Isopropylamino and isobutylamino groups as recognition sites for carbohydrates: Acyclic receptors with enhanced binding affinity toward β-galactosides

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 75, Issue 19, 2010, Pages 6416-6423

  Mazik, Monika ^a   Sonnenberg, Claudia ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APOLAR MEDIA; BINDING AFFINITIES; BINDING MOTIF; BINDING STUDIES; CARBOHYDRATE RECEPTORS; PHASE TRANSFER; RECOGNITION SITE; SIDE CHAINS; TWO PHASE SYSTEMS; VAN DER WAALS CONTACTS;

BINDING ENERGY; BINDING SITES; CARBOHYDRATES; DISSOLUTION; HYDROGEN BONDS; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; SUGAR (SUCROSE); VAN DER WAALS FORCES;

COMPLEXATION;

1,3 BIS(AMINOMETHYL) 5 [(4,6 DIMETHYLPYRIDIN 2 YL)AMINOMETHYL] 2,4,6 TRIETHYLBENZENE; 1,3 BIS[(ISOBUTYLAMINO)METHYL] 5 [(4,6 DIMETHYLPYRIDIN 2 YL)AMINOMETHYL] 2,4,6 TRIETHYLBENZENE; 1,3 BIS[(ISOPROPYLAMINO)METHYL] 5 [(4,6 DIMETHYLPYRIDIN 2 YL)AMINOMETHYL] 2,4,6 TRIETHYLBENZENE; 1,3,5 TRIS[(ISOBUTYLAMINO)METHYL] 2,4,6 TRIETHYLBENZENE; 1,3,5 TRIS[(ISOPROPYLAMINO)METHYL] 2,4,6 TRIETHYLBENZENE; BENZENE DERIVATIVE; BETA GALACTOSIDE; CARBOHYDRATE; LEUCINE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VALINE;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; HYDROGEN BOND; LIQUID LIQUID EXTRACTION; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN CARBOHYDRATE INTERACTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

