Law and cognitive neuroscience

Annual Review of Law and Social Science

Volumn 6, Issue , 2010, Pages 61-92

  Goodenough, Oliver R ^a,b,c   Tucker, Micaela ^d  

^a VERMONT LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Gruter Institute for Law and Behavioral Research   (United States)

^d Office of the Attorney General of Vermont   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Criminal law; fMRI; Neurolaw; Psychology; Responsibility

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049429736     PISSN: 15503585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131523     Document Type: Article

References (299)

1. Aamodt S, Wang S. 2008. Welcome to Your Brain: Why You Lose Your Car Keys but Never Forget How to Drive and Other Puzzles of Everyday Life. New York: Bloomsbury
2. Abe N. 2009. The neurobiology of deception: Evidence from neuroimaging and loss-of-function studies. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 22(6): 594-600
3. Aharoni E, Funk C, Sinnott-Armstrong W, Gazzaniga M. 2008. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1124: 145-160
4. Anderson AK, Phelps EA. 2001. Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 411: 305-309
5. Anderson SW, Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. 1999. Impairment of social andmoral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 2: 1032-1037
6. Aronson JD. 2010. The law's use of brain evidence. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. In press
7. Baars BJ, Gage NM, eds. 2007. Cognition, Brain, and Consciousness: Introduction to Cognition Neuroscience. Burlington, MA: Academic
8. Baird AA. 2009a. The developmental neuroscience of criminal behavior. See Farahany 2009a, pp. 81-121
9. Baird AA. 2009b. Adolescent moral reasoning: The integration of emotion and cognition. In Moral Psychology, Vol.3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, ed. W Sinnott-Armstrong, pp. 323-342 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
10. Baird AA, Fugelsang JA. 2004. The emergence of consequentialist thought: Evidence from neuroscience. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1797-1804
11. Bandes SA. 1999. The Passions of Law. New York: N. Y. Univ. Press
12. Bandes SA. 2007. The heart has its reasons: Examining the strange persistence of the American death penalty. In Studies in Law, Politics and Society Special Issue: "Is the Death Penalty Dying?" ed. A Sarat, 42: 21-52. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group
13. Baron-Cohen S, Tager-Flusberg H, Cohen DJ. 1993. Understanding Other Minds.Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
14. Barrie A. 2008. Homeland security detects terrorist threats by reading your mind. Fox News, Sept. 23. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0, 2933, 426485, 00.html
15. Barros B. 2010. Human behavior, evolution, and the law: The case of the biology of possession.Work. Pap., Widener Univ. Sch. Law. Feb. 25. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1559390
16. Batts S. 2009. Brain lesions and their implications in criminal responsibility. Behav. Sci. Law 27(2): 261-272
17. Belcher A, Sinnott-Armstrong W. 2010. Neurolaw. Wiley Interdiscipl. Rev. 1: 18-22
18. Bentham J. 1830. The Rationale of Punishment, ed. JT McHugh. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books
19. Bilski v. Kappos, No.08-964 (S. Ct. June 28, 2010) (Kennedy J). Citations are to the slip opinion, available at http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/ 09pdf/08-964.pdf
20. Blumoff TY. 2010. The neuropsychology of justifications and excuses: Some cases from self-defense, duress, and provocation. Jurimetrics. In press
21. Bonnie RJ. 2005. Judicially mandated treatment with naltrexone by opiate-addicted criminal offenders. Va. J. Soc. Policy Law 13: 64-88
22. Bonnie RJ. 2006. Judicially mandated naltrexone use by criminal offenders: A legal analysis. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 31(2): 121-127
23. Bonnie RJ, Monahan J. 2005. From coercion to contract: Reframing the debate on mandated community treatment for people with mental disorders. Law Hum. Behav. 29(4): 485-503
24. Boudreau C. 2009. Cues in the courtroom: When do they improve juror's decisions? In Law, Mind, and Brain, ed. M Freeman, OR Goodenough, pp. 373-390 Farnham, UK: Ashgate
25. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S, Richerson PJ. 2003. The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100: 3531-3535
26. Brown GG, Eyler LT. 2006. Methodological and conceptual issues in functional magnetic resonance imaging: Applications to schizophrenia research. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2: 51-81
27. Brown TR, Murphy ER. 2010. Through a scanner darkly-functional neuroimaging as evidence of a criminal defendant's past mental states. Stanford Law Rev. 62: 1119-1208
28. Buckholtz JW, Asplund CL, Dux PE, Zald DH, Gore JC, et al. 2008. The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron 60(5): 930-935
29. Burns JM, Swerdlow RH. 2003. Right orbitofrontal tumorwith pedophilia symptom and constructional apraxia sign. Arch. Neurol. 60: 437-440
30. Callaway E. 2009. Brain scanners can tell what you're thinking about. New Sci., Issue 2732, Oct. 28
31. Camerer CF. 2003. Behavioral studies of strategic thinking in games. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7: 225-231
32. Canli T, Amin Z. 2002. Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: Scientific evidence and ethical considerations. Brain Cogn. 50: 414-431
33. Canli T, Brandon S, Casebeer W, Crowley PJ, DuRousseau D, et al. 2007. Neuroethics and national security. Am. J. Bioeth. Neurosci. 7(5): 3-13
34. Cantor JM, Kabani N, Christensen BK, Zipursky RB, Barbaree HE, et al. 2008. Cerebral white matter deficiencies in pedophilic men. J. Psychiatr. Res. 42(3): 167-183
35. Carter R. 1998. Mapping the Mind. London: Weindenfeld & Nicholson
36. Casebeer WD. 2003. Moral cognition and its neural constituents. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 4(10): 840-846
37. Charland LC. 2007. Affective neuroscience and addiction. Am. J. Bioeth. 7(1): 8-11
38. Claydon L. 2009. Mind the gap: Problems of mind, body and brain in the criminal law. See Freeman & Goodenough 2009, pp. 55-80
39. Coleman DL, Coleman JE Jr. 2008. The problem of doping. Duke Law J. 57: 1743-1794
40. Coricelli G, McCabe K, Smith V. 2000. Theory-of-mind mechanism in personal exchange. In Affective Minds, ed. G Hatano, N Okada, H Tanabe, pp. 249-259 Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci.
