Self-regulated learning in learning environments with pedagogical agents that interact in natural language

Educational Psychologist

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 234-244

  Graesser, Arthur ^a   McNamara, Danielle ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77958141856     PISSN: 00461520     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2010.515933     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aleven, V., Stahl, E., Schworm, S., Fischer, F., & Wallace, R. (2003). Help seeking and help design in interactive learning environments. Review of Educational Research, 73, 277-320.
2. Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193-198.
3. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning faciliate students' learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
4. Azevedo, R., Witherspoon, A., Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D., Chauncey, A., Siler, E.,... Lintean, M. (2009). MetaTutor: Analyzing self-regulated learning in a tutoring system for biology. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education (pp. 635-637). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
5. Baker, L. (1985). Differences in standards used by college students to evaluate their comprehension of expository prose. Reading Research Quarterly, 20,298-313.
6. Baker, R., Corbett, A., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.(2009). Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18, 287-314.
7. Baker, R.S., D'Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.T., & Graesser, A.C. (2010). Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners' cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68, 223-241.
8. Baylor, A. L., & Kim, Y. (2005). Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 15, 95-115.
9. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N. & The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19, 363-392.
10. Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: McKay.
11. Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13,4-16.
12. Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: The SMILI open learner modeling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17, 89-120.
13. Cade, W., Copeland, J., Person, N., & D'Mello, S. K. (2008). Dialogue modes in expert tutoring. In B. Woolf, E. Aimeur, R. Nkambou, & S. Lajoie (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 470-479). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
14. Chi, M. T. H., Roy, M., & Hausmann, R. G. M. (2008) Observing tutorial dialogues collaboratively: Insights about human tutoring effectiveness from vicarious learning. Cognitive Science, 32, 301-341.
15. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., & Jeong, H. (2004). Can tutors monitor students' understanding accurately? Cognition and Instruction, 22, 363-387.
16. Chi, M. T. H., Siler, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533.
17. Cohen, P. A., Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1982). Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 237-248.
18. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2009). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
19. Conati C. (2002). Probabilistic assessment of user's emotions in educational games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence, 16, 555-575.
20. Craig, S. D., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., & Gholson, B. (2006). Deep-level reasoning questions effect: The role of dialog and deep-level reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 563-589.
21. D'Mello, S., & Graesser, A.C. (2010). Multimodal semi-automated affect detection from conversational cues, gross body language, and facial features. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction, 20, 147-187.
22. D'Mello, S. K., Picard, R., & Graesser, A. C. (2007). Toward an affect-sensitive AutoTutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22, 53-61.
23. Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16,228-232.
24. Dweck, C. S. (2002). Messages that motivate: How praise molds students' beliefs, motivation, and performance (in surprising ways). In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 61-87). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25. Gholson, B., & Craig, S. D. (2006). Promoting constructive activities that support learning during computer-based instruction. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 119-139.
26. Gholson, B., Witherspoon, A., Morgan, B., Brittingham, J. K., Coles, R., Graesser, A. C.,... Craig, S. D. (2009). Exploring the deep-level reasoning questions effect during vicarious learning among eighth to eleventh graders in the domains of computer literacy and Newtonian physics. Instructional Science, 37, 487-493.
27. Graesser, A. C., D'Mello, S.K., and Cade, W. (in press). Instruction based on tutoring. In R. E. Mayer & P. A. Alexander (Eds.), Handbook of research on learning and instruction. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Graesser, A. C., D'Mello, S., & Person, N. K. (2009). Metaknowledge in tutoring. In D. Hacker, J. Donlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 361-382). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
29. Graesser, A. C., Jeon, M., & Dufty, D. (2008). Agent technologies designed to facilitate interactive knowledge construction. Discourse Processes, 45, 298-322.
30. Graesser, A.C., Lu, S., Jackson, G. T., Mitchell, H., Ventura, M., Olney, A., & Louwerse, M. M. (2004). AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36,180-193.
31. Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (in press). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science.
32. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
33. Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524-536.
34. Graesser, A. C., Penumatsa, P., Ventura, M., Cai, Z., & Hu, X. (2007). Using LSA in AutoTutor: Learning through mixed initiative dialogue in natural language. In T. Landauer, D. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 243-262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
36. Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995). Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 1-28.
37. Graesser, A. C., Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., O'Reilly, T., Jeon, M., & McDaniel, B. (2007). SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption. Metacognition and Learning, 2,89-105.
38. Greene, J. A., Moos, D. C., Azevedo, R., & Winters, F. I. (2008). Exploring differences between gifted and grade-level students' use of self-regulatory learning processes with hypermedia. Computers & Education, 50, 1069-1083.
39. Halpern, D. F. (2002). An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Jackson, G. T., & Graesser, A. C. (2006). Applications of human tutorial dialog in AutoTutor: An intelligent tutoring system. Revista Signos, 39, 31-48.
41. Jackson, G. T., Guess, R. H., & McNamara, D. S. (2010). Assessing cognitively complex strategy use in an untrained domain. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 127-137.
42. Klahr, D. (2002). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Landauer, T., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S., & Kintsch, W. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of latent semantic analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Lepper, M. R., Drake, M., & O'Donnell-Johnson, T. M. (1997). Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan & M. Pressley (Eds.), Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues (pp. 108-144). New York, NY: Brookline Books.
45. Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002). The wisdom of practice: Lessons learned from the study of highly effective tutors. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 135-158). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
46. Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
47. McNamara, D. S., Boonthum, C., Levinstein, I. B., & Millis, K. (2007). Evaluatingself-explanationsiniSTART:Comparingword-basedandLSA algorithms. In T. Landauer, D. S. McNamara, S. Dennis, & W. Kintsch (Eds.), Handbook of latent semantic analysis (pp. 227-241). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. McNamara, D. S., O'Reilly, T., Rowe, M., Boonthum, C., & Levinstein, I. B. (2007). iSTART: A web-based tutor that teaches self-explanation and metacognitive reading strategies. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 397-420). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. McQuiggan, S., & Lester, J. (2007). Modeling and evaluating empathy in embodied companion agents. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 348-360.
50. Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18,377-390.
51. Millis, K., Cai, Z., Graesser, A., Halpern, D. & Wallace, P. (2009). Learning scientific inquiry by asking questions in an educational game. In T. Bastiaens, J. Dron, & C. Xin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2951-2956). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
52. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Personalized messages that promote science learning in virtual environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 165-173.
53. Mosenthal, P. (1996). Understanding the strategies of document literacy and their conditions of use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 314-332.
54. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315-341.
55. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). New York, NY: Academic Press.
56. Resnick, L. B. (in press). Nested learning systems for the thinking curriculum. Educational Researcher
57. Rogoff, B., & Gardner, W. (1984). Adult guidance of cognitive development. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 95-116). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
58. Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181-221.
59. Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). A time for telling. Cognition & Instruction, 16, 475-522.
60. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
61. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3-62.
62. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 27,255-265.
63. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Wisher, R. A., & Graesser, A. C. (2007). Question asking in advanced distributed learning environments. In S. M. Fiore & E. Salas (Eds.), Toward a science of distributed learning and training (pp. 209-234). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.