BINDING SITES; BUTYLAMINES; CARBOHYDRATES; CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, X-RAY; GALACTOSIDES; HYDROGEN BONDING; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PROPYLAMINES; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 77957173020     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: 15206904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo100982x     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Osborn, H.; Khan, T. Oligosaccharides: Their Synthesis and Biological Roles; Oxford University Press: New York, 2000.
2. Lindhorst, T. K. Essentials of Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2007.
3. Dwek, R. A.; Butters, T. D. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 283-284
4. Gabius, H. J.; Siebert, H. C.; Andre, S.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.; Rudiger, H. ChemBioChem 2004, 5, 741-764
5. Bertozzi, C. R.; Kiessling, L. L. Science 2001, 291, 2357-2364
6. Lis, H; Sharon, N. Lectins; Kluwer Academic: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
7. Lis, H; Sharon, N. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98, 637-674
8. Quiocho, F. A. Pure Appl. Chem. 1989, 61, 1293-1306
9. Weiss, W. I.; Drickamer, K. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1996, 65, 441-473
10. Lemieux, R. U. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1989, 18, 347-374
11. Wright, C. S.; Hester, G. Structure 1996, 4, 1339-1352
12. For reviews on carbohydrate recognition with artificial receptors using noncovalent interactions, see: Davis, A. P.; James, T. D. In Functional Synthetic Receptors; Schrader, T.; Hamilton, A. D., Eds., Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005.
13. Davis, A. P.; Wareham, R. S. Angew. Chem. 1999, 111, 3161 - 3179
14. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2979 - 2996.
15. Walker, D. B.; Joshi, G.; Davis, A. P. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 3177-3191
16. Mazik, M. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 935-956
17. Jin, S.; Cheng, Y.; Reid, S.; Li, M.; Wang, B. Med. Res. Rev. 2010, 30, 171-257
18. For examples of carbohydrate receptors operating through noncovalent interactions see refs 3 and 7 and: Ferrand, Y.; Klein, E.; Barwell, N. P.; Crump, N. P.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Vicent, C.; Boons, G.-J.; Ingale, S.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1775-1779
19. Ardá, A.; Venturi, C.; Nativi, C.; Francesconi, O.; Gabrielli, G.; Caňada, F. J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Roelens, S. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 414-418
20. Abe, H; Takashima, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Inouye, M. Chem. Commun. 2009, 2121-2123
21. Abe, H.; Horii, A.; Matsumoto, S.; Shiro, M.; Inouye, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2685-2688
22. Palde, P. B.; Gareiss, P. C.; Miller, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9566-9573
23. Klein, E.; Ferrand, Y.; Auty, E. K.; Davis, A. P. Chem. Commun. 2007, 2390-2392
24. Nativi, C.; Cacciarini, M.; Francesconi, O.; Moneti, G.; Roelens, S. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4685-4688
25. Ferrand, Y.; Crump, M. P.; Davis, A. P. Science 2007, 318, 619-622
26. Klein, E.; Crump, M. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 298-302
27. Abe, H.; Aoyagi, Y.; Inouye, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 59-61
28. Welti, R.; Abel, Y.; Gramlich, V.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 548-562
29. Welti, R.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 494-503
30. Wada, K.; Mizutani, T.; Kitagawa, S. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 5123-5131
31. Segura, M.; Bricoli, B.; Casnati, A.; Muñoz, E. M.; Sansone, F.; Ungaro, R.; Vicent, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6296-6303
32. Ishi-I, T.; Mateos-Timoneda, M. A.; Timmerman, P.; Crego-Calama, M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2300-2305
33. Tamaru, S.-i.; Shinkai, S.; Khasanov, A. B.; Bell, T. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4972-4976
34. Ladomeno', K.; Bonar-Law, R. P. Chem. Commun. 2002, 2108-2109
35. Bitta, J.; Kubik, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2637-2640
36. Král, V.; Rusin, O.; Schmidtchen, F. P. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 873-876
37. Eblinger, F.; Schneider, H.-J. Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun. 2000, 65, 667-672
38. For reviews on boronic acid-based receptors, which use covalent interactions for sugar binding, see refs 3a,3e and: James, T. D.; Shinkai, S. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218, 159-200
39. James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem. 1996, 108, 2038 - 2050
40. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1996, 35, 1910 - 1922. For a recent example of a boronic acid-based receptor, see
41. : Phillips, M. D.; Fyles, T. M.; Barwell, N. P.; James, T. D. Chem. Commun. 2009, 6557-6559 For a recent discussion on o -hydroxymethyl phenylboronic acid (benzoboroxole) binding capability, see:
42. Bérubé, M.; Dowlut, M.; Hall, D. G. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 6471-6479
43. For recent discussions on the nature of the CH-π interactions, see: Nishio, M.; Umezawa, Y.; Honda, K.; Tsuboyama, S.; Suezawa, H. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 1757-1788
44. Takahashi, O; Kohno, Y.; Nishio, M. Chem. Rev. 2010, DOI: 10.1021/cr100072x.
45. Mazik, M.; Hartmann, A. Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2010, 6, No. 9.
46. Mazik, M.; Hartmann, A.; Jones, P. G. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9147-9159
47. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 2063-2071
48. Mazik, M.; Hartmann, A. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 7444-7450
49. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 1558-1568
50. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M. Chem. Eur. J. 2008, 14, 2405-2419
51. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 1517-1526
52. Mazik, M.; Buthe, A. C. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 8319-8326
53. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 831-838
54. Mazik, M.; König, A. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3271-3276
55. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 3633-3638
56. Mazik, M.; König, A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7854-7857
57. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2957-2963
58. Mazik, M.; Kuschel, M.; Sicking, W. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 855-858
59. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H.; Jones, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9045-9052
60. Mazik, M.; Radunz, W.; Boese, R. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 7448-7462
61. Mazik, M.; Sicking, W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 3117-3121
62. Mazik, M.; Radunz, W.; Sicking, W. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 4579-4582
63. Mazik, M.; Sicking, W. Chem. Eur. J. 2001, 7, 664-670
64. Mazik, M.; Bandmann, H.; Sicking, W. Angew. Chem. 2000, 112, 562 565.
65. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 551 - 554.
66. For a discussion on selectivity in supramolecular host-guest complexes, see: Schneider, H.-J.; Yatsimirsky, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2008, 37, 263-277
67. Wallace, K. J.; Hanes, R.; Anslyn, E.; Morey, J.; Kilway, K. V.; Siegel, J. Synthesis 2005, 2080-2083
68. The dissolution of solid carbohydrates in apolar media provides valuable means of studying carbohydrate recognition by organic-soluble receptors. For examples of receptors which are able to dissolve solid carbohydrates in apolar media, see refs 3a, 4b, and 7a,7b,7p,7r and: Bähr, A.; Felber, B.; Schneider., K.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2000, 83, 1346-1376
69. Inouye, M.; Chiba, J.; Nakazumi, H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 8170-8176
70. Inouye, M.; Miyake, T.; Furusyo, M.; Nakazumi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.'1995, 117, 12416
71. For examples of macrocyclic receptors which are able to extract sugars from water into nonpolar organic solutions, see: Velasco, T.; Lecollinet, G.; Ryan, T.; Davis, A. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 645-647
72. Ryan, T.; Lecollinet, G.; Velasco, T.; Davis, A. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99, 4863-4866
73. Aoyama, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Sugahara, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 5397
74. Aoyama, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Toi, H.; Ogoshi, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 634
75. For a description of the mole ratio method, see: Schneider, H.-J.; Yatsimirsky, A. Principles and Methods in Supramolecular Chemistry; Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 2000; p 148.
76. Tsukube, H.; Furuta, H.; Odani, A.; Takeda, Y.; Kudo, Y.; Inoue, Y.; Liu, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; Kimura, K. In Comprehensive Supramolecular Chemistry; Atwood, J.-L.; Davis, J. E. D.; MacNicol, D. D.; Vögtle, F., Eds.; Pergamon: Oxford, U.K., 1996; Vol. 8, p 425.
77. Wilcox, C. S.; Glagovich, N. M. Program HOSTEST 5.6; University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994.
78. Cowart, M. D.; Sucholeiki, I.; Bukownik, R. R.; Wilcox, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 6204-6210
79. The HOSTEST program is designed to fit data to different binding models, which include both "pure" binding models, taking into consideration the formation of only one type of complex in solution (1:1, 1:2, or 2:1 receptor-substrate complex), and "mixed" binding models containing more than one type of complex in solution (for example, 1:1 and 1:2 or 1:1 and 2:1 receptor-substrate complex).
80. Hynes, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 311-312
81. The titration data were analyzed by non-linear regression analysis, using the program HOSTEST 5.6 (13) and EQNMR. (14)
82. a was <20%.
83. 12.
84. Fielding, L. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 6151-6170
85. For a discussion on solvent effects in carbohydrate binding by synthetic receptors, see: Klein, E.; Ferrand, Y.; Barwell, N. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 2733 2736.
86. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 2693 - 2696.
87. For discussions on the importance of carbohydrate-aromatic interactions, see: Tsuzuki, S.; Uchimaru, T.; Mikami, M. J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 5617-5621
88. Terraneo, G.; Potenza, D.; Canales, A.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Baldridge, K. K.; Bernardi, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2890-2900
89. Chávez, M. I.; Andreu, C.; Vidal, P.; Aboitiz, N.; Freire, F.; Groves, P.; Asensio, J. L.; Asensio, G.; Muraki, M.; Caňada, F. J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J. Chem. Eur. J. 2005, 11, 7060-7074
90. Screen, J.; Stanca-Kaposta, E. C.; Gamblin, D. P.; Liu, B.; Macleod, N. A.; Snoek, L. C.; Davis, B. G.; Simons, J. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3644-3648
91. Kiehna, S. H.; Laughrey, Z. R.; Waters, M. L. Chem. Commun. 2007, 4026-4028
92. Morales, J. C.; Penadés, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 654-657
93. -1; see: Fernandez-Trillo, F.; Fernandez-Megia, E.; Riguera, R. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 3878-3881
94. Davis, A. P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 3629-3638
95. Kubik, S. Angew. Chem. 200', 121, 17501753.
96. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1722 - 1725.
97. Mazik, M. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1015-1017