41. Counc. State Gov. Justice Cent. 2008. Mental Health Courts: A Primer for Policymakers and Practitioners. Washington, DC: Bur. Justice Assist. http://consensusproject.org/mhcp/mhc-primer.pdf
42. Cunningham WA, Johnson MK, Raye CL, Gatenby JC, Gore JC, Banaji MR. 2004. Separable neural components in the processing of Black andWhite faces. Psychol. Sci. 15: 806-813
43. Cushman F. 2008. Crime and punishment: Distinguishing the roles of causal and intentional analyses in moral judgment. Cognition 108(2): 353-380
44. Cushman F, Young L, Hauser M. 2006. The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychol. Sci. 17(12): 1082-1089
45. Damasio AR. 1994. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam
46. Damasio H, Grabowski T, Frank R, Galaburda AM, Damasio AR. 1994. The return of Phineas Gage: Clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science 264: 1102-1105
47. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
48. Delgado MR, Frank RH, Phelps EA. 2005. Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust game. Nat. Neurosci. 8: 1611-1618
49. DelgadoMR, Schotter A, Ozbay EY, Phelps EA. 2008. Understanding overbidding: Using the neural circuitry of reward to design economic auctions. Science 321: 1849-1852
50. de Waal F. 1996. Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
51. de Waal F. 2000. Chimpanzee Politics. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. Rev. ed.
52. Dolan RJ. 2002. Emotion, cognition, and behavior. Science 298: 1191-1194
53. Dreber A, Rand D, Fudenberg D, Nowak MA. 2008. Winners don't punish. Nature 452: 348-351
54. Dumit J. 2004. Picturing Personhood: Brain Scans and Biomedical Identity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
55. Eagleman DM, Correro MA, Singh J. 2010. Why neuroscience matters for rational drug policy. Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 11: 7
56. Eastman N, Campbell C. 2006. Neuroscience and legal determination of criminal responsibility. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 7: 311-318
57. Easton S. 2008. Attacking Adverse Experts. Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
58. Edmundson E Jr, McCarty D. 2006. Implementing Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Alcohol and Drug Disorders. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Med. Press
59. Elliott ED. 1985. The evolutionary tradition in jurisprudence. Columbia Law Rev. 85: 38-94
60. Erickson CK. 2007. The Science of Addiction: From Neurobiology to Treatment. New York: W.W. Norton
61. Erickson SK, Campbell JD, Lamberti JS. 2006. Variations in mental health courts: Challenges, opportunities, and a call for caution. Commun. Ment. Health J. 42: 335-344
62. Faigman D, Kaye DH, Saks MJ, Sanders J, eds. 2009. Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony, Vols. 1-5, 2009-2010. St. Paul, MN: West/Thomson
63. Farah MJ. 2004. Neuroethics: The practical and the philosophical. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9(1): 34-40
64. Farah MJ. 2007. Social, legal, and ethical implications of cognitive neuroscience: "neuroethics" for short. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19(3): 363-364
65. Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan R, GardnerH, Kandel E, et al. 2004. Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 5: 421-425
66. Farahany NA, ed. 2009a. The Impact of Behavioral Sciences on Criminal Law. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
67. Farahany NA. 2009b. Law and behavioral morality. Vanderbilt Public Law Res. Pap. No.09-03. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1336268
68. Farahany NA, Coleman J. 2006. Genetics and responsibility: To know the criminal from the crime. Law Contemp. Probl. 69: 115-164
69. Farahany NA, Coleman JE. 2009. Genetics, neuroscience, and criminal responsibility. See Farahany 2009a, pp. 183-240
70. Fehr E, Camerer CF. 2007. Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends Cogn. Sci. 11(10): 419-426
71. Fehr E, Fischbacher U. 2004. Third party punishment and social norms. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25: 63-87
72. Fehr E, Fischbacher U, Kosfeld M. 2005. Neuroeconomic foundations of trust and social preferences: Initial evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 95(2): 346-351
73. Fehr E, Gächter S. 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415: 137-140
74. Feigenson N. 2006. Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: On the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI. Int. J. Law Context 2: 233-255
75. Feigenson N. 2009. Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: On the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI. See Freeman & Goodenough 2009, pp. 23-54
76. Fine C. 2008. Will working mothers' brains explode? The popular new genre of neurosexism. Neuroethics 1: 69-72
77. Finn DP. 2006. Brain imaging and privacy: How recent advances in neuroimaging implicate privacy concerns. Bepress Legal Ser.Work. Pap. 1752, Sept. 13. http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1752
78. Foley LA. 1993. A Psychological View of the Legal System. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark
79. Frackowiak RS, Friston KJ, Frith CD, Dolan RJ, Price CJ, et al. 2004. Human Brain Function. San Diego: Academic. 2nd ed.
