-350
83. Branzei D., Sollier J., Liberi G., Zhao X., Maeda D., Seki M., Enomoto T., Ohta K., and Foiani M. Ubc9- and Mms21-mediated sumoylation counteracts recombinogenic events at damaged replication forks. Cell 127 (2006) 509-522
84. Robert T., Dervins D., Fabre F., and Gangloff S. Mrc1 and Srs2 are major actors in the regulation of spontaneous crossover. EMBO J. 25 (2006) 2837-2846
85. Ira G., Malkova A., Liberi G., Foiani M., and Haber J.E. Srs2 and Sgs1-Top3 suppress crossovers during double-strand break repair in yeast. Cell 115 (2003) 401-411
86. Wang J.C. DNA topoisomerases: why so many?. J. Biol. Chem. 266 (1991) 6659-6662
87. Mankouri H.W., and Hickson I.D. Top3 processes recombination intermediates and modulates checkpoint activity after DNA damage. Mol. Biol. Cell 17 (2006) 4473-4483
88. Wu L., and Hickson I.D. The Bloomz's syndrome helicase suppresses crossing over during homologous recombination. Nature 426 (2003) 870-874
89. Gangloff S., McDonald J.P., Bendixen C., Arthur L., and Rothstein R. The yeast type I topoisomerase Top3 interacts with Sgs1, a DNA helicase homolog: a potential eukaryotic reverse gyrase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 14 (1994) 8391-8398