Evaluation of amino acids as chiral ligands for the enantiodifferentiation of carbohydrates by TOCSY NMR

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 75, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3878-3881

  Fernández Trillo, Francisco ^a   Fernandez Megia, Eduardo ^a   Riguera, Ricardo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHIRAL LIGAND; ENANTIO-DIFFERENTIATION; H NMR SPECTRA; NATURAL AMINO ACIDS; TRIETHYLBENZENE SCAFFOLD;

AMINO ACIDS; CARBOHYDRATES; GLUCOSE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ORGANIC ACIDS;

LIGANDS;

AMINO ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; GLUCOSE; LIGAND; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; RECEPTOR;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CHEMICAL BINDING; CHIRALITY; ENANTIOSELECTIVITY; ENERGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; TITRIMETRY;

AMINO ACIDS; CARBOHYDRATE CONFORMATION; CARBOHYDRATES; GLUCOSE; LIGANDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 77953016322     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: 15206904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo1004263     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Dwek, R. A. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 683
2. Bertozzi, C. R.; Kiessling, L. L. Science 2001, 291, 2357
3. Carbohydrate-based Drug Discovery; Wong, C.-H., Ed.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2003.
4. James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 35, 1910
5. Davis, A. P.; Wareham, R. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2978
6. Davis, A. P.; James, T. D. In Functional synthetic receptors; Schrader, T.; Hamilton, A. D., Eds.; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2005; p 45.
7. Mazik, M. ChemBioChem 2008, 9, 1015
8. Kubik, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1722
9. James, T. D.; Sandanayake, K. R. A. S.; Iguchi, R.; Shinkai, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 8982
10. Zhong, Z.; Anslyn, E. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 9014
11. Suri, J. T.; Cordes, D. B.; Cappuccio, F. E.; Wessling, R. A.; Singaram, B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5857
12. Dowlut, M.; Hall, D. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4226 For alternative examples of boronic acid-based carbohydrate receptors in water, see ref 2 and the Supporting Information.
13. Selected examples of synthetic carbohydrate receptors in water: Sugimoto, N.; Miyoshi, D.; Zou, J. Chem. Commun. 2000, 2295
14. Klein, E.; Crump, M. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 298
15. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 2957
16. Ferrand, Y.; Crump, M. P.; Davis, A. P. Science 2007, 318, 619
17. Davis, A. P.; Wareham, R. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1998, 37, 2270
18. Ishi-i, T.; Mateos-Timoneda, M. A.; Timmerman, P.; Crego-Calama, M.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Shinkai, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 2300
19. Mazik, M.; Cavga, H.; Jones, P. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9045
20. Waki, M.; Abe, H.; Inouye, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3059
21. Ardá, A.; Venturi, C.; Nativi, C.; Francesconi, O.; Gabrielli, G.; Caiada, F. J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Roelens, S. Chem.-Eur. J. 2010, 16, 414 For alternative examples of non-covalent carbohydrate receptors in organic solvents, see ref 2 and the Supporting Information.
22. Vacca, A.; Nativi, C.; Cacciarini, M.; Pergoli, R.; Roelens, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 16456
23. Bhattarai, K. M.; Bonar-Law, R. P.; Davis, A. P.; Murray, B. A. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 752
24. Kim, H.-J.; Kim, Y.-H.; Hong, J.-I. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 5049
25. Anderson, S.; Neidlein, U.; Gramlich, V.; Diederich, F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 1596
26. Das, G.; Hamilton, A. D. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 3675
27. Ardá, A.; Venturi, C.; Nativi, C.; Francesconi, O.; Caiada, F. J.; Jiménez-Barbero, J.; Roelens, S. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 64
28. Welti, R.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 494
29. Welti, R.; Abel, Y.; Gramlich, V.; Diederich, F. Helv. Chim. Acta 2003, 86, 548
30. Li, C.; Wang, G. T.; Yi, H. P.; Jiang, X. K.; Li, Z. T.; Wang, R. X. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1797
31. Hubbard, R. D.; Horner, S. R.; Miller, B. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5810
32. Bitta, J.; Kubik, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2637
33. Billing, J.; Grundberg, H.; Nilsson, U. J. Supramolecular Chem. 2002, 14, 367
34. Segura, M.; Bricoli, B.; Casnati, A.; Muioz, E. M.; Sansone, F.; Ungaro, R.; Vicent, C. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 6296
35. Benito, J. M.; Meldal, M. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2004, 23, 117
36. Reenberg, T.; Nyberg, N.; Duus, J. i.; van Dongen, J. L. J.; Meldal, M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 5003
37. Hennrich, G.; Anslyn, E. V. Chem.-Eur. J. 2002, 8, 2218
38. The enantiomeric integrity of receptors 3 was established by chiral HPLC (see the Supporting Information).
39. Adasch, V.; Hoffmann, B.; Milius, W.; Platz, G.; Voss, G. Carbohydr. Res. 1998, 314, 177
40. Mazik, M.; Bandmann, H.; Sicking, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2000, 39, 551
41. Nativi, C.; Cacciarini, M.; Francesconi, O.; Vacca, A.; Moneti, G.; Ienco, A.; Roelens, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4377
42. 3 at concentrations higher than 1 mM has been reported (see ref 6).
43. Xu, G.; Evans, J. S. J. Magn. Reson., Ser. B 1996, 111, 183
44. Hynes, M. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1993, 311
45. Control NMR experiments confirmed that no dimerization of receptors 3 occurred in the range of concentrations used for the titrations.
46. Frisch, M. J. Gaussian03, revision E.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2004.
47. 50 is usually expressed in mM, and the lower it is the better the affinity.
48. Fitting the data for 3g proved to be more difficult than for the other receptors, suggesting a different binding mode. Nevertheless, the 1:1 and 1:2 mix model afforded again the most accurate correlation.