80. Frank J. 1930. Law and the Modern Mind. New York: Brentano's
81. Frank RH. 1988. Passions within Reason. New York: W.W. Norton
82. Frank RH. 2001. Cooperation through emotional commitment. In Evolution and the Capacity for Commitment, ed. RM Nesse, pp. 57-76. New York: Russell Sage Found.
83. Frank RH. 2008. The status of moral emotions in consequentialist moral reasoning. See Zak 2008, pp. 42-62
84. Frank T. 2008. Anxiety detecting machines could spot terrorists. USA Today, Sept. 18
85. Freeman M. 2006. Introduction: Law and neuroscience. Int. J. Law Context 2: 217-219
86. Freeman M, Goodenough O, eds. 2009. Law, Mind and Brain. Burlington, VT: Ashgate
87. Frolik LA. 1998. Report: 7th Annual Teaching Seminar: Neurobiology, Human Behavior, and Law. Gruter Inst. Law Behav. Res. Newsl. 11(2): 1-3
88. Frye v. United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. Cir., 1923)
89. Gao Y, Glenn AL, Schug RA, Yang Y, Raine A. 2009. Neurobiology of psychopathy: A neurodevelopmental perspective. Can. J. Psychiatry 54(12): 813-23
90. Garland B, ed. 2004. Neuroscience and the Law: Brain, Mind and the Scales of Justice. New York: Dana
91. Garland B, Frankel MS. 2009. Considering convergence: A policy dialogue about behavioral genetics, neuroscience, and law. See Farahany 2009a, pp. 147-160
92. Garland B, Glimcher PW. 2006. Cognitive neuroscience and the law. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 16: 130-134
93. Gazzaniga MS, Ivry RB, Mangum GR. 2008. Cognitive Neuroscience. New York: W.W. Norton. 3rd ed.
94. Giridharadas A. 2008. India's novel use of brain scans in courts is debated. NY Times, Sept. 15, p. A10
95. Glannon W. 2007a. Bioethics and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
96. GlannonW, ed. 2007b. Defining Right and Wrong in Brain Science: Essential Readings in Neuroethics. New York: Dana
97. Glannon W. 2009. Our brains are not us. Bioethics 23(6): 321-329
98. Glimcher PW. 2003. Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
99. Goodenough OR. 2001. Mapping cortical areas associated with legal reasoning and with moral intuition. Jurimetrics 41: 429-442
100. Goodenough OR. 2004. Responsibility and punishment: Whose mind? A response. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1805-1809
101. Goodenough OR. 2006. Can cognitive neuroscience make psychology a foundational discipline for the study of law? In Law and Psychology, Current Legal Issues, ed. B Brooks-Gordon, M Freeman, 9: 77-92. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
102. Goodenough OR. 2008. Values, mechanism design, and fairness. See Zak 2008, pp. 228-255
103. Goodenough OR. 2009. Institutions, emotions, and law: A Goldilocks problem formechanism design. Vt. Law Rev. 33(3): 395-404
104. Goodenough OR, Decker G. 2009. Why do good people steal intellectual property? See Freeman & Goodenough 2009, pp. 345-372
105. Goodenough OR, Prehn K. 2004. A neuroscientific approach to normative judgment in law and justice. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1709-1726
106. Gov. State Highw. Assoc. 2010. Curbing Distracted Driving: 2010 Survey of State Safety Programs. Washington, DC: GHSA http://www.ghsa.org/html/ publications/survey/pdf/2010-distraction. pdf
107. Grafman J, Schwab K, Warden D, Pridgen A, Brown HR, Salazar AM. 1996. Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: A report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study. Neurology 46: 1231-1238
108. Grafton ST, Sinnott-Armstrong WP, Gazzaniga SI, GazzanigaMS. 2006. Brain scans go legal. Sci. Am.Mind 17: 30-37
109. Graham v. Florida, 560 U.S.-(2010), slip opinion No. 08-7412
110. Greely HT. 2004. Neuroethics: The Neuroscience Revolution, Ethics and the Law. 2004 Regan Lect., Markkula Cent. Appl. Ethics, Santa Clara Univ. http://www.scu.edu/ethics/publications/ submitted/greely/neuroscience-ethics- law.html
111. Greely HT. 2005a. Frontier issues: Neuroscience. Presented at Where Are Law, Ethics & the Life Sciences Headed? Frontier Issues, Univ. Minn. Law Sch., May 20
112. Greely HT. 2005b. Premarket approval regulation for lie-detections: An idea whose time may be coming. Am. J. Bioeth. 5: 50-52
113. Greely HT. 2005c. Regulating human biological enhancements: Questionable justifications and international complications. Univ. Technol. Sydney, Law Rev. 7: 87-110/ Santa Clara J. Int. Law 4: 87-110
