SEEK Web tutor: Fostering a critical stance while exploring the causes of volcanic eruption

Metacognition and Learning

Volumn 2, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 89-105

  Graesser, Arthur C ^a   Wiley, Jennifer ^b   Goldman, Susan R ^b   O'Reilly, Tenaha ^c   Jeon, Moongee ^a   McDaniel, Bethany ^a  

^a University of Memphis   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical thinking; SEEK; Tutoring; Web

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849077591     PISSN: 15561623     EISSN: 15561631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11409-007-9013-x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
2. Azevedo, R. (2005). Computer environments as metacognitive tools for enhancing learning. Educational Psychologist, 40, 193-198.
3. Azevedo, R., & Cromley, J. G. (2004). Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 523-535.
4. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Brem, S. K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191-213.
6. Britt, M. A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving student's ability to use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(40), 485-522.
7. Chi, M. T. H., de Leeuw, N., Chiu, M., & LaVancher, C. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439-477.
8. Chinn, C., & Brewer, W. (1993). The role of anomalous data in knowledge acquisition: A theoretical framework and implications for science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63, 1-49.
9. Corbett, A. T. (2001). Cognitive computer tutors: Solving the two-sigma problem. In User modeling: Proceedings of the eighth international conference (pp. 137-147). Berlin: Springer.
10. Dodds, P., & Fletcher, J. D. (2004). Opportunities for new "smart" learning environments enabled by next-generation web capabilities. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13, 391-404.
11. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychology, 34, 906-911.
12. Goldman, S. R., Duschl, R. A., Ellenbogen, K., Williams, S., & Tzou, C. T. (2003). Science inquiry in a digital age: Possibilities for making thinking visible. In H. van Oostendorp (Ed.) Cognition in a digital age (pp. 253-283). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Goldman, S. R., & Murray, J. (1992). Knowledge connectors as cohesion devices in text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 504-519.
14. Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 247-269.
15. Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & VanLehn, K. (2005). Scaffolding deep comprehension strategies through Point&Query, AutoTutor, and iSTART. Educational Psychologist, 40, 225-234.
16. Graesser, A. C., & Olde, B. A. (2003). How does one know whether a person understands a device? The quality of the questions the person asks when the device breaks down. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 524-536.
17. Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994). Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 104-137.
18. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.) (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Hadwin, A., & Winne, P. (2001). CoNoteS2: A software tool for promoting self-regulation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 7, 313-334.
20. Halpern, D. F. (2002). An introduction to critical thinking (4th ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (Eds.) (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Maki, R. H. (1998). Test predictions over text material. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 117-144). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Multimedia learning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
24. McNamara, D. S. (2004). SERT: Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1-30.
25. Millis, K. K., & Graesser, A. C. (1994). The time-course of constructing knowledge-based inferences for scientific texts. Journal of Memory & Language, 33(5), 583-599.
26. Otero, J., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3(4), 229-235.
27. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.) Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 452-502). New York: Academic.
28. Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Sanchez, C., & Wiley, J. (2006). Effects of working memory capacity on learning from illustrated text. Memory & Cognition, 34, 344-355.
30. Sanchez, C. A., Wiley, J., & Goldman, S. R. (2006). Teaching students to evaluate source reliability during internet research tasks. In Proceedings of the 7th international conference of the learning sciences (pp. 662-666). Bloomington, IN: ACM Digital Library.
31. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A. C., Jackson, G. T., Jordan, P., Olney, A., & Rose, C. P. (2007). When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31, 3-62.
32. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
33. White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition & Instruction, 16(1), 3-118.
34. Wiley, J. (2001). Supporting understanding through task and browser design. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1136-1143). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Wiley, J., Goldman, S. R., Graesser, A. C., Sanchez, C. A., Ash, I. K., & Hemmerich, J. (2007). Learning science from internet inquiry tasks: The importance of teaching students to discriminate and use reliable sources. Unpublished manuscript, University of Illinois at Chicago.
36. Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 408-428.
37. Wiley, J., & Myers, J. L. (2003). Availability and accessibility of information and causal inferences from expository text. Discourse Processes, 36, 109-129.
38. Wiley, J., & Voss, J. F. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-11.
39. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 153-189). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Zimmerman, B. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. Zimmerman, & D. Schunk (Eds.)Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 1-37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.