114. Greely HT. 2007a. Knowing sin: Making sure good science doesn't go bad. In Cerebrum 2007: Emerging Ideas in Brain Science, ed. CA Read, pp. 1-8. New York: Dana
115. Greely HT. 2007b. Law and neuroscience. In Encyclopedia of Law and Society, ed. DS Clark, pp. 1062-1064 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
116. Greely HT. 2007c. On neuroethics. Science 318: 533
117. Greely HT. 2008. Neuroscience and criminal justice: Not responsibility but treatment. Univ. Kansas Law Rev. 56: 1103-1138
118. Greely HT. 2009. Law and the revolution in neuroscience: An early look at the field. Akron Law Rev. 42: 687-715
119. Greely HT, Cho MK, Hogle LF, Satz DM. 2007. Thinking about the human neuron mouse. Am. J. Bioeth.: Neurosci. 7(5): 27-40
120. Greely HT, Illes J. 2007. Neuroscience-based lie detection: The urgent need for regulation. Am. J. Law Med. 33(2-3): 377-431
121. Greely H, Sahakian B, Harris J, Kessler R, Gazzaniga M, et al. 2008. Towards responsible use of cognitiveenhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456: 702-705
122. Greene JD. 2008. The secret joke of Kant's soul. In Moral Psychology, Vol.3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, ed. W Sinnott-Armstrong, pp. 35-79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
123. Greene J, Cohen J. 2004. For the law, neuroscience changes nothing and everything. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1775-1785
124. Greene JD, Paxton JM. 2009. Patterns of neural activity associated with honest and dishonest moral decisions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 12506-12511
125. Gruter M. 1991. Law and the Mind. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
126. Hall W, Carter L, Morley KI. 2004. Neuroscience research on the addictions: A prospectus for future ethical and policy analysis. Addict. Behav. 29: 1481-1495
127. Halleck SL. 1986. Responsibility and excuse in medicine and law: A utilitarian perspective. Law Contemp. Probl. 49: 127-146
128. Harlow J. 1848. Passage of an iron bar through the head. Boston Med. Surg. J. 13: 389-93
129. Harrington v. State of Iowa, 659 N.W.2d 509 (2003)
130. Hart AJ, Whalen PJ, Shin LM, McInereney SC, Fischer H, Rauch SL. 2000. Differential response of human amygdala to racial outgroup vs ingroup face stimuli. NeuroReport 11: 2351-2355
131. Herrmann B, Thoni C, Gächter S. 2008. Antisocial punishment across societies. Science 319: 1362-1367
132. Hodgson D. 2000. Guilty mind or guilty brain? Criminal responsibility in the age of neuroscience. Aust. Law J. 74: 661-680
133. Holland NN. 2000. Themind and the book: A long look at psychoanalytic literary criticism. J. Appl. Psychoanal. Stud. 2(1): 13-23
134. Horowitz IA, Willging TE. 1984. The Psychology of Law: Integrations and Applications. Boston: Little, Brown
135. Hughes V. 2010. Head case. Nature 464: 340-342
136. Hyman SE. 2006. Improving our brains? BioSocieties 1: 103-111
137. Hyman SE. 2007a. The neurobiology of addiction: Implications for the voluntary control of behavior. Am. J. Bioeth. 7(1): 8-11
138. Hyman SE. 2007b. Neuroethics: At age 5, field continues to evolve. In The 2007 Progress Report on Brain Research, ed. Dana Alliance Brain Initiat., pp. 6-9. New York: Dana. http://www.dana.org/news/ publications/detail.aspx?id=5850
139. Hyman SE, Malenka RC, Nestler EJ. 2006. Neural mechanisms of addiction: The role of reward-related learning and memory. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29: 565-598
140. Illes J, ed. 2006. Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
141. In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943, 88 U.S.P.Q.2d 1385 (Fed. Cir. 2008)
142. Jacobs D, Jackson AL. 2010. On the politics of imprisonments: A review of systemic findings. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. In press
143. Jones OD, Kurzban R. 2007. The origins of shared intuitions of justice. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 60: 1633-1688
144. Jones OD, Kurzban R. 2010. Intuitions of punishment. Chicago Law Rev. In press
145. JonesOD, Buckholtz JW, Schall JD, Marois R. 2009. Brain imaging for legal thinkers: A guide for the perplexed. Stanford Technol. Law Rev. 5: 1-48
146. Judd T, Capetillo D, Carrion-Baralt J, Marmol LM, San Miguel-Montes L, et al. 2009. Professional considerations for improving the neuropsychological evaluation of Hispanics: A National Academy of Neuropsychology education paper. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 24(2): 127-135
147. Kapardis A. 2003. Psychology and Law: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press. 2nd ed.
148. Kaplan J. 2009. Misinformation, misrepresentation, and misuse of human behavioral genetics research. See Farahany 2009a, pp. 45-80
149. Kenny A. 1978. Freewill and Responsibility. London: Routledge
150. Kiehl KA. 2008. Without morals: The cognitive neuroscience of criminal psychopaths. In Moral Psychology, Vol.3: The Neuroscience of Morality: Emotion, Brain Disorders, and Development, ed. W Sinnott-Armstrong, pp. 119-149 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
151. Kiehl KA, Bates AT, Laurens KR, Liddle PF. 2006. Psychopathy and semantic processing: An examination of the N400. Personal. Individ. Differ. 40: 293-304
152. Kiehl KA, Smith AM, Mendrek A, Forster BB, Hare RD, Liddle PF. 2004. Temporal lobe abnormalities in semantic processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Psychiatry Res.: Neuroimaging 130: 27-42
153. Kimbrough EO, Smith VL, Wilson BJ. 2008. Building a market: From personal to impersonal exchange free enterprise. See Zak 2008, pp. 280-299
154. Klaming L, Vedder A. 2009. Brushing up our memories: Can we use neurotechnologies to improve eyewitness memory? Law Innov. Technol. 1(2): 203-221
155. Knoch D, Gianotti LRR, Baumgartner T, Fehr E. 2010. A neural marker of costly punishment behavior. Psychol. Sci. 21: 337-342
156. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D. 2001. Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. J. Neurosci. 21: RC159
157. Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D. 2000. FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. NeuroImage 12: 20-27
158. Kolber AJ. 2006. Therapeutic forgetting: The legal and ethical implications of memory dampening. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 59: 1561-1626
159. Kolber AJ. 2007. Pain detection and the privacy of subjective experience. Am. J. Law Med. 33: 433-456
160. Kolber AJ. 2009a. The comparative nature of punishment. Boston Univ. Law Rev. 89: 1565-1608
161. Kolber AJ. 2009b. The subjective experience of punishment. Columbia Law Rev. 109(1): 182-236
162. Kolber AJ. 2010. The experiential future of the law. Emory Law J. In press
163. Kozel FA, Johnson KA, Mu Q, Grenesko EL, Laken SJ, George MS. 2005. Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biol. Psychiatry 58(8): 605-613
164. Kuhnen CM, Knutson B. 2005. The neural basis of financial risk taking. Neuron 47: 763-770
165. Lamberti JS. 2007. Understanding and preventing criminal recidivism among adults with psychotic disorders. Psychiatr. Serv. 58(6): 773-781
166. Langleben DD. 2008. Detection of deception with fMRI: Are we there yet? Leg. Criminol. Psychol. 13: 1-9
167. Lee AJ. 2005. Unconscious bias theory in employment discrimination litigation. Harvard Civ. Rights-Civ. Liberties Law Rev. 40: 481-503
168. Leeman RF, Grant JE, Potenza MN. 2009. Behavioral and neurological foundations for the moral and legal implications of intoxication, addictive behaviors and disinhibition. Behav. Sci. Law 27: 119-296
169. Leggett H. 2009. The next hacking frontier: Your brain? Wired News, Jul. 9
170. Lempinen EW.2004.AAASand the Dana Foundation join on "Neuroscience and theLaw: Brain, Mind and the Scales of Justice."AAAS News Arch. Oct. 5. http://www.aaas.org/news/releases/2004/1005dana.shtml
171. Levy N. 2007. Neuroethics: Challenges for the 21st Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
172. Lewis DW. 1998. Guilty by Reason of Insanity: A Psychiatrist Explores the Minds of Killers. New York: Fawcett
173. Libet B. 2000. Do we have free will? In The Volitional Brain: Towards a Neuroscience of Free Will, ed. B Libet, A Freeman, K Sutherland, pp. 47-58. Exeter, UK: Imprint Acad.
174. Liptak A. 2008. U.S. prison population dwarfs that of other nations. NY Times, April 23. http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/23/world/americas/23iht- 23prison.12253738.html
175. Liptak A. 2009. Defining 'cruel and unusual' when offender is 13. NY Times, Feb. 2, p. A12
176. Madrigal A. 2010a. Brain scan lie-detection deemed far from ready for courtroom. Wired, June 1. http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/06/fmri-lie- detection-in-court
177. Madrigal A. 2010b. Brain scan evidence rejected by Brooklyn court. Wired, May 5. http://www.wired.com/ wiredscience/2010/05/fmri-in-court-update
178. Manson NC, O'Neill O. 2007. Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
179. Maroney TA. 2006. Law and emotion: A proposed taxonomy of an emerging field. Law Hum. Behav. 30: 119-142
180. Maroney TA. 2009. Emotional common sense as constitutional law. Vanderbilt Law Rev. 62: 851-917
181. Merikangas JR. 2008. Commentary: Functional MRI lie detection. J. Am. Acad. Psychiatry Law 36: 499-501
182. McCabe DP, Castel AD. 2008. Seeing is believing: The effect of brain images on judgments of scientific reasoning. Cognition 107: 343-352
183. McCabe K, Chorvat T, Smith V. 2005a. Law and neuro-economics. Supreme Court Econ. Rev. 13: 35-62
184. McCabe K, Chorvat T, Smith V. 2005b. Lessons from neuroeconomics for the law. In The Law and Economics of Irrational Behavior, ed. F Parisi, V Smith, pp. 68-94. Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
185. Mehlman MJ, Berg JW. 2008. Human subjects protections in biomedical enhancement research: Assessing risk and benefit and obtaining informed consent. J. Law Med. Ethics 36(3): 546-549
186. Miller G. 2009. fMRI evidence used in murder sentencing. ScienceInsider, Nov. 23
187. Miller WR, Sorenson JL, Selzer JA, Brigham GS. 2006. Disseminating evidence-based practices in substance abuse treatment: A review with suggestions. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 31: 25-39
188. Miyamoto S, LaMantia AS, Duncan GE, Sullivan P, Gilmore JH, Lieberman JA. 2003. Recent advances in the neurobiology of schizophrenia. Mol. Interv. 3: 27-39
189. Mobbs D, Lau HC, Jones OD, Frith CD. 2007. Law, responsibility, and the brain. PLoS Biol. 5(4): 693-700
190. Monti MM, ColemanMR, Owen AM. 2009. Neuroimaging and the vegetative state: Resolving the behavioral assessment dilemma. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1157: 81-89
191. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR, Boly M, Pickard JD, et al. 2010. Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. New Engl. J. Med. 362(7): 579-589
192. Moreno JA. 2009. The future of neuroimaged lie detection and the law. Akron Law Rev. 42: 717-734
193. Moreno JD. 2006. Mind Wars: Brain Research and National Defense. Washington, DC: Dana
194. Morris J, Dolan R. 2004. Functional neuroanatomy of human emotion. In Human Brain Function, ed. RSJ Frackowiak, KJ Friston, CD Frith, RJ Dolan, CJ Price, et al., pp. 365-396 San Diego: Academic. 2nd ed.
195. Morse SJ. 2004a. New neuroscience, old problems: Legal implications of brain science. Cerebrum 6(4): 81-90
196. Morse SJ. 2004b. Reason, results and criminal responsibility. Ill. Law Rev. 2004: 363
197. Morse SJ. 2006a. Addiction, genetics, and criminal responsibility. Law Contemp. Probl. 69: 165-207
198. Morse SJ. 2006b. Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: A diagnostic note. Ohio State J. Crim. Law 3: 397-412
199. Morse SJ. 2006c. Moral and legal responsibility and the new neuroscience. In Neuroethics in the 21st Century: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice and Policy, ed. J Eles, pp. 33-50. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
200. Morse SJ. 2007. Voluntary control of behavior and responsibility. Am. J. Bioeth. 7(1): 12-13
201. Morse SJ. 2008. Determinism and the death of folk psychology: Two challenges to responsibility from neuroscience. Minn. J. Law Sci. Technol. 9: 1-36
202. Morse SJ. 2009. Addiction, science and criminal responsibility. See Farahany 2009a, pp. 241-288
203. Myers JE. 2010. The moment of truth for fMRI: Will deception detection pass admissibility hurdles in Oklahoma? Okla. J. Law Technol. 6: 47
204. Nadel L, Sinnott-Armstrong WS. 2010. Conscious Will and Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press. In press
205. Nalbantian S. 2003. Memory in Literature: From Rousseau to Neuroscience. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
206. Narayan A. 2009. The fMRI brain scan: A better lie detector? Time, July 20
207. Nestler EJ, Malenka RC. 2004. The addicted brain. Sci. Am. 290(3): 78-85
208. New York City Bar Comm. Sci. Law. 2005. Are your thoughts your own? "Neuroprivacy" and the legal implications of brain imaging. Rec. Assoc. Bar City New York 60: 407-437
209. Nolan JL. 2003. Reinventing Justice: The American Drug Court Movement. Princeton, NJ: PrincetonUniv. Press
210. NPR. 2010a. A neuroscientist uncovers a dark secret. Morning Edition, June 29. http://www.npr. org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127888976
211. NPR. 2010b. Inside a psychopath's brain: The sentencing debate. Morning Edition, June 30. http://www.npr. org/templates/story/story.php?storyId= 128116806
212. NPR. 2010c. Can your genes make you murder? Morning Edition, July 1. http://www.npr.org/templates/ story/story.php?storyId=128043329
213. NPR. 2010d. Can genes and brain abnormalities create killers? Talk of the Nation, July 6. http://www.npr.org/ templates/story/story.php?storyId=128339306
214. O'Craven K, KanwisherN. 2000. Mental imagery of faces and places activates corresponding stimulus-specific brain regions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 1013-1023
215. O'Hara EA. 2008. Trustworthiness and contract. See Zak 2008, pp. 173-203
216. O'Hara EA, Hill CA. 2007. A cognitive theory of trust. Wash. Univ. Law Rev. 84: 1717-1796
217. O'Hear MM. 2009. Rethinking drug courts: Restorative justice as a response to racial injustice. Stanford Law Policy Rev. 20: 101-137
218. Ortinski P, Meador KJ. 2004. Neuronal mechanisms of conscious awareness. Arch. Neurol. 61: 1017-1020
219. Ortolan JLE. 1870. Histoire de la Législation Romaine et Généralisation du Droit (The History of Roman Law). Transl. IT Prichard, D Nasmith, 1871, Sect. XXIX, pp. 86-92. London, UK: Butterworths
220. Panetti v. Quarterman, 551 U.S. 930 (2007)
221. Pardo MS. 2006. Neuroscience, evidence, legal culture, and criminal procedure. Ala. J. Crim. Law. 33: 301-337
222. Pardo MS, Patterson D. 2010. Philosophical foundations of law and neuroscience. Univ. Ill. Law Rev. In press
223. People v. Weinstein, 591 N.Y.S.2d 715 (Sup. Ct. 1992)
224. Perlin ML. 2010. Neuroimaging and competency to be executed after Panetti. NYLS Legal Stud. Res. Pap. No. 09/10 #20. http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1557753
225. Phelps EA. 2002. The cognitive neuroscience of emotion. In Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of Mind, ed. MS Gazzaniga, RB Ivry, GR Mangun, pp. 536-537 New York: Norton. 2nd ed.
226. Phelps EA. 2006. Emotion and cognition: Insights from studies of the human amygdala. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 24(57): 27-53
227. Phelps EA, O'Connor KJ, CunninghamWA, Funayma ES, Gatenby JC, et al. 2000. Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activity. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12: 1-10
228. Phelps EA, Sharot T. 2008. How (and why) emotion enhances the subjective sense of recollection. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 17(2): 147-152
229. Phelps EA, Thomas LA. 2003. Race, behavior, and the brain: The role of neuroimaging in understanding complex social behaviors. Polit. Psychol. 24(4): 747-758
230. Pielke RA Jr. 2007. The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
231. Pope A. 1712 (1966). Moral essays: To Richard Temple, Viscount Cobham. Of the knowledge and characters of men. In Poems of Alexander Pope, ed. J Butt, pp. 549-648 New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
232. Posner RA. 1999. Emotion versus emotionalism in law. In The Passions of Law, ed. SA Bandes, pp. 309-329 New York: N. Y. Univ. Press
233. Prinz JJ. 2005. The Emotional Construction of Morals. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
234. Pustilnik AC. 2006. Prisons of the mind: Social value and economic inefficiency in the criminal justice response to mental illness. J. Crim. Law Criminol. 95: 217-266
235. Pustilnik AC. 2009. It's all in your head: Chronic pain, neuroimaging, and disability adjudication. Presented at Gruter Inst. Squaw Valley Conf. 2009: Law, Behavior & the Brain, May 20, Squaw Valley, CA. http://ssrn.com/ abstract=1405379
236. Rand DG, Pfeiffer T, Dreber A, Sheketoff RW, Wernerfelt NC, Benkler Y. 2009. Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106(15): 6187-6191
237. Recht JM. 2008. Performance enhancement: What the Israel Baseball League can learn from the agreement between Major League Baseball and Japan. Suffolk Transnatl. Law Rev. 32: 191-219
238. Richeson JA, Baird AA, Gordon HL, Heatherton TF, Wyland CL, et al. 2003. An fMRI investigation of the impact of interracial contact on executive function. Nat. Neurosci. 6(12): 1323-1328
239. Richeson JA, Shelton JN. 2007. Negotiating interracial interactions: Costs, consequences, and possibilities. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16: 316-320
240. Rissman J, Greely H, Wagner AD. 2010. Detecting individual memories through the neural decoding of memory states and past experience. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107(21): 9849-9854
241. Roberts JV, Hough M. 2002. Public attitudes to punishment: The context. In Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice, ed. JV Roberts, M Hough, pp. 1-15. Portland, OR: Willan
242. Rolls ET. 1999. The Brain and Emotion. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
243. Roper v. Simmons, 543 U.S. 551 (2005)
244. Rosen J. 2007. The brain on the stand. NY Times Sunday Mag., March 11. http://www.nytimes. com/2007/03/11/magazine/11Neurolaw.t.html
245. Roskies AL. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35: 21-23
246. Roskies AL. 2006. Neuroscientific challenges to free will and responsibility. Trends Cogn. Sci. 10(9): 419-423
247. Rothenberg K, Wang A. 2009. The scarlet gene: Behavioral genetics, criminal law, and racial and ethnic stigma. Law Contemp. Probl. 69: 343-365
248. Ruhl JB. 2007. Reconstructing the wall of virtue: Maxims for the co-evolution of environmental law and environmental science. Environ. Law 37: 1063-1082
249. Sanfey AG, Rilling JK, Aronson JA, Nystrom LE, Cohen JD. 2003. The neural basis of economic decisionmaking in the Ultimatum Game. Science 300: 1755-1758
250. Santosuosso A, ed. 2009. Le Neuroscienze e il Diritto. Como-Pavia: Ibis
251. Sapolsky RM. 2004. The frontal cortex and the criminal justice system. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1787-1796
252. Sawa A, Snyder SH. 2002. Schizophrenia: Diverse approaches to a complex disease. Science 296(5568): 692-695
253. Schacter DL, Dawes R, Jacoby LL, Kahneman D, Lempert R, et al. 2008. Studying eyewitness investigations in the field. Law Hum. Behav. 32: 3-5
254. Schacter DL, Slotnick SD. 2004. The cognitive neuroscience of memory distortion. Neuron 44: 149-160
255. Schauer F. 2010. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law. Trends Cogn. Sci. 14(3): 101-103
256. Schleim S, Spranger TM, Erk S, Walter H. 2010. From moral to legal judgment: The influence of normative context in lawyers and other academics. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsq010
257. Seabrook J. 2008. Suffering souls: The search for the roots of psychopathy. New Yorker, Nov. 10
258. Seaman J. 2009. Black boxes: FMRI lie detection and the role of the jury. Akron Law Rev. 42: 931-938
259. Seymour B, Singer T, Dolan R. 2007. The neurobiology of punishment. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8: 300-11
260. Shinkareva SV, Mason RA, Malave VL, Wang W, Mitchell TM, et al. 2008. Using fMRI brain activation to identify cognitive states associated with perception of tools and dwellings. PLoS ONE 3(1): E1394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001394
261. Sigman SM. 2008. Are we all dopes? A behavior law and economics approach to legal regulation of doping in sports. Marquette Sports Law Rev. 19: 125
262. Sinnott-Armstrong W. 2009. Neural lie detection in courts. In Using Imaging to Identify Deceit: Scientific and Ethical Questions, ed. E Bizzi, SE Hyman, ME Raichle, N Kanwisher, EA Phelps, et al, pp. 35-39. Cambridge, MA: Am. Acad. Arts Sci.
263. Sinnott-Armstrong WP, ed. 2008. Moral Psychology. Vol.2: The Cognitive Science of Morality: Intuition and Diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
264. Snead OC. 2007. Neuroimaging and the "complexity" of capital punishment. Notre Dame Legal Stud. Pap. No.07-03. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/ papers.cfm?abstract-id=965837
265. Sousa D. 2009. How Brain Science Can Make You a Better Lawyer. Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
266. Spence SA, Farrow TF, Hereford AE, Wilkinson ID, Zheng Y, et al. 2001. Behavioral and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. NeuroReport 12: 2849-2853
267. Stake JE. 2004. The property instinct. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1763-1774
268. Stone JM, Morrison PD, Pilowsky LS. 2007. Review: Glutamate and dopamine dysregulation in schizophrenia-a synthesis and selective review. J. Psychopharmacol. 21: 440-452
269. Strathearn L, Li J, Fonagy P, Montague PR. 2008. What's in a smile?Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues. Pediatrics 122(1): 40-51
270. Sunstein C. 2009. Some effects of moral indignation on law. Vt. Law Rev. 33: 405-434
271. Tadros V. 2005. Criminal Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
272. Taha S, Nagel K. 2001. Report: Workshop: Neurological Basis for Justice. University of California at San Francisco, CA, November 16, 2001. Portola Valley, CA: Gruter Inst. http://www. gruterinstitute.org/Archive-files/ 74Neuro%20basis%20for%20justice.pdf
273. Talbot M. 2009. Reporter at large: Brain gain. New Yorker, April 27
274. Tallis R. 2007.Whyblameme? It was allmybrain's fault: The dubious rise of "neurolaw." London Times, Oct. 24. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/ comment/columnists/guest-contributors/article2726643.ece
275. Tallis R. 2010. You won't find consciousness in the brain. New Sci. Mag., Jan. 7
276. Tovino SA. 2007. Functional neuroimaging and the law: Trends and directions for future scholarship. Am. J. Bioeth. 7(9): 44-56
277. Tovino SA. 2008. Incidental findings: A common law approach. Acc. Res. 15(4): 242-261
278. Turner M. 1996. The Literary Mind. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
279. United States v. Semrau, No.07-10074, Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, May 31, 2010
280. Victoroff J. 2009. Aggression, science, and law: The origins framework. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 32(4): 189-197
281. Vincent N. 2009a. Neuroimaging and responsibility assessments. Neuroethics. doi: 10.1007/s12152-008- 9030-9038
282. Vincent N. 2009b. On the relevance of neuroscience to criminal responsibility. Crim. Law Philos. 4(1): 77-98
283. Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H. 2009. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4(3): 274-290
284. Vul E, Kanwisher N. 2010. Begging the question: The nonindependence error in fMRI data analysis. In Foundations and Philosophy for Neuroimaging, ed. S Hanson, M Bunzl. In press
285. Weisberg DS, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray J. 2008. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 20(3): 470-477
286. Wermke K, Goodenough O. 2001. Report: Workshop: "Law and Neuroscience, " Humboldt University, Berlin, February 19, 2001. Portola Valley, CA: Dana. http://www.gruterinstitute.org/Archive-files/ 65Workshop%20Law%20and%20Neuroscience.pdf
287. Wheeler ME, Fiske ST. 2005. Controlling racial prejudice: Social cognitive goals affect amygdala and stereotype activation. Psychol. Sci. 16(1): 56-63
288. Widom CS. 1989. Child abuse, neglect, and violent criminal behavior. Criminology 27(2): 251-271
289. Wilson v. Corestaff Services, L.P & Medina, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 20176
290. Wolpe PR, Foster KR, Langleben DD. 2005. Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. Am. J. Bioeth. 5(2): 39-49
291. Young RA, Hsieh L, Graydon FX, Genik R, Benton MD, et al. 2005. Mind-on-the-drive: Real-time functional neuroimaging of cognitive brain mechanisms underlying driver performance and distraction. SAE Tech. Pap. Ser. No. 2005-01-0436, SAE Int., Warrendale, PA. http://papers.sae.org/2005-01-0436
292. Zaibert L. 2006. Punishment and Retribution. Burlington, VT: Ashgate
293. Zak PJ. 2004. Neuroeconomics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1737-1748
294. Zak PJ. 2007. The neuroeconomics of trust. In Renaissance in Behavioral Economics, ed. R Frantz, pp. 17-33. New York: Routledge
295. Zak PJ, ed. 2008. Moral Markets: The Critical Role of Values in the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
296. Zak PJ, Kurzban R, Matzner WT. 2005. Oxytocin is associated with human trustworthiness. Horm. Behav. 48: 522-527
297. Zeki S. 1999. Inner Vision: An Exploration of Art and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
298. Zeki S, Goodenough OR. 2004. Law and the brain: Introduction. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 359: 1661-1665
299. Zeki S, Goodenough O, eds. 2006. Law and the Brain. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press